Abstract
Pingbian Miao Autonomous County is one of the poorest rural areas in China. Land-use changes, mainly driven by agricultural expansion and deforestation, may significantly impact ecosystem services and functions, but such effects are difficult to quantify. In the present study, Landsat image data were combined with the published coefficients about the world and China ecosystem to quantify land-use and ecosystem service changes in the mountainous area. A sensitivity analysis was employed to determine the effect of manipulating these coefficients on the estimated values. Our results show that during the past decades (from 1973 to 2004) forests and grasslands were converted into shrubland and cropland, respectively, resulting in a continuous decrease in ecosystem service (from 124.5 US$ × 106 in 1973 to 100.4 US$ × 106 in 2004). We found that the decrease of mixed forest in the study area was the largest contributor (i.e., 25.4 US$ × 106) to the decline of the ecosystem service. Therefore we propose that future land-use policy should pay more attention to the crucial ecosystem functions of these forests (including tropical forest), and that it is necessary to balance the relationship between the livelihood of local farmers and environmental protection in order to maintain a healthy and stable ecosystem.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chen, Z. X., & Zhang, X. S. (2000). The value of ecosystem services in China. Science in China (Series D), 45, 17–23.
Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., et al. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253–260.
Daily, G. C. (1997). Introduction: What are ecosystem services. In G. C. Daily (Ed.), Nature’s services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems (pp. 1–10). Washington, District of Columbia: Island.
Faminow, M. D. (1998). Cattle, deforestation, and development in the Amazon: An economic, agronomic, and environmental perspective (p. 253). New York: Cab International.
Fearnside, P. M. (1997). Environmental services as a strategy for sustainable development in rural Amazonia. Ecological Economics, 20, 53–70.
Guo, Z., Xiao, X., Gan, Y., & Zheng, Y. (2001). Ecosystem functions, services and their values—A case study in Xingshan County of China. Ecological Economics, 38, 141–154.
Guo, Z. W., Xiao, X. M., & Li, D. M. (2000). An assessment of ecosystem services: Water flow regulation and hydroelectric power production. Ecological Applications, 10(3), 925–936.
Kremen, C. (2005). Managing ecosystem services: What do we need to know about their ecology? Ecology Letters, 8, 468–479.
Kreuter, U. P., Harris, H. G., Matlock, M. D., & Lacey, R. E. (2001). Change in ecosystem service values in the San Antonio area, Texas. Ecological Economics, 39, 333–346.
Laurance, W. F. (1999). Reflections on the tropical deforestation crisis. Biological Conservation, 91, 109–117.
Liu, J. Y., Liu, M. L., Zhuang, D. F., Zhang, Z. X., & Deng, X. Z. (2002). Spatial pattern analysis of the recent land-cover change in China. Science in China (Series D), 32, 1031–1043.
Liu, J. Y., Tian, H. Q., Liu, M. L., Zhuang, D. F., Melillo, J. M., & Zhang, Z. X. (2005). China’s changing landscape during the 1990s: Large-scale land transformations estimated with satellite data. Geophysical Research Letters, 32, L02405, doi:10.1029/2004GL021649.
Mansfield, E. (1985). Microeconomics: Theory and applications, 5th ed. New York: Norton.
Pearce, D., & Moran, D. (1994). The economic value of biodiversity. Cambridge: IUCN.
Peters, C. M., Gentry, A. H., & Mendelsohn, R. O. (1989). Valuation of an Amazonian rainforest. Nature, 339, 655–656.
Portela, R., & Rademacher, I. (2001). A dynamic model of patterns of deforestation and their effect on the ability of the Brazilian Amazonia to provide ecosystem services. Ecological Modelling, 143, 2115–2146.
Rees, W. G., & Williams, M. (1997). Monitoring changes in land cover induced by atmospheric pollution in the Kola Peninsula, Russia, using Landsat-MSS data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 18, 1703–1723.
Sutton, P. C., & Costanza, R. (2002). Global estimates of market and non-market values derived from nighttime satellite imagery, land cover, and ecosystem service valuation. Ecological Economics, 41, 509–527.
Tømmervik, H., Høgd, A. K., & Inger, S. I. (2003). Monitoring vegetation changes in Pasvik (Norway) and Pechenga in Kola Peninsula (Russia) using multitemporal Landsat MSS/TM data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 85, 370–388.
Tong, C. I., Charles, A. S., & Wang, H. Q. (2003). Land use change in rice, wheat and maize production in China (1961–1998). Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 95, 523–536.
Verstraete, M. M., Pinty, B., & Myneni, R. B. (1996). Potential and limitations of information extraction on the terrestrial biosphere from satellite remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment, 58, 201–214.
Vitousek, P. M., Mooney, H. A., Lubchenco, J., & Melillo, J. M. (1997). Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science, 277, 494–499.
White, P. C., Gregory, K. W., Lindsey, P. J., & Richards, G. (1997). Economic values of threatened mammals in Britain: A case study of the Otter (Lutra lutra) and the water vole Arvicola terrestris. Biological Conservation, 82, 345–354.
Wilson, M. A., & Carpenter, S. (1999). Economic valuation of freshwater ecosystem services in the United States: 1971–1997. Ecological Applications, 9(3), 772–783.
Zhao, B., Kreuter, U., Li, B., Ma, Z. J., Chen, J. K., & Nakagoshi, N. (2004). An ecosystem service value assessment of land-use change on Chongming Island, China. Land Use Policy, 21, 139–148.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, RQ., Dong, M., Cui, JY. et al. Quantification of the Impact of Land-Use Changes on Ecosystem Services: A Case Study in Pingbian County, China. Environ Monit Assess 128, 503–510 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-9344-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-9344-0