Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

What Is Academic Governance?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Academic Governance in the Contemporary University

Abstract

This chapter synthesises the scholarly literature to introduce the concept of academic governance in a more general sense. It begins by placing this in context, acknowledging that academic governance within universities takes place at a number of levels, of which institutional-level processes and practices are only one. The chapter then considers traditional collegial governance, or what is sometimes described as academic self-governance. It later discusses common ways in which institutional-level academic governance has changed in recent years, incorporating brief discussions of academic freedom, institutional autonomy, tenure, the introduction of new academic governance regimes such as academic workload models and student participation in academic governance. The chapter concludes with some observations about challenges facing academic governance that are subsequently taken up in more detail in later chapters within this volume.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • AAUP. (1940). Statement of principles on academic freedom and tenure. Washington DC: American Association of University Professors.

    Google Scholar 

  • AAUP. (1966). Statement on government of colleges and universities. Washington DC: American Association of University Professors.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altbach, P. G. (2005). Academic challenges: The American professoriate in comparative perspective. In A. Welch (Ed.), The professoriate: Portrait of a profession (pp. 147–265). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Amaral, A., Fulton, O., & Larsen, I. M. (2003). A managerial revolution. In A. Amaral, V. L. Meek, & I. M. Larsen (Eds.), The higher education managerial revolution (Vol. 3, pp. 275–296). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, D., Johnson, R., & Saha, L. (2002). Changes in academic work: Implications for universities of the changing age distribution and work roles of academic staff. Canberra: Department of Education Science and Training.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apkarian, J., Mulligan, K., Rotondi, M., & Brint, S. (2014). Who governs? Academic decision-making in US four-year colleges and universities, 2000–2012. Tertiary Education and Management, 20(2), 151–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, I., & Jones, Gl A. (2016). Governance of higher education: Global perspectives, theories and practices. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, J. (2007). Taking it on board: Quality audit findings for higher education governance. Higher Education Research and Development, 26(1), 101–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benneworth, P., & Jongbloed, B. W. (2009). Who matters to universities? A stakeholder perspective on humanities, arts and social sciences valorisation. Higher Education, 59(5), 567–588. doi:10.1007/s10734-009-9265-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berdahl, R. (1990). Academic freedom, autonomy and accountability in British universities. Studies in Higher Education, 15(2), 169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bexley, E., James, R., & Arkoudis, S. (2011). The Australian academic profession in transition: Addressing the challenge of reconceptualising academic work and regenerating the academic workforce. Canberra: Department of Employment, Education and Workplace Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, R. (2004). The end of shared governance: Looking ahead or looking back. New directions for higher education, 127(2004), 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, J. (2010). Research assessment: A calculative technology governing quality, accountability and equity. In J. Blackmore, M. Brennan, & L. Zipin (Eds.), Re-positioning university governance and academic work (pp. 67–84). Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, J. (2011). Bureaucratic, corporate, market and network governance: Shifting spaces for gender equity in educational organisations. Gender, Work and Organization, 18(5), 443–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, J. (2014). ‘Wasting talent’? Gender and the problematics of academic disenchantment and disengagement with leadership. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(1), 86–99. doi:10.1080/07294360.2013.864616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, J., Brennan, M., & Zipin, L. (2010). Repositioning university governance and academic work: An overview. In J. Blackmore, M. Brennan, & L. Zipin (Eds.), Re-positioning university governance and academic work (pp. 1–16). Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleiklie, I. (2012). Collegiality and hierarchy: Coordinating principles in higher education. In A. R. Nelson & I. P. Wei (Eds.), The global university: Past, present and future perspectives (pp. 85–104). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bleiklie, I., & Kogan, Maurice. (2007). Organization and governance of universities. Higher Education Policy, 20(4), 477–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. O. (2001). Faculty participation in university governance and the effects on university performance. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 44(2), 129–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrows, R. (2012). Living with the h-index? Metric assemblages in the contemporary academy. The Sociological Review, 60(2), 355–371. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, P. (2013). Student engagement: Stakeholder perspectives on course representation in university governance. Studies in Higher Education, 38(9), 1290–1304. doi:10.1080/03075079.2011.621022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (1989). The academic life: Small worlds, different worlds. Educational Researcher, 18(5), 4–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. Guildford: IAU/Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cremonini, L., Westerheijden, D. F., Benneworth, P., & Dauncey, H. (2014). In the shadow of celebrity? World-class university policies and public value in higher education. Higher Education Policy, 27(3), 341–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CSHE. (2014). Clark Kerr Lectures On the Role of Higher Education in Society. Retrieved 28 January 2016, from http://www.cshe.berkeley.edu/events/clark-kerr-lectures-role-higher-education-society

  • Cummings, W. K., Fisher, D., & Locke, W. (2011). Introduction. In W. Locke, W. K. Cummings, & D. Fisher (Eds.), Changing governance and management in higher education: The perspectives of the academy (pp. 1–18). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • De Angelis, M., & Harvie, D. (2009). ‘Cognitive capitalism’ and the rat-race: How capital measures immaterial labour in British universities. Historical Materialism: Research in Critical Marxist Theory, 17(3), 3–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R., Hillyard, S., & Reed, M. (2007). Knowledge, higher education and the New Managerialism: The changing management of UK universities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dill, D. (2014). Academic governance in the US: implications of a ‘commons’ perspective. In M. Shattock (Ed.), International trends in university governance: Autonomy, self-government and the distribution of authority (pp. 165–183). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbins, M., Knill, C., & Vögtle, E. M. (2011). An analytical framework for the cross-country comparison of higher education governance. Higher Education, 62(5), 665–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dooley, A. H. (2007). Thematic analysis: The role of academic boards in university governance. Melbourne: Australian Universities Quality Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enders, J. (2007). The academic profession. In J. J. F. Forest & P. G. Altbach (Eds.), The international handbook of higher education (Vol. 18, pp. 5–21).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fieldon, J. (2008). Global trends in university governance. Education Working Party Series. Retrieved 17 Nov 2011, from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EDUCATION/Resources/278200-1099079877269/547664-1099079956815/Global_Trends_University_Governance_webversion.pdf

  • Finkelstein, M., Ju, M., & Cummings, W. K. (2011). The United States of America: Perspectives on faculty governance. In W. Locke, W. K. Cummings, & D. Fisher (Eds.), Changing governance and management in higher education: The perspectives of the academy (pp. 199–222). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Flaherty, C. (2016). End of the Line in Wisconsin. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved 8 Apr 2016, from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2016/04/07/u-wisconsin-madison-professors-losing-hope-preserving-traditional-tenure-campus

  • Gerber, L. G. (2001). “Inextricably linked”: Shared governance and academic freedom. Academe, 87(3), 22–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harley, S. (2002). The impact of research selectivity on academic work and identity in UK universities. Studies in Higher Education, 27(2), 187–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazelkorn, E. (2011). Rankings and the reshaping of higher education: The battle for world-class excellence. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Henkel, M. (2000). Academic identities and policy change in higher education. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henkel, M. (2007). Can academic autonomy survive in the knowledge society? A perspective from Britain. Higher Education Research & Development, 26(1), 87–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. N., & Deem, R. (2003). Talking of students: Tensions and contradictions for the manager-academic and the university in contemporary higher education. Higher Education, 46(3), 289–314. doi:10.1023/a:1025377826704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. A. (2013). The horizontal and vertical fragmentation of academic work and the challenge for academic governance and leadership. Asia Pacific Education Review, 14(1), 75–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, C. (1970). Governance and functions. Daedalus, 99(1), 108–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. M. (2014). Research productivity and research system attitudes. Public Money & Management, 34(6), 417–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, W. (2014a). Shifting academic careers: Implications for enhancing professionalism in teaching and supporting learning. York: Higher Education Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, W. (2014b). Teaching and research in English higher education: The fragmentation, diversification and reorganisation of academic work, 1992–2007. In J. C. Shin, A. Arimoto, W. K. Cummings, & U. Teichler (Eds.), Teaching and research in contemporary higher education: Systems activities and rewards (pp. 319–334). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Luescher-Mamashela, T. M. (2010). From university democratisation to managerialism: the changing legitimation of university governance and the place of students. Tertiary Education and Management, 16(4), 259–283. doi:10.1080/13583883.2010.529161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luescher-Mamashela, T. M. (2013). Student representation in university decision making: good reasons, a new lens? Studies in Higher Education, 38(10), 1442–1456. doi:10.1080/03075079.2011.625496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macfarlane, B. (2012). Intellectual leadership in higher education: Renewing the role of the university professor. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marceau, J. (1993). Steering from a distance: International trends in the financing and governance of higher education. Canberra: Department of Employment, Education and Training.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2004). Going global: Governance implications of cross-border traffic in higher education. In W. G. Tierney (Ed.), Competing conceptions of academic governance: Negotiating the perfect storm (pp. 1–32). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2008). Clark Kerr and the uses of the university. Paper presented at the CSHE Ideas and Issues in Higher Education seminar series, 15 Dec 2008, University of Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2014a). “Bonfire of the publics”? Rebuilding the social foundations of higher education. Paper presented at the 2014 Clark Kerr Lectures, University of California, Berkeley, 7 October 2014. Retrieved 6 Nov 2015, from http://www.cshe.berkeley.edu/events/2014-clark-kerr-lectures

  • Marginson, S. (2014b). The Californian model of higher education in the world. Paper presented at the 2014 Clark Kerr Lectures, University of California, Berkeley, 2 October 2014. Retrieved 6 Nov 2015, from http://www.cshe.berkeley.edu/events/2014-clark-kerr-lectures

  • Marginson, S., & Considine, M. (2000). The enterprise university: Power, governance and reinvention in Australia. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNay, I. (2015). Leading the autonomous university: Conditioning factors and culture of organisations in the UK, Ukraine and other European contexts. International Journal of Universities and Leadership, 1(1), 7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meek, V. L. (2003). Introduction. In A. Amaral, V. L. Meek, & I. M. Larsen (Eds.), The higher education managerial revolution (pp. 1–29). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, H.-D. (2002). The new managerialism in education management: corporatization or organizational learning. Journal of Educational Administration, 40(6), 534–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Middlehurst, R. (1993). Leading academics. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middlehurst, R. (1995). Changing leadership in universities. In T. Schuller (Ed.), The changing university? (pp. 75–92). Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middlehurst, R. (2004). Changing internal governance: A discussion of leadership roles and management structures in UK universities. Higher Education Quarterly, 58(4), 258–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mok, K. H. (2010). Paradign shift or business as usual: the search for new governance in higher education in Asia. In K.-H. Mok (Ed.), The search for new governance of higher education in Asia (pp. 1–11). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moodie, G. C., & Eustace, R. (1974). Power and authority in British universities. London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, J., & Burch, T. (2009). Communities of practice in academe (CoP-iA): understanding academic work practices to enable knowledge building capacities in corporate universities. Oxford Review of Education, 35(2), 227–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newfield, C. (2016). The Management Model Driving Wisconsin’s #FakeTenure Saga. Remaking the University. Retrieved 8 Apr 2016, from http://utotherescue.blogspot.com.au/2016/04/the-management-model-driving-wisconsins.html

  • Pennock, L., Jones, G. A., Leclerc, J. M., & Li, S. X. (2015). Assessing the role and structure of academic senates in Canadian universities, 2000–2012. Higher Education, 70(3), 503–518. doi:10.1007/s10734-014-9852-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Planas, A., Soler, P., Fullana, J., Pallisera, M., & Vilà, M. (2013). Student participation in university governance: the opinions of professors and students. Studies in Higher Education, 38(4), 571–583. doi:10.1080/03075079.2011.586996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • QAA. (n.d.). QAA safeguarding standards and improving the quality of UK higher education. Retrieved 27 July 2016, from http://www.qaa.ac.uk/partners/student-engagement

  • Ramsden, P. (1998). Learning to lead in higher education. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reay, D. (2004). Cultural capitalists and academic habitus: classed and gendered labour in UK higher education. Women’s Studies International Forum, 27(1), 31–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands, J. (2012). Accountability, quality assurance and performativity: The changing role of the academic board. Quality in Higher Education, 18(1), 97–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands, J. (2013a). Academic boards: Less intellectual and more academic capital in higher education governance? Studies in Higher Education, 38(9), 1274–1289. doi:10.1080/03075079.2011.619655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands, J. (2013b). The effectiveness of academic boards in university governance. Tertiary Education and Management, 19(4), 338–352. doi:10.1080/13583883.2013.822926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands, J. (2013c). The symbolic role of academic boards in university academic quality assurance. Quality in Higher Education, 19(2), 142–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands, J. (2015). Present but not counted: The tenuous position of academic board chairs within contemporary university governance. International Journal of Leadership in Education: Theory and Practice, 18(3), 263–278. doi:10.1080/13603124.2014.925978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands, J., & Gale, T. (under review). Extending Bourdieu’s theory of practice: Relating national research assessment frameworks, publication output targets and academic work.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salter, B., & Tapper, T. (2002). The external pressures on the internal governance of universities. Higher Education Quarterly, 56(3), 245–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shattock, Michael. (2006). Managing good governance in higher education. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shattock, M. (2012). Making policy in British higher education 1945–2011. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shattock, M. (2013). University governance, leadership and management in a decade of diversification and uncertainty. Higher Education Quarterly, 67(3), 217–233. doi:10.1111/hequ.12017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shattock, M. (2014). University governance in the UK: Bending the traditional model. In M. Shattock (Ed.), International trends in university governance: Autonomy, self-governance and the distribution of authority (pp. 127–144). Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stensaker, B., & Harvey, L. (2011). Accountability: Understandings and challenges. In B. Stensaker & L. Harvey (Eds.), Accountability in higher education (pp. 7–22). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapper, T., & Salter, B. (1992). Oxford, Cambridge and the changing idea of the university: The challenge to donnish domination. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teichler, Ulrich, Arimoto, Akira, & Cummings, William K. (2013). The changing academic profession: Major findings of a comparative survey. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, W. G., & Minor, J. T. (2003). Challenges for governance: A national report. Los Angeles: Center for Higher Education Policy Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trakman, L. (2008). Modelling university governance. Higher Education Quarterly, 62(1/2), 63–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trow, M. (1973). Problems in the transition from elite to mass higher education. Berkeley, California: Carnegie Commission on Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Universities New Zealand. (2015). The NZ university system. Retrieved 19 February 2016, from http://www.universitiesnz.ac.nz/nz-university-system

  • Vilkinas, T., & Peters, M. (2014). Academic governance provided by academic boards within the Australian higher education sector. Journal of Higher Education Policy & Management, 36(1), 15–28. doi:10.1080/1360080X.2013.825419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodhouse, D., & Baird, J. (2007). Academic boards’ role in quality and standards. Campus Review, 17(16), 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zipin, Lew. (2010). Situating university governance in the ethico-emotive ground tone of post/late times. In J. Blackmore, M. Brennan, & L. Zipin (Eds.), Re-positioning university governance and academic work (pp. 147–162). Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Education, Deakin University, Warrnambool, Australia

    Julie Rowlands

Authors
  1. Julie Rowlands
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julie Rowlands .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rowlands, J. (2017). What Is Academic Governance?. In: Academic Governance in the Contemporary University. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2688-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2688-1_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2686-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2688-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation