Abstract
Psychologists Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky explained how we can change people’s responses through framing. People would answer questions in different ways depending on how they are framed. We take this concept a step further and explain how people will operate in their working lives based on whether their organisation is Positively Framed or Negatively Framed.
In order to use Positive Framing we first explain the complexities of an organisation and the dynamics that exist within it. This is done by using the Integral Organisation Model that is based on Ken Wilber’s Integral Theory (Wilbur, K., 2016. Introduction to the Integral Approach [Online]. Available at: http://www.kenwilber.com/Writings/PDF/IntroductiontotheIntegralApproach_GENERAL_2005_NN.pdf. [Accessed 6 November 2017]). Wilber’s Integral Theory is a map that allows us to bring together all the research across four perspectives, which we have defined as Actions: Planning, Doing, Leading, and Belonging. We explain how we use these four perspectives to understand how a complex organisation works. This provides the basis to implement Positive Framing.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
‘The two problems were identical, but, in the first case, when the choice was framed as a gain, the subjects elected to save 200 people for sure (which meant that 400 people would die for sure, thought the subjects weren’t thinking of it that way). In the second case, with the choice framed as a loss, they did the reverse, and ran the risk that they’d kill everyone.’ Lewis, M., 2016. The Undoing Project. 1st ed. New York, USA: W.W. Norton & Company, pp. 277, 278.
- 2.
Quote from Bob Chapman, CEO of Barry-Wehmiller, in The Lean CEO; Stoller, J., 2015. The Lean CEO. 1st ed. United States: McGraw-Hill Education—Europe.
References
Beck, D., & Cowen, C., 2005. Spiral Dynamics: Mastering Values, Leadership and Change. 1st ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.
Collins, J., 2001a. Good to Great. 1st ed. New York, NY: Harper Collins Publishing.
Collins, J., 2001b. Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap and Others Don’t. 1st ed. London: William Collins.
Hsieh, T., 2014. Delivering Happiness: A Path to Profits, Passion and Purpose. 1st ed. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.
Lorsch, J., & McTague, E., 2016. Culture Is Not the Culprit [Online]. Available at: https://hbr.org/2016/04/culture-is-not-the-culprit [Accessed 17 January 2018].
McLean, B., & Elkind, P., 2003. The Smartest Guys in the Room: The Amazing Rise and Scandalous Fall of Enron. 1st ed. New York, NY: Portfolio Trade.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D., 1981. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, [Online]. Vol. 211, Issue 4481, pp. 453–458. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683 [Accessed 6 November 2017].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Roe, R., Dalton, P. (2019). Organisational Complexity, Taming Through Framing. In: Giving Hope: The Journey of the For-Purpose Organisation and Its Quest for Success. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6145-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6145-6_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-6144-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-6145-6
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)