Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Seismic Retrofitting and Strengthening of Structures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
RC Structures Strengthened with FRP for Earthquake Resistance

Part of the book series: Composites Science and Technology ((CST))

  • 69 Accesses

Abstract

Retrofitting the seismically damaged structures and strengthening the existing structures due to the upgradation of seismic zones continuously taking place. In fact, learning from occurring earthquakes and study of structural damages has become a very important aspect of earthquake engineering. Most of the developing countries have large numbers of habitats made of masonry, while the focus on the safety of these poor men’s habitats is relatively very less. Developing countries can also afford concrete structures for dwellings, while steel structures are mostly used for industrial purposes. On the other hand, the developed countries have large numbers of steel structures as well as shear wall based structures as they can afford the cost of the same. To have a comprehensive idea about retrofitting and strengthening measures for all categorial structures, the current chapter is an attempt to bring together the existing techniques for retrofitting and strengthening all the structures under separate subheadings and also underlines the promising new techniques which are coming up for this purpose. At the end, the chapter summarizes a few important points on this aspect. The chapter may be helpful for having an overall picture of the retrofitting and strengthening of structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Adhikary S das, Li B, Fujikake K (2014) Effects of high loading rate on reinforced concrete beams (with Appendix). Struct J 111:651–660. https://doi.org/10.14359/51686579

  2. AISC (2022) Code of standard practice for steel buildings and bridges

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alba-Rodríguez MD, Martínez-Rocamora A, González-Vallejo P et al (2017) Building rehabilitation versus demolition and new construction: economic and environmental assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev 66:115–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2017.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alcaino P, Maria HS (2008) Experimental response of externally retrofitted masonry walls subjected to shear loading. J Compos Constr 12:489–498. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2008)12:5(489)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ali MSM, Oehlers DJ, Bradford MA (2001) Shear peeling of steel plates bonded to tension faces of RC beams. J Struct Eng (ASCE) 127:1453–1459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ali Q, Khan AN, Ashraf M et al (2013) Seismic performance of stone masonry buildings used in the Himalayan belt. Earthq Spectra 29:1159–1181. https://doi.org/10.1193/091711EQS228M

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Anastasiadis A (2021) Failure of steel structures: rethinking some of the aftermaths. Urbanism Arhitectură Construcţii 12(2).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Angst UM (2018) Challenges and opportunities in corrosion of steel in concrete. Mater Struct/Materiaux et Constructions 51:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1617/S11527-017-1131-6/FIGURES/6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Anwar M, Roushdi M (2013) Improved concrete properties to resist the saline water using environmental by-product. Water Sci 27:30–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WSJ.2013.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Apostolopoulos C, Koulouris K (2021) Corrosion effects on durability of RC structures. Metals 11:1812. https://doi.org/10.3390/MET11111812

  11. Aprile A, Spacone E, Member A, Limkatanyu S (2001) Role of bond in RC beams strengthened with steel and FRP plates. J Struct Eng (ASCE) 127:1445–1452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. ASCE/SEI 41-06 (2007) Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings. American Society of Civil Engineers

    Google Scholar 

  13. Astaneh-Asl A, Qian X, Shi Y (2019) Application of steel shear walls toward more resilient structures. In: Resilient structures and infrastructure. Springer, Singapore, pp 3–46

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ates S, Kahya V, Yurdakul M, Adanur S (2013) Damages on reinforced concrete buildings due to consecutive earthquakes in Van. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 53:109–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.06.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Aydenlou RM (2020a) Types of existing buildings: detailed introduction and seismic rehabilitation. In: Seismic rehabilitation methods for existing buildings. Elsevier, pp 193–553

    Google Scholar 

  16. Aydenlou RM (2020b) Seismic rehabilitation methods for existing buildings. Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  17. Baltazar LG, Henriques FMA, Cidade MT (2019) Rheology of natural hydraulic lime grouts for conservation of stone masonry-influence of compositional and processing parameters. Fluids 4

    Google Scholar 

  18. Banerjee S, Nayak S, Das S (2018) Enhancing shear capacity of masonry wallet using PP-band and steel wire mesh. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 431:072004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/431/7/072004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Banerjee S, Nayak S, Das S (2021) Seismic performance enhancement of masonry building models strengthened with the cost-effective materials under bi-directional excitation. Eng Struct 242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112516

  20. Banerjee S, Nayak S, Das S (2020a) Shear and flexural behaviour of unreinforced masonry wallets with steel wire mesh. J Build Eng 30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101254

  21. Banerjee S, Nayak S, Das S (2020) Improving the In-plane behavior of brick masonry wallet using PP band and steel wire mesh. J Mater Civ Eng 32:04020132. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0003159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Banerjee S, Nayak S, Das S (2019) Enhancing the flexural behaviour of masonry wallet using PP band and steel wire mesh. Constr Build Mater 194:179–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bano S, Jaiswal G, Kumar R, Tiwari A, Karthikeyan M (2023) Experimental Study on the crack repair techniques of concrete structures: a case study. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 1273:012006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1273/1/012006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bartolomé AS, Quiun D, Zegarra L. (2008) Performance of reinforced adobe houses in Pisco, Peru earthquake. In: Proceedings of the 14th world conference on earthquake engineering. Beijing, China

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bernam JW, Bruneau M (2004) Steel plate shear walls are not plate girders. AISC Eng J 95

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bernardo G, Guida A, Mecca I (2015) Advancements in shotcrete technology. In: Structural studies, repairs and maintenance of heritage architecture XIV. WIT Press, pp 591–602

    Google Scholar 

  27. Blokley DI (1980) The nature of structural design and Safety. Ellis Horwood, London

    Google Scholar 

  28. Blondet M, Torrealva D, Vargas J, Velasquez J, Tarque J (2006) Seismic reinforcement of adobe houses using external polymer mesh. In: First European conference on earthquake engineering and seismology, Paper no. 632

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bosio M, di Salvatore C, Bellotti D, Capacci L, Belleri A, Piccolo V, Cavalieri F, Lago BD, Riva P, Magliulo G, Nascimbene R, Biondini F (2022) Modelling and seismic response analysis of non-residential single-storey existing precast buildings in Italy. J Earthquake Eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2022.2033364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bostenaru Dan MD (2004) Multi-criteria decision model for retrofitting existing buildings. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 4:485–499. https://doi.org/10.5194/NHESS-4-485-2004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bradshaw A, Rajeev P, Tesfamariam S (2011) Multi Criteria decision making tool for the selection of seismic retrofitting techniques. In: Australian earthquake engineering society conference. Barossa Valley, South Australia

    Google Scholar 

  32. Braga F, Gigliotti R, Monti G, Morelli F, Nuti C, Salvatore W, Vanzi I (2014) Speedup of post earthquake community recovery: the case of precast industrial buildings after the Emilia 2012 earthquake. Bull Earthq Eng 12:2405–2418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9583-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Bruneau M (2004) Seismic retrofit of steel structures. Sociedad Mexicana de Ingeniera Sismica, VIII SNIS, Tlaxcala

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bush TD, Wyllie LA, Jirsa JO (1991) Observations on two seismic strengthening schemes for concrete frames. Earthq Spectra 7:511–527. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Calderini C, Cattari S, Lagomarsino S (2010) The use of the diagonal compression test to identify the shear mechanical parameters of masonry. Constr Build Mater 24:677–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2009.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Calderoni B, Cordasco EA, del Zoppo M, Prota A (2020) Damage assessment of modern masonry buildings after the L’Aquila earthquake. Bull Earthq Eng 18:2275–2301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00784-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. California University (1976) State-of-the-art review on shotcrete

    Google Scholar 

  38. Canbay E, Ersoy U, Ozcebe G (2003) Contribution of reinforced concrete infills to seismic behavior of structural systems. ACI Struct J 100:637–643. https://doi.org/10.14359/12805

  39. Cancellara D, de Angelis F (2016) Nonlinear dynamic analysis for multi-storey RC structures with hybrid base isolation systems in presence of bi-directional ground motions. Compos Struct 154:464–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.07.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Carden L, Itani A, Buckle I, Aiken I (2004) Buckling restrained braces for ductile end cross frames in steel plate girder bridges. In: 13th world conference on earthquake engineering. Vancouver, B.C., Canada

    Google Scholar 

  41. Caterino N, Iervolino I, Manfredi G, Cosenza E (2009) Comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision-making methods for seismic structural retrofitting. Comput-Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng 24:432–445. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2009.00599.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Chen SJ, Lin HY (1990) Experimental study of steel I-beam to box-column moment connection, 41–7. In: 4th international conference on steel structures and space frames

    Google Scholar 

  43. Christopoulos C, Filiatrault A, Uang CM (2002) Self-centering post-tensioned energy dissipating (PTED) steel frames for seismic regions. San Diego, La Jolla, CA, p 292

    Google Scholar 

  44. Corradi M, Borri A, Vignoli A (2002) Strengthening techniques tested on masonry structures struck by the Umbria–Marche earthquake of 1997–1998. Constr Build Mater 16:229–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-0618(02)00014-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. CPWD (2007) Handbook on repair and rehabilitation of RCC buildings. Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  46. Crawford JE (2002) Retrofit methods to mitigate progressive collapse, karagozian and case structural engineers, Glendale, CA

    Google Scholar 

  47. Dauda JA, Silva LC, Lourenço PB, Iuorio O (2021) Out-of-plane loaded masonry walls retrofitted with oriented strand boards: numerical analysis and influencing parameters. Eng Struct 243:112683. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2021.112683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Debnath P, Chandra Dutta S, Mandal P (2023) Lateral behaviour of masonry walls with different types of brick bonds, aspect ratio and strengthening measures by polypropylene bands and wire mesh. Structures 49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.01.155

  49. Debnath P, Halder L, Dutta SC (2022) Damage survey and seismic vulnerability assessment of unreinforced masonry structures in low-intensity Ambasa earthquake of northeast India. Structures 44:372–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.08.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Dowling D, Samali B, Li J (2005) An Improved means of reinforcing adobe walls-external vertical reinforcement. In: SismoAdobe. Lima, Peru

    Google Scholar 

  51. Dutta SC, Halder L, Sharma RP (2021) Seismic vulnerability assessment of low to mid-rise RC buildings addressing prevailing design and construction practices in the Northeastern region of the Indian subcontinent: a case study based approach. Structures 33:1561–1577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.05.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Dutta SC, Mukhopadhyay P, Goswami K (2013) Augmenting strength of collapsed unreinforced masonry junctions: principal damage feature of walls damaged by moderate Indian earthquakes. Nat Hazards Rev 14:281–285. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Dutta SC, Mukhopadhyay PS, Saha R, Nayak S (2015) 2011 Sikkim earthquake at eastern himalayas: lessons learnt from performance of structures. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 75:121–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.03.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Dutta SC, Nayak S, Acharjee G, Panda SK, Das PK (2016) Gorkha (Nepal) earthquake of April 25, 2015: actual damage, retrofitting measures and prediction by RVS for a few typical structures. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 89:171–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.08.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Dutta SC, Nayak S, Dinakar P (2014) Lateral period and seismic vulnerability of masonry buildings. Proc Inst Civ Eng Struct Build 167:633–645. https://doi.org/10.1680/stbu.12.00043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Eatherton MR, Hajjar JF, Deierlein GG, Krawinkler H, Billington S, Ma X (2008) Controlled rocking of steel-framed buildings with replaceable energy-dissipating fuses. In: 14th world conference on earthquake engineering. Beijing, China

    Google Scholar 

  57. Ehsani MR, Saadatmanesh H, Velazquez-Dimas JI (1999) Behavior of retrofitted URM walls under simulated earthquake loading. J Compos Constr 3:134–142. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1999)3:3(134)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. El-Dakhakhni WW, Hamid AA, Hakam ZHR, Elgaaly M (2006) Hazard mitigation and strengthening of unreinforced masonry walls using composites. Compos Struct 73:458–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2005.02.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Elgawady M, Lestuzzi P, Badoux M (2004) A review of conventional seismic retrofitting techniques for URM. In: 13th international brick and block masonry conference. Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  60. Elgawady MA, Lestuzzi P, Badoux M (2006) Retrofitting of masonry walls using shotcrete. In: NZSEE conference, Paper 45

    Google Scholar 

  61. Fazli H, Wee T (2014) Rehabilitation of RC structures exposed to salinity and moisture using CFRP. Appl Mech Mater 567:488–493. https://doi.org/10.4028/WWW.SCIENTIFIC.NET/AMM.567.488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. FEMA 273 (1997) NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings

    Google Scholar 

  63. FEMA 351 (2000) Recommended seismic evaluation and upgrade criteria for existing welded steel moment-frame buildings.

    Google Scholar 

  64. FEMA 547 (2006) Techniques for the seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings. Washington DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  65. Fillitsa Karantoni BV, Fardis MN (1992) Effectiveness of seismic strengthening techniques for masonry buildings. J Struct Eng 118:1884–1902. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1992)118:7(1884)

  66. Formisano A, Di Lorenzo G, Landolfo R (2019) Seismic retrofitting of industrial steel buildings hit by the 2012 Emilia-Romagna earthquake: a case study. In: AIP conference proceedings. American Institute of Physics Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Garlock M, Ricles JM, Sause R (2004) Experimental studies on full-scale post-tensioned steel moment connections. In: 13th world conference on earthquake engineering. Vancouver, B.C., Canada

    Google Scholar 

  68. Gattulli V, Lampis G, Marcari G, Paolone A (2014) Simulations of FRP reinforcement in masonry panels and application to a historic facade. Eng Struct 75:604–618. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2014.06.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Ghobadi MS, Ghassemieh M, Mazroi A, Abolmaali A (2009) Seismic performance of ductile welded connections using T-stiffener. J Constr Steel Res 65:766–775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.05.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Gilmore AT, Bertero VV, Youssef NFG (1996) Seismic rehabilitation of infilled non‐ductile frame buildings using post‐tensioned steel braces. Earthq Spectra 12:863–882

    Google Scholar 

  71. Gilstrap JM, Dolan CW (1998) Out-of-plane bending of FRP-reinforced masonry walls. Compos Sci Technol 58:1277–1284. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00007-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Görgülü T, Tama YS, Yilmaz S et al (2012) Strengthening of reinforced concrete structures with external steel shear walls. J Constr Steel Res 70:226–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCSR.2011.08.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Gusta S (2015) Tragedy in zolitude—a lesson for contemporary society. Aleksandras Stulginskis University

    Google Scholar 

  74. Halder L, Dutta SC, Debnath P, Sharma RP (2021a) Seismic vulnerability assessment of low-rise unreinforced masonry buildings in Northeast India considering variability of material properties. Asian J Civil Eng 22:843–863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-021-00350-7

  75. Halder L, Dutta SC, Sharma RP (2020) Damage study and seismic vulnerability assessment of existing masonry buildings in Northeast India. J Build Eng 29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101190

  76. Halder L, Dutta SC, Sharma RP, Bhattacharya S (2021b) Lessons learnt from post-earthquake damage study of Northeast India and Nepal during last ten years: 2021 Assam earthquake, 2020 Mizoram earthquake, 2017 Ambasa earthquake, 2016 Manipur earthquake, 2015 Nepal earthquake, and 2011 Sikkim earthquake. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106990

  77. Hamed E, Rabinovitch O (2010) Failure characteristics of FRP-strengthened masonry walls under out-of-plane loads. Eng Struct 32:2134–2145. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2010.03.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Harris JR, Price HJ, Hutchinson DA, et al (2008) NEHRP workshop on meeting the challenges of existing buildings

    Google Scholar 

  79. Hernández ET, Carrera JSG (2020) Damage assessment and seismic behavior of steel buildings during the Mexico earthquake of 19 September 2017. Earthq Spectra 36:250–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293019878186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Huang KF, la Liu X (2014) Effects of temperature variations on safety of reinforced concrete structures during construction. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ Sci 19:139–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12204-014-1482-X/METRICS

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Iqbal S, Islam N (2022) Seismic base isolation of 7 storey RC structure using single friction pendulum system. Struct Int 27:200–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04793-0_15/COVER

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. IS 4326 (1993) Earthquake resistant design and construction of buildings-code of practice (Second Revision). New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  83. IS 13827 (1993) Improving earthquake resistance of earthen buildings—guidelines. New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  84. IS 13828 (1993) Improving earthquake resistance of low strength masonry buildings—guidelines. New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  85. IS 13920 (1993) Ductile detailing of reinforced concrete structures subjected to seismic forces—code of practice. New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  86. IS 13935 (2009) Seismic evaluation, repair and strengthening of masonry buildings—guidelines. New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  87. Islam ABMS, Jumaat MZ, Ahmmad R, ud Darain KM (2015) Retrofitting of vulnerable RC structures by base isolation technique. Earthq Struct 9:603–623. https://doi.org/10.12989/EAS.2015.9.3.603

  88. Ismail M, Muhammad B, Ismail MEG (2010) Compressive strength loss and reinforcement degradations of reinforced concrete structure due to long-term exposure. Constr Build Mater 24:898–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2009.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Ismail N, Khattak N (2015) Reconnaissance report on the Mw 7.5 Hindu Kush earthquake of 26th October 2015 and the subsequent aftershocks

    Google Scholar 

  90. Issa CA, Debs P (2007) Experimental study of epoxy repairing of cracks in concrete. Constr Build Mater 21:157–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.06.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Kahn L (1984) Shotcrete retrofit for unreinforced brick masonry. In: 8th WCEE. USA, pp 583–590

    Google Scholar 

  92. Kamde DK, Pillai RG (2020) Effect of sunlight/ultraviolet exposure on the corrosion of Fusion-Bonded Epoxy (FBE) coated steel rebars in concrete. Corrosion 76:843–860. https://doi.org/10.5006/3588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Kaplan H, Yilmaz S, Nohutcu H et al (2008) Experimental study on the use of old tyres for seismic strengthening of masonry structures. In: 14th world conference on earthquake engineering. Beijing, China

    Google Scholar 

  94. Karapetrou ST, Fotopoulou SD, Pitilakis KD (2017) Seismic vulnerability of RC buildings under the effect of aging. Procedia Environ Sci 38:461–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2017.03.137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Karayannis CG, Chalioris CE, Sideris KK (1998) Effectiveness of RC beam-column connection repair using epoxy resin injections. J Earthquake Eng 2:217–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469809350320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Karic A, Atalić J, Kolbitsch A (2022) Seismic vulnerability of historic brick masonry buildings in Vienna. Bull Earthq Eng 20:4117–4145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01367-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Khabit IF, Mahin SA, Pister KS (1998) Seismic behavior of concentrically braced steel frames. Report No UCB/EERC-88/01. Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  98. Kiamanesh R, Abolmaali A, Ghassemieh M (2010) The effect of stiffeners on the strain patterns of the welded connection zone. J Constr Steel Res 66:19–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.07.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Korany Y, Drysdale R (2006) Rehabilitation of masonry walls using unobtrusive FRP techniques for enhanced out-of-plane seismic resistance. J Compos Constr 10:213–222. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2006)10:3(213)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Krauss PD, Scanlon JM, Hanson MA (1995) Evaluation of injection materials for the repair of deep cracks in concrete structures

    Google Scholar 

  101. Kumar GR, Satish Kumar SR, Kalyanaraman V (2007) Behaviour of frames with Non-Buckling bracings under earthquake loading. J Constr Steel Res 63:254–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2006.04.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Kuzik MD, Elwi AE, Cheng JJR (2003) Cyclic flexure tests of masonry walls reinforced with glass fiber reinforced polymer sheets. J Compos Constr 7:20–30. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2003)7:1(20)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Leelataviwat S (1998) Drift and yield mechanism based seismic design and upgrading of steel moment frames

    Google Scholar 

  104. Leon RT, Yang C-S (2003) Special inverted-v-braced frames with suspended zipper struts. Georgia Institute of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  105. Li A, Assih T, Delmas Y (2000) Influence of the adhesive thickness and steel plate thickness on the behaviour of strengthened concrete beams. J Adhes Sci Technol 14:1639–1656. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856100742456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Li P, Zhou Z, Chen L, et al (2019) Research on dust suppression technology of shotcrete based on new spray equipment and process optimization. Adv Civil Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4831215

  107. Lieping YE, Zhe QU (2009) Failure mechanism and its control of building structures under earthquakes based on structural system concept

    Google Scholar 

  108. Liu H, Wang X, Jiao Y (2016) Effect of temperature variation on modal frequency of reinforced concrete slab and beam in cold regions. Shock Vib. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4792786

  109. LRFD (1999) Specification for structural steel buildings

    Google Scholar 

  110. Lu Y (2019) Impact on reinforced concrete structures. Encycl Continuum Mech 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53605-6_227-1

  111. Ma P, Xin R, Yao J (2021) Assessment of failure mode and seismic performance of damaged masonry structures retrofitted with grout-injected ferrocement overlay reinforcement (GFOR). Constr Build Mater 305:124778. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2021.124778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Maalej M, Lin VWJ, Nguyen MP, Quek ST (2010) Engineered cementitious composites for effective strengthening of unreinforced masonry walls. Eng Struct 32:2432–2439. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2010.04.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Macabuag J (2007) An introduction to modelling and retrofitting of non-engineered masonry buildings under seismic loading

    Google Scholar 

  114. Macabuag J, Guragain R, Bhattacharya S (2012) Seismic retrofitting of non-engineered masonry in rural Nepal. Proc Inst Civ Eng Struct Build 165:273–286. https://doi.org/10.1680/stbu.10.00015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Man L (2008) Improving the earthquake resistance of non-engineered adobe masonry buildings. Oxford University

    Google Scholar 

  116. Mardani A, Dehkordi MR, Moghadam AS, Yekrangnia M (2018) Example of a two-story unreinforced masonry building retrofitted by shotcrete. In: Advanced design examples of seismic retrofit of structures. Elsevier, pp 13–118

    Google Scholar 

  117. Masri AC, Goel SC (1996) Seismic design and testing of an RC slab-column frame strengthened by steel bracing. Earthq Spectra 12:645–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Michiels T, Adriaenssens S, Dejong M (2019) Form finding of corrugated shell structures for seismic design and validation using non-linear pushover analysis. Eng Struct 181:362–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2018.12.043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  119. Michiels T, Adriaenssens S, Jorquera-Lucerga JJ (2017) Parametric study of masonry shells form-found for seismic loading. J Int Assoc Shell Spatial Struct 58:267–275. https://doi.org/10.20898/J.IASS.2017.194.892

  120. Mosallam AS (2007) Out-of-plane flexural behavior of unreinforced red brick walls strengthened with FRP composites. Compos B Eng 38:559–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2006.07.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. Moudi M, Yan S, Bahador B et al (2019) Statistical model for earthquake economic loss estimation using GDP and DPI: a case study from Iran. Qual Quant 53:583–598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0776-8

  122. Mulas MG, Perotti F, Coronelli D et al (2013) The partial collapse of “Casa dello Studente” during L’Aquila 2009 earthquake. Eng Fail Anal 34:566–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.02.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  123. Narayan S, Shrimali MK, Bharti SD, Datta TK (2018) Collapse of damaged steel building frames because of earthquakes. J Perform Constructed Facil 32. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0001125

  124. Nayak S, Banerjee S, Das S (2018) Augmenting out-of-plane behaviour of masonry wallet using PP-band and steel wire mesh. In: IOP conference series: materials science and engineering. Institute of Physics Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  125. Nayak S, Dutta SC (2016) Improving seismic performance of masonry structures with openings by polypropylene bands and L-shaped reinforcing bars. J Perform Constr Facil 30:04015003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0000733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Nayak S, Dutta SC (2016) Failure of masonry structures in earthquake: a few simple cost effective techniques as possible solutions. Eng Struct 106:53–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.10.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  127. NDMA (2014) Seismic retrofitting of deficient buildings and structures. India

    Google Scholar 

  128. NIST (2012) program plan for the development of seismic design guidelines for port container, wharf, and cargo systems

    Google Scholar 

  129. NIST (2013) Review of past performance and further development of modeling techniques for collapse assessment of existing reinforced concrete buildings.

    Google Scholar 

  130. Oyguc R (2016) Seismic performance of RC school buildings after 2011 Van earthquakes. Bull Earthq Eng 14:821–847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9857-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  131. Oyguc R, Oyguc E (2017) 2011 Van earthquakes: lessons from damaged masonry structures. J Perform Constructed Facil 31. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0001057

  132. Padalu PKVR, Singh Y, Das S (2020) Cyclic two-way out-of-plane testing of unreinforced masonry walls retrofitted using composite materials. Constr Build Mater 238:117784. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2019.117784

  133. Padalu PKVR, Singh Y, Das S (2019) Out-of-plane flexural behaviour of masonry wallettes strengthened using FRP composites and externally bonded grids: Comparative study. Composites Part B 176. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2019.107302

  134. Pekelnicky R, Poland C (2012) seismic evaluation and retrofit rehabilitation of existing buildings. In: SEAOC 2012 convention proceedings

    Google Scholar 

  135. Perera R, Gómez S, Alarcón E (2004) Experimental and analytical study of masonry infill reinforced concrete frames retrofitted with steel braces. J Struct Eng 130:2032–2039. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2004)130:12(2032)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  136. Piekarczyk M, Grec R (2012) Application of adhesive bonding in steel and aluminium structures. Arch Civ Eng 58:309–329. https://doi.org/10.2478/v.10169-012-0018-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  137. Power A (2008) Does demolition or refurbishment of old and inefficient homes help to increase our environmental, social and economic viability? Energy Policy 36:4487–4501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  138. Prakash SS, Alagusundaramoorthy P (2008) Load resistance of masonry wallettes and shear triplets retrofitted with GFRP composites. Cem Concr Compos 30:745–761. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEMCONCOMP.2007.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  139. Pugsley AG (1951) Concepts of safety in structural Engineering, Pugsley on concepts of safety in structural engineering.

    Google Scholar 

  140. Pushpakumara B, Mendis W, de Silva S (2016) Bamboo as a new retrofitting material for existing masonry walls with improving the walls aesthetic view. Built Environ Spatial Sci

    Google Scholar 

  141. Roca P, Araiza G (2010) Shear response of brick masonry small assemblages strengthened with bonded FRP laminates for in-plane reinforcement. Constr Build Mater 24:1372–1384. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2010.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  142. Roeder CW, Banerjee S, Jung DR, Smith SK (1996) The role of building foundations in seismic retrofit. Earthq Spectra (EERI) 12:925–942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  143. Scozzese F, Terracciano G, Zona A, Corte GD, Dall’Asta A, Landolfo R (2018) Modeling and seismic response analysis of italian code-conforming single-storey steel buildings. J Earthq Eng 22:2104–2133. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2018.1528913

  144. Sen D (2017) Behaviour and strength of RC columns retrofitted with steel angles and strips under eccentric axial loads. Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology

    Google Scholar 

  145. Shrive NG (2006) The use of fibre reinforced polymers to improve seismic resistance of masonry. Constr Build Mater 20:269–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2005.08.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  146. da Silva LS, Silva LC, Tankova T, Craveiro HD, Simões R, Costa R, D’Aniello M, Landolfo R (2021) Performance of modular hybrid cold-formed/tubular structural system. Structures 30:1006–1019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.01.066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  147. Sonuvar M, Ozcebe G, Ersoy U (2004) Rehabilitation of reinforced concrete frames with reinforced concrete infills. ACI Struct J 101. https://doi.org/10.14359/13335

  148. Sumerente G, Lovon H, Tarque N, Chácara C (2020) Assessment of combined in-plane and out-of-plane fragility functions for adobe masonry buildings in the peruvian andes. Front Built Environ 6:52. https://doi.org/10.3389/FBUIL.2020.00052/BIBTEX

    Article  Google Scholar 

  149. Suwal R (2018) Failure study of reinforced concrete buildings of kathmandu valley in gorkha earthquake 2015. Int J Modern Res Eng Manag (IJMREM) 2581–4540

    Google Scholar 

  150. Taghdi M, Bruneau M, Saatcioglu M (2000) Seismic retrofitting of low-rise masonry and concrete walls using steel strips. J Struct Eng 126:1017–1025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:9(1017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  151. Takeuchi T, Wada A (2018) Review of buckling-restrained brace design and application to tall buildings. Int J High-Rise Build 7:187–195

    Google Scholar 

  152. Taljsten B (1997) Strengthening of beams by plate bonding. J Mater Civil Eng 9

    Google Scholar 

  153. Tan KH, Patoary MKH (2004) Strengthening of masonry walls against out-of-plane loads using fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement. J Compos Constr 8:79–87. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2004)8:1(79)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  154. Tartaglia R, Milone A, Prota A, Landolfo R (2022) seismic retrofitting of existing industrial steel buildings: a case-study. Materials 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15093276

  155. Tetley R, Madabhushi G (2007) Vulnerability of adobe buildings under earthquake loading. In: Proceedings of the international conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering. Greece

    Google Scholar 

  156. Tetteh AR, Liang Y (2020) Repair of cracks on concrete structures. Int J Sci Res (IJSR) 9:82–92. https://doi.org/10.21275/sr20324212517

  157. Thermou GE, Elnashai AS (2006) Seismic retrofit schemes for RC structures and local-global consequences. Prog Struct Mat Eng 8:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  158. Thorburn LJ, Kulak GL, Montgomery CJ (1983) Analysis of steel plate shear walls. Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  159. Tsavdaridis KD (2014) Strengthening techniques: code-deficient steel buildings. Encyclopedia of earthquake engineering. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–26

    Google Scholar 

  160. Tsavdaridis KD, D’Mello C, Huo BY (2013) Experimental and computational study of the vertical shear behaviour of partially encased perforated steel beams. Eng Struct 56:805–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.04.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  161. Tsonos AG (2002) Seismic repair of reinforced concrete beam-column subassemblages of modern structures by epoxy injection technique. Struct Eng Mech 14:543–563. https://doi.org/10.12989/SEM.2002.14.5.543

  162. Turer A, Korkmaz SZ, Korkmaz HH (2007) Performance improvement studies of masonry houses using elastic post-tensioning straps. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 36:683–705. https://doi.org/10.1002/EQE.649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  163. Turk AM (2013) Seismic response analysis of masonry minaret and possible strengthening by fiber reinforced cementitious matrix (FRCM) materials. Adv Mater Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/952497

  164. Turner BA (1978) Man-made disasters. Wykeham Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  165. Valluzzi MR, Tinazzi D, Modena C (2002) Shear behavior of masonry panels strengthened by FRP laminates. Constr Build Mater 16:409–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-0618(02)00043-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  166. Warner J (1995) Understanding shotcrete—the fundamentals. Concr Int 17(5)

    Google Scholar 

  167. Wasserman I (2019) Behaviour of concrete structures upon the impact of UV and rain of natural acidity. J Int Sci Publ: Mater Methods Technol (Online) 13:210–229

    Google Scholar 

  168. Willis CR, Yang Q, Seracino R, Griffith MC (2009) Damaged masonry walls in two-way bending retrofitted with vertical FRP strips. Constr Build Mater 23:1591–1604. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2007.09.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  169. Yadav P, Khursheed S, Solanki SK, Kumar Paul V (2022) A review of retrofitting techniques of masonry structures.

    Google Scholar 

  170. Yang CS, Leon RT, DesRoches R (2008) Design and behavior of zipper-braced frames. Eng Struct 30:1092–1100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.06.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  171. Ying B (2021) Investigating the behavior of boundary elements in steel shear walls with different connections. Stavební Obzor—Civil Eng J 30. https://doi.org/10.14311/cej.2021.04.0071

  172. Yılmaz S, Tama YS, Kaplan H, Caliskan O, Solak A (2011) Experimental program on design and application of external retrofit walls for low ductility RC frames. In: 4th international conference on advances in experimental structural engineering. Isprira, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  173. Yossef NM (2015) Strengthening steel I-beams by welding steel plates before or while loading. Int J Eng Res Technol (IJERT) 4

    Google Scholar 

  174. Zhao B, Taucer F, Rossetto T (2009) Field investigation on the performance of building structures during the 12 May 2008 Wenchuan earthquake in China. Eng Struct 31:1707–1723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (ISM), Dhanbad, India

    Pranoy Debnath & Sekhar Chandra Dutta

Authors
  1. Pranoy Debnath
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sekhar Chandra Dutta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sekhar Chandra Dutta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology and Science (BITS) Pilani, Pilani, Rajasthan, India

    Shamsher Bahadur Singh

  2. Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

    C. V. R. Murty

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Debnath, P., Dutta, S.C. (2024). Seismic Retrofitting and Strengthening of Structures. In: Singh, S.B., Murty, C.V.R. (eds) RC Structures Strengthened with FRP for Earthquake Resistance. Composites Science and Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0102-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0102-5_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-97-0101-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-97-0102-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation