Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Improving the information society skills: Is knowledge accessible for all?

  • Position Paper
  • Published:
Universal Access in the Information Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The emergence and popularization of information and communications technologies (ICT) is changing modern society and its educational landscape. ICT facilitates individuals’ ability to learn anywhere and at any time. In fact, by using ICT, access to knowledge acquisition is not restricted to formal contexts, such as academic institutions. This position paper reviews the educational contexts in which new learning strategies using ICT have been adapted, by focusing on how users access information and improve their digital skills. Our initial hypothesis is that in technological environments, learners use very specific devices and applications to access information, because content accessibility depends on both the user’s profiles and ICT. We demonstrate this through a case study applied in several Spanish university institutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dede, C.: Emerging influences of information technology on school curriculum. J. Curric. Stud. 32(2), 282–303 (2000). doi:10.1080/002202700182763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kreijns, K., Acker, F.V., Vermeulen, M., Buuren, H.V.: What stimulates teachers to integrate ICT in their pedagogical practices? The use of digital learning materials in education. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29, 217–225 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.08.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shen, C.X., Liu, R.D., Wang, D.: Why are children attracted to the Internet? The role of need satisfaction perceived online and perceived in daily real life. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29, 185–192 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.08.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fonseca, D., Martí, N., Redondo, E., Navarro, I., Sánchez, A.: Relationship between student profile, tool use, participation, and academic performance with the use of Augmented Reality technology for visualized architecture models. Comput. Hum. Behav. 31, 434–445 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.03.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Prensky, M.: Digital natives, digital immigrants, part 1. Horizon 9(5), 1–6 (2001). doi:10.1108/10748120110424816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Van Dijk, J., Hacker, K.: The digital divide as a complex and dynamic phenomenon. Inf. Soc. 19(4), 315–326 (2003). doi:10.1080/01972240390227895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bennett, S., Maton, K., Kervin, L.: The ‘digital natives’ debate: a critical review of the evidence. Br. J. Edu. Technol. 39(5), 775–786 (2008). doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Stephanidis, C.: Adaptive techniques for universal access. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 11(1–2), 159–179 (2001). doi:10.1023/A:1011144232235

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Bonfadelli, H.: The Internet and knowledge gaps a theoretical and empirical investigation. Eur. J. Commun. 17(1), 65–84 (2002). doi:10.1177/0267323102017001607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Warschauer, M.: Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Australian National Audit Office: Innovation in the public sector: enabling better performance, driving new directions. Australian, National Audit Office, Canberra, Commonwealth of Australia, Barton (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. García-Peñalvo, F.J., Colomo-Palacios, R.: Innovative teaching methods in engineering. Eng. Educ. 31(3), 689–693 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vanderlinde, R., Van Braak, J.: The gap between educational research and practice: views of teachers, school leaders, intermediaries and researchers. Br. Educ. Res. J. 36(2), 299–316 (2010). doi:10.1080/01411920902919257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sein-Echaluce, M.L., Fidalgo, A., García-Peñalvo, F.J.: Buenas prácticas de Innovación Educativa: artículos seleccionados del II Congreso Internacional sobre Aprendizaje, Innovación y Competitividad, CINAIC 2013. RED. Revista de Educación a Distancia. 44, 1–5 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sun, J., Hsu, Y.: Effect of interactivity on learner perceptions in Web-based instruction. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29(1), 171–184 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.08.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Giesbers, B., Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D., Gijselaers, W.: Investigating the relations between motivation, tool use, participation, and performance in an e-learning course using web-videoconferencing. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29(1), 285–292 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.09.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rømen, D., Svanæs, D.: Validating WCAG versions 1.0 and 2.0 through usability testing with disabled users. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 11(4), 375–385 (2012). doi:10.1007/s10209-011-0259-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lu, Z.: Learning with Mobile Technologies, Handheld Devices, and Smart Phones: Innovative Methods, pp. 1–272. IGI-Global, Hershey (2012). doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-0936-5

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Parsons, D.: Refining Current Practices in Mobile and Blended Learning: New Applications, pp. 1–334. IGI-Global, Hershey (2012). doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-0053-9

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Kuo, Y.F., Yen, S.N.: Towards an understanding of the behavioral intention to use 3G mobile valued-added services. Comput. Hum. Behav. 25(1), 103–110 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.07.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tsekleves, E., Whitham, R., Kondo, K., Hill, A.: Investigating pay-as-you-go address issues of trust, privacy and security around media use at home. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 12(2), 217–231 (2013). doi:10.1007/s10209-012-0270-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kavita, E.T.: Investigation of age-differentiated spatial semantic elaboration strategies for communicating route instructions. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 12(2), 175–190 (2013). doi:10.1007/s10209-012-0274-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fernandes, H., Conceição, N., Paredes, H., Pereira, A., Araújo, P., Barroso, J.: Providing accessibility to blind people using GIS. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 11(4), 399–407 (2012). doi:10.1007/s10209-011-0255-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rogers, D.L.: A paradigm shift: technology integration for higher education in the new millennium. Educ. Technol. Rev. 1, 19–33 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Redacción de Educaweb: El 52% de los docentes ha tenido problemas para utilizar las TIC en el aula debido a fallos técnicos. www.Scolartic.com. Retrieved 18 Mar 2013 (2013)

  26. Georgina, D.A., Olson, M.R.: Integration of technology in higher education: a review of faculty self-perceptions. Internet Higher Educ. 11, 1–8 (2007). doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hu, B.Y.: Book review: integrating technology into higher. Educ. Technol. Soc. 9(1), 359–360 (2006)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Milliken, J., Philip-Barnes, L.: Teaching and technology in higher education: student perceptions and personal reflections. J. Comput. Educ. 39(3), 223–235 (2002). doi:10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00042-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Fonseca, D., Canaleta, X., Climent, A.: Usability and satisfaction assessment of vocational training students in terms of their initial motivation. In: Mobile Comerce Course Using SCC Methodology. 12th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies, Lisbon, Accepted for publication (2017)

  30. Área, M., San Nicolás, M.B., Fariña, E.: Buenas prácticas de aulas virtuales en la docencia universitaria semipresencial. Revista de Teoría de la Educación Sociedad de la Información (TESI) 11(3), 7–31 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Massy, W.F., Zemsky, R.: Using information technology to enhance academic productivity. In: CAUSE Conference http://www.educase.edu/nlii/keydocs/massy.html. Retrieved 18 Mar 2013 (1995)

  32. Ruiz, M., Abella, V.: Creación de un blog educativo como herramienta TIC e instrumento TAC en el ámbito universitario. Revista de Teoría de la Educación Sociedad de la Información (TESI) 12(4), 53–70 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Dale, E.: Audiovisual Methods in Teaching, p.719. Dryden Press, New York (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Álvarez, P.: La Clase magistral se reinventa. Cinco Dias. http://cincodias.com/cincodias/2017/02/24/sentidos/1487958255_668523.html. Retrieved 26 Feb 2017 (2017)

  35. Torres, A.: El cerebro necesita emocionarse para aprender, El País. http://economia.elpais.com/economia/2016/07/17/actualidad/1468776267_359871.html. Retrieved 2 Feb 2017 (2016)

  36. Cramond, B.: Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and creativity—what is the connection? J. Creat. Behav. 28(3), 193–210 (1994). doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.1994.tb01191.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. White, H.A., Shah, P.: Uninhibited imaginations: creativity in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Pers. Individ. Differ. 40(6), 1121–1131 (2006). doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.11.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Forés, A., Ligioiz, M.: Descubrir la neurodidáctica. Ediciones UOC, Barcelona (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Vázquez, K.: ¿Qué fue de la revolución MOOC? El País. http://economia.elpais.com/economia/2014/10/08/actualidad/1412783861_083138.html. Retrieved 26 Feb 2017 (2014)

  40. Fonseca, D., Climent, A., Vicent, L., Canaleta, X.: Learning4Work. Designing a new evaluation system based on scenario centered curriculum methodology: the pre-test. In: Learning and Collaboration Technologies (LCT 2016), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 9753. Springer, Berlin (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-39483-1_1

  41. Fonseca, D., Redondo, E., Villagrasa, S., Canaleta, X.: Assessment of augmented visualization methods in multimedia engineering education. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 31(3), 736–750 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Fonseca, D., Redondo, E., Valls, F., Villagrasa, S.: Technological adaptation of the student to the educational density of the course. A case study: 3D architectural visualization. Comput. Hum. Behav. (2016). doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.048

    Google Scholar 

  43. L, Vicent, Villagrasa, S., Fonseca, D., Redondo, E.: Virtual learning scenarios for qualitative assessment in higher education 3D arts. J. Univ. Comput. Sci. 21(8), 1086–1105 (2015). doi:10.3217/jucs-021-08-1086

    Google Scholar 

  44. Menárguez, A.T.: Las ventajas de usar gafas de realidad virtual en el aula. El País. http://economia.elpais.com/economia/2017/02/27/actualidad/1488183754_722436.html. Retrieved 26 Feb 2017 (2017)

  45. Van Wetering, M.W.: Technology compass for education. Hos Smart ICT prepares our students for the future. Kennisnet Trend Report. https://www.kennisnet.nl/fileadmin/kennisnet/corporate/algemeen/Kennisnet_Trendreport_2016_2017.pdf. Retrieved 26 Feb 2017 (2016–2017)

  46. Instituto Nacional de Tecnologías Educativas y de Formación del Profesorado (2017). http://educalab.es/intef. Retrieved 26 Feb 2017

  47. Conde, M.Á.: Personalización del aprendizaje: Framework de servicios para la integración de aplicaciones online en los sistemas de gestión del aprendizaje. Tesis Doctoral, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca (2012)

  48. Comisión de las Comunicades Europeas: Hacer realidad un espacio europeo del aprendizaje permanente. Comunicación de la Comisión. 678 final (2001)

  49. Livingstone, D.: Exploring the icebergs of adult learning: findings of the first Canadian survey of informal learning practices. Can. J. Study Adult Educ. 3(2), 49–72 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Colardyn, D., Bjornavold, J.: Validation of formal, non-formal and informal learning: policy and practices in EU member states. Eur. J. Educ. 39(1), 21 (2004). doi:10.1111/j.0141-8211.2004.00167.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Attwell, G.: e-Portfolios—the DNA of the Personal Learning Environment? J. e-Learning Knowl. Soc. 3(2), 39–61 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Barrett, H., Carney, J.: Conflicting paradigms and competing purposes in electronic portfolio development. TaskStream web site (2005)

  53. Cole, D., Ryan, C.W., Kick, F.: Portfolios Across the Curriculum and Beyond. Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Weigel, V.B.: Deep Learning for a Digital Age: Technology’s Untapped Potential to Enrich Higher Education. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Chen, T.: Recommendations for creating and maintaining effective networked learning communities: a review of the literature. Int. J. Instr. Media 30(1), 35–44 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Avgeriou, P., Papasalouros, A., Retalis, S., Skordalakis, M.: Towards a pattern language for learning management systems. Educ. Technol. Soc. 6(2), 11–24 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  57. Prendes, M.P.: Plataformas de campus virtuales de Software Libre: Análisis compartivo de la situación actual de las Universidades Españoles. Informe del proyecto EA-2008-0257 de la Secretaría de Estado de Universidades e Investigación (2009)

  58. Arroway, P., Davenport, E., Guangning, X., Updegrove, D.: Educause Core Data Service Fiscal Year 2009 summary report. EDUCAUSE White Paper. EDUCAUSE (2010)

  59. Browne, T., Hewitt, R., Jenkins, M., Voce, J., Walker, R., Yip, H.: Survey of Technology Enhanced Learning for Higher Education in the UK. UCISA—Universities and Colleges Information System Asociation, Oxford (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Wexler, S., Dublin, L., Grey, N., Jagannathan, S., Karrer, T., Martinez, M., Mosher, B., Oakes, K., Barneveld, A.: Learning management systems. The good, the bad, the ugly,… and the truth. Guild Research 360 Degree Report. The eLearning Guild, Santa Rosa, CA (2008)

  61. Brown, J.S., Adler, R.P.: Minds on fire: open education, the long tail, and learning 2.0. Educ. Q. 42(6), 16–32 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Cuban, L.: Oversold and Underused: Computers in the Classroom. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Attwell, G.: The personal learning environments—the future of eLearning? eLearn. Pap. 2(1), 1–8 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  64. Ajjan, H., Hartshorne, R.: Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: theory and Empirical Tests. Internet Higher Educ. 11(2), 71–80 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Casquero, O., Portillo, J., Ovelar, R., Benito, M., Romo, J.: iPLE Network: an integrated eLearning 2.0 architecture from University’s perspective. Interact. Learn. Environ. 18(3), 293–308 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Mott, J., Wiley, D.: Open for learning: the CMS and the open learning network. Educ. Explor. Connect. Educ. Landsc. 15(2), 3–22 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  67. European-Union: Towards the European higher education area. In: Conference of Ministers responsible for Higher Education in 29 European countries, Bologna, Italy (1999)

  68. Fielding, R.T.: Architectural Styles and the Design of Network-Based Software Architectures. University of California, Irvine (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  69. Wilson, S., Liber, O., Johnson, M., Beauvoir, P., Sharples, P., Milligan, C.: Personal learning environments: challenging the dominant design of educational systems. J. e-Learning Knowl. Soc. 3(3), 27–38 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  70. Adell, J., Castañeda, L.: Los Entornos Personales de Aprendizaje (PLEs): una nueva manera de entender el aprendizaje. In: Roig Vila, R., Fiorucci, M. (eds.) Claves para la investigación en innovación y calidad educativas. La integración de las Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación y la Interculturalidad en las aulas. Marfil – Roma TRE Universita degli studi, Alcoy (2010)

  71. Schaffert, R., Hilzensauer, W.: On the way towards personal learning environments: seven crucial aspects. e-Learning Pap. 2(9), 1–11 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  72. Sclater, N.: Web 2.0, personal learning environments, and the future of learning management systems. Res. Bull. 13, 1–13 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  73. Piscitelli, A., Adaime, I., Binder, I.: El proyecto facebook y la posuniversidad. Sistemas operativos sociales y entornos abiertos de aprendizaje. Fundación Telefónica. Editorial Ariel, S.A., Barcelona (2010)

  74. Conde, M.Á., García-Peñalvo, F.J., Rodríguez-Conde, M.J., Alier, M., García-Holgado, A.: Perceived openness of Learning Management Systems by students and teachers in education and technology courses. Comput. Hum. Behav. 31, 517–526 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Severance, C., Hardin, J., Whyte, A.: The coming functionality mash-up in personal learning environments. Interact. Learn. Environ. 16(1), 47–62 (2008). doi:10.1080/10494820701772694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Palmér, M., Sire, S., Bogdanov, E., Gillet, D., Wild, F.: Mapping web personal learning environments. Paper presented at the Mash-Up Personal Learning Environments—2nd Workshop MUPPLE’09, Nize, France, 29 September (2009)

  77. García-Peñalvo, F.J., Conde, M.Á., Alier, M., Casany, M.J.: Opening learning management systems to personal learning environments. J. Univ. Comput. Sci. 17(9), 1222–1240 (2011). doi:10.3217/jucs-017-09-1222

    Google Scholar 

  78. Casquero, O., Portillo, J., Ovelar, R., Romo, J., Benito, M.: iGoogle and gadgets as a platform for integrating institutional and external services. Paper presented at the Mash-Up Personal Learning Environments—1st Workshop MUPPLE’08, Maastricht, The Netherlands (2008)

  79. Torres, R., Edirisingha, P., Mobbs, R.: Building Web 2.0-based personal learning environments: a conceptual framework. Paper presented at the EDEN Research Workshop, Paris, France (2008)

  80. IMS-GLC: Common cartridge and basic learning tools interoperability progress and conformance status. http://www.imsglobal.org/cc/statuschart.html. Accessed 30 Aug 2012 (2011)

  81. Peret, Y., Leroy, S., Leprêtre, E.: First steps in the integration of institutional and personal learning environments. Paper presented at the Workshop Future Learning Landscape—EC-TEL 2010, Barcelona, Spain, 28 September (2010)

  82. Booth, A.G., Clark, B.P.: A service-oriented virtual learning environment. On the Horizon 17(3), 232–244 (2009). doi:10.1108/10748120910993268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Wilson, S., Sharples, P., Griffiths, D., Popat, K.: Moodle wave: reinventing the VLE using Widget technologies. Paper presented at the Mash-Up Personal Learning Environments—2nd Workshop MUPPLE’09, Nize France (2009)

  84. De-la-Fuente-Valentín, L., Leony, D., Pardo, A., Kloos, C.D.: Mashups in learning design: pushing the flexibility envelope. Paper presented at the Mash-Up Personal Learning Environments—1st Workshop MUPPLE’08, Maastricht, The Netherlands, September 17 (2008)

  85. Verpoorten, D., Glahn, C., Kravcik, M., Ternier, S., Specht, M.: Personalisation of learning in virtual learning environments. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning: Learning in the Synergy of Multiple Disciplines, Nice, France (2009)

  86. Alario-Hoyos, C., Wilson, S.: Comparison of the main alternatives to the integration of external tools in different platforms. Paper presented at the International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation, ICERI, Madrid, Spain, November (2010)

  87. Dale, M., Bell, J.: Informal Learning in the Workplace. Dept. for Education and Employment (1999)

  88. Halliday-Wynes, S., Beddie, F.: Informal Learning. At a Glance. National Centre for Vocational Education Research Ltd., Adelaide (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  89. CEDEFOP: European Guidelines for Validating Non-formal and Informal Learning. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg (2009)

  90. Otero, M.S., McCoshan, A., Junge, K.: European inventory on validation of non-formal and informal learning. ECOTEC Research and Consulting Limited, Birmingham (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  91. Werquin, P.: Recognition of Non-formal and Informal Learning: Country Practices. OECD—Organization for Economic Coperation and Development, Paris (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  92. ILO: International Labour Organization—International Standard Classification of Occupations. http://www.ilo.org/public/english/bureau/stat/isco/isco88/index.htm. Accessed 25 Mar 2013 (1987)

  93. ILO: International Labour Organization—International Standard Classification of Occupations. http://www.ilo.org/public/english/bureau/stat/isco/isco08/index.htm. Accessed 25 Mar 2013 (2008)

  94. García-Peñalvo, F.J., González-González, J.C., Murray, M.: MyElvin: a web-based informal learning platform for languages practice. Int. J. Knowl. Soc. Res. 3(1), 26–39 (2012). doi:10.4018/jksr.2012010103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Berlanga, A.J., Sloep, P.B., Brouns, F., Bitter-Rijpkema, M.E., Koper, R.: Towards a TENCompetence ePortfolio. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 3, 24–28 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  96. Schoonenboom, J., Sligte, H., Moghnieh, A., Hernández-Leo, D., Stefanov, K., Glahn, C., Specht, M., Lemmers, R.: Supporting life-long competence development using the TENComptence infrastructure: a first experiment. Int. J. Emerg. Tech. Learn. 3(1), 53–59 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  97. FREE: Fostering return to employment through entrepreneurship, innovation and creativity. http://web.spi.pt/free/. Accessed 25 Mar 2013 (2010)

  98. IBAK: Identification, assessment and recognition of informally acquired competences. http://www.competences.info/ibak/cms/website.php?id=/en/index/projekt.htm. Accessed 25 Mar 2013 (2008)

  99. Mozilla: OpenBadges. http://openbadges.org/. Accessed 25 Mar 2013 (2011)

  100. García-Peñalvo, F.J., Conde, M.Á., Zangrando, V., García-Holgado, A., Seoane, A.M., Forment, M.A., Galanis, N., Janssen, J., Brouns, F., Vogten, H., Griffiths, D., Mykowska, A., Alves, G.R., Minović, M.: TRAILER project (Tagging, recognition, acknowledgment of informal learning experiences). A Methodology to make visible learners’ informal learning activities to the institutions. J. Univ. Comput. Sci. 19(11), 1661–1683 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  101. García-Peñalvo, F.J.: Technological ecosystems. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje 11(1), 31–32 (2016). doi:10.1109/RITA.2016.2518458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Adkins, B.A., Foth, M., Summerville, J.A., Higgs, P.L.: Ecologies of innovation: symbolic aspects of cross-organizational linkages in the design sector in an Australian inner-city area. Am. Behav. Sci. 50(7), 922–934 (2007). doi:10.1177/0002764206298317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Adomavicius, G., Bockstedt, J., Gupta, A., Kauffman, R.J.: Understanding patterns of technology evolution: an ecosystem perspective. In: Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference System Sciences, 2006. HICSS ‘06. Hawaii, 04–07 Jan 2006, vol 8. IEEE, USA, p. 189a (2006). doi:10.1109/HICSS.2006.515

  104. Birrer, A.J.F.: Science-trained professionals for the innovation ecosystem: looking back and looking ahead. Ind. High. Educ. 20(4), 273–277 (2006). doi:10.5367/000000006778175865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Crouzier, T.: Science Ecosystem 2.0: How Will Change Occur? Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg (2015). doi:10.2777/67279

  106. Dini, P., Darking, M., Rathbone, N., Vidal, M., Hernández, P., Ferronato, P., Briscoe, G., Hendryx, S.: The Digital Ecosystems Research Vision: 2010 and Beyond. European Commission, Luxembourg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  107. Nachira, F.: Towards a Network of Digital Business Ecosystems Fostering the Local Development. European Commission, Luxembourg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  108. García-Peñalvo, F.J., García-Holgado, A.: Open source solutions for knowledge management and technological ecosystems. In: García-Peñalvo, F.J., García-Holgado, A. (eds.) Advances in Knowledge Acquisition, Transfer, and Management (AKATM). IGI Global, Hershey (2017). doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-0905-9

    Google Scholar 

  109. García-Peñalvo, F.J., Hernández-García, Á., Conde, M.Á., Fidalgo-Blanco, Á., Sein-Echaluce, M.L., Alier-Forment, M., Llorens-Largo, F., Iglesias-Pradas, S.: Enhancing education for the knowledge society era with learning ecosystems. In: García-Peñalvo, F.J., García-Holgado, A. (eds.) Open Source Solutions for Knowledge Management and Technological Ecosystems. Advances in Knowledge Acquisition, Transfer, and Management (AKATM), pp. 1–24. IGI Global, Hershey (2017). doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-0905-9.ch001

    Google Scholar 

  110. García-Peñalvo, F.J., Hernández-García, Á., Conde-González, M.Á., Fidalgo-Blanco, Á., Sein-Echaluce Lacleta, M.L., Alier-Forment, M., Llorens-Largo, F., Iglesias-Pradas, S.: Learning services-based technological ecosystems. In: Alves, G.R., Felgueiras, M.C. (eds.) Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM’15) (Porto, Portugal, October 7–9, 2015), pp. 467–472. ACM, New York (2015)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  111. Moore, J.F.: Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. Harvard Bus. Rev. 71(3), 75–86 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  112. Iansiti, M., Levien, R.: Strategy as ecology. Harvard Bus. Rev. 82(3), 68–78 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  113. Yu, E., Deng, S.: Understanding software ecosystems: a strategic modeling approach. In: Jansen, S., Bosch, J., Campbell, P., Ahmed, F. (eds.) IWSECO-2011 Software Ecosystems 2011. Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Software Ecosystems. Brussels, Belgium, June 7th, 2011. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Aachen, Germany, pp. 65–76 (2011)

  114. García-Holgado, A., García-Peñalvo, F.J.: Architectural pattern to improve the definition and implementation of eLearning ecosystems. Sci. Comput. Program. 129, 20–34 (2016). doi:10.1016/j.scico.2016.03.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Pickett, S.T.A., Cadenasso, M.L.: The ecosystem as a multidimensional concept: meaning, model, and metaphor. Ecosystems 5(1), 1–10 (2002). doi:10.1007/s10021-001-0051-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. García-Holgado, A., García-Peñalvo, F.J.: A metamodel proposal for developing learning ecosystems. In: HCI International 2017, Vancouver, Canada, 2017. Springer, Accepted for publication (2017)

  117. Pardo, A., Delgado-Kloos, C.: Stepping out of the box: Towards analytics outside the learning management system. In: LAK ‘11 Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 163–167. ACM, New York (2011). doi:10.1145/2090116.2090142

  118. Bosch, J.: Architecture challenges for software ecosystems. In: ECSA’10 Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Software Architecture: Companion Volume, pp. 93–95. ACM, New York (2010). doi:10.1145/1842752.1842776

  119. Domingo, M.G., Forner, J.A.M.: Expanding the learning environment: combining physicality and virtuality-the internet of things for eLearning. In: Proceedings of 2010 IEEE 10th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), Sousse, Tunisia, 5–7 July 2010, pp. 730–731. IEEE, Washington (2010). doi:10.1109/ICALT.2010.211

  120. Ferguson, R.: Learning analytics: drivers, developments and challenges. Int. J. Technol. Enhanc. Learn. 4(5–6), 304–317 (2012). doi:10.1504/IJTEL.2012.051816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. Yukselturk, E., Ozekes, S., Türel, Y.: Predicting dropout student: an application of data mining methods in an online education program. Eur. J. Open Distance E-Learning (2014). doi:10.2478/eurodl-2014-0008

  122. Cruz-Benito, J., Therón, R., García-Peñalvo, F.J.: Analytics of information flows and decision making in heterogeneous learning ecosystems. In: García-Peñalvo, F.J. (ed.) Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM’14), pp. 703–707. ACM, New York (2014). doi:10.1145/2669711.2669977

    Google Scholar 

  123. García-Holgado, A., Cruz-Benito, J., García-Peñalvo, F.J.: Analysis of knowledge management experiences in spanish public administration. In: Alves, G.R., Felgueiras, M.C. (eds.) Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM’15) (Porto, Portugal, October 7–9, 2015), pp. 189–193. ACM, New York (2015). doi:10.1145/2808580.2808609

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  124. Cruz-Benito, J., Therón, R., García-Peñalvo, F.J., Pizarro Lucas, E.: Discovering usage behaviors and engagement in an Educational Virtual World. Comput. Hum. Behav. 47, 18–25 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. Fernandez, C., Esteban, G., Conde, M.Á., Rodríguez-Lera, F.J.: ICT for older people to learn about ICT: application and evaluation. In: Zaphiris, P., Ioannou, A. (eds.) Learning and Collaboration Technologies: Third International Conference, LCT 2016, Held as Part of HCI International 2016, Toronto, Canada, July 17–22, Proceedings, vol. 9753, pp. 292–302. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-39483-1_27

    Google Scholar 

  126. García-Peñalvo, F.J., Conde, M.Á., Matellán-Olivera, V.: Mobile apps for older users—the development of a mobile apps repository for older people. In: Zaphiris, P., Ioannou, A. (eds.) Learning and Collaboration Technologies Technology-Rich Environments for Learning and Collaboration, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 8524, pp. 117–126. Springer, Cham (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-07485-6_12

    Google Scholar 

  127. Kurniawan, S.: Older people and mobile phones: a multi-method investigation. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 66(12), 889–901 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  128. Fundación-Vodafone-España: TIC y Mayores. Conectados al futuro (2012)

  129. Fundación-Orange: eEspaña 2014. Informe Anual sobre el desarrollo de la sociedad de la información en España. Madrid (2015)

  130. Fundación-Vodafone-España, Red.es: Tecnologías orientadas a la movilidad: valoración y tendencias. Madrid (2014)

  131. World-Health-Organization: Definition of an older or elderly person. Proposed Working Definition of an Older Person in Africa for the MDS Project. http://www.who.int/healthinfo/survey/ageingdefnolder/en/. Accessed 03 Feb 2014 (2014)

  132. Ala-Mutka, K., Malanowski, N., Punie, Y., Cabrera, M.: Active ageing and the potential of ICT for learning. European Comission, Seville (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  133. European-Comission: The 2015 Ageing Report—Economic and budgetary projections for the 28 EU Member States (2013–2060). European Economy 2015. Publications Office of the European Union, Louxembourg (2015)

  134. Sandhu, J., Damodaran, L., Ramondt, L.: ICT skills acquisition by older people: motivations for learning and barriers to progression. Int. J. Educ. Ageing 3(1), 25–42 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  135. Amaro, F., Gil, H.: ICT for elderly people : “Yes, They Can!”. In: e-CASE & e-Teach International Conference on e-Commerce, e-Administration, e-Society, e-Education, and e-Technology, Tokyo, 2011, pp. 3792–3803

  136. Prensky, M.: Digital natives, digital immigrants, part ii: do they really think differently? On the Horizon 9(6), 1–6 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  137. European-Commission: European Union’s Research and Innovation funding programme for 2007–2013. https://ec.europa.eu/research/fp7/. Accessed 26 Jan 2016 (2007)

  138. European-Commission: HORIZON 2020—the EU framework programme for research and innovation. http://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/ Accessed 26 Jan 2016 (2014)

  139. European-Commission: The Active and Assisted Living Joint Programme (AAL JP). https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/node/50829. Accessed 26 Jan 2016 (2008)

  140. White, H., McConnell, E., Clipp, E., Bynum, L., Teague, C., Navas, L., Craven, S., Halbrecht, H.: Surfing the net in later life: a review of the literature and pilot study of computer use and quality of life. J. Appl. Gerontol. 18(3), 358–378 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  141. Weatherall, J.W.A.: A grounded theory analysis of older adults and information technology. Educ. Gerontol. 26(4), 371–386 (2000). doi:10.1080/036012700407857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  142. Czaja, S.J., Lee, C.C.: Designing computer systems for older adults. In: Julie, A.J., Andrew, S. (eds.) The Human–Computer Interaction Handbook, pp. 413–427. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., Mahwah (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  143. European-Commission: Active Ageing in the Information Society: e-Inclusion—Be Part of It! Brussels (2007)

  144. ITU: ICT Facts & Figures. Geneva, Switzerland (2015)

  145. COM: 678 Final. Making a European Area of Lifelong Learning a Reality. Communication from the commission (2001)

  146. Davie, R.: Older People in Europe—EU Policies and Programmes. European Parliamentary Research Service (2014)

  147. Balanskat, A., Blamire, R., Kefala, S.: The ICT impact report. European Schoolnet 1, 1–71 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  148. Collis, B., Wende, M.: Models of technology and change in higher education: an international comparative survey on the current and future use of ICT in higher education. http://doc.utwente.nl/44610/. Accessed 20 Jan 2017 (2002)

  149. Cox, M.J., Marshall, G.: Effects of ICT: do we know what we should know? Educ. Inf. Technol. 12(2), 59–70 (2007). doi:10.1007/s10639-007-9032-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  150. Briz-Ponce, L., Pereira, A., Carvalho, L., Juanes-Méndez, J.A., García-Peñalvo, F.J.: Learning with mobile technologies: students’ behavior. Comput. Hum. Behav. (2017). doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.027

    Google Scholar 

  151. Sánchez Prieto, J.C., Olmos Migueláñez, S., García-Peñalvo, F.J.: Informal tools in formal contexts: development of a model to assess the acceptance of mobile technologies among teachers. Comput. Hum. Behav. 55A, 519–528 (2016). doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  152. Sánchez Prieto, J.C., Olmos Migueláñez, S., García-Peñalvo, F.J.: MLearning and pre-service teachers: an assessment of the behavioral intention using an expanded TAM model. Comput. Hum. Behav. (2017). doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.061

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been partially funded by the Spanish Government Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness throughout the DEFINES project (Ref. TIN2016-80172-R).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. La Salle Ramon Llull University, Barcelona, Spain

    David Fonseca

  2. University of Leon, León, Spain

    Miguel Ángel Conde

  3. University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain

    Francisco J. García-Peñalvo

Authors
  1. David Fonseca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Miguel Ángel Conde
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Francisco J. García-Peñalvo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Fonseca.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fonseca, D., Conde, M.Á. & García-Peñalvo, F.J. Improving the information society skills: Is knowledge accessible for all?. Univ Access Inf Soc 17, 229–245 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0548-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0548-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation