Skip to main content

Biological Control as a Tool for Sustainable Development: For Increase the Distribution and Income Generation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Bioeconomy for Sustainable Development
  • 956 Accesses

Abstract

With a world population of more than 7.5 billion people, today we are able to produce enough food to support the entire population of the planet. However, in the next few years, the population will continue to grow and the challenges are even greater, limitation in expanding new agricultural frontiers, besides the demand of conscious consumers who seek healthy sustainable produced food. In this scenario, the biological control seems to be one solution and one opportunity to reduce the dependence of the oligopoly on agrochemicals. Based on the strategic innovation model of the triple helix, the decentralization of investments in research and innovation, with the approach of universities and research institutes, of the rural producers, fomented by the government, boosts the search of solutions of biological control, supporting the regional development, with the increase the income generation and socioeconomic contributions in diverse countries. This way, we will be able to break the circle of poison.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ABCBIO (2016) Incentivo aos Produtos Biológicos: Panorama Atual e Perspectivas. Agroanalysis 30–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Altieri MA, Funes-Monzotefr (2012) The Paradox of Cuban Agriculture. Mon Rev: Indep Socialist Mag 63:23–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bale JS, Van Lenteren JC, Bigler F (2008) Biological control and sustainable food production. Phil Trans R Soc B363:761–776. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettiol W (2011) Biopesticide use and research in Brazil. Outlooks Pest Manag 22(6):280–284. https://doi.org/10.1564/22dec10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bombardini LM (2017) Geografia do Uso de Agrotóxicos no Brasil e Conexões com a União Europeia. FFLCH – USP, São Paulo, 296p

    Google Scholar 

  • Bueno AF, Sosa-Gómez DR, Corrêa-Ferreira BS, Moscardi F, Bueno RCOF (2012) Capítulo 8 – Inimigos naturais das pragas de soja. In: Hoffmann-Campo CB, Corrêa-Ferreira BS, Moscardi F (eds) Soja: manejo integrado de insetos e outros artrópodes-praga. Embrapa, Brasília, pp 493–630

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler AD (1962) Strategy and structure: chapters in the history of the industrial enterprise. MIT Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumagun CJR (2014) Advances in formulation of trichoderma for biocontrol (Chapter 39). Biotechnol Biol Trichoderma 527–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-59576-8.00039-4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • de Bach P (1964) Biological control of insect pests and weeds. Reinhold, New York. 844p

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker P (1985) Innovation and entrepreneurship. Harper, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dzisah J, Etzkowitz H (2008) Triple helix circulation: the heart of innovation and development. Int J Technol Manag Sustain Dev 7:101–115. https://doi.org/10.1386/ijtm.7.2.101_1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz H, Zhou C (2017) Hélice Tríplice: inovação e empreendedorismo universidade-indústria-governo. EstudosAvançados 31:23–48. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-40142017.3190003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2017) Pesticides in the European Union authorization and use. Available in: http://europa.eu/rapid/attachment/IP-17-5191/en/Pesticides_factsheet.pdf. Accessed 26 Mar 2019

  • FAO (2017a) Concerted action needed to stop diseases and pests from ravaging the food chain. Available in: http://www.fao.org/news/story/en/item/469269/icode/. Accessed 26 Mar 2019

  • FAO (2017b) Estudo revela que Brasil é um dos países mais eficientes no uso da terra e insumos agrícolas em função de sua alta produção. FAO no Brasil. Available in: http://www.fao.org/brasil/noticias/detail-events/en/c/1070557/. Accessed 26 Mar 2019

  • FAO, IFAD, WFP (2015) The state of food insecurity in the world 2015, in meeting the 2015 international hunger target: taking stock of uneven progress. FAO, Rome. Available in: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4646e.pdf. Accessed 26 Mar 2019

    Google Scholar 

  • Faria Jr P (2017) Biocontrol in Brazil: opportunities and challenges. Agropages – Biopesticide Suppl 12–13. Available in: http://img.agropages.com/userfiles/pdf/2017bssl2.pdf. Accessed 26 Mar 2019

  • FCEC Food Chain Evaluation Consortium (2012) Study on existing monitoring and surveillance activities, communication of the results of these activities to the public and awareness raising programmes put in place by MS on the impacts of use of plant protection products on human health and the environment. European Commission Directorate General for Health and Consumers 145p

    Google Scholar 

  • Galt RE (2008) Beyond the circle of poison: significant shifts in the global pesticide complex, 1976–2008. Glob Environ Chang 18:786–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes De Almeida S, Petersen P, Cordeiro A (2001) Crise Socioambiental e Conversão Ecológica da Agricultura Brasileira: subsídios à formulação de diretrizes ambientais para o desenvolvimento agrícola. AS-PTA, Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  • González F (2004) Innovation for the 21st century banking industry. In: Innovation perspectives for the 21st century. BBVA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard M, Hynes RK, Erlandson M, Bailey KL (2014) The biochemistry behind biopesticide efficacy. Sustain Chem Process 2:2–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40508-014-0018-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keswani C, Sarma BK, Singh HB (2016) Synthesis of policy support, quality control, and regulatory management of biopesticides in sustainable agriculture. In: Singh HB, Sarma BK, Keswani C (eds) Agriculturally important microorganisms: commercial and regulatory requirement in Asia. Springer, Singapore, pp 167–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar KK, Sridhar J, Murali-Baskaran RK, Senthil-Nathan S, Kaushal P, Dara SK, Arthurs S (2018) Microbial biopesticides for insect pest management in India: current status and future prospects. J Invertebr Pathol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2018.10.008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laplase L, Sparvoli F, Masmoudi K, Hash CT (2018) Harvesting plant and microbial biodiversity for sustainably enhanced food security. Front Plant Sci Front Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/978-2-88945-444-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Locatelli GO, Santos GF, Botelho PS, Finkler CLL, Bueno LA (2018) Development of Trichoderma sp. formulations in encapsulated granules (CG) and evaluation of conidia shelf-life. Biol Control 117:21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2017.08.020

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas JA, Hawkins NJ, Fraaije BA (2015) The evolution of fungicide resistance. Adv Appl Microbiol 90:29–92

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls CI, Perez N, Vasquez L, Altieri MA (2002) The development and status of biologically based integrated pest management in Cuba. IPM Rev 7:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2009) The bioeconomy to 2030: designing a policy agenda. 326p. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264056886-en

  • OECD/FAO/UNCDF (2016) Adopting a territorial approach to food security and nutrition policy. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264257108-en

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Olson S (2015) An analysis of the biopesticide market now and where it is going. Outlooks Pest Manag 26:203–206. https://doi.org/10.1564/v26_oct_04

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ONU (2013) População mundial deve atingir 9,6 bilhões em 2050, diz novo relatório da ONU. Available in: https://nacoesunidas.org/populacao-mundial-deve-atingir-96-bilhoes-em-2050-diz-novo-relatorio-da-onu/. Accessed 26 Mar 2019

  • Parnell JJ, Berka R, Young HA, Sturino JM, Kang Y, Barnhart DM, Dileo MV (2016) From the lab to the farm: an industrial perspective of plant beneficial microorganisms. Front Plant Sci 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01110

  • Polanczyk RA, Pratissoli D (2009) Biological control of agricultural pests: principles and field applications. Rev Ceres 56:410–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Porto GS (2013) Gestão da Inovação e Empreendedorismo. Elsevier, Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  • Rai MK (2006) Handbook of microbial biofertilizers. Food Products Press, New York. 42p

    Google Scholar 

  • Ram RM, Keswani C, Bisen K, Tripathi R, Singh SP, Singh HB (2018) Biocontrol technology: eco-friendly approaches for sustainable agriculture. In: Brah D, Azevedo V (eds) Omics technologies and bio-engineering: towards improving quality of life volume II microbial, plant, environmental and industrial technologies. Academic, London, pp 177–190

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Roderick GK, Hufbauer R, Navajas M (2012) Evolution and biological control. Evol Appl 5:419–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4571.2012.00281.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosset PM (1997) Cuba: ethics, biological control, and crisis. Agric Hum Values 14:291–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schachtman DP, Reid RJ, Ayling SM (1998) Phosphorus uptake by plants: from soil to cell. Plant Physiol 116:447–453. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.116.2.447

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter JA (1943) Capitalism, socialism and democracy. ALLAN and UNWIN, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Senthil-Nathan S (2015) A review of biopesticides and their mode of action against insect pests. In: Thangavel P, Sridevi G (eds) Environmental sustainability. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2056-5_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shishkoff N (1993) Plant diseases and their control by biological means in Cuba. Agric Hum Values 10:24–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh HB, Jha A, Keswani C (eds) (2016a) Intellectual property issues in biotechnology. CABI, Wallingford. 304 pages, ISBN-13:9781780646534

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh HB, Jha A, Keswani C (2016b) Biotechnology in agriculture, medicine and industry: an overview. In: Singh HB, Jha A, Keswani C (eds) Intellectual property issues in biotechnology. CABI, Wallingford, pp 1–4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Singh HB, Sarma BK, Keswani C (eds) (2016c) Agriculturally important microorganisms: commercialization and regulatory requirements in Asia. Springer, Singapore. 336 pages, ISBN-13:978-9811025754

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh HB, Sarma BK, Keswani C (eds) (2017) Advances in PGPR research. CABI, Wallingford. 408 pages, ISBN:9781786390325

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh HB, Keswani C, Singh SP (eds) (2019) Intellectual property issues in microbiology. Springer, Singapore. 425 pages, ISBN:9789811374654

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriel Olivo Locatelli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Locatelli, G.O. (2020). Biological Control as a Tool for Sustainable Development: For Increase the Distribution and Income Generation. In: Keswani, C. (eds) Bioeconomy for Sustainable Development. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9431-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics