Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Connecting levels of activity with classroom network technology

  • Published:
International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Classroom activity traditionally takes one of three forms, variously oriented toward the levels of individual students, small groups, or the whole class. CSCL systems, however, may enable novel ways to facilitate instruction within or sequence activity across these different levels. Drawing on theoretical accounts of learning at and across different scales of social interaction, this paper examines episodes of classroom activity featuring two learning environment designs that leverage networked digital devices to support face-to-face collaboration. Analysis of these episodes focused on two questions: When did activity shift between small and whole-group levels, and what mechanisms enabled or supported those shifts? Findings suggest that classroom activity in these environments was sometimes characterized by frequent, rapid shifts between levels, as well as instances that suggested hybrid forms of small-group and whole-class interaction. These shifts between and overlaps across levels were enabled and sustained through mechanisms including teacher orchestration, mediating roles played by virtual mathematical objects, learners’ appropriation of shared artifacts and resources, and emergent properties of these complex interactions among classroom participants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamson, D., Trninic, D., Gutiérrez, J. F., Huth, J., & Lee, R. G. (2011). Hooks and shifts: A dialectical study of mediated discovery. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 16(1), 55–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ares, N., Stroup, W. M., & Schademan, A. R. (2009). The power of mediating artifacts in group-level development of mathematical discourses. Cognition and Instruction, 27(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. (2000). Working on the inside: Using one’s own practice as a site for studying teaching and learning. In A. Kelly & R. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research Design in Mathematics and Science Education (pp. 365–402). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, C., White, T., Davis, S., & Hegedus, S. (2013). SimCalc and the networked classroom. In S. Hegedus & J. Roschelle (Eds.), The SimCalc vision and contributions: Democratizing access to important mathematics (pp. 99–121). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsen, M. (2010). Appropriating geometric series as a cultural tool: A study of student collaborative learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 74(2), 95–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W., Looi, C. K., & Tan, S. (2010). What do students do in a F2F CSCL classroom? The optimization of multiple communications modes. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1159–1170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark-Wilson, A. (2010). Emergent pedagogies and the changing role of the teacher in the TI-Nspire navigator-networked mathematics classroom. ZDM, 42(7), 747–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colella, V. (2000). Participatory simulations: Building collaborative understanding through immersive dynamic modeling. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(4), 471–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P. (1999). Individual and collective mathematical development: The case of statistical data analysis. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1(1), 5–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., & Yackel, E. (1996). Constructivist, emergent, and sociocultural perspectives in the context of developmental research. Educational Psychologist, 31(3–4), 175–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cress, U., & Kimmerle, J. (2008). A systemic and cognitive view on collaborative knowledge building with wikis. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(2), 105.

  • Damsa, C. I., & Jornet, A. (2016). Revisiting learning in higher education—Framing notions redefined through an ecological perspective. Frontline Learning Research, 4(4), 39–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, B., & Simmt, E. (2003). Understanding learning systems: Mathematics education and complexity science. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(2), 137–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derry, S. J., Pea, R. D., Barron, B., Engle, R. A., Erickson, F., Goldman, R., et al. (2010). Conducting video research in the learning sciences: Guidance on selection, analysis, technology, and ethics. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(1), 3–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P. (2012). Design for classroom orchestration. Computers & Education, 69, 485–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P. (2015). Orchestration graphs: Modeling scalable education. Lausanne: EPFL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drijvers, P., Doorman, M., Boon, P., Reed, H., & Gravemeijer, K. (2010). The teacher and the tool: Instrumental orchestrations in the technology-rich mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75(2), 213–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enyedy, N. (2005). Inventing mapping: Creating cultural forms to solve collective problems. Cognition and Instruction, 23(4), 427–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furberg, A., Kluge, A., & Ludvigsen, S. (2013). Student sensemaking with science diagrams in a computer-based setting. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8(1), 41–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guin, D., & Trouche, L. (1998). The complex process of converting tools into mathematical instruments: The case of calculators. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 3(3), 195–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegedus, S., & Kaput, J. (2004). An introduction to the profound potential of connected algebra activities: Issues of representation, engagement and pedagogy. Proceedings of the 28th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of mathematics education, 3, 129–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegedus, S. J., & Moreno-Armella, L. (2009). Intersecting representation and communication infrastructures. ZDM Mathematics Education, 41, 399–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegedus, S., & Penuel, W. (2008). Studying new forms of participation and identity in mathematics classrooms with integrated communication and representational infrastructures. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 68, 171–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, S. E., Mercier, E., Burd, E., & Hatch, A. (2011). Multi-touch tables and the relationship with collaborative classroom pedagogies: A synthetic review. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(4), 515–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunsu, N. J., Adesope, O., & Bayly, D. J. (2016). A meta-analysis of the effects of audience response systems (clicker-based technologies) on cognition and affect. Computers & Education, 94, 102–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. B. (2001). Emergence. The Connected Lives of Ants, Brains, Cities and Software. The Penguin: Allen lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaput, J. (2000). Implications of the shift from isolated, expensive technology to connected, inexpensive, diverse and ubiquitous technologies. In M. O. J. Thomas (Ed.), Proceedings of the TIME 2000: An international conference on Technology in Mathematics Education (pp. 1–24). Auckland: The University of Auckland and the Auckland University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieran, C. (1992). The learning and teaching of school algebra. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 390–419). New York: McMillan & National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klopfer, E., Yoon, S., & Perry, J. (2005). Using palm technology in participatory simulations of complex systems: A new take on ubiquitous and accessible mobile computing. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(3), 285–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koschmann, T. D. (Ed.). (1996). CSCL, theory and practice of an emerging paradigm. Routledge.

  • Lai, K., & White, T. (2014). How groups cooperate in a networked geometry learning environment. Instructional Science, 42(4), 615–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leinhardt, G., Zaslavsky, O., & Stein, M. (1990). Functions, graphs, and graphing: Tasks, learning, and teaching. Review of Educational Research, 60(1), 1–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, S. T., & Wilensky, U. (2008). Inventing a “mid level” to make ends meet: Reasoning between the levels of complexity. Cognition and Instruction, 26(1), 1–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linchevski, L., & Herscovics, N. (1996). Crossing the cognitive gap between arithmetic and algebra: Operating on the unknown in the context of equations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 30(1), 39–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludvigsen, S., & Arnseth, H. C. (2017). Computer-supported collaborative learning. In E. Duval, M. Sharples, & R. Sutherland (Eds.), Technology enhanced learning (pp. 47–58). Chicago: Springer International Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mariotti, M. A. (2000). Introduction to proof: The mediation of a dynamic software environment. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44(1), 25–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moschkovich, J. N. (2004). Appropriating mathematical practices: A case study of learning to use and explore functions through interaction with a tutor. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 55(1–3), 49–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radford, L. (2000). Signs and meanings in students' emergent algebraic thinking: A semiotic analysis. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 42(3), 237–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radford, L. (2013). Three key concepts of the theory of objectification: Knowledge, knowing, and learning. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 2(1), 7–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In J. V. Wertsch, P. del Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139–164). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Roschelle, J., Dimitriadis, Y., & Hoppe, U. (2013). Classroom orchestration: Synthesis. Computers & Education, 69, 523–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roschelle, J., & Pea, R. (2002). A walk on the WILD side: How wireless hand-helds may change CSCL. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Proceedings of the CSCL (Computer Supported Collaborative Learning) 2002. Boulder, CO, January, 7–11 2002. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

  • Roschelle, J., Penuel, W. R., & Abrahamson, L. A. (2004). The networked classroom. Educational Leadership, 61(5), 50–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roschelle, J., Tatar, D., Chaudhury, S. R., Dimitriadis, Y., Patton, C., & DiGiano, C. (2007). Ink, improvisation, and interactive engagement: Learning with tablets. IEEE Computer, 40(9), 42–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Säljö, R. (2010). Digital tools and challenges to institutional traditions of learning: Technologies, social memory and the performative nature of learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 53–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R. K. (2005). Social emergence: Societies as complex systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Saxe, G. B. (2002). Children's developing mathematics in collective practices: A framework for analysis. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(2–3), 275–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the Organization of Repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, Smith, & Arcavi. (1993). Learning: The microgenetic analysis of one student’s evolving understanding of a complex subject matter domain. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 55–175). Earlbaum: Hillsdale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, B. B., De Groot, R., Mavrikis, M., & Dragon, T. (2015). Learning to learn together with CSCL tools. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10(3), 239–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge (acting with technology).

  • Stahl, G. (2009). Studying virtual math teams. New York: Springer. Computer-supported collaborative learning series #11.

  • Stahl, G. (2012). Traversing planes of learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7(4), 467–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. (2013). Learning across levels. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. K., Grover, B. W., & Henningsen, M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 455–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stroup, W., Ares, N., & Hurford, A. (2005). A dialectic analysis of generativity: Issues of network-supported design in mathematics and science. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 7(3), 181–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stroup, W., Ares, N., Hurford, A. & Lesh, R. (2007). Diversity-by-design: The what, why, and how of generativity in next-generation classroom networks. In R. Lesh, E. Hamilton, & J. Kaput (Eds.), Foundations for the Future in Mathematics Education (pp. 367–394). Routledge.

  • Sutherland, S. M., & White, T. F. (2016). Constraint-referenced analytics of algebra learning. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(3), 143–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szewkis, E., Nussbaum, M., Rosen, T., Abalos, J., Denardin, F., Caballero, D., et al. (2011). Collaboration within large groups in the classroom. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(4), 561–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, T. (2006). Code talk: Student discourse and participation with networked handhelds. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(3), 359–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, T., & Pea, R. (2011). Distributed by design: On the promises and pitfalls of collaborative learning with multiple representations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(3), 489–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, T., Sutherland, S., & Lai, K. (2010). Constructing Collective Algebraic Objects in a Classroom Network. In P. Brosnan, D. B. Erchick, & L. Flevares (Eds.), Proceedings of the Thirty Second Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 1523–1530). Columbus: The Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, T., Wallace, M., & Lai, K. (2012). Graphing in groups: Learning about lines in a collaborative classroom network environment. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 14(2), 149–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky, U., & Stroup, W. (1999a). Learning through participatory simulations: Network-based design for systems learning in classrooms. In C. Hoadley & J. Roschelle (Eds.), Proceedings of the conference on computer-supported collaborative learning (pp. 667–676). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky, U. & Stroup, W. (1999b). HubNet. http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/hubnet.html. Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling. Evanston: Northwestern University.

  • Wilensky, U. 1999. NetLogo. http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/. Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling. Evanston: Northwestern University.

  • Zurita, G., & Nussbaum, M. (2004). Computer supported collaborative learning using wirelessly interconnected handheld computers. Computers & Education, 42, 289–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. DRL-0747536. Jeremy Roschelle and several anonymous reviewers provided insightful feedback on earlier drafts.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Education, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA, 95616, USA

    Tobin White

Authors
  1. Tobin White
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tobin White.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

White, T. Connecting levels of activity with classroom network technology. Intern. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn 13, 93–122 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9272-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9272-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation