Abstract
Biomass is not only considered as an important energy career for transition from fossil fuel to renewable energy, this is by far the most sustainable form of energy system. Given its inherent carbon neutrality, biomass-based energy conversion systems have the potential of becoming carbon-negative systems. This feature of biomass, together with its widespread availability, propels the development and deployment of biomass-based distributed energy systems. Among the different pathways of biomass energy conversion, gasification is considered as the most versatile route which can yield multiple end products, ranging from liquid fuels, methane, hydrogen, electricity, process heat and even refrigeration. Several technology options are currently available commercially: some are under different stages of development and some are futuristic, yet seemingly viable. This chapter presents an overview of the different technology options. Their status and potentials as distributed systems are reported and analysed. Socio-economic perspectives favouring or hindering their penetration, with particular reference to Indian and Asian scenario, have also been discussed herein.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ahmed S, Papadias D, Ahluwalia R, Hua T, Roh HS (2015) Performance and cost analysis for a 300Â kW tri-generation Molten carbonate fuel cell system. In 2015 US DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office, Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting
Al-attab KA, Zainal ZA (2010) Performance of high-temperature heat exchangers in biomass fuel powered externally fired gas turbine systems. Renew Energy 35(5):913–920
Al-attab KA, Zainal ZA (2015) Externally fired gas turbine technology: a review. Appl Energy 138:474–487
Bammert K (1987) Operating experiences and measurements on turbo sets of CCGT-cogeneration plants in Germany. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 109(1), 22–31
Bang-Møller Christian, Rokni Masoud, Elmegaard Brian (2011) Exergy analysis and optimization of a biomass gasification, solid oxide fuel cell and micro gas turbine hybrid system. Energy 36(8):4740–4752
Buragohain B, Mahanta P, Moholkar VS (2010) Biomass gasification for decentralized power generation: the Indian perspective. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14:73–92
Campanari S, Chiesa P, Manzolini G, Bedogni S (2014) Economic analysis of CO2 capture from natural gas combined cycles using Molten Carbonate Fuel Cells. Applied Energy 130:562–573
Chowdhury NR (2014) Advances in trends in woody biomass gasification. Energy engineering and management, Tecnico Lisboa.
Denver F (2010) Cheddie, integration of a solid oxide fuel cell into a 10 MW gas. Turbine Power Plant Energies 3:754–769
Economic Analysis of Biomass Energy (2007) DTI UK working paper 1 (biomass strategy). Department of Trade and Industry (DTI), London, UK
Franco A, Giannini N (2005) Perspectives for the use of biomass as fuel in combined cycle power plants. Int J Therm Sci 44:163–177
Gandiglio M, Drago D, Santarelli M (2016) Techno-economic analysis of a solid oxide fuel cell installation in a biogas plant fed by agricultural residues and comparison with alternative biogas exploitation paths. Energy Procedia 101:1002–1009
Gill B, MacLeod N, Clayton D, Cowburn R, Roberts J, Hartley N (2005) Biomass task force. Report to government. London, UK: Defra
IRENA (2012) Renewable energy technologies: cost analysis series. International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) working paper, vol 1: Biomass for power generation
Mamaghani AH, Najafi B, Shirazi A, Rinaldi F (2015) Exergetic, economic, and environmental evaluations and multi-objective optimization of a combined molten carbonate fuel cell-gas turbine system. Applied Thermal Engineering 77:1–11
McKendry P (2002) Energy production from biomass (part 2): conversion technologies. Biores Technol 83:47–54
Mehr AS, Mahmoudi SMS, Yari M, Chitsaz A (2015) Thermodynamic and exergoeconomic analysis of biogas fed solid oxide fuel cell power plants emphasizing on anode and cathode recycling: a comparative study. Energy Convers Manag 105:596–606
Mondal P, Ghosh S (2013) Thermal performance of an indirectly heated bio-gasification based combined cycle plant employing reciprocating compressor. Int J Emer Tech and Adv Eng 3(3):186–192
Mondal P, Ghosh S (2016) Bio-gasification based externally fired combined cogeneration plant: thermo-economic and exergo-economic analyses. Int J Exergy 20(4):496–516
Mondal P, Ghosh S (2017a) Exergo-economic analysis of a 1 MW BIGCC plant with indirectly heated GT cycle and supercritical ORC. Clean Technol Environ Policy 19(5):1475–1486
Mondal P, Ghosh S (2017b) Techno-economic performance evaluation of a direct biomass-fired combined cycle plant employing air turbine. Clean Technol Environ Policy 19(2):427–436
Mondal P, Mondal K, Ghosh S (2015) Bio-gasification based distributed power generation system employing indirectly heated GT and supercritical ORC: energetic and exergetic performance assessment. Int J Renew Energy Res 5(3)
Nagel FP, Ghosh S, Pitta C, Schildhauer TJ (2011) Biomass integrated gasification fuel cell systems–concept development and experimental results. Biomass Bioenerg 35(1):354–362
Oakey J, Simms N, Kilgallon P (2004) Gas turbines: gas cleaning requirements for biomass-fired systems. Mater Res 7(1):17–25
Paisley MA, Welch MJ (2003) Biomass gasification combined cycle opportunities using the future energy Silvagas gasifier coupled to Alstom’s industrial gas turbines. In: Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2003, Georgia, 16–19 June 2003
Pruitt KA, Braun RJ, Newmanc AM (2013) Establishing conditions for the economic viability of fuel cell-based, combined heat and power distributed generation systems. Appl Energy 111:904–920
Report on conversion efficiency of biomass. EU BASIS Report, July 2015. Available online at http://www.basisbioenergy.eu/
Roy PC (2013) Role of biomass energy for sustainable development of rural India: case studies. Int J Emerg Technol Adv Eng 3:577–582
Roy D, Ghosh S (2017) Energy and exergy analyses of an integrated biomass gasification combined cycle employing solid oxide fuel cell and organic Rankine cycle. Clean Techn Environ Policy 19:1693–1709
Soltani S, Mahmoudi SMS, Yari M, Morosuk T, Rosen MA, Zare V (2013) A comparative exergoeconomic analysis of two biomass and co-firing combined power plants. Energy Convers Manag 76:83–91
Ståhl K, Neergaard M (1998) IGCC power plant for biomass utilisation, Värnamo, Sweden. Biomass Bioenergy 15(3):205–211
Technology Assessment for Biomass Power Generation (2004) SMUD ReGen Report, UC Davic
Tees, Renewable Energy Plant Non Technical Summary (2008) PB Power London, UK
Tracking Clean Energy Progress (2016) International Energy Agency. Website: http://www.iea.org/etp/tracking2016/
Wei M (2015) A total cost of ownership model for solid oxide fuel cell systems in power and combined heat and power applications. Fuel Cell Seminar, 17 Nov 2015, Los Angeles, CA
Wickwire S (2007) Biomass Combined Heat and Power catalog of technologies. Washington, DC
World Energy Outlook (2015) International Energy Agency. Website: http://www.worldenergyoutlook.org/weo2015/
Zhang X, Li J, Li G, Feng Z (2006) Dynamic modeling of a hybrid system of the solid oxide fuel cell and recuperative gas turbine. J Power Source 163:523–531
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ghosh, S. (2018). Biomass-Based Distributed Energy Systems: Opportunities and Challenges. In: Gautam, A., De, S., Dhar, A., Gupta, J., Pandey, A. (eds) Sustainable Energy and Transportation . Energy, Environment, and Sustainability. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7509-4_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7509-4_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-7508-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-7509-4
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)