Skip to main content

Optimize CSCL Activities Based on a Data-Driven Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Data-Driven Design for Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Educational Technology ((LNET))

Abstract

Computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) has been widely used in the field of education. Computer-supported collaborative learning plays a very crucial role for improving learning performance, social interaction skills, problem-solving abilities, and knowledge building. However, most studies focus on implementing collaborative learning activities based on personal and subjective experiences. Previous studies seldom examine how to optimize collaborative learning activities based on a data-driven approach. This study aims to bridge this gap to propose how to optimize collaborative learning activities as well as evaluate the effectiveness of optimization strategies. Totally 72 junior school students participated this study and completed 7 collaborative learning tasks. For each collaborative learning task, two rounds of collaborative learning were implemented and recorded for analysis. The results indicated that the proposed 17 optimization strategies were very effective for improving the design quality of collaborative learning, the alignment between design and enactment, collaborative knowledge building level, and group products quality. The results and implications for teachers and practitioners are also discussed in depth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alvarez, C., Alarcon, R., & Nussbaum, M. (2011). Implementing collaborative learning activities in the classroom supported by one-to-one mobile computing: A design-based process. Journal of Systems and Software, 84(11), 1961–1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahirat, P., He, Y., Menon, A., & Knijnenburg, B. (2018). A data-driven approach to developing IoT privacy-setting interfaces. In 23rd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (pp. 165–176).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1301_1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barmaki, R., & Guo, Z. (2020). Deep neural networks for collaborative learning analytics: Evaluating team collaborations using student gaze point prediction. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(6), 53–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., Duguid, P., & Brown, S. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cen, L., Ruta, D., Powell, L., Hirsch, B., & Ng, J. (2016). Quantitative approach to collaborative learning: performance prediction, individual assessment, and group composition. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11(2), 187–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, S. C., Hwang, G. J., & Lai, C. L. (2020). Effects of the group leadership promotion approach on students’ higher order thinking awareness and online interactive behavioral patterns in a blended learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(2), 246–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DamÅŸa, C. I., & Ludvigsen, S. (2016). Learning through interaction and co-construction of knowledge objects in teacher education. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 11, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Er, E., Dimitriadis, Y., & GaÅ¡ević, D. (2020). Collaborative peer feedback and learning analytics: theory-oriented design for supporting class-wide interventions. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1764490.

  • Feidakis, M. (2011). Emotional scaffolding with respect to time factors in Networking Collaborative Learning Environments. eLearn Center Research Paper Series. Retrieved from https://www.raco.cat/index.php/eLearn/article/view/257265.

  • Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Stegmann, K., & Wecker, C. (2013). Toward a script theory of guidance in computer-supported collaborative learning. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 56–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, Q. K., & Hwang, G. J. (2018). Trends in mobile technology-supported collaborative learning: A systematic review of journal publications from 2007 to 2016. Computers & Education, 119, 129–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, J., Kim, K. H., Rhee, W., & Cho, Y. H. (2021). Learning analytics dashboards for adaptive support in face-to-face collaborative argumentation. Computers & Education, 163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoadley, C. P. (2002). Creating context: Design-based research in creating and understanding CSCL. In Proceedings of CSCL (pp. 453–462). https://repository.isls.org/bitstream/1/3808/1/453-462.pdf.

  • Järvelä, S. (2011). How does help seeking help?–New prospects in a variety of contexts. Learning and Instruction, 21(2), 297–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1991). Cooperative learning: Increasing college faculty instructional productivity. Washington: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalir, J. H. (2018). Equity-oriented design in open education. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 35(5), 357–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karno, D., & Hatcher, B. (2020). Building computer supported collaborative learning environments in early childhood classrooms. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 249–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ketelhut, D. J., Hestness, E., & Mills, K. (2019). Embedding computational thinking in the elementary classroom: An extended collaborative teacher learning experience. https://repository.isls.org/bitstream/1/1703/1/869-870.pdf.

  • Kinshuk. (2016). Designing adaptive and personalized learning environments. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulin, M., Fortuna, C., De Poorter, E., Deschrijver, D., & Moerman, I. (2016). Data-driven design of intelligent wireless networks: An overview and tutorial. Sensors, 16(6), 790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, K. (2019). Student-generated awareness information in a group awareness tool: what does it reveal? Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 1301–1327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09727-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leinonen, T., Keune, A., Veermans, M., & Toikkanen, T. (2016). Mobile apps for reflection in learning: A design research in K-12 education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(1), 184–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., & Bonk, C. J. (2016). Social network analysis of peer relationships and online interactions in a blended class using blogs. The Internet and Higher Education, 28, 35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, G. Y. (2020). Scripts and mastery goal orientation in face-to-face versus computer-mediated collaborative learning: Influence on performance, affective and motivational outcomes, and social ability. Computers & Education, 143, 103691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, P. C., Hou, H. T., & Chang, K. E. (2020). The development of a collaborative problem solving environment that integrates a scaffolding mind tool and simulation-based learning: an analysis of learners’ performance and their cognitive process in discussion. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1719163.

  • Lyons, K. M., Lobczowski, N. G., Greene, J. A., Whitley, J., & McLaughlin, J. E. (2021). Using a design-based research approach to develop and study a web-based tool to support collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 161,.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niles-Hofmann, L. (2017). Data-driven learning design. Retrieved June 27, 2020, from https://momentum.gevc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/DataDrivenLearningDesign-Ebook-July2016-1.pdf.

  • Radkowitsch, A., Vogel, F., & Fischer, F. (2020). Good for learning, bad for motivation? A meta-analysis on the effects of computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 15(1), 5–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez, H. J. M., & Monterola, S. L. C. (2019). Co-creating scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning and its effects on students’ logical thinking in earth science. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1702063.

  • Roll, I., Aleven, V., McLaren, B. M., & Koedinger, K. R. (2011). Improving students’ help-seeking skills using metacognitive feedback in an intelligent tutoring system. Learning and Instruction, 21(2), 267–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubens, N., Vilenius, M., & Okamoto, T. (2009). Automatic group formation for informal collaborative learning. In 2009 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (Vol. 3, pp. 231–234). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/wi-iat.2009.270.

  • Saqr, M., Viberg, O., & Vartiainen, H. (2020). Capturing the participation and social dimensions of computer-supported collaborative learning through social network analysis: which method and measures matter? International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 15(2), 227–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schildkamp, K., & Kuiper, W. (2010). Data-informed curriculum reform: Which data, what purposes, and promoting and hindering factors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 482–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, Y., Kim, D., & Song, D. (2020). Types and timing of scaffolding to promote meaningful peer interaction and increase learning performance in computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(3), 640–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. (2000). A model of collaborative knowledge-building. In Fourth international conference of the learning sciences (Vol. 10, pp. 70–77). http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.97.8816&rep=rep1&type=pdf.

  • Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: A historical perspective. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 409–426). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, F., Wecker, C., Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2017). Socio-cognitive scaffolding with computer-supported collaboration scripts: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 29(3), 477–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, A., Yu, S., Wang, M., & Chen, L. (2019). Effects of a visualization-based group awareness tool on in-service teachers’ interaction behaviors and performance in a lesson study. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(5–6), 670–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, C. J., & González-Howard, M. (2018). Studying discourse as social interaction: The potential of social network analysis for discourse studies. Educational Researcher, 47(6), 375–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, T. (2018). Connecting levels of activity with classroom network technology. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 13(1), 93–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9272-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, L. (2017). Knowledge building and regulation in computer-supported collaborative learning. Springer Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Yuan, G., & Bogouslavsky, M. (2020). Give student ideas a larger stage: Support cross-community interaction for knowledge building. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 15(4), 389–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, L., Li, X., & Huang, R. (2017). The effect of socially shared regulation approach on learning performance in computer-supported collaborative learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(4), 35–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, L., Li, X., Zhang, X., & Sun, W. (2019). The effects of group metacognitive scaffolding on group metacognitive behaviors, group performance, and cognitive load in computer-supported collaborative learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 42, 13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, L., & Yang, K. (2014). Why We Should Research on the Consistency rather than the Effectiveness? Chinese Educational Technology, 9, 20–23.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lanqin Zheng .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zheng, L. (2021). Optimize CSCL Activities Based on a Data-Driven Approach. In: Data-Driven Design for Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1718-8_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1718-8_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-1717-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-1718-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics