Skip to main content

CO2-Based Enhanced Oil Recovery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Microbial Enhanced Oil Recovery

Part of the book series: Green Energy and Technology ((GREEN))

Abstract

Several mechanisms have been demonstrated to be actively participating for increasing the oil recovery by CO2 injection, including swelling of crude oil, reduction of crude oil viscosity, mutual mass transfer amid the gas injected in the reservoir and the crude oil, and reduction of interfacial tension (IFT) or a combination of all these mechanisms. Typical oil recovery by CO2 flooding varies from 5 to 20% of original oil in place. To improve the performance of CO2 flooding and overcome its limitations, various techniques like water-alternating gas (WAG), surfactant-alternated gas (SAG), and alkaline-surfactant-alternated gas (ASAG) floodings have been developed. An essential element of CO2 flooding considered during any field-scale implementation is the source of CO2, which may be either natural sources or anthropogenic. In the case of anthropogenic CO2, the capture and geological storage of CO2 becomes an important aspect of the CO2 flooding processes. The successful implementation of the process depends to a large extent on the experimental and modeling investigations. The CO2-based enhanced oil recovery (EOR) with a statistical comparison of different EOR projects implemented worldwide, the factors responsible along with issues associated with CO2 flooding are discussed in this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abass, A.E., A.A. Gawish, and E.M. Elakhal. 2018. Simulation study of different modes of miscible carbon dioxide flooding. Egyptian Journal of Petroleum 27 (4): 1195–1207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adasani, A.A., and B. Bai. 2011. Analysis of EOR projects and updated screening criteria. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 79 (1): 10–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aghdam, K.A., J.S. Moghaddas, and B. Moradi. 2013. An investigation of the effect of using foam in wag injection in an Iranian oil reservoir. Petroleum Science and Technology 31 (21): 2228–2236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, T. 1997. A generalized methodology for minimum miscibility pressure. In Latin American and caribbean petroleum engineering conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, pp. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Hinai, K., Al-Bemani, A., Vakili-Nezhaad, G. 2014. Experimental and theoretical investigation of the CO2 minimum miscibility pressurefor the omani oils for CO2 Injection EOR method. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 5(2), 142-146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alston, R., G. Kokolis, and C. James. 1985. CO2 minimum miscibility pressure: a correlation for impure CO2 streams and live oil systems. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal 25 (02): 268–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, J.S., and C.G. Wall. 1986. Improved hydrocarbon recovery. In Petroleum engineering: principles and practice, 191–217. Netherlands. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bagci, A.S. 2007. Immiscible CO2 flooding through horizontal wells. Energy Sources, Part A, 29, 85–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahadori, A. 2018. Fundamentals of enhanced oil and gas recovery from conventional and unconventional reservoirs. Gulf Professional Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, G.G., and W.L. Jacobs. 1965. Effect of foam on trapped gas saturation and on permeability of porous media to water. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal 5 (04): 6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bon, J., Sarma, H.K. 2004. A technical evaluation of a CO2 flood for EOR benefits in the Cooper Basin, South Australia. In SPE Asia Pacific oil and gas conference and exhibition Vol. 88451, SPE. Perth, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, M., and Y. Gu. 2013. Oil recovery mechanisms and asphaltene precipitation phenomenon in immiscible and miscible CO2 flooding processes. Fuel 109: 157–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G., X. Wang, Z. Liang, R. Gao, T. Sema, P. Luo, F. Zeng, and P. Tontiwachwuthikul. 2013. Simulation of CO2-oil minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) for CO2 enhanced oil recovery (EOR) using neural networks. Energy Procedia 37: 6877–6884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, J.R., E.H. Stenby, and A. Skauge. 2001. Review of WAG field experience. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering 4 (02): 10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, F.T.H., R.A. Jones, and H.T. Nguyen. 1988. Measurements and correlations of the physical properties of CO2-heavy crude oil mixtures. SPE Reservoir Engineering 3 (03): 822–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cottin, C., Morel, D., Levitt, D., Cordelier, P., Pope, G. 2012. Alkali Surfactant gas injection—attractive laboratory results in carbonates under Harsh Salinity and High Temperature. In Abu Dhabi international petroleum exhibition & conference Vol. SPE 161727, Society of Petroleum Engineers. Abu Dhabi, UAE, pp. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronquist, C. 1978. CO2 dynamic displacement with light reservoir oils. In US DOE annual symposium, Tulsa, OK. August. pp. 28–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dake, L.P. 1978. Fundamentals of reservoir engineering/L. P. Dake. Elsevier Scientific Pub. Co.; distributors for the U.S. and Canada Elsevier North-Holland, Amsterdam; New York: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elwy, M., Zekri, A.Y., Almehaideb, R.A., Al-Attar, H.H. 2012. Optimization of CO2 WAG processes in carbonate reservoirs-an experimental approach. In Abu Dhabi international petroleum conference and exhibition, Vol. SPE-161782-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers. Abu Dhabi, UAE, pp. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emera, M.K., Lu, J. 2005. Genetic Algorithm (GA)-Based Correlations Offer More Reliable Prediction of Minimum Miscibility Pressures (MMP) Between the Reservoir Oil and CO2 or Flue Gas. In Canadian International Petroleum Conference, Petroleum Society of Canada. Calgary, Alberta, pp. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emera, M.K., and H. Sarma. 2007. Genetic algorithm (GA)-based correlations offer more reliable prediction of minimum miscibility pressures (MMP) between reservoir oil and CO2 or flue gas. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology 46: 19–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enick, R.M., Olsen, D.K. 2012. Mobility and Conformance Control for Carbon Dioxide Enhanced Oil Recovery (CO2-EOR) via Thickeners, Foams, and Gels – A Detailed Literature Review of 40 Years of Research. National Energy Technology Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fath, A., Abdol-RasoulPouranfard. 2014. Evaluation of miscible and immiscible CO2 injection in one of the Iranian oil fields. Egyptian Journal of Petroleum, 23(3), 255–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabrielli, P., M. Gazzani, and M. Mazzotti. 2020. The Role of Carbon Capture and Utilization, Carbon Capture and Storage, and Biomass to Enable a Net-Zero-CO2 Emissions Chemical Industry. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 59 (15): 7033–7045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gandomkar, A., B. Honarvar, Y. Kazemzadeh, and Z. Derikvand. 2016. An experimental study of surfactant alternating CO2 injection for enhanced oil recovery of carbonated reservoir. Iranian Journal of Oil and Gas Science and Technology 5 (4): 01–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandomkar, A., R. Kharrat, M. Motealleh, H.H. Khanamiri, M. Nematzadeh, and M.H. Ghazanfari. 2012. An experimental investigation of foam for gas mobility control in a low-temperature fractured carbonate reservoir. Petroleum Science and Technology 30 (10): 976–985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghedan, S. 2009. Global laboratory experience of CO2-EOR flooding. In SPE/EAGE reservoir characterization and simulation conference held SPE. Abu Dhabi, UAE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaso, O. 1985. Generalized minimum miscibility pressure correlation (includes associated papers 15845 and 16287). Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal 25 (06): 927–934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godec, M.L. 2011. Global technology roadmap for CCS in industry sectoral assessment CO2 enhanced oil recovery. United Nations Industrial Development Organization

    Google Scholar 

  • Gogoi, S.B. 2013. Carbon-dioxide for EOR in Upper Assam Basin. Berlin, Heidelberg. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 157–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gogoi, S.B., and M. Kakoty. 2017. A study of CO2 flooding on wave velocities in the Naharkatiya oil reservoir of Upper Assam Basin. Resource-Efficient Technologies 3 (1): 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, H., Zitha, P.L.J., Faber, R., Buijse. 2012. A novel alkaline/surfactant/foam enhanced oil recovery process. SPE Journal, SPE 145043, 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosseini-Nasab, S.M., Zitha, P.L.J. 2017. Investigation of certain physical–chemical features of oil recovery by an optimized alkali–surfactant–foam (ASF) system. Colloid and Polymer Science, 295, 1873–1886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarrell, P.M. 2002. Practical Aspects of CO2 Flooding (SPE Monograph Series, Vol. 22). Society of Petroleum Engineers (U.S.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamali, F., F. Le-Hussain, and Y. Cinar. 2015. A laboratory and numerical-simulation study of Co-optimizing CO2 storage and CO2 enhanced oil recovery. SPE Journal 20 (06): 1227–1237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karimaie, H., B. Nazarian, T. Aurdal, P.H. Nøkleby, and O. Hansen. 2017. Simulation study of CO2 EOR and storage potential in a north sea reservoir. Energy Procedia 114: 7018–7032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karmakar, G.P. 2016. Carbon dioxide sequestration during enhanced oil recovery: Operational and economical aspects. Journal of Indian Geophysics Union 1: 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kibodeaux, K.R., Rossen, W.R. 1997. Coreflood study of surfactant-alternating-gas foam processes: Implications for field design. In SPE western regional meeting, Vol. SPE-38318-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers. Long Beach, California, pp. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulkarni, M.M., and D.N. Rao. 2005. Experimental investigation of miscible and immiscible Water-Alternating-Gas (WAG) process performance. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 48: 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, B., Mani, D. 2007. India’s Energy Future and Carbon Management. in: 27th Oil Shale Symposium. Colorado School of Mines, pp. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, S., and A. Mandal. 2017. A comprehensive review on chemically enhanced water alternating gas/CO2 (CEWAG) injection for enhanced oil recovery. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 157: 20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lake, L.W., M. Lotfollahi, and S.L. Bryant. 2019. Chapter 2—CO2 enhanced oil recovery experience and its messages for CO2 storage. In Science of Carbon Storage in Deep Saline Formations, ed. P. Newell, 15–31. A.G. Ilgen: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lashgari, H.R., Sepehrnoori, K., Delshad, M. 2015. Modeling of low-tension surfactant-gas flooding process in a four-phase flow simulator. In: SPE Annual technical conference and exhibition, Vol. SPE-175134-MS, Society Of Petroleum Engineers. Houston, Texas, USA, pp. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontaritis, K.J., Mansoori, G.A. 1987. Asphaltene flocculation during oil production and processing: a thermodynamic colloidal model. In: SPE international Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, Vol. 16258, SPE. Texas

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, S., B. Li, Q. Zhang, Z. Li, and D. Yang. 2018. Effect of CO2 on heavy oil recovery and physical properties in Huff-n-Puff processes under reservoir conditions. Journal of Energy Resources Technology 140: 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, M., J. Zhang, Q.P. Nguyen, and G.A. Pope. 2009. A systematic study of alkaline-surfactant-gas injection as an EOR Technique. SPE 124752: 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majidaie, S., M. Onur, and I.M. Tan. 2015. An experimental and numerical study of chemically enhanced water alternating gas injection. Petroleum Science 12: 13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangalsingh, D., T.Jagai. 1996. A laboratory investigation of the carbon dioxide immiscible process. In: Society of petroleum engineers, Vol. SPE 36134, Society of Petroleum Engineers. Port of Spain, Trinidad & Tobago, pp. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansour, E.M., Al-Sabagh, A.M., Desouky, S.M., Zawawy, F.M., Ramzi, M. 2018. A new estimating method of minimum miscibility pressure as a key parameter in designing CO2 gas injection process. Egyptian Journal of Petroleum, 27(4), 801–810.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrotra, A.K., Svrcek, W.Y. 1982. Correlations for properties of bitumen saturated with CO2, CH4 and N2, and experiments with combustion gas mixtures. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 21(06).

    Google Scholar 

  • Memon, M.K., K.A. Elraies, and M.I. Al-Mossawy. 2017. Impact of new foam surfactant blend with water alternating gas injection on residual oil recovery. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology 7 (3): 843–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammad, R.S., Zhang, S., Lu, S., Jamal-Ud-Din, S., Zhao, X. 2017. Simulation study of asphaltene deposition and solubility of co2 in the brine during cyclic CO2 injection process in unconventional tight reservoirs. International Journal of Geological and Environmental Engineering, 11(6), 495–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagarajan, N.R., Honarpour, M.M., Sampath, K. 2006. reservoir fluid sampling and characterization—Key to efficient reservoir management. Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nobakht, M., S. Moghadam, and Y. Gu. 2007. Effects of viscous and capillary forces on CO2 enhanced oil recovery under reservoir conditions. Energy & Fuels 21: 3469–3476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perera, M.S.A., R.P. Gamage, T.D. Rathnaweera, A.S. Ranathunga, A. Koay, and X. Choi. 2016. A review of CO2-enhanced oil recovery with a simulated sensitivity analysis. Energies 9 (481): 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phukan, R. 2020. Enhanced oil recovery by alkaline-surfactant-alternated-CO2 flooding for the reservoirs of upper assam basin, vol. PhD. India: Indian Instititue of Technology Guwahati.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phukan, R. 2020b. Enhanced oil recovery by alkaline-surfactant-alternated-Gas/CO2 flooding. In Department of chemical engineering, indian institute of technology Guwahati, Vol. PhD, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati. Guwahati.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phukan, R., S.B. Gogoi, and P. Tiwari. 2019. Alkaline-surfactant-alternated-gas/CO2 flooding: Effects of key parameters. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 173: 547–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phukan, R., Gogoi, S.B., Tiwari, P. 2020. Effects of CO2-foam stability, interfacial tension and surfactant adsorption on oil recovery by alkaline-surfactant-alternated-gas/CO2 flooding. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 597, 124799.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phukan, R., S.B. Gogoi, and P. Tiwari. 2019. Enhanced oil recovery by alkaline-surfactant-alternated-gas/CO2 flooding. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology 9: 247–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin, J., H. Han, and X. Liu. 2015. Application and enlightenment of carbon dioxide flooding in the United States of America. Petroleum Exploration and Development 42 (2): 232–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, R.K., S.S. Huang, and M. Dong. 2000. Laboratory investigation of weyburn CO2 miscible flooding. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology 39 (2): 41–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahimi, V., M. Bidarigh, and P. Bahrami. 2017. Experimental study and performance investigation of miscible water-alternating-CO2 flooding for enhancing oil recovery in the sarvak formation. Oil & Gas Science and Technology 72 (35): 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbauer, R.J., Thomas, B. 2010. 3—Carbon dioxide (CO2) sequestration in deep saline aquifers and formations. In Developments and Innovation in Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Capture and Storage Technology, (Ed.) M.M. Maroto-Valer, Vol. 2, Woodhead Publishing, pp. 57–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahin, S., Kalfa, U., Celebioglu, D. 2007. Bati Raman field immiscible CO2 application: status quo and future plans. In: 2007 SPE Latin American and Caribbean petroleum engineering conference Society of Petroleum Engineers. Buenos Aires, Argentina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salehi, M.M., M.A. Safarzadeh, E. Sahraei, and S.A.T. Nejad. 2014. Comparison of oil removal in surfactant alternating gas with wateralternating gas, water flooding and gas flooding in secondary oil recovery process. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 120: 86–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samanta, A., A. Bera, K. Ojha, and A. Mandal. 2012. Comparative studies on enhanced oil recovery by alkali–surfactant and polymer flooding. Journal of Petroleum Exploration & Production Technology 2: 8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satter, A., Iqbal, G., Buchwalter, J. 2007. Practical enhanced reservoir engineering: Assisted with simulation softwar. PennWell Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebastian, H., Renner, T., Wenger, R. 2013. Correlation of minimum miscibility pressure for impure CO2 streams. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 37.

    Google Scholar 

  • ShamsiJazeyi, H., Hirasaki, G.J., Verduzco, R. 2013. sacrificial agent for reducing adsorption of anionic surfactants. In: SPE International symposium on oilfield chemistry, Society of Petroleum Engineers. The Woodlands, Texas, USA, pp. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi, J.-X., Rossen, W.R. 1988. Improved surfactant-alternating-gas foam process to control gravity override. In: SPE/DOE improved oil recovery symposium, Society of Petroleum Engineers. Tulsa, Oklahoma, pp. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, R., Graue, D. 1965. Generalized corre-lations for predicting solubility, swelling and viscosity behavior of CO2-crude systems. JPT,(Jan., 1965), 102–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skauge, A., Stensen, J.A. 2003. Review of WAG field experience. In Oil recovery—2003, 1st international conference and exhibition modern challenges in oil recovery. Russia, Moscow, pp. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, Z., W. Zhu, X. Wang, and S. Guo. 2018. 2-D Pore-Scale experimental investigations of asphaltene deposition and heavy oil recovery by CO2 flooding. Energy & Fuels 32: 3194–3201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spivak, A., Karaoguz, D., Issever, K., Nolen, J.S. 1989. Simulation of Immiscible CO2 injection in a fractured carbonate reservoir, bati raman field, Turkey. In SPE California regional meeting, Society of Petroleum Engineers. California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, J.P., D.S.Negi, K.Jain, A., A.K.Dhawan. 2011. Surfactant-Alternate-Gas (SAG) injection process as a novel EOR technique—A laboratory investigation. In 2nd South Asain geoscience conference and exhibition, GEOIndia2011, Geo India. New Delhi, India, pp. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, R.K., S.S.Huang. 1997. Aphaltene deposition during CO2 flooding: A laboratory assessment. In SPE production operations symposium Vol. 37468, SPE. Oklahoma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocker, T.F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.K., Tignor, M., Allen, S.K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., Midgley, P.M. 2018. Climate change 2013: The Physical Science Basis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeftink, T.N., C.A. Latooij, and W.R. Rossen. 2015. Injectivity errors in simulation of foam EOR. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 126: 26–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taber, J.J., Martin, F.D., Seright, R.S. 1997a. EOR Screening Criteria revisited-Part 1: Introduction to screening criteria and enhanced recovery field projects. SPE Reservoir Engineering(August), 189–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taber, J.J., Martin, F.D., Seright, R.S. 1997b. EOR screening criteria revisited-Part 2: Applications and impact of oil prices. SPE Reservoir Engineering(August), 199–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talebian, S.H., Masoudi, R., M.Tan, I., Zitha, P.L.J. 2013. Foam assisted CO2-EOR; concepts, challenges and applications. In SPE enhanced oil recovery conference Vol. SPE 165280, Society of Petroleum Engineers. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, pp. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Telmadarreie, A., and J.J. Trivedi. 2018. Static and dynamic performance of wet foam and polymer-enhanced foam in the presence of heavy oil. Colloids and Interfaces 2 (38): 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma, M.K. 2015. Fundamentals of carbon dioxide-enhanced oil recovery (CO2-EOR)—A supporting document of the assessment methodology for hydrocarbon recovery using CO2-EOR associated with carbon sequestration. U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viebahn, P. 2012. Prospects of carbon capture and storage technologies (CCS) in emerging economies. Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q., S. Yang, H. Han, L. Wang, K. Qian, and J. Pang. 2019. Experimental investigation on the effects of CO2 displacement methods on petrophysical property changes of ultra-low permeability sandstone reservoirs near injection wells. Energies 12 (2): 327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaghoobi, H., Tsau, J.S., Grigg, R.B. 1998. Effect of foam on CO Breakthrough: Is this favorable to oil recovery? In SPE permian basin oil and gas recovery conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers. Midland, Texas, pp. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yellig, W., and R. Metcalfe. 1980. Determination and prediction of CO2 minimum miscibility pressures (includes associated paper 8876). Journal of Petroleum Technology 32 (01): 160–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yongmao, H., W. Zenggui, J.B.C. Yueming, and L. Xiangjie. 2004. Laboratory investigation of CO2 flooding. SPE 88883: 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, K., Seetahal, S., Alexander, D., He, R., Lv, J., Wu, K., Hu, Y., Chen, Z. 2016. Correlation for CO2 minimum miscibility pressure in tight oil reservoirs. In SPE trinidad and tobago section energy resources conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers. Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago, pp. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, N., Wei, M., Bai, B. 2018. Comprehensive review of worldwide CO2 immiscible flooding. In SPE improved oil recovery conference society of petroleum engineers. Oklahoma, USA, pp. 14.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pankaj Tiwari .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Phukan, R., Saha, R., Pandey, L., Tiwari, P. (2022). CO2-Based Enhanced Oil Recovery. In: Pandey, L., Tiwari, P. (eds) Microbial Enhanced Oil Recovery. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5465-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5465-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-5464-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-5465-7

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics