Framing Scholarly Practice

  • Melanie Williams
Part of the Tourism, Hospitality & Event Management book series (THEM)


William Angliss Institute (WAI) is introducing a framework to guide understandings and practices of scholarship for both vocational and higher education teachers. This chapter explains the impetus for this initiative and outlines the development of the institute’s approach to scholarship with reference to the literature. A case study is presented, which investigates how the WAI Framework for Scholarly Practice was used to guide the authors in writing their chapters of this book. Based on their monthly reflections on their research and writing processes, the study explores how the authors engaged with the framework, how it facilitated their awareness and learning about scholarly practice, and the role that other forms of support played in assisting them to approach their research and writing in a scholarly manner. The study appears to indicate evidence of development in knowledge and practices of scholarship and a correlation between this development and the various forms of support offered to authors. The chapter concludes with observations about the framework’s potential for transformation in the vocational education and training (VET) sector workforce more broadly.


Scholarship Scholarly practice Scholarship of teaching and learning Reflective practice Co-creation 



This chapter was developed from a working paper originally prepared for presentation at THE-ICE International Panel of Experts (IPoE) 2017. A sketch outline of this research was also presented in a working paper at CAUTHE 2018 Conference.


  1. Badley, G. (2003). Improving the scholarship of teaching and learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40(3), 303–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barr, R., & Tagg, J. (1995). From teaching to learning: a new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change, 27(6), 12–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill/Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  5. Boyer, E. L. (1996). The scholarship of engagement. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 49(7).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brew, A. (2010). Transforming academic practice through scholarship. International Journal for Academic Development, 15(2), 105–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Commonwealth of Australia. (2015). Higher education standards framework (Threshold standards) 2015. Canberra.Google Scholar
  8. Everingham, N., McLean, D., Mancini, J., Mitton, A., & Williams, M. (2017). Addressing the challenge of scholarship and industry currency in vocational education: A pilot. International Journal of Training Research, 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Glassick, C. E., Huber, M. T., & Maeroff, G. I. (1997). Scholarship assessed: Evaluation of the professoriate. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  10. Kreber, C. (2013). Authenticity in and through teaching in higher education: The transformative potential of the scholarship of teaching. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Rice, R. E. (2002). Beyond scholarship considered: Toward an enlarged vision of the scholarly work of faculty members. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2002(90), 7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Williams, M., Goulding, F., & Seddon, T. (2013). Towards a culture of scholarly practice in mixed-sector institutions. Adelaide: NCVER.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.William Angliss InstituteMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations