Abstract
Promoting an increase in motivation in first-year undergraduate students not only results in an improvement in their follow-up, performance, and therefore their satisfaction, but can also lead to a reduction in early dropout due to any situation of frustration or poor results. To confirm the initial assumption, the present research work demonstrates how the work of certain competencies in a transversal way allows the first-time student to increase empathy with the degree while improving interpersonal relationships with their peers being an aspect that significantly affects the intrinsic motivation of the student. The chapter focuses on analyzing the results of two transversal tasks carried out through a teamwork process and monitored during the first year of the Bachelor's Degree in Architecture. For the analysis, we used a mixed approach that allowed us to identify the strengths (enhanced in the new iterations) and weaknesses of the proposal on which we are already acting in subsequent replications of these types of transversal activities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ABET. (2019). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2020–2021 | ABET. https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2020-2021/. Accessed 20 Apr 2021
Adell, J. M., & García Santos, A. (2005). Gaudí y las bovedas de las escuelas de la Sagrada Familia. Informes De La Construcción, 56, 31–45. https://doi.org/10.3989/ic.2005.v57.i496.461
Alaez, M., Romero, S., & Fonseca, D., et al. (2021). Auto-assessment of teamwork and communication competences improvement applying active methodologies. comparing results between students of first academic year in architecture, economics and engineering degrees. In Zaphiris, P. I. A. (Ed.) Lecture notes in computer science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (pp. 193–209). Cham, Wash: Springer.
ARLEP LSD. (2020). NCA, Nuevo Contexto de Aprendizaje, La Salle A. La Salle ARLEP, Madrid.
Beqiri, M. S., Chase, N. M., & Bishka, A. (2009). Online course delivery: An empirical investigation of factors affecting student satisfaction. Journal of Education for Business, 85, 95–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832320903258527
Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., et al. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26, 369–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139
Bottero, M., Bragaglia, F., & Caruso, N., et al. (2020). Experimenting community impact evaluation (CIE) for assessing urban regeneration programmes: The case study of the area 22@ Barcelona. Cities, 99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102464
Bunce, D. M., Flens, E. A., & Neiles, K. Y. (2010). How long can students pay attention in class? A study of student attention decline using clickers. Journal of Chemical Education, 87, 1438–1443. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed100409p
Centeno Hernáez, E. (2018). A hands-on experience of the use of active learning and some innovative teaching techniques in a basic engineering subject = Una experiencia práctica del uso de aprendizaje activo y técnicas docentes innovadoras en una asignatura básica de ingeniería. Teaching and Learning Innovation Journal = Revista de Innovación en la Enseñanza y el Aprendizaje, 2, 14. https://doi.org/10.18002/telein.v2i0.5456
Chan, C. K. Y., Zhao, Y., & Luk, L. Y. Y. (2017). A validated and reliable instrument investigating engineering students’ perceptions of competency in generic skills. Journal of Engineering Education, 106, 299–325. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20165
Escudero, D. F., Climent, A., Canaleta, X., & Vicent, L. (2016). Evaluación del método Scenario Centered Curriculum en función del perfil tecnológico del estudiante. Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS), 17, 67–88. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks20161736788
Fidalgo-Blanco, Á., Sein-Echaluce, M. L., García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Conde, M. Á. (2015). Using learning analytics to improve teamwork assessment. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 149–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.050
Fonseca, D., Martí, N., Redondo, E., et al. (2014). Relationship between student profile, tool use, participation, and academic performance with the use of augmented reality technology for visualized architecture models. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 434–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.03.006
Fonseca, D., Redondo, E., & Villagrasa, S. (2015). Mixed-methods research: A new approach to evaluating the motivation and satisfaction of university students using advanced visual technologies. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14, 311–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0361-4
Fonseca, D., Valls, F., Redondo, E., & Villagrasa, S. (2016). Informal interactions in 3D education: Citizenship participation and assessment of virtual urban proposals. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 504–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.032
Fonseca, D., Redondo, E., Valls, F., & Villagrasa, S. (2017). Technological adaptation of the student to the educational density of the course. A case study: 3D architectural visualization. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 599–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.048
Fonseca, D., Conde, M. Á., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2018). Improving the information society skills: Is knowledge accessible for all? Universal Access in the Information Society, 17, 229–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0548-6
Fonseca, D., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2019). Interactive and collaborative technological ecosystems for improving academic motivation and engagement. Universal Access in the Information Society.
Fonseca, D., Necchi, S., & Simón, D., et al. (2019). Evaluación mixta de actividades transversales en el grado de Arquitectura basadas en la metodología de la “Lesson Study”.
Fonseca, D., Cavalcanti, J., & Peña, E., et al. (2021). Mixed assessment of virtual serious games applied in architectural and urban design education. Sensors, 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21093102
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., et al. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Corell, A. (2020). La COVID-19: ¿enzima de la transformación digital de la docencia o reflejo de una crisis metodológica y competencial en la educación superior?
García-Peñalvo, F. J., Corell, A., Abella-García, V., & Grande, M. (2020). Online assessment in higher education in the time of COVID-19. Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS), 21, 26. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.23086
International Engineering Alliance. (2014). Celebrating international engineering education standards and recognition. https://www.ieagreements.org/assets/Uploads/Documents/History/25YearsWashingtonAccord-A5booklet-FINAL.pdf. Accessed 20 Apr 2021
Jones, B. D. (2009). Motivating students to engage in learning: The MUSIC model of academic motivation. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 21, 272–285.
Jutgla, E. D., & Pallares-Barbera, M. (2015). Industrial heritage, economic revitalization and urban compactness in Poblenou-22@Barcelona. A new Barcelona model? Boletin de la Asociacion de Geografos Espanoles. https://doi.org/10.21138/bage.1889
Kahu, E. R., & Nelson, K. (2018). Student engagement in the educational interface: Understanding the mechanisms of student success. Higher Education Research and Development, 37, 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1344197
Kolmos, A., Holgaard, J. E., & Clausen, N. R. (2020). Progression of student self-assessed learning outcomes in systemic PBL. European Journal of Engineering Education, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2020.1789070
Land, S. M., & Hannafin, M. J. (1996). Student-centered learning environments: foundations, assumptions, and implications.
Moore, J. L., Dickson-Deane, C., & Galyen, K. (2011). e-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same? The Internet and Higher Education, 14, 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IHEDUC.2010.10.001
Necchi, S., Peña, E., Fonseca, D., & Arnal, M. (2020). Improving teamwork competence applied in the building and construction engineering final degree project. International Journal of Engineering Education, 36, 328–340.
Partanen, L. (2020). How student-centred teaching in quantum chemistry affects students’ experiences of learning and motivation - A self-determination theory perspective. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21, 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9rp00036d
Passow, H. J. (2012). Which ABET competencies do engineering graduates find most important in their work? Journal of Engineering Education, 101, 95–118. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00043.x
Passow, H. J., & Passow, C. H. (2017). What competencies should undergraduate engineering programs emphasize? A systematic review. Journal of Engineering Education, 106, 475–526. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20171
Peña, E., Fonseca, D., Marti, N., & Ferrándiz, J. (2018). Relationship between specific professional competences and learning activities of the building and construction engineering degree final project. International Journal of Engineering Education, 34, 924–939.
Peña, E., Fonseca, D., & Martí, N. (2016). Relationship between learning indicators in the development and result of the building engineering degree final project. In ACM international conference proceeding series (pp 335–340).
Petchamé, J., Iriondo, I., & Riu, D., et al. (2020). Project based learning or the rethinking of an engineering subject: measuring motivation. In ACM international conference proceeding series.
Petchamé, J., Iriondo, I., & Canaleta, X., et al. (2021). Engaging ict engineering undergraduates in a management subject through first day of class activities: An empirical study. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13137440
Pique, J. M., Miralles, F., & Berbegal-Mirabent, J. (2019). Areas of innovation in cities: The evolution of 22@Barcelona. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, 10, 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKBD.2019.098227
Rodenbusch, S. E., Hernandez, P. R., Simmons, S. L., & Dolan, E. L. (2016). Early engagement in course-based research increases graduation rates and completion of science, engineering, and mathematics degrees. CBE Life Sciences Education, 15. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-03-0117
la Salle Distrito ARLEP. (2018). NCA, otra manera de hacer escuela.
Sanchez-Sepulveda, M. V., Torres-Kompen, R., Fonseca, D., & Franquesa-Sanchez, J. (2019). Methodologies of learning served by virtual reality: A case study in urban interventions. Applied Sciences (Switzerland) 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9235161
Sanchez-Sepulveda, M. V., Fonseca, D., García-Holgado, A., et al. (2020). Evaluation of an interactive educational system in urban knowledge acquisition and representation based on students’ profiles. Expert Systems, 37. https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12570
Strobel, J., van Barneveld, A. (2009). When is PBL More Effective? A Meta-synthesis of Meta-analyses When is PBL More Effective? A Meta-synthesis of Meta-analyses Comparing PBL to Conventional Classrooms Comparing PBL to Conventional Classrooms. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 3(1). Special Issue on the Efficacy of Problem-based Learning Article 4 https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1046
Valls, F., Redondo, E., & Sánchez, A., et al. (2017). Simulated environments in architecture education. Improving the student motivation. In Advances in intelligent systems and computing (pp. 235–243).
Villa Sánchez, A., & Poblete Ruiz, M. (2007). Una propuesta para la evaluación de las competencias genéricas. Estudios Sobre Educación, 16, 327.
Villegas, E., Fonseca, D., & Peña, E., et al. (2021). Qualitative assessment of effective gamification design processes using motivators to identify game mechanics. Sensors, 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21072556
Wagenaar, R. (2014). Competences and learning outcomes: A panacea for understanding the (new) role of Higher Education? Tuning Journal for Higher Education, 1, 279. https://doi.org/10.18543/tjhe-1(2)-2014pp279-302
Acknowledgements
This study is funded under the project “Improving social and collaborative competences of undergraduate students using active methodologies. A mixed assessment approach”, awarded at the 6th Call for Research Projects by Aristos Campus Mundus (ACM) in 2020, under ID code ACM2020_02.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fonseca, D., Necchi, S., Alaez, M., Romero, S. (2022). Improving the Motivation of First-Year Undergraduate Students Through Transversal Activities and Teamwork. In: García-Peñalvo, F.J., Sein-Echaluce, M.L., Fidalgo-Blanco, Á. (eds) Trends on Active Learning Methods and Emerging Learning Technologies. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7431-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7431-1_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-7430-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-7431-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)