Abstract
To ensure the quality of pre-service science teacher education, the National Institute of Education in Singapore continuously review the programmes offered to students who aspire to become a teacher. There are two key teacher education programmes to cater to interested students with different backgrounds – the 16-month Post-Graduate Diploma in Education (PGDE) and the 4-year Bachelor of Science (Education) programme. Both programmes are built on the key principles of Teacher Education for twenty-first-century framework of V3SK (values, skills, and knowledge). The three values fundamental to pre-service teacher education in general are (1) learner-centred values, (2) teacher identity, and (3) service to the profession and community. These values are deliberately worked into all programmes to enable the development of pre-service teachers into teachers who are ready for twenty-first-century classrooms. This chapter delves into the details of how the PGDE and the undergraduate programme prepare future-ready science teachers to teach science in schools. Besides presenting the structure of the teacher preparation programmes, we use personal narratives to present the lived experiences of pre-service teachers enrolled in the programmes to bring to life the programmes. We end the chapter with four recommendations for pre-service science teacher education in the years ahead.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Singapore has a tracking system where students are streamed in Express stream (4 years of secondary education), Normal (Academic) (5 years of secondary education), or Normal (Technical) [N(T)] (5 years of secondary education that is more vocational based). This tracking system will replaced with SSB (subject-based banding) in 2024. SSB is a practice to allow students to take classes at various levels of difficulty based on their strengths.
References
Barab, S. A., & Hay, K. E. (2001). Doing science at the elbows of experts: Issues related to the science apprenticeship camp. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(1), 70–102.
Charney, J., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Sofer, W., Neigeborn, L., Coletta, S., & Nemeroff, M. (2007). Cognitive apprenticeship in science through immersion in laboratory practices. International Journal of Science Education, 29(2), 195–213.
Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (2001). Beyond certainty: Taking an inquiry stance on practice. In A. Lieberman & L. Miller (Eds.), Teachers caught in the action: Professional development that matters (The series on school reform) (pp. 45–58). New York: Teachers College Press.
Grimes, N. K. (2013). The nanny in the schoolhouse: The role of femme-Caribbean identity in attaining success in urban science classrooms. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 8, 333–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9476-1.
Im, S., Yoon, H.-G., & Cha, J. (2016). Pre-service science teacher education system in South Korea: Prospects and challenges. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(7), 1863–1880.
Isozaki, T. (2018). Science teacher education in Japan: Past, present, and future. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 4(10), 1–14.
Matin, M. O., Mullise, I. V. S., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2016). TIMSS 2015 International results in science. Retrieved on 20 June 2019 from Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Centre website: http://timssandpiris.bc.edu/timss2015/international-results/
National Institute of Education. (2019). The new V3SK model. Singapore: National Institute of Education. Retrieved on 21 June 2019 from https://www.nie.edu.sg/docs/default-source/td_practicum/te21%2D%2D-v3sk.pdf
Oshima, C. (1920). Rika-kyoujyu no genre (The principles of science teaching) [In Japanese]. Tokyo, Japan: Dobunkan. Cited in Isozaki, T. (2018). Science teacher education in Japan: Past, present, and future. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 4(10), 1–14.
Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079.
Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (2016). Framework for 21st century learning. Retrived on 29 June 2019 from http://www.p21.org/our-work/p21-framwork
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tan, A.L., Koh, D.J.Q., Lim, X.Y. (2021). Science Teacher Education in Singapore: Developing Twenty-First-Century Readiness. In: Tan, O.S., Low, E.L., Tay, E.G., Yan, Y.K. (eds) Singapore Math and Science Education Innovation. Empowering Teaching and Learning through Policies and Practice: Singapore and International Perspectives, vol 1. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1357-9_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1357-9_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-1356-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-1357-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)