Skip to main content

The Philosophy of Heutagogy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Exploring Heutagogy in Higher Education
  • 530 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter we present the philosophical basis of heutagogy from our point of view. Based on the writings of Michel Serres, we discuss the ideas of knowledge and learning as wandering in a networked world. Our concept of heutagogy is strongly influenced by the French philosopher Michel Serres, (mainly 1964 [1968]; 1968; 1991 [1997]; 2015 [2012]; 2016). We embrace Serres’ (a member of the French academy, 1930–2019) “image of thought” of the world as a network, the figures of Hermes and the “instructed third” (le tiers instruit), and the claim that there is no learning without wandering. At the centre of Serres’ view stands the notion of the third (le tiers) which has logical, epistemological, and ethical aspects. We’ll begin by uncovering the logical features of the learning-as-wandering process and examine its ethical significance.

Certainly, I never learned anything unless I left, nor taught someone else without inviting him to leave his nest

(Serres, 1997, p. 7)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For the idea of the rhizome and its application to education see: (Back & Mansur, 2016; Cormier, 2008; Gorodezki & Barak, 2016; Semetsky, 2008). We prefer to use the mesh network concept because it is part of a larger typological theory which can refer to processes such as star and bus type learning (see Chap. 3). The rhizome, which is a biological phenomenon (e.g., grass), is a more limited metaphor since it is impossible that every node in the rhizome will be connected to any other.

References

  • Back, S., & Mansur-Schachor, R. (2016). The “third” within ACE. In J. Barak & A. Gidron (Eds.), Active collaborative education: A journey towards teaching (pp. 149–67). Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudelaire, C. (2010). The painter of modern life (P. Charvet, Trans.). London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2008). Does ethics have a chance in a world of consumers?. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, W. (1999). The arcades project (H. Eiland & K. McLaughlin, Trans.). Cambridge and London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaschke, L. M. (2018). Self-determined Learning (Heutagogy) and digital media creating integrated educational environments for developing lifelong learning skills. In D. Kergel, B. Heidkamp, P. Telléus, T. Rachwal, & S. Nowakowski (Eds.), The digital turn in higher education. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cajete, G. (1996). Look to the mountain: An ecology of indigenous education. Durango: Kivaki Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cormier, D. (2008). Rhizomatic education: Community as curriculum. Innovate, 4(5). http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article&id=550.

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1988). A thousand Plateaus—Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floridi, L. (1999). Philosophy and computing: An introduction. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorodezki, M., & Barak, J. (2016). Edge pedagogy. In J. Barak & A. Gidron (Eds.), Active collaborative education: A journey towards teaching (pp. 169–181). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerriero, S. (Ed.). (2017). Pedagogical knowledge and the changing nature of the teaching profession. Paris: OECD—Centre for Educational Research and Innovation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harasim, L. (2012). Learning theory and online technology. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, L. (1920). Normal logic or the science of order. The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, 7(15), 393–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hase, S. (2014). Introduction to self-determined learning (Heutagogy). In L. M. Blaschke, C. Kenyon & S. Hase (Eds.), Experiences in self-determined learning (Kindle ed.). CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgekinson, T. (2004). How to be Idle. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey, R. (1967). Formal logic: Its scope and limits. New York: Mc Graw-Hill Book Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleene, S. C. (1952). Introduction to metamathematics. Amsterdam: Wolters-Noordhoff Publishing and North-Holland Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masschelein, J., & Simons, M. (2013). In defense of school: A public issue (J. McMartin, Trans.). Leuven: E-ducation, Culture & Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (1995). Poetic justice. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino, L., W., & Hilton, M. L. (2012). Education for life and work. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1978). The development of thought: Equilibration and cognitive structures. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirsig, R. M. (1974). Zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, J.-J. (1979 [1782]). Reveries of a solitary walker (P. France, Trans.). London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, J. (1978). Education and the structure of the disciplines. In I. Westbury & N. Wilkof (Eds.), Science, curriculum, and liberal education. Chicago: Chicago UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, B., & Glassner, A. (2003). The blind and the paralytic: Supporting argumentation in Everyday and Scientific Issues. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker, & D. Suthers (Eds.), Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments (pp. 227–260). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Semetsky, I. (Ed.). (2008). Nomadic education: Variations on a theme by Deleuze and Guattari. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serres, M. (1968L). Le system de Leibniz et se modele mathematique; Tome II (1 ed.). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serres, M. (1980). Hermes V: Le Passage du Nord-Ouest. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serres, M. (1982K). Knowledge in the classical age: La Fontaine & Descartes (Sankey, M. & Cowley, P., Trans.). In J. V. Harari & D. F. Bell (Eds.), Hermes–literature, science, philosophy (pp. 15–28). London, New York: Johns Hopkins University Press. (An abbreviated translation of Serres, M. (1977). Le jeu du loup. In M. Serres (Ed.), Hermes IV: La Distribution (pp. 89–104). Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serres, M. (1982P). The parasite (L. R. Schehr, Trans.). Baltimore & London: The John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serres, M. (1991). Rome: The book of foundations (F. McCarren, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serres, M. (1975). Feux et signaux de brume—Zola. Paris: Bernard Grasset.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serres, M. (1995G). Genesis (G. James & J. Nielson, Trans.). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serres, M. (1997). The troubadour of knowledge (F. Faria Glaser, Trans.). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serres, M. (1997S). Science and the humanities: The case of turner. SubStance, 83(26;2), 6–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serres, M. (2000). The Birth of physics (J. Hwaks, Trans.). Manchester: Clinamen Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serres, M. (2011). Variations on the body (R. Burks, Trans.). Minneapolis: Univocal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serres, M. (2015). Thumbelina: The culture and technology of millennials. (D. W. Smith, Trans.). London, New York: Rowman & Littlefield International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serres, M. (2016). Pantopie ou le monde de Michel Serres. Paris: Le Pommier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serres, M., & Latour, B. (1995). Conversations on science, culture, and time (R. Lapidus, Trans.). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C. (1998). The two cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoreau, H. D. (1914 [1862]). Walking. Cambridge: The Riverside Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (2018). Validity and soundness. https://www.iep.utm.edu/val-snd/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amnon Glassner .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Glassner, A., Back, S. (2020). The Philosophy of Heutagogy . In: Exploring Heutagogy in Higher Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4144-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4144-5_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-4143-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-4144-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics