Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Biofouling Detection on Reverse Osmosis Membranes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Water and Wastewater Treatment Technologies

Part of the book series: Energy, Environment, and Sustainability ((ENENSU))

  • 2853 Accesses

Abstract

Reverse osmosis (RO) membrane technology is considered to be the premier process used for the purpose of seawater and brackish water desalination and water treatment of municipal and industrial wastewater for water reclamation and reuse. Membrane biofouling is a significant challenge in RO processes due to the interference of biofilm formed on the membrane surface on membrane performance. Thus, diverse areas of research are geared towards the understanding, prevention, and control of biofouling. Diagnosis of biofouling is difficult since no single microbial assay on the source water can accurately predict biofouling during the RO process. Biofouling evaluation methods of fouled membranes and collected biofoulants from the treatment processes are counterproductive when biofouling prevention is warranted. It is therefore important for the detection tests to be predictive enough taking into consideration the water quality characteristics of the source feed water, the properties of the RO membrane used for the water treatment, and the hydrodynamic properties during the RO process. This chapter provides an overview of biofouling tests most commonly used for detection of biofouling in the source feed water, and in the foulants and fouled membranes. It has a brief section on the use of flow cell units that can simulate hydrodynamic conditions in the RO plant with the ability to predict biofouling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Afonso MD, Jaber JO, Mohsen MS (2004) Brackish groundwater treatment by reverse osmosis in Jordan. Desalination 164:157–171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alcamo J, Flörke M, Märker M (2007) Future long-term changes in global water resources driven by socio-economic and climatic changes. Hydrol Sci J 52:247–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alhadidi A, Kemperman AJB, Shurer R, Schippers JC, Wessling M, van der Meer WGJ (2012) Using SDI, SDI+ and MFI to evaluate fouling in a UF/RO desalination pilot plant. Desalination 285:153–162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Altmann J, Massa L, Sperlich A, Gnirss R, Jekel M (2016) UV254 absorbance as real- time monitoring and control parameter for micropollutant removal in advanced wastewater treatment with powdered activated carbon. Water Res 94:240–245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alzahrani S, Mohammad AW, Hilal N, Abdullah P, Jaafar O (2013) Identification of foulants, fouling mechanisms and cleaning efficiency for NF and RO treatment of produced water. Sep Purif Technol 118:324–341

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ang WS, Tiraferri A, Chen KL, Elimelech M (2011) Fouling and cleaning of RO membranes fouled by mixtures of organic foulants simulating wastewater effluent. J Membr Sci 376:196–206

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arnell NW (2004) Climate change and global water resources: SRES emissions and socio-economic scenarios. Glob Environ Change 14:31–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baek Y, Yu J, Kim S-H, Lee S, Yoon J (2011) Effect of surface properties of reverse osmosis membranes on biofouling occurrence under filtration conditions. J Membr Sci 382:91–99

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baker JS, Dudley LY (1998) Biofouling in membrane systems – A review. Desalination 118:81–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bartels CR (2006) Reverse osmosis membranes for wastewater reclamation. http://www.waterworld.com/articles/wwi/print/volume-21/issue-6/features/reverse-osmosis-membranes-play-key-role-in-wastewater-reclamation.html. Last accessed 23 Dec 2015

  • Bar-Zeev E, Passow U, Castrillon SR-V, Elimelech M (2015) Transparent exopolymer particles: from aquatic environments and engineered systems to membrane biofouling. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49:691–707

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berman T, Mizrahi R, Dosoretz CG (2011) Transparent exopolymer particles (TEP): a critical factor in aquatic biofilm initiation and fouling on filtration membranes. Desalination 276:184–190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bódalo-Santoyo A, Gómez-Carrasco JL, Gómez-Gómez E, Máximo-Martin MF, Hidalgo-Montesinos AM (2003) Application of reverse osmosis to reduce pollutants present in industrial wastewater. Desalination 155:101–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carstea EM, Bridgeman J, Baker A, Reynolds DM (2016) Fluorescence spectroscopy for wastewater monitoring: a review. Water Res 95:205–219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Westerhoff P, Leenheer JA, Booksh K (2003) Fluorescence ex-citation—emission matrix regional integration to quantify spectra for dissolved organic matter. Environ Sci Technol 37:5701–5710

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Suwarno SR, Chong TH, McDougald D, Kjelleberg S, Cohen Y, Fane AG, Rice SA (2013) Dynamics of biofilm formation under different nutrient levels and the effect on biofouling of a reverse osmosis membrane system. Biofoul J Bioad Biofilm Res 29(3):319–330

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen F, Peldszus S, Elhadidy AM, Legge RL, Van Dyke MI, Huck PM (2016) Kinetics of natural organic matter (NOM) removal during drinking water biofiltration using different NOM characterization approaches. Water Res 104:361–370

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Choi J-S, Hwang T-M, Lee S, Hong S (2009) A systematic approach to determine the fouling index for a RO/NF membrane process. Desalination 238:117–127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chong TH, Wong FS, Fane AG (2008) The effect of imposed flux on biofouling in reverse osmosis: role of concentration polarization and biofilm enhanced osmotic pressure. J Membr Sci 325:840–850

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon MB, Qiu T, Blaikie M, Pelekani C (2012a) The application of the bacterial regrowth potential method and flow cytometry for biofouling detection at the Penneshaw Desalination Plant in South Australia. Desalination 284:245–252

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon MB, Lasslett S, Pelekani C (2012b) Destructive and non-destructive methods for biofouling analysis investigated at the Adelaide Desalination Pilot Plant. Desalination 296:61–68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DOW (2010) FILMTECâ„¢ reverse osmosis membranes—technical manual. The Dow Chemical Company. https://dowwater.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/3428. Last accessed 03 Jan 2018

  • DuBois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA, Smith F (1956) Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem 28(3):350–356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dunne WM (2002) Bacterial adhesion: seen any good biofilms lately? Clin Microbiol Rev 15:155–166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flemming H-C (1997) Reverse osmosis membrane biofouling. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 14:382–391

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flemming H-C (2002) Biofouling in water systems–cases, causes and countermeasures. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 59:629–640

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flemming H-C, Geesey GG (eds) (1991) Biofouling and biocorrosion in industrial water systems. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Flemming H-C, Wingender J (2010) The biofilm matrix. Nat Rev Microbiol 8:623–633

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fortunato L, Leiknes T (2017) In-situ biofouling assessment in spacer filled channels using optical coherence tomography (OCT): 3D biofilm thickness mapping. Bioresour Technol 229:231–235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fortunato L, Bucs S, Linares RV, Cali C, Vrouwenvelder JS, Leiknes T (2017) Spatially-resolved in-situ quantification of biofouling using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and 3D image analysis in a spacer filled channel. J Membr Sci 524:673–681

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fritzmann C, Löwenberg J, Wintgens T, Melin T (2007) State-of-the-art of reverse osmosis desalination. Desalination 216:1–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ghaffour N, Missimer TM, Amy GL (2013) Technical review and evaluation of the economics of water desalination: current and future challenges for better water supply sustainability. Desalination 309:197–207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Global Water Intelligence (GWI/IDA DesalData) (2013) Market profile and desalination markets, 2009–2012 yearbooks and GWI website. http://www.desaldata.com/. Last accessed 20 June 2015

  • Greenlee LF, Lawler DF, Freeman BD, Marrot B, Moulin P (2009) Reverse osmosis desalination: water sources, technology, and today’s challenges. Water Res 43(9):2317–2348

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Habimana O, Semião AJC, Casey E (2014) The role of cell-surface interactions in bacterial adhesion and consequent biofilm formation on nanofiltration/reverse osmosis membranes. J Membr Sci 454:82–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson RK, Baker A, Murphy KR, Hambly A, Stuetz RM, Khan SJ (2009) Fluorescence as a potential monitoring tool for recycled water systems: a review. Water Res 43:863–881

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herzberg M, Elimelech M (2007) Biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes: role of biofilm-enhanced osmotic pressure. J Membr Sci 295:11–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herzberg M, Kang S, Elimelech M (2009) Role of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) in biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes. Environ Sci Technol 43:4394–4398

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbie JE, Daley RJ, Jasper S (1977) Use of nucleopore filters for counting bacteria by fluorescence microscopy. Appl Environ Microbiol 33:1225–1228

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holm-Hansen O, Booth CR (1966) The measurement of adenosine triphosphate in the ocean and its ecological significance. Limnol Oceanogr 11(4):510–519

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang X, Guillen GR, Hoek EMV (2010) A new high-pressure optical membrane module for direct observation of seawater RO membrane fouling and cleaning. J Membr Sci 364(1–2):149–156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang S, Voutchkov N, Jiang SC (2013) Investigation of environmental influences on membrane biofouling in a Southern California desalination pilot plant. Desalination 319:1–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huber SA, Balz A, Abert M, Pronk W (2011) Characterisation of aquatic humic and non-humic matter with size-exclusion chromatography—organic carbon detection—organic nitrogen detection (LC-OCD-OND). Water Res 45:879–885

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson N, Baker A, Reynolds D (2007) Fluorescence analysis of dissolved organic matter in natural, waste and polluted waters—a review. River Res Appl 23:631–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huertas E, Herzberg M, Oron G, Elimelech M (2008) Influence of biofouling on boron removal by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes. J Membr Sci 318(1–2):264–270

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IDA (International Desalination Association) (2015) Desalination by the numbers. http://idadesal.org/desalination-101/desalination-by-the-numbers/. Accessed online on 22 Apr 2018

  • Jeong S, Kim L, Kim S-J, Nguyen TV, Vigneswaran S, Kim IS (2012) Biofouling potential reductions using a membrane hybrid system as a pre-treatment to seawater reverse osmosis. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 67(6):1716–1727

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jeong S, Kim S-J, Kim LH, Shin MS, Vigneswaran S, Nguyen TV, Kim IS (2013a) Foulant analysis of a reverse osmosis membrane used pretreated seawater. J Membr Sci 428:434–444

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jeong S, Naidu G, Vigneswaran S, Ma CH, Rice SA (2013b) A rapid bioluminescence-based test of assimilable organic carbon for seawater. Desalination 317:160–165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jeong S, Naidu G, Vollprecht R, Leiknes T, Vigneswaran S (2016) In-depth analyses of organic matters in a full-scale seawater desalination plant and an autopsy of reverse osmosis membrane. Sep Purif Technol 162:171–179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khan MMT, Stewart PS, Moll DJ, Mickols WE, Burr MD, Nelson SE, Camper AK (2010) Assessing biofouling on polyamide reverse osmosis (RO) membrane surfaces in a laboratory system. J Membr Sci 349:429–437

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khan MMT, Stewart PS, Moll DJ, Mickols WE, Nelson SE, Camper AK (2011) Characterization and effect of biofouling on polyamide reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membrane surfaces. Biofoul J Bioad Biofilm Res 27:173–183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khan MT, Manes C, Ld O, Aubry C, Gutierrez L, Croué J-P (2013a) Kinetic study of seawater reverse osmosis membrane fouling. Environ Sci Technol 47:10884–10894

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khan MT, Manes CLO, Aubry C, Croué J-P (2013b) Source water quality shaping different fouling scenarios in a full-scale desalination plant at the Red Sea. Water Res 47(2):558–568

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khan MT, Busch M, Molina VG, Emwas A-H, Aubry C, Croue J-P (2014) How different is the composition of the fouling layer of wastewater reuse and seawater desalination RO membranes? Water Res 59:271–282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura K, Oki Y (2017) Efficient control of membrane fouling in MF by removal of biopolymers: comparison of various pretreatments. Water Res 115:172–179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kwan SE, Bar-Zeev E, Elimelech M (2015) Biofouling in forward osmosis and reverse osmosis: measurements and mechanisms. J Membr Sci 493:703–708

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee W, Ahn C, Hong S, Kim S, Lee S, Baek Y, Yoon J (2010) Evaluation of surface properties of reverse osmosis membranes on the initial biofouling stages under no filtration condition. J Membr Sci 351:112–122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee KP, Arnot TC, Mattia D (2011) A review of reverse osmosis membrane materials for desalination—development to date and future potential. J Membr Sci 370(1–2):1–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Levine AD, Asano T (2004) Recovering sustainable water from wastewater. Environ Sci Technol 38(11):201A–208A

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lutskiy M-Y, Avneri-Katz S, Zhu N, Itsko M, Ronen Z, Arnusch CJ, Kasher R (2015) A microbiology-based assay for quantification of bacterial early stage biofilm formation on reverse-osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. Sep Purif Technol 141:214–220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mairal AP, Greenberg AR, Krantz WB (2000) Investigation of membrane fouling and cleaning using ultrasonic time-domain relectometry. Desalination 130:45–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malaeb L, Ayoub GM (2011) Reverse osmosis technology for water treatment: state of the art review. Desalination 267:1–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manalo CV, Ohno M, Okuda T, Nakai S, Nishijima W (2016) Rapid novel test for the determination of biofouling potential on reverse osmosis membranes. Water Sci Technol 73(12):2978–2985

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mansouri J, Harrisson S, Chen V (2010) Strategies for controlling biofouling in membrane filtration systems: challenges and opportunities. J Mater Chem 20:4567–4586

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Massons-Gassol G, Gilabert-Oriol G, Johnson J, Arrowood T (2017) Comparing biofouling development in membrane fouling simulators and spiral-wound reverse osmosis elements using river water and municipal wastewater. Ind Eng Chem Res 56(40):11628–11633

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matin A, Khan Z, Zaidi SMJ, Boyce MC (2011) Biofouling in reverse osmosis membranes for seawater desalination: phenomena and prevention. Desalination 281:1–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McFeters GA, Yu FP, Pyle BH, Stewart PS (1995) Physiological methods to study biofilm disinfection. J Ind Microbiol 15:333–338

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meng S, Rzechowicz M, Winters H, Fane AG, Liu Y (2013) Transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) and their potential effect on membrane biofouling. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97:5705–5710

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller GW (2006) Integrated concepts in water reuse: managing global water needs. Desalination 187:65–75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miyoshi T, Hayashi M, Shimamura K, Matsuyama H (2016) Important fractions of organic matter causing fouling of seawater reverse (SWRO) membranes. Desalination 390:72–80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Monnot M, Nguyên HTK, Laborie S, Cabassud C (2017) Seawater reverse osmosis desalination plant at community-scale: role of an innovative pretreatment on process performances and intensification. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif 113:42–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mosset A, Bonnelye V, Petry M, Sanz MA (2008) The sensitivity of SDI analysis: from RO feed water to raw water. Desalination 222:17–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen PH, Jahn A (1999) Extraction of EPS. In: Wingender J, Flemming H-C, Neu TR (eds) Microbial extracellular polymeric substances: characterization, structure, and function. Springer, New York, p 49

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Norberg D, Seungkwan H, James T, Yu Z (2007) Surface characterization and performance evaluation of commercial fouling resistant low-pressure RO membranes. Desalination 202:45–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey SR, Jegatheesan V, Baskaran K, Shu L (2012) Fouling in reverse osmosis (RO) membrane in water recovery from secondary effluent: a review. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 11:125–145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Passow U, Alldredge AL (1995) A dye-binding assay for the spectrophotometric measurement of transparent exopolymer particles (TEP). Limnol Oceanogr 40:1326–1335

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Potter BB, Wimsatt JC (2005) Method 415.3—measurement of total organic carbon, dissolved organic carbon and specific UV absorbance at 254 in source water and drinking water. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_record_report.cfm?direntryid=103917. Last accessed 08 July 2018

  • Pype M-L, Patureau D, Wery N, Poussade Y, Gernjak W (2013) Monitoring reverse osmosis performance: conductivity versus fluorescence excitation-emission matrix (EEM). J Membr Sci 428:205–211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rachman RM, Ghaffour N, Wali F, Amy GL (2013) Assessment of silt density index (SDI) as fouling propensity parameter in reverse osmosis (RO) desalination systems. Desalin. Water Treat 51(4–6):1091–1103

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reasoner DJ, Geldreich EE (1985) A new medium for the enumeration and subculture of bacteria from potable water. Appl Environ Microbiol 49:1–7

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ridgway HF, Kelly A, Justice C, Olson BH (1983) Microbial fouling of reverse-osmosis membranes used in advanced wastewater treatment technology: chemical, bacteriological, and ultrastructural analyses. Appl Environ Microbiol 45:1066–1084

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider RP, Ferreira LM, Binder P, Bejarano EM, Góes KP, Slongo E, Machado CR, Rosa GMZ (2005) Dynamics of organic carbon and of bacterial populations in a conventional pretreatment train of a reverse osmosis unit experiencing severe biofouling. J Membr Sci 266:18–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon MA, Bohn PW, Elimelech M, Georgiadis JG, Mariñas BJ, Mayes AM (2008) Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades. Nature 452:301–310

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sim STV, Krantz WB, Chong TH, Fane AG (2015) Online monitor for the reverse osmosis spiral wound module—development of the canary cell. Desalination 368:48–59

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sim LN, Chong TH, Taheri AH, Sim STV, Lai L, Krantz WB, Fane AG (2018) A review of fouling indices and monitoring techniques for reverse osmosis. Desalination 434:169–188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Subramani A, Hoek EMV (2008) Direct observation of initial microbial deposition onto reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. J Membr Sci 319:111–125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Subramani A, Hoek EMV (2010) Biofilm formation, cleaning, re-formation on polyamide composite membranes. Desalination 257:73–79

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Subramani A, Huang XF, Hoek EMV (2009) Direct observation of bacterial deposition onto clean and organic-fouled polyamide membranes. J Colloid Interface Sci 336:13–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Suwarno SR, Chen X, Chong TH, Puspitasari VL, McDougald D, Cohen Y, Rice SA, Fane AG (2012) The impact of flux and spacers on biofilm development on reverse osmosis membranes. J Membr Sci 405–406:219–232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tang CY, Kwon Y-N, Leckie JO (2009) The role of foulant–foulant electrostatic interaction on limiting flux for RO and NF membranes during humic acid fouling—theoretical basis, experimental evidence, and AFM interaction force measurement. J Membr Sci 326(2):526–532

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tang CY, Chong TH, Fane AG (2011) Colloidal interactions and fouling of NF and RO membranes: a review. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 164:126–143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Teng CK, Hawlader MNA, Malek A (2003) An experiment with different pretreatment methods. Desalination 156:51–58

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Toze S (2006) Reuse of effluent water—benefits and risks. Agric Water Manag 80(1–3):147–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Kooij D (1992) Assimilable organic carbon as an indicator of bacterial regrowth. J Am Water Works Assoc 84:57–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veza JM, Ortiz M, Sadhwani JJ, Gonzales JE, Santana FJ (2008) Measurement of biofouling in seawater: some practical tests. Desalination 220:326–334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vörösmarty CJ, McIntyre PB, Gessner MO, Dudgeon D, Prusevich A, Green P, Glidden S, Bunn SE, Sullivan CA, Liermann CR, Davies PM (2010) Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 467:555–561

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vrouwenvelder JS, Van der Kooij D (2001) Diagnosis, prediction and prevention of biofouling of NF and RO membranes. Desalination 139:65–71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vrouwenvelder JS, Kappelhof JWNM, Heijman SGJ, Schippers JC, Van der Kooij D (2003) Tools for fouling diagnosis of NF and RO membranes and assessment of the fouling potential of feed water. Desalination 157:361–365

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vrouwenvelder JS, van Paassen JAM, Wessels LP, van Dam AF, Bakker SM (2006) The membrane fouling simulator: a tool for fouling prediction and control. J Membr Sci 281:316–324

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vrouwenvelder JS, Manolarakis SA, van der Hoek JP, van Paassen JAM, van der Meer WGJ, van Agtmaal JMC, Prummel HDM, Kruithof JC, van Loosdrecht MCM (2008) Quantitative biofouling diagnosis in full scale nanofiltration and reverse osmosis installations. Water Res 42:4856–4868

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weinrich L, LeChevallier M, Haas CN (2016) Contribution of assimilable organic carbon to biological fouling in seawater reverse osmosis membrane treatment. Water Res 101:203–213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • West S, Wagner M, Engelke C, Horn H (2016) Optical coherence tomography for the in situ three-dimensional visualization and quantification of feed spacer channel fouling in reverse osmosis membrane modules. J Membr Sci 498:345–352

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilf M, Alt S (2000) Application of low fouling RO membrane elements for reclamation of municipal wastewater. Desalination 132:11–119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf G, Crespo JG, Reis MAM (2002) Optical and spectroscopic methods for biofilm examination and activity analysis in water and wastewater treatment. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 1:227–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WWAP (United Nations World Water Assessment Programme). The United Nations World Water Development Report (2015) Water for a sustainable world. Paris, UNESCO. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002318/231823E.pdf. Last accessed 20 Dec 2015

  • Xu P, Bellona C, Drewes JE (2010) Fouling of nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes during municipal wastewater reclamation: membrane autopsy results from pilot-scale investigations. J Membr Sci 353(1–2):111–121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Y, Song L, Ong SL (2010) Fouling behavior and foulant characteristics of reverse osmosis membranes for treated secondary effluent reclamation. J Membr Sci 349(1–2):65–74

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Environmental Research and Management Center, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, 739-8513, Japan

    Cervinia V. Manalo & Wataru Nishijima

Authors
  1. Cervinia V. Manalo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wataru Nishijima
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cervinia V. Manalo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Environment and Natural Resou, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technolog, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam

    Xuan-Thanh Bui

  2. Faculty of Engineering, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand

    Chart Chiemchaisri

  3. Graduate School of Engineering, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Nagasaki, Japan

    Takahiro Fujioka

  4. Gujarat Pollution Control Board, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India

    Sunita Varjani

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Manalo, C.V., Nishijima, W. (2019). Biofouling Detection on Reverse Osmosis Membranes. In: Bui, XT., Chiemchaisri, C., Fujioka, T., Varjani, S. (eds) Water and Wastewater Treatment Technologies. Energy, Environment, and Sustainability. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3259-3_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation