Skip to main content

Outward Direct Investment, Firm Productivity and Credit Constraints: Evidence from Chinese Firms

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Outward Foreign Direct Investment of Chinese Enterprises

Part of the book series: Contributions to Economics ((CE))

  • 237 Accesses

Abstract

China is currently the third largest country in terms of outward direct investment (ODI), with the investors mainly being state-owned enterprises. This presents a question: What inhibits private enterprises from increasing ODI ? Using a firm-level panel data set for Zhejiang Province in China, we examine the impact of firm heterogeneity on private firm ODI. We have three main findings: first, a higher productivity level contributes to better access to ODI, and increases ODI value as well; second, lowering a firm’s financial constraint level can increase both the probability and volume of ODI; third, productivity cannot offset the negative effect of financial constraint on private firm ODI.

This chapter is published in Pacific Economic Review by Wang Bijun, Yuyan Tan, Miaojie Yu, Yiping Huang.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This dataset is provided by International Cooperation Office of Zhejiang Province.

  2. 2.

    Since there is no detailed information in the dataset allowing us to classify export firms into general trade and processing trade groups, we are not able to directly test this interpretation. However, some findings from other studies could be good supports of our argument. Dai et al. (2012) used custom data and found that processing trade accounts for nearly half of China’s exports. More importantly, those firms are 4% to 30% less productive than non-exporters. Yu (2015) showed low-productivity firms self-select to engage in process sing trade. These evidence are consistent with our results.

References

  • Bellone, F., Musso, P., Nesta, L., & Schiavo, S. (2010). Financial constraints and firm export behaviour. World Economy, 33(3), 347–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, N., & Héricourt, J. (2010). Financial factors and the margins of trade: Evidence from cross-country firm-level data. Journal of Development Economics, 93(2), 206–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, A., Jensen, J. B., & Schott, P. (2003). Falling trade costs, heterogeneous firms, and industry dynamics. Nber Working Papers, 167(4), 613–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottazzi, G., Secchi, A., & Tamagni, F. (2014). Financial constraints and firm dynamics. Small Business Economics, 42(1), 99–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, Y. W., & Qian, X. (2009). Empirics of China’s outward direct investment. Pacific Economic Review, 14(3), 312–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Contessi, S., & De Pace, P. (2012). (Non-) resiliency of foreign direct investment in the United States during the 2007–2009 financial crisis. Pacific Economic Review, 17(3), 368–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damijan, J. P., & Rojec, M. (2007). Foreign direct investment and catching up of new EU member states: Is there a flying geese pattern? Applied Economics Quarterly, 53, 91–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feenstra, R. C., Li, Z., & Yu, M. (2014). Exports and credit constraints under incomplete information: Theory and evidence from China. Review of Economics and Statistics, 96(4), 729–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girma, S., Kneller, R., & Pisu, M. (2005). Exports versus FDI: An empirical test. Review of World Economics, 141(2), 193–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenaway, D., & Kneller, R. (2007). Firm heterogeneity, exporting and foreign direct investment. The Economic Journal, 117(517), 134–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadlock, C. J., & Pierce, J. R. (2010). New evidence on measuring financial constraints: Moving beyond the KZ index. The Review of Financial Studies, 23(5), 1909–1940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head, K., & Ries, J. (2003). Heterogeneity and the FDI versus export decision of Japanese manufacturers. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 17(4), 448–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helpman, E., Melitz, M. J., & Yeaple, S. R. (2004). Export versus FDI with heterogeneous firms. American Economic Review, 94(1), 300–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (1980). Scale economies, product differentiation, and the pattern of trade. The American Economic Review, 70(5), 950–959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, O., Polk, C., & Saaá-Requejo, J. (2001). Financial constraints and stock returns. The Review of Financial Studies, 14(2), 529–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. (2010). Decision to invest abroad: The case of South Korean multinationals. Pacific Economic Review, 15(2), 281–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melitz, M. J. (2003). The impact of trade on intra‐industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica71(6), 1695–1725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minetti, R., & Zhu, S. C. (2011). Credit constraints and firm export: Microeconomic evidence from Italy. Journal of International Economics, 83(2), 109–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musso, P., & Schiavo, S. (2008). The impact of financial constraints on firm survival and growth. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 18(2), 135–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, S. C. (1984). The Capital Structure Puzzle. The Journal of Finance, 39, 574–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, J., & Yamori, N. (2009). Regional disparities and investment–cash flow sensitivity: Evidence from Chinese listed firms. Pacific Economic Review, 14(5), 657–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian, W., & Yu, M. (2012). Outward foreign direct investment and productivity: Firm-level evidence from China. China Economic Quarterly, 11, 383–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todo, Y. (2011). Quantitative evaluation of the determinants of export and FDI: Firm-level evidence from Japan. The World Economy, 34(3), 355–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomiura, E. (2007). Foreign outsourcing, exporting, and FDI: A productivity comparison at the firm level. Journal of International Economics, 72(1), 113–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., & Huang, Y. (2012). Outward direct investment: A financial repression perspective. In International Workshop on Chinese Outward Direct Investment, Peking University, Beijing, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whited, T. M., & Wu, G. (2006). Financial constraints risk. The Review of Financial Studies, 19(2), 531–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, M. (2015). Processing trade, tariff reductions and firm productivity: Evidence from Chinese firms. The Economic Journal, 125(585), 943–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Tian .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tian, W., Yu, M. (2022). Outward Direct Investment, Firm Productivity and Credit Constraints: Evidence from Chinese Firms. In: Outward Foreign Direct Investment of Chinese Enterprises. Contributions to Economics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4719-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4719-3_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-4718-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-4719-3

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics