Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Foams in Wood Composites

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Phenolic Based Foams

Part of the book series: Gels Horizons: From Science to Smart Materials ((GHFSSM))

Abstract

The global demand in which lightweight panels are being used for furniture applications has changed significantly during the last decades. This chapter reviews important factors that are driving the use and consumption of lightweight wood composites around the world. The chapter begins with recent data about the regional production volume of wood-based panels (WBPs), followed by describing the various strategies used for weight reduction of WBPs. In the section of sandwich composites, the potential of sandwich concept to be used for wood composites is discussed. In the next section, discontinuous, continuous, and simultaneous (integrated) processes were described as various production technologies of foam core panels. The specific requirements for the foam core layer materials are considered in the context of polymeric foams. In this context, phenolic foam, as a thermoset and fire resistance component, shows great potential to be used as the core layer of foam core panels. Finally, new developments in alternative polymeric foams based on biopolymers are reported.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. FAO (2018) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations - Global forest products. Facts and figures. http://www.fao.org/3/ca7415en/ca7415en.pdf

  2. Thoemen H, Irle M, Sernek M (2010) Wood-based panels: an introduction for specialists. Brunel University Press

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hemmilä V, Adamopoulos S, Karlsson O, Kumar A (2017) Development of sustainable bio-adhesives for engineered wood panels-A review. RSC Adv 7:38604–38630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Matuana LM, Heiden PA (2005) Wood composites. Encycl Polym Sci Technol 12:521–546

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shalbafan A, Welling J, Luedtke J (2013) Effect of processing parameters on physical and structural properties of lightweight foam core sandwich panels. Wood Mater Sci Eng 8:1–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Teischinger A (2010) The development of wood technology and technology developments in the wood industries-from history to future. Eur J Wood Wood Prod 68:281–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Monteiro S, Martins J, Magalhaes FD, Carvalho L (2016) Low density wood-based particleboards bonded with foamable sour Cassava starch: preliminary studies. Polym 8:354

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cordella M, Hidalgo C (2016) Analysis of key environmental areas in the design and labelling of furniture products: application of a screening approach based on a literature review of LCA studies. Sustain Prod Consum 8:64–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Azizi M, Mohebbi N, De Felice F (2016) Evaluation of sustainable development of wooden furniture industry using multi criteria decision making method. Agric Agric Sci procedia 8:387–394

    Google Scholar 

  10. Burnett MP, Kharazipour A (2017) Mechanical behaviour of a lightweight, three-layered sandwich panel based on the raw material maize. Holzforschung 72:65–70

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shalbafan A, Luedtke J, Welling J, Thoemen H (2012) Comparison of foam core materials in innovative lightweight wood-based panels. Eur J Wood Wood Prod 70:287–292

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Khojasteh-Khosro S, Shalbafan A, Thoemen H (2020) Preferences of furniture manufacturers for using lightweight wood-based panels as eco-friendly products. Eur J Wood Wood Prod 78:593–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jafarnezhad S, Shalbafan A, Luedtke J (2018) Effect of surface layers compressibility and face-to-core-layer ratio on the properties of lightweight hybrid panels. Int Wood Prod J 9:164–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. O’Brien M, Bringezu S (2017) What is a sustainable level of timber consumption in the EU: Toward global and eu benchmarks for sustainable forest use. Sustain 9:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  15. Paletto A, Bernardi S, Pieratti E, et al (2019) Assessment of environmental impact of biomass power plants to increase the social acceptance of renewable energy technologies. Heliyon 5:e02070

    Google Scholar 

  16. Buonocore E, Häyhä T, Paletto A, Franzese PP (2014) Assessing environmental costs and impacts of forestry activities: a multi-method approach to environmental accounting. Ecol Modell 271:10–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shalbafan A (2013) Investigation of foam materials to be used in lightweight wood based composites. Dissertation. Hamburg University, Hamburg, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lüdtke J (2011) Entwicklung und Evaluierung eines Konzepts für die kontinuierliche Herstellung von Leichtbauplatten mit polymerbasiertem Kern und Holzwerkstoffdecklagen. Dissertation, Hamburg University, Hamburg, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nelis PA, Mai C (2019) The influence of low-density (Paulownia spp.) and high-density (Fagus sylvatica L.) wood species on various characteristics of light and medium-density three-layered particleboards. Wood Mater Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/17480272.2019.1659850

  20. Dziurka MT (2013) Characteristics of lightweight particleboards with the core layer supplemented with rape straw and expanded polystyrene. For Wood Technol 82:250–254

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Allen HG (1969) Analysis and structural design of sandwich panels. Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zenkert D (1995) An introduction to sandwich construction. Engineering Materials Advisory Services, England

    Google Scholar 

  23. Corrêa FF, Pereira MP, Madail RH et al (2017) Anatomical traits related to stress in high density populations of Typha angustifolia L. (Typhaceae). Brazilian J Biol 77:52–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gibson LJ (2005) Biomechanics of cellular solids. J Biomech 38:377–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Thomsen OT, Bozhevolnaya E, Lyckegaard A (2005) Sandwich structures 7: advancing with sandwich structures and materials. Proceedings of the 7th International conference on sandwich structures, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark. Springer Science & Business Media, Aalborg, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  26. Davies JM (2008) Lightweight sandwich construction. Wiley, New Jeresy

    Google Scholar 

  27. CEN/TS 16526 (2013) Sandwich boards for furniture (SWB-F). Factory made products. Definition, classification and test methods for determination of performance characteristics. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1997) Cellular solids. Structure and properties., Second edi. Cambridge university press, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kollmann FFP, Kuenzi EW, Stamm AJ (1975) Principles of wood science and technology: II. Wood based materials. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  30. Thoemen H (2008) Lightweight panels for the European furniture industry: some recent developments. COST E49 conference: Lightweight wood-based composite; properties and usage; Bled; 23rd – 25th June., pp 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rindler A, Vay O, Hansmann C, Müller U (2017) Dimensional stability of multi-layered wood-based panels: a review. Wood Sci Technol 51:969–996

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Xiong J, Du Y, Mousanezhad D, et al (2018) Sandwich structures with prismatic and foam cores: a review. Adv Eng Mater 21:1800036 (1–19)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hill C, Eastoe J (2017) Foams: from nature to industry. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 247:496–513

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Lee S-T, Scholz DPK (2008) Polymeric foams: Technology and developments in regulation, process, and products. CRC Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  35. Karlsson KF, TomasÅström B (1997) Manufacturing and applications of structural sandwich components. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 28:97–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Georgiadis GP, Elekidis AP, Georgiadis MC (2019) Optimization-based scheduling for the process industries: From theory to real-life industrial applications. Processes 7:438 (1–35)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lüdtke J, Welling J, Thömen H, Barbu MC (2010) Lightweight wood-based board and process for producing it. United States Patent Office, US20100098933A1

    Google Scholar 

  38. Shalbafan A, Luedtke J, Welling J, Fruehwald A (2013) Physiomechanical properties of ultra-lightweight foam core particleboard: Different core densities. Holzforschung 67:169–175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Klyosov AA (2007) Wood-plastic composites. Wiley, New Jersey

    Book  Google Scholar 

  40. Raps D, Hossieny N, Park CB, Altstädt V (2015) Past and present developments in polymer bead foams and bead foaming technology. Polym 56:5–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Ionescu M (2005) Chemistry and technology of polyols for polyurethanes. iSmithers Rapra Publishing, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  42. Gama NV, Ferreira A (1841) Barros-Timmons A (2018) Polyurethane foams: past, present, and future. Materials (Basel) 11:1–35

    Google Scholar 

  43. Mougel C, Garnier T, Cassagnau P, Sintes-Zydowicz N (2019) Phenolic foams: a review of mechanical properties, fire resistance and new trends in phenol substitution. Polym 164:86–117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Shalbafan A, Chaydarreh KC, Welling J (2016) Development of a one-step process for production of foam core particleboards using rigid polyurethane foam. BioResources 11:9480–9495

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Shalbafan A, Choupani Chaydarreh K, Welling J (2021) Effect of blowing agent concentration on rigid polyurethane foam and the properties of foam-core particleboard. Wood Mater Sci Eng 16:85–93

    Google Scholar 

  46. Choupani Chaydarreh K, Shalbafan A, Welling J (2017) Effect of ingredient ratios of rigid polyurethane foam on foam core panels properties. J Appl Polym Sci 134:44722

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Shalbafan A, Welling J, Luedtke J (2012) Effect of processing parameters on mechanical properties of lightweight foam core sandwich panels. Wood Mater Sci Eng 7:69–75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Shalbafan A, Rhême M, Thoemen H (2017) Ultra-light particleboard: characterization of foam core layer by digital image correlation. Eur J Wood Wood Prod 75:43–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Pascault J-P, Sautereau H, Verdu J, Williams RJJ (2002) Thermosetting polymers. CRC Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  50. Ashida K (2006) Polyurethane and related foams: chemistry and technology. CRC Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  51. Liu J, Wang L, Zhang W, Han Y (2020) Phenolic resin foam composites reinforced by acetylated poplar fiber with high mechanical properties, low pulverization ratio, and good thermal insulation and flame retardant performance. Materials (Basel) 13:148 (1–14)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Agarwal S, Gupta RK (2017) Plastics in buildings and construction. In: Applied plastics engineering handbook. Elsevier, pp 635–649

    Google Scholar 

  53. Samali B, Nemati S, Sharafi P et al (2019) Structural performance of polyurethane foam-filled building composite panels: a state-of-the-art. J Compos Sci 3:40

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Langguth S (2018) Light structural panel (LSP) - next generation building material. In: 11th European wood-based Panel Symposium, 10th – 12th 2018. Hamburg, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  55. Mao J, Chang J, Chen Y, Fang D (1998) Review of phenolic foam. Ind Eng Chem Res 15:38–43

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Ogle RA, Schumacher JL (1998) Fire patterns on upholstered furniture: Smoldering versus flaming combustion. Fire Technol 34:247–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Shalbafan A, Dietenberger MA, Welling J (2013) Fire performances of foam core particleboards continuously produced in a one-step process. Eur J Wood Wood Prod 71:49–59

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Dietenberger MA, Shalbafan A, Welling J (2014) Foam core particleboards with intumescent FRT veneer: Cone calorimeter testing with varying adhesives, surface layer thicknesses, and processing conditions. In: 25th annual conference on recent advances in flame retardancy of polymeric Materialsm 19–21st May, 2014, Stamford, Connecticut, USA

    Google Scholar 

  59. Dietenberger MA, Shalbafan A, Welling J (2018) Cone calorimeter testing of foam core sandwich panels treated with intumescent paper underneath the veneer (FRV). Fire Mater 42:296–305

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Pilato L (2010) Phenolic resins: a century of progress. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  61. Saba N, Jawaid M, Paridah MT, Al-Othman OY (2016) A review on flammability of epoxy polymer, cellulosic and non-cellulosic fiber reinforced epoxy composites. Polym Adv Technol 27:577–590

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Gomez-Bueso J, Haupt R (2010) Wood composite adhesives. Phenolic resins: a century of progress. Springer, Berlin, pp 155–187

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  63. Asim M, Saba N, Jawaid M et al (2018) A review on phenolic resin and its composites. Curr Anal Chem 14:185–197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Yoon Y, Plummer CJG, Thoemen H, Månson J-AE (2016) Liquid CO2 processing of solid polylactide foam precursors. J Cell Plast 52:153–174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Yoon Y (2016) Heat expandable biopolymers for one-step production of foam core sandwich composites. École Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, Zurich, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  66. Yoon Y, Plummer CJG, Månson J-AE (2015) Solid heat-expandable polylactide-poly (methyl methacrylate) foam precursors prepared by immersion in liquid carbon dioxide. J Mater Sci 50:7208–7217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Figueiredo JA, Ismael MI, Anjo CMS, Duarte AP (2010) Cellulose and derivatives from wood and fibers as renewable sources of raw-materials. In: Carbohydrates in sustainable development I. Springer, pp 117–128

    Google Scholar 

  68. Zepnik S, Hildebrand T, Kabasci S, et al (2013) Cellulose acetate for thermoplastic foam extrusion. Cellul Conversion Rijeka InTech 17–44

    Google Scholar 

  69. Lüdtke J, Roch H, Haiduk FK (2017) Biobasierter Hybrid-Sandwichwerkstoff aus Holz und Celluloseschaum. Holztechnologie 58:18–22

    Google Scholar 

  70. Green and Bio Polyols Market by 2021 (2018) Markets and markets press release. https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/PressReleases/green-and-bio-polyols.asp

  71. Guan J, Song Y, Lin Y et al (2011) Progress in study of non-isocyanate polyurethane. Ind Eng Chem Res 50:6517–6527

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Grignard B, Thomassin J-M, Gennen S et al (2016) CO2-blown microcellular non-isocyanate polyurethane (NIPU) foams: from bio-and CO 2-sourced monomers to potentially thermal insulating materials. Green Chem 18:2206–2215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Solt P, Libowitzky S, van Herwijnen HWG, Konnerth J (2020) Improved method for analyzing cohesive strength development of pMDI. Wood Sci Technol 54:7–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Cui Y, Hou X, Wang W, Chang J (2017) Synthesis and characterization of bio-oil phenol formaldehyde resin used to fabricate phenolic based materials. Materials (Basel) 10:668

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Glasser WG (2019) About making lignin great again-some lessons from the past. Front Chem 7:565

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Li B, Feng SH, Niasar HS et al (2016) Preparation and characterization of bark-derived phenol formaldehyde foams. RSC Adv 6:40975–40981

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Li W, Lin Q, Yan M, Zou Y (2003) Reducing the contents of free phenol and formaldehyde in phenolic foam. J Appl Polym Sci 90:2333–2336

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Hartman Jr JJ, Lenox RS, Putt DL (1998) Phenolic foams having a low formaldehyde evolution. United State Patent Office (US5705537A)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Natural Resources and Marine Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

    Ali Shalbafan

Authors
  1. Ali Shalbafan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Shalbafan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Chemical Sciences, Mahatma Gandhi University, Kottayam, India

    Sandhya P.K

  2. Sree Sankara College, Kalady, India

    Sreekala M.S.

  3. Mahatma Gandhi University, Kottayam, India

    Sabu Thomas

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Shalbafan, A. (2022). Foams in Wood Composites. In: P.K, S., M.S., S., Thomas, S. (eds) Phenolic Based Foams. Gels Horizons: From Science to Smart Materials. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5237-0_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation