Skip to main content

Socioeconomic Challenges and Prospects in the Adoption of Conservation Agriculture Practices in India

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Conservation Agriculture: A Sustainable Approach for Soil Health and Food Security

Abstract

Conservation agriculture (CA) though a good technology capable of protecting the soil resources its rate of adoption by Indian farmers is not so promising. This chapter discusses major reasons behind the low adoption of CA with the help of ‘social learning model’ of diffusion as farmers mostly adopt innovative technologies because of its outcome in prior adopters field rather than the scientific advantage of the technology; and the ‘progressive farmer strategy’ in technology transfer as extension worker-progressive farmer attraction is observed to be another factor that slow down the rate of technology adoption. In fact, demonstrations of CA technologies in different cropping systems of India convey that farmers benefitted economically and ecologically with those technologies. However, knowledge-intensive nature of CA demands strong awareness generation about the technology among the rural farmers of India to fuel up its adoption rate. Moreover, the heterogeneity of farmlands throughout the country demands more farmer field demonstrations of the CA practices to make it need based rather than a ‘one-size-fits-all’ technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bell RW, Haque ME, Jahiruddin M, Rahman MM, Begum M, MonayemMiah MA, Islam MA, Hossen MA, Salahin N, Zahan T, Hossain MM, Alam MK, Hasan Mahmud MN (2019) Conservation agriculture for rice-based intensive cropping by smallholders in the eastern gangetic plain. Agriculture 9(5):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhan S, Behera UK (2014) Conservation agriculture in India – Problems, prospects and policy issues. Int Soil Water Conservat Res 2(4):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-6339(15)30053-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanckenburg PV (1972) Who leads agricultural modernisation? A study of some progressive farmers in Mysore and Punjab. Econ Polit Wkly 7(40):94–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers R (1983) Rural development: putting the last first. Longman Inc., USA. 235p

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhillon GS (2016) Comparative evaluation of happy seeder technology versus normal sowing in wheat (Triticumaestivum) in adopted village KilliNahal Singh of Bathinda district of Punjab. J Appl Nat Sci 8(4):2278–2282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekboir J (2002) Developing no-till packages for small farmers. In: Ekboir J (ed) CIMMYT 2000–2001 world wheat overview and outlook: developing no-till packages for small-scale farmers. CIMMYT, Mexico, DF, pp 1–38

    Google Scholar 

  • FICCI Agri Report (2015) Labour in Indian agriculture: a growing challenge. Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce & Industry, New Delhi, India. http://ficci.in/spdocument/20550/FICCI-agri-Report%2009-03-2015.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization (2001) The economics of conservation agriculture. http://www.fao.org/3/y2781e/y2781e00.htm.

  • Foster AD, Rosenzweig MR (1995) Learning by doing and learning from others: human capital and technical change in agriculture. J Polit Econ 103(6):1176–1209. Available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/2138708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich T, Derpsch R, Kassam A (2012) Overview of the global spread of conservation agriculture. Field Actions Sci Rep 6:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould BW, Saupe WE, Klemme RM (1989) Conservation tillage: the role of farm and operator characteristics and the perception of soil erosion. Land Econ 65(2):167–182. https://doi.org/10.2307/3146791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habanyati EJ, Nyanga PH, Umar BB (2020) Factors contributing to disadoption of conservation agriculture among smallholder farmers in Petauke, Zambia. Kasetsart J Soc Sci 41:91–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassam A, Basch G, Friedrich T, Shaxson TF, Goddard T, Amado T, Crabtree B, Hongwen L, Mello I, Pisante M, Mkomwa S (2013) Sustainable soil management is more than what and how crops are grown. In: Lal R, Stewart RA (eds) Principles of soil management in agro-ecosystems, pp 337–399. Available at http://www.fao.org/tempref/AG/agp/ca/CA_CoP_Sep13/Ch14_Principles_SSMA.pdf

  • Kassam A, Friedrich T, Derpsch R (2019) Global spread of conservation agriculture. Int J Environ Stud 76(1):29–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2018.1494927

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laxmi V, Mishra V (2007) Factors affecting the adoption of resource conservation technology: case of zero tillage in rice-wheat farming systems. Indian J Agricult Econ 62(1):126–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik RK, Yadav A, Gill GS, Sardana P, Gupta RK, Piggin C (2004) Evolution and acceleration of no-till farming in rice–wheat cropping system of the Indo-Gangetic Plains. In ‘New directions for a diverse planet. Proceedings of the 4th international crop science congress’. http://www.cropscience.org.au/icsc2004/symposia/2/2/459malikrk.htm. [Verified 22 April 2007]

  • Mueller JP, Pezo D, Benites J, Schlaepfer NP (2001) Conflicts between conservation agriculture and livestock over utilization of crop residues. In: Gracia-Torres L, Benites J, Martínez-Vilela A (eds) Conservation agriculture: a worldwide challenge. ECAF/FAO, Córdoba, Spain, pp 211–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Muneer S (2014) Agricultural extension and the continuous progressive farmers’ bias and laggards blame: the case of date palm producers in Saudi Arabia. Int J Agric Ext 2(3):177–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Munshi K (2004) Social learning in a heterogeneous population: technology diffusion in the Indian Green Revolution. J Dev Econ 73:185–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2003.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pannell DJ (1999) Social and economic challenges in the development of complex farming systems. Agrofor Syst 45:395. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006282614791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pannell DJ, Llewellyn RS, Corbeels M (2014) The farm-level economics of conservation agriculture for resource-poor farmers. Agric Ecosyst Environ 187(1):52–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan A, Idol T, Roul PK (2016) Conservation agriculture practices in rainfed uplands of India improve maize-based system productivity and profitability. Front Plant Sci 7:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramasubramaniyan MR, Vasanthakumar J, Hansara BS (2016) Knowledge and adoption of conservation agriculture technologies by the farming community in different agro-climatic zones of Tamil Nadu state in India. J Agric Sci 8(11):154–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers EM (1983) Diffusion of innovations, 3rd edn. The Free Press, New York, 453p

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers EM (1995) Diffusion of innovations, 4th edn. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers EM (2002) Diffusion of preventive innovations. Addict Behav 27:989–993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roling NG (1988) Extension science, information systems in agricultural development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 240 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadoulet E (2006) Review of theories of learning for adopting. Available at https://ferdi.fr/dl/df-TPhnDxFqLo1MTroF9KRREdqz/ferdi-p163-review-of-theoriesof-learning-for-adopting.pdf

  • Sidhu RS, Vatta K, Dhaliwal HS (2010) Conservation agriculture in Punjab—economic implications of technologies and practices. Indian J Agricult Econ 65(3):413–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Space Applications Centre-Government of India (2016) Desertification and land degradation Atlas of India (Based on IRS AWiFS data of 2011–13 and 2003–05). Space Applications Centre, Indian Space Research Organisation, Ahmedabad, India, 219 p. Available at https://www.sac.gov.in/SACSITE/Desertification_Atlas_2016_SAC_ISRO.pdf

  • Srivastava SK, Chand R, Singh J (2017) Changing crop production cost in India: Input price substitution and technological effects. Agric Econ Res Rev 30:171–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wall PC (2007) Tailoring conservation agriculture to the needs of small farmers in developing countries. J Crop Improv 19(1):137–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young HP (2009) Innovation diffusion in heterogeneous populations: contagion, social influence, and social learning. Am Econ Rev 99(5):1899–1924. Available at http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/aer.99.5.1899

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Shinogi, K.C. et al. (2021). Socioeconomic Challenges and Prospects in the Adoption of Conservation Agriculture Practices in India. In: Jayaraman, S., Dalal, R.C., Patra, A.K., Chaudhari, S.K. (eds) Conservation Agriculture: A Sustainable Approach for Soil Health and Food Security . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0827-8_29

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics