Skip to main content

Technique to Reduce PAPR Problem in Next-Generation Wireless Communication System

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Architectural Wireless Networks Solutions and Security Issues

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 196))

  • 357 Accesses

Abstract

When the fourth generation for wireless communication networks was developed, it was upgraded to provide both enhanced coverage area and higher data rates to every mobile user with lower latency. However, wireless communication system for the next-generation network will need to challenge new requirement with a greater diversity of application requirements such as ultra-high data rate, ultra-low latency, flexible use of spectrum and spectrum sharing, and battery-powered sensors that needs extremely low energy consumption, and some other control applications that want a very short round trip time (RTT). Due to problems with orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) and next-generation demands, OFDM is not used as a promising waveform for next-generation wireless communication network. In these circumstances, alternative multiplexing schemes such as generalized frequency division multiplexing (GFDM), due to flexibility in pulse shape and single cyclic prefix in a multi-path system, GFDM is becoming common every day, making it eligible for 5G wireless technologies. GFDM looks as generalization of OFDM technique. But one of the common drawbacks of every multicarrier system is their high peak to average power ratio (PAPR). The main effect of strong PAPR is instability in the analog to digital converter (ADC) and digital to analog converter (DAC), decreased its performance and raised costs. A PAPR reduction technique such as clipping and filtering that greatly improves the efficiency compared to the initial GFDM signal PAPR. Overall peak re-growth can be reduced by using repeated clip and filter operations. Simulation is performed for this scheme to evaluate this system’s PAPR output for different values of roll-off variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. De D, Mukherjee A, Das SK, Dey N (2020) Wireless sensor network: applications, challenges, and algorithms. Nature inspired computing for wireless sensor networks. Springer, Singapore, pp 1–18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Das SK, Tripathi S (2019) Energy efficient routing formation algorithm for hybrid ad-hoc network: a geometric programming approach. Peer-To-Peer Netw Appl 12(1):102–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Das SK, Tripathi S (2018) Adaptive and intelligent energy efficient routing for transparent heterogeneous ad-hoc network by fusion of game theory and linear programming. Appl Intell 48(7):1825–1845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Das SK, Samanta S, Dey N, Kumar R (2020) Design frameworks for wireless networks. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  5. De D, Mukherjee A, Das SK, Dey N (2019) Nature inspired computing for wireless sensor networks

    Google Scholar 

  6. Binh HTT, Hanh NT, Nghia ND, Dey N (2020) Metaheuristics for maximization of obstacles constrained area coverage in heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. Appl Soft Comput 86:105939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mishra AR (2004) Fundamentals of cellular network planning and optimization, 2G/2.5G/3G…Evolution of 4G. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pereira V, Sousa T (2004) Evolution of mobile communications: from 1G to 4G. Department of Informatics Engineering of the University of Coimbra, Portugal

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chen S, Zhao J (2014) The requirements, challenges, and technologies for 5G of terrestrial mobile telecommunication. IEEE Commun Mag 52(5):36–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Thompson J, Ge X, Wu HC, Irmer R, Jiang H, Fettweis G, Alamouti S (2014) 5G wireless communication systems: prospects and challenges. IEEE Commun Mag 52(2):62–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Farhang-Boroujeny B (2011) OFDM versus filter bank multicarrier. IEEE Signal Process Mag 28(3):92–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vakilian V, Wild T, Schaich F, ten Brink S, Frigon JF (2013) Universal filtered multi-carrier technique for wireless systems beyond LTE. In: Proceedings of IEEE Globecom workshop, Atlanta, GA, USA, pp 223–228

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ayadi R, Siala M, Kammoun I (2007) Transmit/receive pulse-shaping design in gfdm systems over time-frequency dispersive AWGN channel. In: Proceedings of IEEE ICSPC, Dubai, UAE, pp 772–775

    Google Scholar 

  14. Datta R, Michailow N, Lentmaier M, Fettweis G (2012) GFDM interference cancellation for flexible cognitive radio PHY design. In: Proceedings of 76th IEEE VTC fall, Québec City, QC, Canada, pp 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kumar A, Gupta M (2015) Key technologies and problem in deployment of 5G mobile communication systems. Commun Appl Electr 1(3):4–7. (Published by Foundation of Computer Science, New York, USA)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fettweis G, Krondorf M, Bittner S (2009) GFDM—generalized frequency division multiplexing. In Proceedings of 69th IEEE VTC spring, Barcelona, Spain, pp 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wunder G et al (2014) 5GNOW: non-orthogonal, asynchronous waveforms for future mobile applications. IEEE Commun Mag 52(2):97–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sameen M, Khan AA, Khan IU, Azim N, Iqbal N (2016) Comparative analysis of OFDM and GFDM. Int J Adv Comput Tech Appl 4(2):267–274

    Google Scholar 

  19. Michailow N, Gaspar I, Krone S, Lentmaier M, Fettweis G (2012) Generalized frequency division multiplexing: analysis of an alternative multi-carrier technique for next generation cellular systems. In: 2012 International symposium on wireless communication systems (ISWCS), pp 171–175

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wu J, Ma X, Qi X, Babar Z, Zheng W (2017) Influence of pulse shaping filters on PAPR performance of underwater 5G communication system technique: GFDM. Hindawi Wirel Commun Mob Comput 2017, Article ID 4361589

    Google Scholar 

  21. Asseri MI, Tsimenidis CC, Sharif BS, Le Goff SY (2010) Orthogonal-SLM technique for PAPR reduction and recovery without side information in OFDM systems. In: 2010 7th international symposium on communication systems networks and digital signal processing (CSNDSP), pp 162,166

    Google Scholar 

  22. Han SH, Lee JH (2005) An overview of peak to average power ratio reductions techniques multicarrier transmission. IEEE Wirel Commun 12(2):56–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Farhang A, Marchetti N, Doyle LE (2016) Low-complexity modem design for GFDM. IEEE Trans Signal Process 64(6)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Han SH, Lee JH (2005) An overview of peak to average power ratio reduction techniques for multicarrier transmission. IEEE Wirel Commun 12(2):56–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Michailow N, Fettweis G (2013) Low peak-to-average power ratio for next generation cellular systems with generalized frequency division multiplexing. International symposium on intelligent signal processing and communication systems ISPACS. Naha, Japan, pp 651–655

    Google Scholar 

  26. Daumont S, Rihawi B, Lout Y (2008) Root-Raised Cosine filter influences on PAPR distribution of single carrier signals. ISCCSP 2008, Malta, pp 841–845

    Google Scholar 

  27. Armstrong J (2001) New OFDM peak-to-average power reduction scheme. Proceedings. IEEE, VTC2001 Spring, Rhodes, Greece

    Google Scholar 

  28. Armstrong J (2002) Peak-to-average power reduction for OFDM by repeated clipping and frequency domain filtering. Electron Lett 38(5):246–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. SaadHadi Z, Mosa Omran B (2015) Peak-to-average power reduction using repeated frequency domain filtering and clipping in OFDM. Int J Comput Appl 122(11):6–10

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kumar, A., Mishra, V., Tyagi, S., Saini, P., Saxena, N. (2021). Technique to Reduce PAPR Problem in Next-Generation Wireless Communication System. In: Das, S.K., Samanta, S., Dey, N., Patel, B.S., Hassanien, A.E. (eds) Architectural Wireless Networks Solutions and Security Issues. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 196. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0386-0_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0386-0_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-0385-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-0386-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics