Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Surgery: Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

  • 445 Accesses

Abstract

Technical advances in endoscopic equipment and thoracoscopic surgery have increased the popularity of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). Recently, robot-assisted thoracoscopic and/or laparoscopic esophagectomy using the da Vinci surgical system (DVSS) (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, USA) became an attractive option. More recently, nonthoracic radical esophagectomy with both transcervical and transhiatal approaches using mediastinoscopic devices were developed. However, there is currently no established scientific evidence supporting the use of MIE as an alternative to open esophagectomy (OE). In general, MIE is associated with longer operative times but lower blood loss and lower rates of pulmonary complications such as pneumonia compared with OE. To date, two patient positions were used for thoracoscopic esophagectomy, one is left lateral decubitus position, and the other is prone position. However, the optimal MIE type, approach, and position remain unclear. Over the next few years, an ongoing randomized phase III study, JCOG1409, is expected to determine the benefits of each procedure in terms of short- and long-term outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Booka E, Takeuchi H, Suda K, et al. Meta-analysis of the impact of postoperative complications on survival after oesophagectomy for cancer. BJS Open. 2018;2:276–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Ando N, Ozawa S, Kitagawa Y, et al. Improvement in the results of surgical treatment of advanced squamous esophageal carcinoma during 15 consecutive years. Ann Surg. 2000;232:225–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Booka E, Takeuchi H, Nishi T, et al. The impact of postoperative complications on survivals after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94:e1369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Takeuchi H, Miyata H, Gotoh M, et al. A risk model for esophagectomy using data of 5354 patients included in a Japanese nationwide web-based database. Ann Surg. 2014;260:259–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Takeuchi H, Kawakubo H, Kitagawa Y. Current status of minimally invasive esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;61:513–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cuschieri A, Shimi S, Banting S. Endoscopic oesophagectomy through a right thoracoscopic approach. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1992;37:7–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379:1887–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Takeuchi H, Miyata H, Ozawa S, et al. Comparison of short-term outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer using a Nationwide database in Japan. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:1821–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Koyanagi K, Ozawa S, Tachimori Y. Minimally invasive esophagectomy performed with the patient in a prone position: a systematic review. Surg Today. 2016;46:275–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kitagawa Y, Uno T, Oyama T, et al. Esophageal cancer practice guidelines 2017 edited by the Japan esophageal society: part 1. Esophagus. 2019a;16:1–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kitagawa Y, Uno T, Oyama T, et al. Esophageal cancer practice guidelines 2017 edited by the Japan esophageal society: part 2. Esophagus. 2019b;16:25–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shichinohe T, Hirano S, Kondo S. Video-assisted esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surg Today. 2008;38:206–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nagpal K, Ahmed K, Vats A, et al. Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:1621–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M, et al. A comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for squamous cell cancer of the oesophagus with open operation. Br J Surg. 2003;90:108–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nakauchi M, Uyama I, Suda K, et al. Robotic surgery for the upper gastrointestinal tract: current status and future perspectives. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2017;10:354–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fujiwara H, Shiozaki A, Konishi H, et al. Perioperative outcomes of single-port mediastinoscope-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus. 2017;30:1–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mori K, Aikou S, Yagi K, et al. Technical details of video-assisted transcervical mediastinal dissection for esophageal cancer and its perioperative outcome. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2017;1:232–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Nakauchi M, Uyama I, Suda K, et al. Robot-assisted mediastinoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: the first clinical series. Esophagus. 2019;16:85–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bumm R, Holscher AH, Feussner H, et al. Endodissection of the thoracic esophagus. Technique and clinical results in transhiatal esophagectomy. Ann Surg. 1993;218:97–104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Sadanaga N, Kuwano H, Watanabe M, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted surgery: a new technique for transhiatal esophageal dissection. Am J Surg. 1994;168:355–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kernstine KH, DeArmond DT, Karimi M, et al. The robotic, 2-stage, 3-field esophagolymphadenectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;127:1847–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Akaishi T, Kaneda I, Higuchi N, et al. Thoracoscopic en bloc total esophagectomy with radical mediastinal lymphadenectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;112:1533–40. Discussion 40–1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kawahara K, Maekawa T, Okabayashi K, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc. 1999;13:218–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cuschieri A. Thoracoscopic subtotal oesophagectomy. Endosc Surg Allied Technol. 1994;2:21–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Palanivelu C, Prakash A, Senthilkumar R, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position--experience of 130 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203:7–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ozawa S, Ito E, Kazuno A, et al. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy while in a prone position for esophageal cancer: a preceding anterior approach method. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:40–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Watanabe M, Baba Y, Nagai Y, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: an updated review. Surg Today. 2013;43:237–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jarral OA, Purkayastha S, Athanasiou T, et al. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:2095–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Noshiro H, Miyake S. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy using prone positioning. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;19:399–408.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Yatabe T, Kitagawa H, Yamashita K, et al. Better postoperative oxygenation in thoracoscopic esophagectomy in prone positioning. J Anesth. 2010;24:803–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Takeuchi H, Oyama T, Saikawa Y, et al. Novel thoracoscopic intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis technique for patients with esophageal cancer. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012;22:88–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Matsuda S, Takeuchi H, Kawakubo H, et al. Three-field lymph node dissection in esophageal cancer surgery. J Thorac Dis. 2017;9:731–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Dantoc M, Cox MR, Eslick GD. Evidence to support the use of minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg. 2012;147:768–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kaburagi T, Takeuchi H, Kawakubo H, et al. Clinical utility of a novel hybrid position combining the left lateral decubitus and prone positions during thoracoscopic esophagectomy. World J Surg. 2014;38:410–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Shiraishi T, Kawahara K, Shirakusa T, et al. Risk analysis in resection of thoracic esophageal cancer in the era of endoscopic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81:1083–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hara H, Tahara M, Daiko H, et al. Phase II feasibility study of preoperative chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Sci. 2013;104:1455–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Kinjo Y, Kurita N, Nakamura F, et al. Effectiveness of combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy: comparison of postoperative complications and midterm oncological outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:381–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Daiko H, Nishimura M. A pilot study of the technical and oncologic feasibility of thoracoscopic esophagectomy with extended lymph node dissection in the prone position for clinical stage I thoracic esophageal carcinoma. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:673–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Miyasaka D, Okushiba S, Sasaki T, et al. Clinical evaluation of the feasibility of minimally invasive surgery in esophageal cancer. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2013;6:26–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Hsu PK, Huang CS, Wu YC, et al. Open versus thoracoscopic esophagectomy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. World J Surg. 2014;38:402–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Tapias LF, Mathisen DJ, Wright CD, et al. Outcomes with open and minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy after neoadjuvant therapy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101:1097–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Sundaram A, Geronimo JC, Willer BL, et al. Survival and quality of life after minimally invasive esophagectomy: a single-surgeon experience. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:168–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Koyanagi K, Igaki H, Iwabu J, et al. Recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis after esophagectomy: respiratory complications and role of nerve reconstruction. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2015;237:1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Seesing MFJ, Gisbertz SS, Goense L, et al. A propensity score matched analysis of open versus minimally invasive transthoracic esophagectomy in the Netherlands. Ann Surg. 2017;266:839–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Mamidanna R, Bottle A, Aylin P, et al. Short-term outcomes following open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer in England: a population-based national study. Ann Surg. 2012;255:197–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Nozaki I, Mizusawa J, Kato K, et al. Impact of laparoscopy on the prevention of pulmonary complications after thoracoscopic esophagectomy using data from JCOG0502: a prospective multicenter study. Surg Endosc. 2018;32:651–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Takeno S, Takahashi Y, Moroga T, et al. Retrospective study using the propensity score to clarify the oncologic feasibility of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer. World J Surg. 2013;37:1673–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Straatman J, van der Wielen N, Cuesta MA, et al. Minimally invasive versus open esophageal resection: three-year follow-up of the previously reported randomized controlled trial: the TIME trial. Ann Surg. 2017;266:232–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Mitzman B, Lutfi W, Wang CH, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy provides equivalent survival to open esophagectomy: an analysis of the National Cancer Database. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;29:244–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Kataoka K, Takeuchi H, Mizusawa J, et al. A randomized phase III trial of thoracoscopic versus open esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: Japan clinical oncology group study JCOG1409. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2016;46:174–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Suda K, Ishida Y, Kawamura Y, et al. Robot-assisted thoracoscopic lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in the prone position: technical report and short-term outcomes. World J Surg. 2012;36:1608–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Ruurda JP, van der Sluis PC, van der Horst S, et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review. J Surg Oncol. 2015;112:257–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Jeong DM, Kim JA, Ahn HJ, et al. Decreased incidence of postoperative delirium in robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy compared with open transthoracic esophagectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2016;26:516–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Park S, Hwang Y, Lee HJ, et al. Comparison of robot-assisted esophagectomy and thoracoscopic esophagectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Thorac Dis. 2016;8:2853–61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Chao YK, Hsieh MJ, Liu YH, et al. Lymph node evaluation in robot-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity-matched analysis. World J Surg. 2018;42:590–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. He H, Wu Q, Wang Z, et al. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018;13:52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. van der Sluis PC, van der Horst S, May AM, et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2019;269:621–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. van der Sluis PC, Ruurda JP, van der Horst S, et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer, a randomized controlled trial (ROBOT trial). Trials. 2012;13:230.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Jin D, Yao L, Yu J, et al. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus the conventional minimally invasive one: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Int J Med Robot. 2019:e1988.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Ikeda Y, Niimi M, Kan S, et al. Mediastinoscopic esophagectomy using carbon dioxide insufflation via the neck approach. Surgery. 2001;129:504–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Koyanagi K, Ozawa S, Tachimori Y. Minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position improves postoperative outcomes: role of C-reactive protein as an indicator of surgical invasiveness. Esophagus. 2018;15:95–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Mariette C, Markar TS, Dabakuyo-Yonli B, et al. Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:152–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Shizuoka, Japan

    Hiroya Takeuchi

  2. Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

    Eisuke Booka

  3. Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

    Kazuo Koyanagi

Authors
  1. Hiroya Takeuchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eisuke Booka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kazuo Koyanagi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroya Takeuchi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. International Goodwill Hospital, Yokohama, Japan

    Nobutoshi Ando

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Takeuchi, H., Booka, E., Koyanagi, K. (2020). Surgery: Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy. In: Ando, N. (eds) Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4190-2_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4190-2_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-4189-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-4190-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation