Abstract
Computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) has been widely used in the field of education. Computer-supported collaborative learning plays a very crucial role for improving learning performance, social interaction skills, problem-solving abilities, and knowledge building. However, most studies focus on implementing collaborative learning activities based on personal and subjective experiences. Previous studies seldom examine how to optimize collaborative learning activities based on a data-driven approach. This study aims to bridge this gap to propose how to optimize collaborative learning activities as well as evaluate the effectiveness of optimization strategies. Totally 72 junior school students participated this study and completed 7 collaborative learning tasks. For each collaborative learning task, two rounds of collaborative learning were implemented and recorded for analysis. The results indicated that the proposed 17 optimization strategies were very effective for improving the design quality of collaborative learning, the alignment between design and enactment, collaborative knowledge building level, and group products quality. The results and implications for teachers and practitioners are also discussed in depth.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alvarez, C., Alarcon, R., & Nussbaum, M. (2011). Implementing collaborative learning activities in the classroom supported by one-to-one mobile computing: A design-based process. Journal of Systems and Software, 84(11), 1961–1976.
Bahirat, P., He, Y., Menon, A., & Knijnenburg, B. (2018). A data-driven approach to developing IoT privacy-setting interfaces. In 23rd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (pp. 165–176).
Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1301_1.
Barmaki, R., & Guo, Z. (2020). Deep neural networks for collaborative learning analytics: Evaluating team collaborations using student gaze point prediction. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(6), 53–71.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., Duguid, P., & Brown, S. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.
Cen, L., Ruta, D., Powell, L., Hirsch, B., & Ng, J. (2016). Quantitative approach to collaborative learning: performance prediction, individual assessment, and group composition. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11(2), 187–225.
Cheng, S. C., Hwang, G. J., & Lai, C. L. (2020). Effects of the group leadership promotion approach on students’ higher order thinking awareness and online interactive behavioral patterns in a blended learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(2), 246–263.
Damşa, C. I., & Ludvigsen, S. (2016). Learning through interaction and co-construction of knowledge objects in teacher education. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 11, 1–18.
Er, E., Dimitriadis, Y., & Gašević, D. (2020). Collaborative peer feedback and learning analytics: theory-oriented design for supporting class-wide interventions. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1764490.
Feidakis, M. (2011). Emotional scaffolding with respect to time factors in Networking Collaborative Learning Environments. eLearn Center Research Paper Series. Retrieved from https://www.raco.cat/index.php/eLearn/article/view/257265.
Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Stegmann, K., & Wecker, C. (2013). Toward a script theory of guidance in computer-supported collaborative learning. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 56–66.
Fu, Q. K., & Hwang, G. J. (2018). Trends in mobile technology-supported collaborative learning: A systematic review of journal publications from 2007 to 2016. Computers & Education, 119, 129–143.
Han, J., Kim, K. H., Rhee, W., & Cho, Y. H. (2021). Learning analytics dashboards for adaptive support in face-to-face collaborative argumentation. Computers & Education, 163.
Hoadley, C. P. (2002). Creating context: Design-based research in creating and understanding CSCL. In Proceedings of CSCL (pp. 453–462). https://repository.isls.org/bitstream/1/3808/1/453-462.pdf.
Järvelä, S. (2011). How does help seeking help?–New prospects in a variety of contexts. Learning and Instruction, 21(2), 297–299.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1991). Cooperative learning: Increasing college faculty instructional productivity. Washington: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.
Kalir, J. H. (2018). Equity-oriented design in open education. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 35(5), 357–367.
Karno, D., & Hatcher, B. (2020). Building computer supported collaborative learning environments in early childhood classrooms. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 249–267.
Ketelhut, D. J., Hestness, E., & Mills, K. (2019). Embedding computational thinking in the elementary classroom: An extended collaborative teacher learning experience. https://repository.isls.org/bitstream/1/1703/1/869-870.pdf.
Kinshuk. (2016). Designing adaptive and personalized learning environments. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Kulin, M., Fortuna, C., De Poorter, E., Deschrijver, D., & Moerman, I. (2016). Data-driven design of intelligent wireless networks: An overview and tutorial. Sensors, 16(6), 790.
Kwon, K. (2019). Student-generated awareness information in a group awareness tool: what does it reveal? Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 1301–1327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09727-7.
Leinonen, T., Keune, A., Veermans, M., & Toikkanen, T. (2016). Mobile apps for reflection in learning: A design research in K-12 education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(1), 184–202.
Lee, J., & Bonk, C. J. (2016). Social network analysis of peer relationships and online interactions in a blended class using blogs. The Internet and Higher Education, 28, 35–44.
Lin, G. Y. (2020). Scripts and mastery goal orientation in face-to-face versus computer-mediated collaborative learning: Influence on performance, affective and motivational outcomes, and social ability. Computers & Education, 143, 103691.
Lin, P. C., Hou, H. T., & Chang, K. E. (2020). The development of a collaborative problem solving environment that integrates a scaffolding mind tool and simulation-based learning: an analysis of learners’ performance and their cognitive process in discussion. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1719163.
Lyons, K. M., Lobczowski, N. G., Greene, J. A., Whitley, J., & McLaughlin, J. E. (2021). Using a design-based research approach to develop and study a web-based tool to support collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 161,.
Niles-Hofmann, L. (2017). Data-driven learning design. Retrieved June 27, 2020, from https://momentum.gevc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/DataDrivenLearningDesign-Ebook-July2016-1.pdf.
Radkowitsch, A., Vogel, F., & Fischer, F. (2020). Good for learning, bad for motivation? A meta-analysis on the effects of computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 15(1), 5–47.
Ramirez, H. J. M., & Monterola, S. L. C. (2019). Co-creating scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning and its effects on students’ logical thinking in earth science. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1702063.
Roll, I., Aleven, V., McLaren, B. M., & Koedinger, K. R. (2011). Improving students’ help-seeking skills using metacognitive feedback in an intelligent tutoring system. Learning and Instruction, 21(2), 267–280.
Rubens, N., Vilenius, M., & Okamoto, T. (2009). Automatic group formation for informal collaborative learning. In 2009 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (Vol. 3, pp. 231–234). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/wi-iat.2009.270.
Saqr, M., Viberg, O., & Vartiainen, H. (2020). Capturing the participation and social dimensions of computer-supported collaborative learning through social network analysis: which method and measures matter? International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 15(2), 227–248.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265–283.
Schildkamp, K., & Kuiper, W. (2010). Data-informed curriculum reform: Which data, what purposes, and promoting and hindering factors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 482–496.
Shin, Y., Kim, D., & Song, D. (2020). Types and timing of scaffolding to promote meaningful peer interaction and increase learning performance in computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(3), 640–661.
Stahl, G. (2000). A model of collaborative knowledge-building. In Fourth international conference of the learning sciences (Vol. 10, pp. 70–77). http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.97.8816&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: A historical perspective. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 409–426). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vogel, F., Wecker, C., Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2017). Socio-cognitive scaffolding with computer-supported collaboration scripts: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 29(3), 477–511.
Wang, A., Yu, S., Wang, M., & Chen, L. (2019). Effects of a visualization-based group awareness tool on in-service teachers’ interaction behaviors and performance in a lesson study. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(5–6), 670–684.
Wagner, C. J., & González-Howard, M. (2018). Studying discourse as social interaction: The potential of social network analysis for discourse studies. Educational Researcher, 47(6), 375–383.
White, T. (2018). Connecting levels of activity with classroom network technology. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 13(1), 93–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9272-3.
Zheng, L. (2017). Knowledge building and regulation in computer-supported collaborative learning. Springer Singapore.
Zhang, J., Yuan, G., & Bogouslavsky, M. (2020). Give student ideas a larger stage: Support cross-community interaction for knowledge building. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 15(4), 389–410.
Zheng, L., Li, X., & Huang, R. (2017). The effect of socially shared regulation approach on learning performance in computer-supported collaborative learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(4), 35–46.
Zheng, L., Li, X., Zhang, X., & Sun, W. (2019). The effects of group metacognitive scaffolding on group metacognitive behaviors, group performance, and cognitive load in computer-supported collaborative learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 42, 13–24.
Zheng, L., & Yang, K. (2014). Why We Should Research on the Consistency rather than the Effectiveness? Chinese Educational Technology, 9, 20–23.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zheng, L. (2021). Optimize CSCL Activities Based on a Data-Driven Approach. In: Data-Driven Design for Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1718-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1718-8_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-1717-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-1718-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)