Skip to main content

Pattern Recognition to Identify Susceptible Areas in Northwestern Himalaya

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Geohazards

Abstract

Regions in northern India, especially within the Himalayan arc, have experienced frequent disastrous earthquakes. Major seismic activity in India is concentrated along the geologically young and seismo-tectonically active Himalayan arc. An area between the latitude 25° N to 35° N and longitude 72° E to 90° E was considered for the study, which falls between the great Kangra earthquake of 1905 and the great Bihar–Nepal earthquake of 1934. The main objective of the study is to identify the areas of high seismic susceptibility using pattern recognition (PR) exercise. Areas which have experienced high seismicity and have complex tectonics are more prone to much frequent seismic activity in future and are defined as seismically susceptible areas. The pattern recognition technique started with the identification, selection, and extraction of features from the seismicity and tectonic data. Various features were identified from a circle of radius 25 km around each epicenter, known as the central earthquake. These features were then subjected to discriminant analysis, which constituted the training exercise of the PR technique. The discriminant functions obtained from this training exercise were then applied for the decision-making exercise to identify the susceptible areas. This resulted in the identification of susceptible area within the study area in the form of clusters. Various clusters were identified along the Himalayan arc, which are capable of producing damaging earthquake of significant magnitude. A dense cluster was observed between the Main Boundary Thrust (MBT) and the Main Central Thrust (MCT), and Kishtwar Fault in west and Sundernagar Fault in east. The great Kangra earthquake is part of this dense cluster. A great amount of seismicity was also observed around MCT, east of Sundernagar Fault, in Uttarakhand and western Nepal. Epicenters of Uttarkashi (Mw = 6.8) and Chamoli (Mw = 6.7) earthquakes are within this cluster. Other dense clusters were also observed which trends transverse to the Himalayan arc and follows the Kaurik Fault system and in the vicinity of Lake Lighten Fault, in the Kashmir Tibet region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bhatia SC, Chetty TRK, Filimonov MB, Gorshkov AI, Rantsman EY, Rao MN (1992) Identification of potential areas for the occurrence of strong earthquakes in Himalayan arc region. Proc Indian Acad Sci (Earth Planet Sci) 101:369–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Caputo M, Keilis-Borok VI, Oficerova Ranzman E, Rotwain I, Solovjeff A (1980) Pattern recognition of earthquake prone areas in Italy. Phys Earth Planet Inter 305–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand IM, Guberman SI, Izvekova ML, Keilis-Borok VI, Ranzman EJ (1972) Criteria of high seismicity, determined by pattern recognition. Tectonophysics 13(1):415–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand IM, Guberman SA, Izvekova ML, Keilis-Borok VI, Ranzman E (1973a) Recognition of places where strong earthquake may occur. I. Pamir and Tien Shan. Computational seismology, vol 6 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand IM, Guberman SA, Kaletskaja MS, Keilis-Borok VI, Ranzman E, Zhidkov MP (1973b) On transfer of criterion of high seismicity from Central Asia to Anatolia and adjacent regions (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand IM, Guberman SA, Kaletskaja MS, Keilis-Borok VI, Ranzman E, Rotwain IM, Zhidkov MP (1974a) Recognition of places where strong earthquakes may occur. II: four regions of Asia Minor and S-E Europe (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand IM, Guberman SA, Keilis-Borok VI, Ranzman E, Rotwain IM, Zhidkov MP (1974b) Recognition of places where strong earthquakes may occur. III: the case when the boundaries of disjunctive knots are unknown (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand IM, Guberman SA, Keilis-Borok VI, Knopoff L, Press F, Rantsman E, Rotwain I, Sadovsky AM (1976) Pattern recognition applied to earthquake epicenters in California. Phys Earth Planet Inter 11(3):227–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorshkov AI, Kuznetsov I, Panza G, Soloviev AA (2000) Identification of future earthquake sources in the Carpatho-Balkan Orogenic Belt using morphostructural criteria. Pure Appl Geophys 157:79–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorshkov AI, Panza GF, Soloviev AA, Aoudia A (2002) Morphostructural zonation and preliminary recognition of seismogenic nodes around the Adria margin in peninsular Italy and Sicily. J Seismol Earthq Eng 4:1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorshkov AI, Panza GF, Soloviev AA, Aoudia A (2004) Identification of seismogenic nodes in the alps and dinarides. Boll Soc Geol Ital 123:3–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorshkov AI, Mokhtari M, Piotrovskaya EP (2009) The Alborz region: identification of seismogenic nodes with morphostructural zoning and pattern recognition. J Seismol Earthq Eng 11:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorshkov AI, Soloviev AA, Jimenez MJ, Fernandez G, Panza GF (2010) Recognition of earthquake prone areas (M ≥ 5.0) in the Iberian Peninsula, Rend. Fis Acc Lincei 21(2):131–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorshkov AI, Soloviev AA, Zharkikh YI (2017) A morphostructural zoning of the mountainous crimea and the possible locations of future earthquakes. J Volcanol Seismol 11(6):407–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorshkov AI, Soloviev AA, Zharkikh YuI (2018) Recognition of strong earthquake prone areas in the Altai–Sayan–Baikal region. Dokl Earth Sci 479(1):412–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gvishiani AD, Soloviev AA (1984) Recognition of places on the Pacific coast of the South America where strong earthquakes may occur. Earthq Prediction Res 2:237–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Gvishiani AD, Zhidkov MP, Soloviev AA (1984) On application of the criteria of high seismicity of Andean mountain belt to Kamchatka. Izv Akad Nauk SSSR Fiz Zemli 1:20–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Gvishiani A, Gorshkov A, Kossobokov V, Cisternas A, Philip H, Weber C (1987) Identification of seismically dangerous zones in the Pyrenees. Ann Geophys B 5(6):681–690

    Google Scholar 

  • Gvishiani AD, Gorshkov AI, Ranzman EY, Cisternas A, Soloviev AA (1988) Forecasting the earthquake locations in the regions of moderate seismic activity. Nauka, Moscow, p 187

    Google Scholar 

  • ISC. https://www.isc.ac.uk/iscbulletin/search/bulletin

  • Mridula, Sinvhal A, Wason HR (2013) A review on pattern recognition techniques for seismic hazard analysis. In: Proceedings of international conference on emerging trends in engineering and technology, pp 854–858

    Google Scholar 

  • Mridula, Sinvhal A, Wason HR (2014a) Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment in the vicinity of MBT and MCT in western Himalaya. Res Inventy Int J Eng Sci 4(11):21–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Mridula, Sinvhal A, Wason HR (2014b) Seismic hazard zonation of Himachal Pradesh, Northwest Himalaya. In: National workshop on status of natural hazards in Himachal Pradesh (NHHP-14), 6–8 Nov, 2014 conducted by Central University of Himachal Pradesh, Shahpur, Dharamsala (Abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mridula, Rajput SS, Sinvhal A, Wason HR (2015) Seismic hazard and vulnerability assessment of Himachal Pradesh and contiguous regions. In: EMI 2015 conference. Stanford University, June 16–19, 2015 (Abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mridula, Sinvhal A, Wason HR (2016a) Identification of seismically susceptible areas in the western Himalaya using pattern recognition. J Earth Syst Sci 125(4):855–871

    Google Scholar 

  • Mridula, Sinvhal A, Wason HR, Rajput SS (2016b) Segmentation of main boundary thrust and main central thrust in Western Himalaya for assessment of seismic hazard. Nat Hazards 84(1):383–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Narula PL, Acharya SK, Banerjee J (2000) Seismotectonic atlas of India and its environs. Geological Survey of India, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Novikova O, Gorshkov A (2013) Recognition of earthquake prone areas (M≥6.0) in the Kopet Dagh region using the GIS technology. J Seismol Earthq Eng 15(3):92–99, 31

    Google Scholar 

  • Novikova O, Gorshkov A (2016) Seismogenic nodes defined by pattern recognition in the central part of the Alpine Himalayan belt. Bull Geol Soc Greece 50:1426–1432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peresan A, Zuccolo E, Vaccari F, Gorshkov A, Panza GF (2011) Neo-deterministic seismic hazard and pattern recognition techniques: time-dependent scenarios for North-Eastern Italy. Pure Appl Geophys 168:583–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peresan A, Gorshkov AI, Soloviev A, Panza GF (2015) The contribution of pattern recognition of seismic and morphostructural data to seismic hazard assessment. Boll Geofis Teorica Appl 56:295–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajput SS, Mridula, Sinvhal A (2014) Vulnerability assessment of area and structures. In: 15th symposium on earthquake engineering, proceedings volume, pp 1099–1108

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajput SS, Mridula, Sinvhal A, Wason HR, Dixit P (2016) Seismic hazard and risk assessment in Kangra seismogenic source zone. In: 6th international conference on recent advances in geotechnical earthquake engineering & soil dynamics, Noida, India, Aug 1–6, 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajput SS, Mridula, Sinvhal A, Jakka RS (2017) Seismic hazard and risk assessment of Himachal Pradesh and its contiguous area. In: 14th annual meeting Asia Oceania Geosciences Society in SUNTEC Singapore from 6–11 Aug 2017 (Abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinvhal A, Sinvhal H (1992) Seismic modelling and pattern recognition in oil exploration. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, p 178

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinvhal A, Khattri KN, Sinvhal H, Awasthi AK (1984) Seismic indicators of stratigraphy. Geophysics 48:1196–1212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinvhal A, Joshi G, Sinvhal H, Singh VN (1990) A pattern recognition technique for microzonation. In: Proceedings of the ninth symposium on earthquake engineering, pp 24–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinvhal A, Sinvhal H, Joshi G (1991) A valid pattern of microzonation. In: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on seismic zonation, pp 641–648

    Google Scholar 

  • Soloviev AA, Gorshkov AI (2017) Modelling the dynamics of the block structure and seismicity of the Caucasus. Phys Solid Earth 53(3):321–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Soloviev AA, Novikova OV, Gorshkov AI, Piotrovskaya EP (2013) Recognition of potential sources of strong earthquakes in the caucasus region using GIS technologies. Dokl Earth Sci 450(2):658–660. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1028334X13060159

  • Soloviev AA, Gvishiani AD, Gorshkov AI, Dobrovolsky MN, Novikova OV (2014) Recognition of earthquake-prone areas: methodology and analysis of the results. Izv Phys Solid Earth 50(2):151–168. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351314020116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soloviev AA, Gorshkov AI, Soloviev AA (2016) Application of the data on the lithospheric magnetic anomalies in the problem of recognizing the earthquake prone areas. Phys Solid Earth 52(6):803–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talebi M, Zare M, Peresan A, Ansari A (2017) Long-term probabilistic forecast for M ≥ 5.0 earthquakes in Iran. Pure Appl Geophys 174:1561–1580

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuyen NH, Gorshkov AI, Lu NT (2012) Recognition of earthquake-prone areas (M≥5.0) applied for North Vietnam and adjacency. J Sci Earth 34(3):251–265

    Google Scholar 

  • USGS. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eqarchives

  • Varunoday, Gaur VK, Wason HR (1979) Spatial prediction of earthquakes in the Kumaon Himalaya by pattern recognition. Mausam 30:253–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Vorobieva I, Mandal P, Gorshkov AI (2017) Block-and-fault dynamics modelling of the Himalayan frontal arc: implications for seismic cycle, slip deficit, and great earthquakes. J Asian Earth Sci 148:131–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walt CM, Barnard E (2007) Data characteristics that determine classifier performance. SAIEE Afr Res J 98:87–93

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Indian Meteorological Department, New Delhi, for the epicentral data provided. Author (Swati Singh Rajput) is grateful to the Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD) and Department of Earthquake Engineering for the financial and academic support, respectively, provided for the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Swati Singh Rajput .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rajput, S.S., Jakka, R.S., Sinvhal, A. (2021). Pattern Recognition to Identify Susceptible Areas in Northwestern Himalaya. In: Latha Gali, M., Raghuveer Rao, P. (eds) Geohazards. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 86. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6233-4_47

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6233-4_47

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-6232-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-6233-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics