Skip to main content

Ecosystem Services in the Riverine Landscapes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Water Resource Planning and Sustainability

Abstract

Every ecosystem existing on the earth’s surface has been providing numerous services to people in different ways like provisioning, regulating, cultural and supporting. The benefits obtained from nature are called ecosystem services. These services have been responsible for the survival of each living being on the planet. River ecosystems and landscapes have been integral to human civilization since antiquity. Riverine landscapes are diverse in the natural world and offer a variety of services to humankind. The recently deposited alluvium after the flood provides fertile ground for farming. Riverine landscapes deliver several provisioning services like fishing, medicines, drinking water, irrigation water, and hydropower. These services sustain the food, water and energy needs of local people. Important regulating services of the riverine landscapes include flood regulation, water purification, groundwater recharge, and climate regulation. Cultural services of riverine landscapes include recreation, tourism, aesthetic value, education value, and spiritual and religious value. Riverine landscapes also provide supporting services like habitat provision, nutrient cycling and water cycling. The quantification and valuation of all these services are very crucial at the present time. There are various approaches that can be used to value these riverine ecosystem services like biophysical quantification, socio-cultural assessment and monetary evaluation. Several models have also been used for ecosystem services assessment such as InVEST, ARIES and SWAT. In the current scenario, economic valuation of riverine ecosystem services is crucially important in sustainable planning for the conservation and management of riverine landscapes and their natural and cultural resources. The present book chapter provides an introduction to the various ecosystem services that riverine landscapes supply. Further various approaches to their assessment including models and tools have also been discussed. The given insight in this chapter would be playing a major role in research and management of multiple ecosystem services generated in riverline landscapes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abu GO, Dike PO (2008) A study of natural attenuation processes involved in a microcosm model of a crude oil-impacted wetland sediment in the Niger Delta. Biores Technol 99(11):4761–4767

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Albert JS, Reis RE (2011) Historical biogeography of neotropical freshwater fishes. Berkeley University of California Press, California, USA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ambarita STP, Basyuni M, Sulistyono N, Wati R, Fitri A, Slamet B, Munir E (2018) Landscape planning and economic valuation of mangrove ecotourism using GIS and google earth image.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Sportfishing Association, 2013. Sportfishing in America (Rep.). http://fishhabitat.org/sites/default/files/www/2011_ASASportfishing_in_America_Report_January_2013.pdf. Accessed 26 April 2016

  • Angela CB, Javier CJ, Teresa GM, Marisa MH (2015) Hydrological evaluation of a peri-urban stream and its impact on ecosystem services potential. Glob Ecol Conserv 3:628–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arcidiacono A, Ronchi S, Salata S (2015) Ecosystem services assessment using InVEST as a tool to support decision making process: critical issues and opportunities. In: International conference on computational science and its applications. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthington AH (2012) Environmental flows: saving rivers in the third millennium, vol. 4. University of California Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayanu YZ, Conrad C, Nauss T, Wegmann M, Koellner T (2012) Quantifying and mapping ecosystem services supplies and demands: a review of remote sensing applications. Environ Sci Technol 46(16):8529–8541

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aziz T, Van Cappellen P (2019) Comparative valuation of potential and realized ecosystem services in Southern Ontario, Canada. Environ Sci Policy 100:105–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagstad KJ, Semmens DJ, Winthrop R (2013a) Comparing approaches to spatially explicit ecosystem service modeling: a case study from the San Pedro River, Arizona. Ecosyst Serv 5:40–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagstad KJ, Semmens DJ, Waage S, Winthrop R (2013b) A comparative assessment of decision-support tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation. Ecosyst Serv 5:27–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bark RH, Colloff MJ, MacDonald DH, Pollino CA, Jackson S, Crossman ND (2016) Integrated valuation of ecosystem services obtained from restoring water to the environment in a major regulated river basin. Ecosyst Serv 22:381–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barth NC, Döll P (2016) Assessing the ecosystem service flood protection of a riparian forest by applying a cascade approach. Ecosyst Serv 21:39–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman IJ, Cole MA, Georgiou S, Hadley DJ (2006) Comparing contingent valuation and contingent ranking: a case study considering the benefits of urban river water quality improvements. J Environ Manage 79(3):221–231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Böck K, Muhar S, Muhar A, Polt R (2015) The ecosystem services concept: gaps between science andpractice in river landscape management. GAIA Ecol Perspect Sci Soc 24(1):32–40. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.24.1.8

  • Böck K, Polt R, Schülting L (2018) Ecosystem services in river landscapes. In: Riverine ecosystem management. Springer, Cham, pp 413–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogiani PA, Aranda R, Machado COF (2012) Riqueza de borboletas (Lepidoptera) em um fragmento urbano de cerrado em Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil. Entomo- Brasilis 5:93–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borges SH, Baccaro F, Moreira M, Choueri EL (2019) Bird assemblages on Amazonian River islands: patterns of species diversity and composition. Biotropica 51(6):903–912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boumans R, Roman J, Altman I, Kaufman L (2015) The Multiscale Integrated Model of Ecosystem Services (MIMES): simulating the interactions of coupled human and natural systems. Ecosyst Serv 12:30–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Bricker KS, Kerstetter DL (2000) Level of specialization and place attachment: an exploratory study of whitewater recreationists. Leis Sci 22(4):233–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkhard B, de Groot R, Costanza R, Seppelt R, Jorgensen SE, Potschin M (2012) Solutions for sustaining natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecol Ind 21(2012):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler JR, Wong GY, Metcalfe DJ, Honzák M, Pert PL, Rao N, Brodie JE (2013) An analysis of trade-offs between multiple ecosystem services and stakeholders linked to land use and water quality management in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Agr Ecosyst Environ 180:176–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabette HSR, Souza JR, Shimano Y, Juen L (2017) Effects of changes in the riparian forest on the butterfly community (Insecta: Lepidoptera) in Cerrado areas. Rev Brasil Entomol 6:43–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai Z, Han G, Chen M (2018) Do water bodies play an important role in the relationship between urban form and land surface temperature? Sustain Cities Soc 39:487–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capon SJ, Chambers LE, Nally RM, Naiman RJ, Davies P, Marshall N, Pittock J, Reid M, Capon T, Douglas M, Catford J, Baldwin DS, Stewardson M, Roberts J, Parsons M, Williams SE (2013) Riparian ecosystems in the 21st century: hotspots for climate change adaptation? Ecosystems 16:359–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter SR, Caraco NF, Correll DL, Howarth RW, Sharpley AN, Smith VH (1998) Nonpoint pollution of surface waters with phosphorus and nitrogen. Ecol Appl 8(3):559–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers P (1999) Aquatic and marine biodiversity. In: Posey AD (ed) Cultural and spiritual values of biodiversity: a complimentary contribution to global assessment. UNEP/Intermediate Technology Publications, Nairobi/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan KM, Guerry AD, Balvanera P, Klain S, Satterfield T, Basurto X, Woodside U (2012) Where are cultural and social in ecosystem services? A framework for constructive engagement. Bioscience 62(8):744–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chauhan JS, Singh HJ, Karmakar S (2022) Traditional cultivation practices of water chestnut in Northeast India (Assam): a field survey. In: International conference of the Indian society of ergonomics. Springer, Cham, pp 369–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen WY (2017) Environmental externalities of urban river pollution and restoration: a hedonic analysis in Guangzhou (China). Landsc Urban Plan 157:170–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen M, Lu Y, Ling L, Wan Y, Luo Z, Huang H (2015) Drivers of changes in ecosystem service values in Ganjiang upstream watershed. Land Use Policy 47:247–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinyama A, Ncube R, Ela W (2016) Critical pollution levels in Umguza River, Zimbabwe. Phys Chem Earth, Parts a/b/c 93:76–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chong LS, Berelson WM, McManus J, Hammond DE, Rollins NE, Yager PL (2014) Carbon and biogenic silica export influenced by the Amazon River Plume: patterns of remineralization in deep-sea sediments. Deep Sea Res Part I 85:124–137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Christin ZL, Bagstad KJ, Verdone MA (2016) A decision framework for identifying models to estimate forest ecosystem services gains from restoration. Forest Ecosyst 3:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Clawson RG, Lockaby BG, Rummer B (2001) Changes in production and nutrient cycling across a wetness gradient within a foodplain forest. Ecosystems 4:126–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole LJ, Brocklehurst S, Robertson D, Harrison W, McCracken DI (2015) Riparian buffer strips: their role in the conservation of insect pollinators in intensive grassland systems. Agr Ecosyst Environ 211:207–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collentine D, Futter MN (2018) Realising the potential of natural water retention measures in catchment flood management: Trade-offs and matching interests. J Flood Risk Manag 11(1):76–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coscieme L (2015) Cultural ecosystem services: the inspirational value of ecosystems in popular music. Ecosyst Serv 16:121–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, d’Arge R, De Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Van Den Belt M (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387(6630):253–260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crossman ND, Connor JD, Bryan BA, Summers DM, Ginnivan J (2010) Reconfiguring an irrigation landscape to improve provision of ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 69(5):1031–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daily GC, Ellison K (2012) The new economy of nature: the quest to make conservation profitable. Island Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Dansie AP, Wiggs GFS, Thomas DSG (2017) Iron and nutrient content of wind-erodible sediment in the ephemeral river valleys of Namibia. Geomorphology 290:335–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies OA, Abowei JFN, Tawari CC (2009) Phytoplankton community of Elechi creek, Niger Delta, Nigeria-a nutrient-polluted tropical creek. Am J Appl Sci 6(6):1143–1152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Groot RS, Wilson MA, Boumans RM (2002) A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol Econ 41(3):393–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Sosa LL, Glanville HC, Marshall MR, Williams AP, Jones DL (2018) Quantifying the contribution of riparian soils to the provision of ecosystem services. Sci Total Environ 624:807–819

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dick J, Maes J, Smith RI, Paracchini ML, Zulian G (2014) Cross-scale analysis of ecosystem services identified and assessed at local and European level. Ecol Ind 38:20–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Do HH, Frör O (2022) River ecosystem resilience: applying the contingent valuation method in Vietnam. Sustainability 14(19):12029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doi H, Katano I, Negishi JN, Sanada S, Kayaba Y (2013) Effects of biodiversity, habitat structure, and water quality on recreational use of rivers. Ecosphere 4(8):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dugan PJ, Barlow C, Agostinho AA, Baran E, Cada GF, Chen D, Marmulla G (2010) Fish migration, dams, and loss of ecosystem services in the Mekong basin. AMBIO J Hum Environ 39(4), 344–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupont LM, Jahns S, Marret F, Ning S (2000) Vegetation change in equatorial West Africa: time-slices for the last 150 ka. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 155(1–2):95–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durbha SS, King RL, Younan NH (2007) Support vector machines regression for retrieval of leaf area index from multiangle imaging spectroradiometer. Remote Sens Environ 107:348–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebeku KS (2004) Biodiversity conservation in Nigeria: an appraisal of the legal regime in relation to the Niger Delta area of the country. J Envtl l 16:361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egbagbe E (2009) Investment opportunities in the Niger Delta Region–infrastructure. In: Regenerating the Niger Delta forum. Challenges and opportunities

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich PR, Ehrlich AH (1981) Extinction: the causes and consequences of the disappearance of species. Random House, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ejechi BO (2003) Microbial deterioration of partially submerged service timbers in a tropical inter-tidal zone. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 51(2):115–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekka A, Pande S, Jiang Y, der Zaag PV (2020) Anthropogenic modifications and river ecosystem services: a landscape perspective. Water 12(10):2706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escobedo FJ, Bottin M, Cala D, Sandoval Montoya DL (2020) Spatial literacy influences stakeholder’s recognition and mapping of peri-urban and urban ecosystem services. Urban Ecosyst 23(5):1039–1049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fachrudin HT, Lubis MD (2016) Planning for riverside area as water tourism destination to improve quality of life local residents, case study: Batuan-Sikambing River, Medan, Indonesia. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 234:434–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farber S, Costanza R, Childers DL, Erickson JON, Gross K, Grove M, Wilson M (2006) Linking ecology and economics for ecosystem management. Bioscience 56(2):121–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felipe-Lucia MR, Comín FA (2015) Ecosystem services-biodiversity relationships depend on land use type in floodplain agroecosystems. Land Use Policy 46:201–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng XY, Luo GP, Li CF, Dai L, Lu L (2012) Dynamics of ecosystem service value caused by land use changes in Manas River of Xinjiang, China. Int J Environ Res 6(2):499–508

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher B, Turner RK, Morling P (2009) Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecol Econ 68(3):643–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortier J, Gagnon D, Truax B, Lambert F (2010) Nutrient accumulation and carbon sequestration in 6-year-old hybrid poplars in multiclonal agricultural riparian buffer strips. Agr Ecosyst Environ 137(3):276–287

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Francesconi W, Srinivasan R, Pérez-Miñana E, Willcock SP, Quintero M (2016) Using the soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) to model ecosystem services: a systematic review. J Hydrol 535:625–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu B, Wang S, Su C, Forsius M (2013) Linking ecosystem processes and ecosystem services. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 5(1):4–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia X (2014) The value of rehabilitating urban rivers: the Yarqon River (Israel). J Environ Econ Policy 3(3):323–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia X, Müller S, Buchecker M (2021) Valuation of ecosystem services to assess river restoration projects. In: River restoration: political, social, and economic perspectives, pp 210–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh A, Schmidt S, Fickert T, Nüsser M (2015) The indian sundarban mangrove forests: history, utilization, conservation strategies and local perception. Diversity (basel) 7(2):149–169

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Salazara C, Coll M, Whiteheada H (2012) River Dolphins as indicators of ecosystem degradation in large tropical rivers. Ecol Indic 23, 19–26

    Google Scholar 

  • González E, Felipe-Lucia MR, Bourgeois B, Boz B, Nilsson C, Palmer G, Sher AA (2017) Integrative conservation of riparian zones. Biol Cons 211:20–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grizzetti B, Lanzanova D, Liquete C, Reynaud A, Cardoso AC (2016) Assessing water ecosystem services for water resource management. Environ Sci Policy 61:194–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero P, Haase D, Albert C (2022) Identifying spatial patterns and ecosystem service delivery of nature-based solutions. Environ Manage 69(4):735–751

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Haines-Young R, Potschin M (2010) The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. Ecosyst Ecol New Synth 1:110–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanna DE, Tomscha SA, Ouellet Dallaire C, Bennett EM (2018) A review of riverine ecosystem service quantification: research gaps and recommendations. J Appl Ecol 55(3):1299–1311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hathway EA, Sharples S (2012) The interaction of rivers and urban form in mitigating the Urban Heat Island effect: a UK case study. Build Environ 58:14–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Häyhä T, Franzese PP (2014) Ecosystem services assessment: a review under an ecological-economic and systems perspective. Ecol Model 289:124–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iniesta-Arandia I, García-Llorente M, Aguilera PA, Montes C, Martín-López B (2014) Socio-cultural valuation of ecosystem services: uncovering the links between values, drivers of change, and human well-being. Ecol Econ 108:36–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isichei E (1983) Varieties of Christian experience in Nigeria. Relig Stud 19(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam GT, Islam AS, Shopan AA, Rahman MM, Lázár AN, Mukhopadhyay A (2015) Implications of agricultural land use change to ecosystem services in the ganges delta. J Environ Manag 161:443–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov IV, Prikhodko VE, Zamotaev IV, Manakhov DV, Novenko EY, Kalinin PI, Markova LM, Plaksina AL (2019) Synlithogenic evolution of floodplain soils in valleys of small rivers in the trans-ural Steppe. Eurasian Soil Sci 52:593–609

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Iwegbue CMA, Ekakitie AO, Egun AC (2006) Mineralization of nitrogen in wetlands soils of the Niger Delta amended with water hyacinth (Eichhornia sp.). Waste Int J Soil Sci 1:258–263

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson S, Finn M, Scheepers K (2014) The use of replacement cost method to assess and manage the impacts of water resource development on Australian indigenous customary economies. J Environ Manage 135:100–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang X, Xu S, Liu Y, Wang X (2015) River ecosystem assessment and application in ecological restorations: a mathematical approach based on evaluating its structure and function. Ecol Eng 76:151–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin M, Juan Y, Choi Y, Lee CK (2019) Estimating the preservation value of world heritage site using contingent valuation method: the case of the Li River, China. Sustainability 11(4):1100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorda-Capdevila D, Gampe D, García VH, Ludwig R, Sabater S, Vergoñós L, Acuña V (2019) Impact and mitigation of global change on freshwater-related ecosystem services in Southern Europe. Sci Total Environ 651:895–908

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Junk WJ, Bayley PB, Sparks RE (1989) The flood pulse concept in river–floodplain systems. In: Dodge DP (ed) Proceedings of the international large river symposium. Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci. vol. 106. pp 110–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Junk WJ (2000) Mechanisms for development and maintenance of biodiversity in neotropical floodplains. In: Biodiversity in wetlands: assessment, function and conservation, vol. 1. Backhuys Publishers, pp 119–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabir H, Kibria M, Jashimuddin M, Hossain MM (2015) Conservation of a river for biodiversity and ecosystem services: the case of the Halda-the unique river of Chittagong, Bangladesh. Int J River Basin Manage 13(3):333–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadlec RH (2020) Hydrologic factors in wetland water treatment. In: Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. CRC Press, pp 21–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan SU, Khan I, Zhao M, Khan AA, Ali MAS (2019) Valuation of ecosystem services using choice experiment with preference heterogeneity: a benefit transfer analysis across inland river basin. Sci Total Environ 679:126–135

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knight JM (2010) Invasive ornamental fish: a potential threat to aquatic biodiversity in peninsular India. J Threat Taxa 700–704

    Google Scholar 

  • Knüppe K, Knieper C (2016) The governance of ecosystem services in river basins: an approach for structured data representation and analysis. Environ Sci Policy 66:31–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kondolf GM, Pinto PJ (2017) The social connectivity of urban rivers. Geomorphology 277:182–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar P, Brondizio E, Gatzweiler F, Gowdy J, de Groot D, Pascual U, Reyers B, Sukhdev P (2013) The economics of ecosystem services: from local analysis to national policies. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 5(1):78–86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Labiosa WB, Forney WM, Esnard AM, Mitsova-Boneva D, Bernknopf R, Hearn P, Swain E (2013) An integrated multi-criteria scenario evaluation web tool for participatory land-use planning in urbanized areas: the ecosystem portfolio model. Environ Model Softw 41:210–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (2014) Soil conservation and ecosystem services. Int Soil Water Conserv Res 2(3):36–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster KJ (1966) A new approach to consumer theory. J Polit Econ 74(2):132–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lansing JS, Lansing PS, Erazo JS (1998) The value of a river. J Polit Ecol 5(1):1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Leuven RS, Poudevigne I (2002) Riverine landscape dynamics and ecological risk assessment. Freshw Biol 47(4):845–865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li R-Q, Dong M, Cui J-Y, Zhang L-L, Cui Q-G, He WM (2007) Quantification of the impact of land-use changes on ecosystem services: a case study in Pingbian County, China. Environ Monit Assess 128:503–510

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li C, Yang S, Lian E, Yang C, Deng K, Liu Z (2016) Damming effect on the Changjiang (Yangtze River) river water cycle based on stable hydrogen and oxygen isotopic records. J Geochem Explor 165:125–133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu S, Crossman ND, Nolan M, Ghirmay H (2013) Bringing ecosystem services into integrated water resources management. J Environ Manage 129:92–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lohrenz SE, Fahnenstiel GL, Redalje DG, Lang GA, Dagg MJ, Whitledge TE, Dortch Q (1999) Nutrients, irradiance, and mixing as factors regulating primary production in coastal waters impacted by the Mississippi River plume. Cont Shelf Res 19(9):1113–1141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) (2005) Ecosystems and human wellbeing: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Mancini MS, Galli A, Coscieme L, Niccolucci V, Lin D, Pulselli FM, Bastianoni S, Marchettini N (2018) Exploring ecosystem services assessment through ecological footprint accounting. Ecosyst Serv 30:228–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mander Ü, Hayakawa Y, Kuusemets V (2005) Purification processes, ecological functions, planning and design of riparian buffer zones in agricultural watersheds. Ecol Eng 24:421–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martín-López B, Gómez-Baggethun E, García-Llorente M, Montes C (2014) Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessment. Ecol Ind 37:220–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsunaga K, Nishioka J, Kuma K, Toya K, Suzuki Y (1998) Riverine input of bioavailable iron supporting phytoplankton growth in Kesennuma Bay (Japan). Water Res 32(11):3436–3442

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mazumdar S, Mazumdar S (1993) Sacred space and place attachment. J Environ Psychol 13(3):231–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGinley M (2008) Eastern Zimbabwe montane forest-grassland mosaic In: Cleveland CJ (ed) Encyclopedia of earth. Environmental Information Coalition, National Council for Science and the Environment, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Meybeck M (2003) Global analysis of river systems: from earth system controls to anthropocene syndromes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 358(1440), 1935–1955

    Google Scholar 

  • Mihic S, Golusin M, Mihajlovic M (2011) Policy and promotion of sustainable inland waterway transport in Europe-Danube River. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15(4):1801–1809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra VN, Rai PK, Kumar P, Prashad R (2016) Evaluation of land use/land covers classification accuracy using multi-temporal remote sensing images. Forum Geograp (romania) 15(1):45–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra V, Rai PK (2016) A remote sensing aided multi-layer perceptron-marcove chain analysis for land use and land cover change prediction in Patna district (Bihar), India. Arab J Geosci 9(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-015-2138-3

  • Mishra VN, Rai PK, Mohan K (2014) Prediction of land use changes based on land change modeler (LCM) using remote sensing: a case study of Muzaffarpur (Bihar), India. J Geograph Inst Jovan Cvijić” SASA (Serbia) 64(1):111–127. https://doi.org/10.2298/IJGI1401111M

  • Mishra VN, Rai PK, Singh P (2021) Geo-information technology in earth resources monitoring and management (edit. Book). Nova Science Publishers, U.S.A., ISBN: 978–1–53619–669–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton C, Knowler D, Brugere C, Lymer D, Bartley D (2017) Valuation of fish production services in river basins: a case study of the Columbia River. Ecosyst Serv 24:101–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naiman RJ, Bilby RE (1998) River ecology and management in the Pacific coastal ecoregion. In: Naiman RJ, Bilby RE (eds) River ecology and management: lessons from the Pacific coastal ecoregion. Springer, New York, pp 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Naiman RJ, Décamps H (1997) The ecology of interfaces: the riparian zone. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28:621–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navrud S, Ready RC (eds) (2007) Environmental value transfer: issues and methods, vol. 1084. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Ndukwu BC, Ben-Nwadibia NB (2005) Ethnomedicinal aspects of plants used as spices and condiments in the Niger delta area of Nigeria. Ethnobotan Leaf 2005(1):10

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson C, Berggren K (2000) Alterations of riparian ecosystems caused by river regulation: Dam operations have caused global-scale ecological changes in riparian ecosystems. How to protect river environments and human needs of rivers remains one of the most important questions of our time. BioScience 50(9), 783–792

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakes T (1999) Eating the food of the ancestors: place, tradition, and tourism in a Chinese frontier river town. Ecumene 6(2):123–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogden FL, Stallard RF (2013) Land use effects on ecosystem service provisioning in tropical watersheds, still an important unsolved problem. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110(52):E5037–E5037

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ogg CM, Gulley CD, Reed JM, Ferguson CA (2017) Soil property trends and classification of alluvial floodplains, South Carolina Coastal Plain. Geoderma 305:122–135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olander LP, Johnston RJ, Tallis H, Kagan J, Maguire LA, Polasky S, Palmer M (2018) Benefit relevant indicators: ecosystem services measures that link ecological and social outcomes. Ecol Ind 85:1262–1272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opperman JJ, Luster R, McKenney BA, Roberts M, Meadows AW (2010) Ecologically functional floodplains: connectivity, flow regime, and scale 1. JAWRA J Am Water Res Assoc 46(2):211–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padmalal D, Maya K (2014) Impacts of river sand mining. In: Sand mining. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 31–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascual U, Muradian R, Brander L, Gómez-Baggethun E, Martín-López B, Verma M, Polasky S (2010) The economics of valuing ecosystem services and biodiversity. In: The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: Ecological and economic foundations. pp 183–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson L, Marlow D, Whitten S, Hatton Macdonald D, Burn S (2010) Externalities associated with urban water asset management. Water for a Healthy Country Flagship Report December 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Peet R (1985) The social origins of environmental determinism. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 75(3):309–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelicice FM, Agostinho AA (2005) Perspectives on ornamental fisheries in the upper Paraná River floodplain, Brazil. Fisher Res 72(1):109–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petsch DK, Cionek VDM, Thomaz SM, dos Santos NCL (2022) Ecosystem services provided by river-floodplain ecosystems. Hydrobiologia 1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Pittock J, Cork S, Maynard S (2012) The state of the application of ecosystems services in Australia. Ecosyst Serv 1(1):111–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polizzi C, Simonetto M, Barausse A, Chaniotou N, Känkänen R, Keränen S, Scipioni A (2015) Is ecosystem restoration worth the effort? The rehabilitation of a Finnish river affects recreational ecosystem services. Ecosyst Serv 14:158–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postel S, Carpenter S (1997) Freshwater ecosystem services. In: Daily GC (ed) Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 195–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Posthumus H, Rouquette JR, Morris J, Gowing DJG, Hess TM (2010) A framework for the assessment of ecosystem goods and services; a case study on lowland floodplains in England. Ecol Econ 69(7):1510–1523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prato T (2003) Multiple-attribute evaluation of ecosystem management for the Missouri River system. Ecol Econ 45(2):297–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulford E, Polidoro BA, Nation M (2017) Understanding the relationships between water quality, recreational fishing practices, and human health in Phoenix, Arizona. J Environ Manag 199:242–250

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raheem N, Archambault S, Arellano E, Gonzales M, Kopp D, Rivera J, Dingwell E (2015) A framework for assessing ecosystem services in acequia irrigation communities of the Upper Río Grande watershed. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Water 2(5):559–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rai PK, Mohan K (2014) Remote sensing data & GIS for flood risk zonation mapping in varanasi district. Forum Geograph J (Romania) 13(1), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.5775/fg.2067-4635.2014.041.i

  • Rai PK, Mishra VN, Singh P (2021) Recent technologies for disaster management & risk reduction-sustainable community resilience & responses (edit. Book). Springer Nature, Switzerland, ISBN: 978–3–030–76116–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76116-5

  • Rai PK, Mishra VN, Singh P (2022) Geospatial technology for landscape and environment management: sustainable assessment & planning (edit. Book). Springer Nature, Singapore. ISBN: 978–981–16–7373–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7373-3

  • Rao MR, Palada MC, Becker BN (2004) Medicinal and aromatic plants in agroforestry systems. In: New vistas in agroforestry. Springer, Netherlands, pp 107–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond CM, Bryan BA, MacDonald DH, Cast A, Strathearn S, Grandgirard A, Kalivas T (2009) Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 68(5):1301–1315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rewitzer S, Matzdorf B, Trampnau S (2014) Das Konzept der Ökosystemleistungen aus Sicht der deutschen Umweltverbände. Natur Und Landschaft 89(2):61–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson CT, Tockner K, Ward JV (2002) The fauna of dynamic riverine landscapes. Freshw Biol 47(4):661–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robles-Diaz-de-León LF, Nava-Tudela A (1998) Playing with Asimina triloba (pawpaw): a species to consider when enhancing riparian forest buffer systems with non-timber products. Ecol Model 112(2):169–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozas-Vasquez D, Fuerst C, Geneletti D (2019) Integrating ecosystem services in spatial planning and strategic environmental assessment: the role of the cascade model. Environ Impact Assess Rev 78:106291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanford MP (2009) Valuating mangrove ecosystems as coastal protection in post-tsunami South Asia. Nat Areas J 29(1):91–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos A, Fernandes MR, Aguiar FC, Branco MR, Ferreira MT (2018) Effects of riverine landscape changes on pollination services: a case study on the River Minho, Portugal. Ecol Ind 89:656–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarlett L, Boyd J (2015) Ecosystem services and resource management: institutional issues, challenges, and opportunities in the public sector. Ecol Econ 115:3–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SCEP (Study of Critical Environmental Problems) (1970) Man’s impact on the global environment. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiemer F (2016) Building an eco-hydrological framework for the management of large river systems. Ecohydrol Hydrobiol 16(1):19–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnegg M, Rieprich R, Pröpper M (2014) Culture, nature, and the valuation of ecosystem services in Northern Namibia. Ecol Soc 19(4):26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schröter M, Kraemer R, Mantel M, Kabisch N, Hecker S, Richter A, Bonn A (2017) Citizen science for assessing ecosystem services: status, challenges and opportunities. Ecosyst Serv 28:80–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaaban M, Schwartz C, Macpherson J, Piorr A (2021) A conceptual model framework for mapping, analyzing and managing supply-demand mismatches of ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes. Land 10(2):131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shackleton CM, Guthrie G, Keirungi J, Stewart J (2003) Fuelwood availability and use in the Richtersveld National Park, South Africa. Koedoe 46(2):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharps K, Masante D, Thomas A, Jackson B, Redhead J, May L, Jones L (2017) Comparing strengths and weaknesses of three ecosystem services modelling tools in a diverse UK river catchment. Sci Total Environ 584:118–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sherrouse BC, Semmens DJ, Ancona ZH (2022) Social Values for Ecosystem Services (SolVES): open-source spatial modeling of cultural services. Environ Model Softw 148:105259

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh S, Rai PK (2017) Application of earth observation data for estimation of changes in land trajectories in Varanasi district, India. J Landscape Ecol 11(1):5–18. https://doi.org/10.1515/jlecol-2017-0017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh R, Singh G (2017) Ecosystem services: a bridging concept of ecology and economics. Ecol Quest 25:95–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh R, Singh GS (2019) Climate change impacts on the Ganga River ecosystem services: challenges for the well-being of millions. Clim Change Environ Sustain 7:108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh R, Singh GS (2020) Integrated management of the Ganga River: an ecohydrological approach. Ecohydrol Hydrobiol 20(2):153–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh R, Patel SK, Tiwari AK, Singh GS (2021) Assessment of flood recession farming for livelihood provision, food security and environmental sustainability in the Ganga River Basin. Curr Res Environ Sustain 3:100038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh R, Tiwari AK, Sharma A, Patel SK, Singh GS (2022) Valuing ecosystem services of sacred natural sites in the anthropocene: a case study of Varanasi, India. Anthropocene Sci 1(1):121–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh RP (2011) Varanasi, India’s cultural heritage city: contestation, conservation & planning. Herit Cult Landscapes 205–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Sousa LP, Sousa AI, Alves FL, Lillebø AI (2016) Ecosystem services provided by a complex coastal region: challenges of classification and mapping. Sci Rep 6(1):1–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stålhammar S, Pedersen E (2017) Recreational cultural ecosystem services: how do people describe the value? Ecosyst Serv 26:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swallow BM, Sang JK, Nyabenge M, Bundotich DK, Duraiappah AK, Yatich TB (2009) Tradeoffs, synergies and traps among ecosystem services in the Lake Victoria basin of East Africa. Environ Sci Policy 12(4):504–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teel WS, Buck LE (2002) Between wildcrafting and monocultures: agroforestry options. In: Jones ET, McLain RJ, Weigand J (eds) Nontimber forest products of the United States. University Press of Kansas

    Google Scholar 

  • Terer T, Ndiritu GG, Gichuki NN (2004) Socio-economic values and traditional strategies of managing wetland resources in Lower Tana River, Kenya. Hydrobiologia 527(1):3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomaz SM (2021) Ecosystem services provided by freshwater macrophytes. Hydrobiologia 1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Trodahl MI, Jackson BM, Deslippe JR, Metherell AK (2017) Investigating trade-offs between water quality and agricultural productivity using the land utilisation and capability indicator (LUCI)–a New Zealand application. Ecosyst Serv 26:388–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tunstall S, Tapsell S, House M (2004) Children’s perceptions of river landscapes and play: what children’s photographs reveal. Landsc Res 29(2):181–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner RK, Georgiou S, Fisher B (2008) Valuing ecosystem services. In: The case of multi-functional wetlands. Earthscan, Sterling, VA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Umoh SG (2008) The promise of wetland farming; evidence from Nigeria. Agric J 3(2):107–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Vega M, Pardo R, Barrado E, Debán L (1998) Assessment of seasonal and polluting effects on the quality of river water by exploratory data analysis. Water Res 32(12):3581–3592

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vermaat JE, Wagtendonk AJ, Brouwer R, Sheremet O, Ansink E, Brockhoff T, Hering D (2016) Assessing the societal benefits of river restoration using the ecosystem services approach. Hydrobiologia 769(1):121–135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vidal-Abarca MR, Suárez-Alonso ML, Santos-Martín F, Martín-López B, Benayas J, Montes C (2014) Understanding complex links between fluvial ecosystems and social indicators in Spain: an ecosystem services approach. Ecol Complex 20:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vidal-Abarca Gutierrez MR, Suarez Alonso ML (2013) Which are, what is their status and what can we expect from ecosystem services provided by Spanish rivers and riparian areas? Biodivers Conserv 22(11):2469–2503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vihervaara P, Mononen L, Santos F, Adamescu M, Cazacu C, Maes J (2017) Biophysical quantification. In: Burkhard B, Maes J (eds) Mapping ecosystem services. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia, pp 95–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Villa F, Ceroni M, Bagstad K, Johnson G, Krivov S (2009) ARIES (Artificial Intelligence for Ecosystem Services): a new tool for ecosystem services assessment, planning, and valuation. In: Proceedings of the 11th Annual BIOECON conference on economic instruments to enhance the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity. Venice, Italy, pp 21–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Vishwakarma CS, Thakur S, Rai PK, Kamal V, Mukharjee S (2016) Changing land trajectories: a case study from India using remote sensing. Eur J Geogr 7(2):63–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Vo QT, Kuenzer C, Vo QM, Moder F, Oppelt N (2012) Review of valuation methods for mangrove ecosystem services. Ecol Ind 23:431–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Völker S, Kistemann T (2011) The impact of blue space on human health and well-being–Salutogenetic health effects of inland surface waters: a review. Int J Hyg Environ Health 214(6):449–460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • von Schiller D, Acuña V, Aristi I, Arroita M, Basaguren A, Bellin A, Larrañaga A (2017) River ecosystem processes: a synthesis of approaches, criteria of use and sensitivity to environmental stressors. Sci Total Environ 596:465–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vorstius AC, Spray CJ (2015) A comparison of ecosystem services mapping tools for their potential to support planning and decision-making on a local scale. Ecosyst Serv 15:75–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Waage S (2014) New business decision-making aids in an era of complexity, scrutiny, and uncertainty: tools for identifying, assessing, and valuing ecosystem services. In: Handbook on the economics of ecosystem services and biodiversity. Edward Elgar Publishing, pp 546–566

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang G, Fang Q, Zhang L, Chen W, Chen Z, Hong H (2010) Valuing the effects of hydropower development on watershed ecosystem services: case studies in the Jiulong River Watershed, Fujian Province, China. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 86(3):363–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang ZF, Ding JY, Yang GS (2012) Risk analysis of slope instability of levees under river sand mining conditions. Water Sci Eng 5(3):340–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Zhang Z, Greimann B, Huang V (2018) Application and evaluation of the HEC-RAS-riparian vegetation simulation module to the Sacramento River. Ecol Model 368:158–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward J (1998) Riverine landscapes: biodiversity patterns, disturbance regimes, and aquatic conservation. Biol Cons 83(3):269–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward JV, Tockner K, Arscott DB, Claret C (2002) Riverine landscape diversity. Freshw Biol 47(4):517–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei G, Cui B, Yang Z, Bai J, Wang J, Hu B (2007) Comparison of changes of typical river segment ecosystem service value in LRGR. Chin Sci Bull 52(2):262–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiskopf SR, Myers BJ, Arce-Plata MI, Blanchard JL, Ferrier S, Fulton EA, Rosa IM (2022) A conceptual framework to integrate biodiversity, ecosystem function, and ecosystem service models. Bioscience 72(11):1062–1073

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JA (2002) Riverine landscapes: taking landscape ecology into the water. Freshw Biol 47(4):501–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xue J, Gui D, Lei J, Zeng F, Mao D, Zhang Z (2017) Model development of a participatory Bayesian network for coupling ecosystem services into integrated water resources management. J Hydrol 554:50–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto M, Liu D, Kasai A, Okubo K, Tanaka M (2016) Dynamics of iron in the Chikugo River Basin: comparison of iron with nitrogen and phosphate input to the estuary. Reg Stud Mar Sci 8:89–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao J, He X, Chen W, Ye Y, Guo R, Yu L (2016) A local-scale spatial analysis of ecosystem services and ecosystem service bundles in the upper Hun River catchment, China. Ecosyst Serv 22:104–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zander KK, Straton A (2010) An economic assessment of the value of tropical river ecosystem services: heterogeneous preferences among aboriginal and non-aboriginal Australians. Ecol Econ 69(12):2417–2426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Zhang L, Wang Y, Shao Y, Daniels B, Roß-Nickoll M, Chen Z (2022) Pollinators and urban riparian vegetation: important contributors to urban diversity conservation. Environ Sci Eur 34(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao M, Peng J, Liu Y, Li T, Wang Y (2018) Mapping watershed-level ecosystem service bundles in the Pearl River Delta, China. Ecol Econ 152:106–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziv G, Baran E, Nam S, Rodríguez-Iturbe I, Levin SA (2012) Trading-off fish biodiversity, food security, and hydropower in the Mekong River Basin. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109(15):5609–5614

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amit Kumar Tiwari .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tiwari, A.K., Singh, R., Kumar, S., Singh, G.S. (2023). Ecosystem Services in the Riverine Landscapes. In: Rai, P.K. (eds) Advances in Water Resource Planning and Sustainability. Advances in Geographical and Environmental Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3660-1_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics