Skip to main content

Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Foraminotomy/Foraminoplasty

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Core Techniques of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery
  • 385 Accesses

Abstract

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a disease that refers to a condition in which the spinal canal is narrowed and causes compression of the nerve root and thecal sac. LSS is usually encountered in patients aged 60 years or older and is the most common cause of back pain. The condition of this disease was first described by Antonie Patel in 1803. In the 1950s, Verbiest first named the term spinal stenosis, and also described the factors associated with this disease.

Anatomically, LSS is classified into lateral recess or subarticular, foraminal, and extraforaminal stenosis, including the central, depending on the area being compressed. Foraminal stenosis (FS) is caused by a decrease in the intervertebral disc space, the formation of osteophytes of vertebral endplate and facet joint, and herniation of the disc.

In the case of minimally invasive surgery such as endoscopic surgery, it has been confirmed that postoperative muscle damage can be reduced depending on the wound size and approach direction and method. As a treatment for FS using this endoscopic approach, TELF/TELD (Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy/discectomy) is a technique that enables the selective removal of neural compromising structure that causes the patient’s symptoms within the range that guarantees the stability of the facet joint without damaging the muscles around the spine. While the first endoscopic foraminotomy was reported in the early 2000s, technical and technological advances allowed a safer and more efficient procedure, adopting an “outside-in” approach to the stenotic foramen.

When considering endoscopic foraminotomy, the site of stenosis can come in various forms, and the technique requires decompression in two main directions in technical aspects. The first half consists of superior articular process (SAP) decompression and lateral recess decompression. The second half consists of 3C (central, caudal, and cranial) technique, osteophyte resection, and disc fragmentectomy in that order. Afterwards, when a patient is encountered in the treatment room, it is necessary to classify it into one of eight subtypes, identify important points, and then establish a surgical strategy. And then, the endoscopic surgery method suitable for each case can be selected and performed.

Endoscopic decompression (Lateral recess decompression/Foraminotomy) may be an excellent tool for alleviating the pain. It offers a more powerful and less morbid alternative approach to spinal pathology that ultimately elevates the standard of care. This technique may be an excellent procedure for patients who are not willing to get lumbar fusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Chen KT, Jabri H, Lokanath YK, Song MS, Kim JS. The evolution of interlaminar endoscopic spine surgery. J Spine Surg. 2020;6(2):502–12. https://doi.org/10.21037/jss.2019.10.06.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Taylor H, McGregor AH, Medhi-Zadeh S, Richards S, Kahn N, Zadeh JA, et al. The impact of self-retaining retractors on the paraspinal muscles during posterior spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002;27(24):2758–62. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200212150-00004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sihvonen T, Herno A, Paljarvi L, Airaksinen O, Partanen J, Tapaninaho A. Local denervation atrophy of paraspinal muscles in postoperative failed back syndrome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993;18(5):575–81. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199304000-00009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rantanen J, Hurme M, Falck B, Alaranta H, Nykvist F, Lehto M, et al. The lumbar multifidus muscle five years after surgery for a lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993;18(5):568–74. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199304000-00008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gejo R, Matsui H, Kawaguchi Y, Ishihara H, Tsuji H. Serial changes in trunk muscle performance after posterior lumbar surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999;24(10):1023–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199905150-00017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Singh R, Yadav SK, Sood S, Yadav RK, Rohilla R. Magnetic resonance imaging of lumbar trunk parameters in chronic low backache patients and healthy population: a comparative study. Eur Spine J. 2016;25(9):2864–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4698-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Katsu M, Ohba T, Ebata S, Oba H, Koyama K, Haro H. Potential role of paraspinal musculature in the maintenance of spinopelvic alignment in patients with adult spinal deformities. Clin Spine Surg. 2020;33(2):E76–80. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000862.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Katsu M, Ohba T, Ebata S, Haro H. Comparative study of the paraspinal muscles after OVF between the insufficient union and sufficient union using MRI. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018;19(1):143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2064-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Panjabi MM. The stabilizing system of the spine. Part II. Neutral zone and instability hypothesis. J Spinal Disord. 1992;5(4):390–6; discussion 7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002517-199212000-00002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tacconi L, Signorelli F, Giordan E. Is full endoscopic lumbar discectomy less invasive than conventional surgery? A randomized MRI study. World Neurosurg. 2020;138:E867–E75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.03.123.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Khandge AV, Sharma SB, Kim JS. The evolution of transforaminal endoscopic spine surgery. World Neurosurg. 2021;145:643–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.08.096.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ahn Y, Oh HK, Kim H, Lee SH, Lee HN. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy: an advanced surgical technique and clinical outcomes. Neurosurgery. 2014;75(2):124–33; discussion 32–3. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000000361.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ahn Y, Keum HJ, Lee SG, Lee SW. Transforaminal endoscopic decompression for lumbar lateral recess stenosis: an advanced surgical technique and clinical outcomes. World Neurosurg. 2019;125:e916–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee HY, Ahn Y, Kim DY, Shin SW, Lee SH. Percutaneous ventral decompression for L4-L5 degenerative spondylolisthesis in medically compromised elderly patients: technical case report. Neurosurgery. 2004;55(2):435. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000130040.07472.dc.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schubert M, Hoogland T. Endoscopic transforaminal nucleotomy with foraminoplasty for lumbar disk herniation. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2005;17(6):641–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00064-005-1156-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim HS, Kim JY, Wu PH, Jang IT. Effect of dorsal root ganglion retraction in endoscopic lumbar decompressive surgery for foraminal pathology: a retrospective cohort study of interlaminar contralateral endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy and discectomy versus transforaminal endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy and discectomy. World Neurosurg. 2021;148:e101–e14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.12.176.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen KT, Song MS, Kim JS. How I do it? Interlaminar contralateral endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy assisted with the O-arm navigation. Acta Neurochir. 2020;162(1):121–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-019-04104-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim JY, Kim HS, Jeon JB, Lee JH, Park JH, Jang IT. The novel technique of uniportal endoscopic interlaminar contralateral approach for coexisting L5-S1 lateral recess, foraminal, and extraforaminal stenosis and its clinical outcomes. J Clin Med. 2021;10(7) https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10071364.

  19. Kim J-S, Yeung A, Lokanath YK, Lewandrowski K-U. Is Asia truly a hotspot of contemporary minimally invasive and endoscopic spinal surgery? J Spine Surg. 2020;6(Suppl 1):S224–S36. https://doi.org/10.21037/jss.2019.12.13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Akbary K, Kim J-S. Recent technical advancements of endoscopic spine surgery with disparate or disruptive technologies and patents. World Neurosurg. 2021;145:693–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.07.058.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

1 Electronic Supplementary Material

Case 3 operation (MP4 143834 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kim, JH., Kim, JS., Kim, YJ., Ryu, KS. (2023). Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Foraminotomy/Foraminoplasty. In: Ahn, Y., Park, JK., Park, CK. (eds) Core Techniques of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9849-2_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9849-2_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-9848-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-9849-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics