Connectivity, Understanding and Empathy: How a Lack of Consumer Knowledge of the Fashion Supply Chain Is Influencing Socially Responsible Fashion Purchasing

  • Alana M. JamesEmail author
  • Bruce Montgomery
Part of the Textile Science and Clothing Technology book series (TSCT)


Consumer knowledge of the clothing supply chain remains minimal, with the majority of fashion customers having very little knowledge to the origin of their clothing purchases. Whilst they remain very familiar with the retail environment, the journey any one item of clothing goes through to reach the point of sale eludes them. Referred to as the consumer knowledge barrier, it is this lack of knowledge that is said to be influencing their socially responsible purchasing behaviour. The supply chain remains a complex process, however, with an increased lack of transparency, how consumers can obtain additional information about this remains a problem. Whilst consumers continue to be uninformed their power becomes meaningless, as they are unable to make informed purchasing decisions. Knowledge allows the consumer to choose where to shop, and where to avoid, in relation to their values. It is becoming more common to see retailers now engaging with corporate social responsibility as part of their everyday business practices. The level of engagement, however, remains varied with some companies being much more proactive in developing a strategy to help them move to more responsible practices. It is the communication of this strategy that allows retailers to engage consumers in these practices, informing them of such issues in the process. The adoption of this attitude promotes the linking of their consumers with the supply chain, taking a more transparent approach to business. The connection of the consumer with the supply chain not only increases their knowledge of ethical and sustainable issues in fashion but also aids in the creation of empathy and understanding with the social side of manufacturing. Currently, consumers are disconnected with behind the scenes of the fashion industry and cannot relate to the individual who produced the clothing they choose to buy. Through retailers creating this connection with the consumers and the supply chain they stop acting as the middleman barrier and begin to adopt a more holistic approach to their responsible business practices. This consequently will help in the consumer making more informed and responsible purchasing decisions, transferring some of the power to influence the direction of the industry’s future back with those who buy into it.


Corporate social responsibility (CSR) CSR communication Ethical fashion purchasing 


  1. Andreasen, A. (1995). Marketing social change. Changing behavior to promote health, social development and the environment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  2. Aras, G., & Crowther, D. (2009). Corporate sustainability reporting: A study in disingenuity? Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 279–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burchell, J. (2008). The corporate social responsibility reader: Context & perspectives. Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Cerin, P. (2002). Communication in corporate environmental reports. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 9, 46–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Compare My Spend. (2012). Clothing and footwear. Available at: Accessed: April 1, 2016.
  6. Devinney, T. M. (2009). Is the socially responsible corporation a myth? The good, the bad, and the ugly of corporate social responsibility. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 23, 44–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ethical Trading Initiative. (2010). Making the invisible workforce visible: Tracking homeworkers in Monsoon accessorize’ supply chain. Available at: Accessed: April 4, 2016.
  8. Fox, K. (2005). Watching the english. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
  9. Gentleman, A. (2007). Gap moves to recover from child labour scandal. Available at: Accessed: March 11, 2016.
  10. Harney, A. (2008). The China price—The true cost of chinese competitive advantage. New York: The Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hartley-Brewer, J. (2015). Be honest: you don’t care if your pretty dress was made by child slaves. Available at: Accessed: March 12, 2016.
  12. Hawkes, S. (2013). People thought Rana Plaza would be a blow to Primark. Today’s profit figures say otherwise. The Telegraph, 5. Available at: Accessed: January 30, 2013.
  13. Holme, R., & Watts, P. (1999). Corporate social responsibility. Geneva: World Business Council for Sustainable Development.Google Scholar
  14. Ihlen, Ø., Bartlett, J. L., & May, S. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and communication. In Ø. Ihlen, J. L. Bartlett, & S. May (Eds.), The Handbook of Communication and Corporate Social Responsibility (pp. 1–22). New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. James, A. M. (2015). Influencing ethical fashion consumer behaviour—A study of UK fashion retailers. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. University of Northumbria at Newcastle.Google Scholar
  16. Kirk, A. (2015). How much does the average household spend each week. Available at: Accessed: April 6, 2016.
  17. Klein, N. (2014). Naomi Klein: The hypocrisy behind the big business climate change battle. Available at: Accessed: March 16, 2016.
  18. Kotler, P., & Lee, N. (2005). Corporate social responsability. Doing the most good for your company and your cause. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  19. Lindgreen, A., & Swaen, V. (2010). Corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Made-By. (2016). Four brands take pioneering first step. Available at: Accessed: April 1, 2016.
  21. Miller, C. (2009). Sustainable marketing and the green consumer. In E. Parsons & P. Maclaren (Eds.), Contemporary issues in marketing and consumer behaviour (pp. 141–160). Oxford: Butterworth—Heinemann.Google Scholar
  22. Niinimaki, K. (2010). Eco-clothing, consumer identity and ideology. Sustainable Development, 18, 150–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Patagonia. (2011). Don’t buy this jacket. Available at: Accessed: March 22, 2016.
  24. Smith, N. C. (1995). Marketing strategies for the ethics era. Sloan Management Review, 36, 85–98.Google Scholar
  25. Smith, N. C., & Ward, H. (2007). Corporate social responsibility at a crossroads? Business Strategy Review, 18, 16–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Strom, S. (1996). A sweetheart becomes suspect; looking behind those Kathie Lee labels. Available at: Accessed: March 22, 2016.
  27. Vogel, D. J. (2005). Is there a market for virtue? The business case for corporate social responsibility. California Management Review, 47, 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Waddock, S., & Googins, B. K., (2011). The paradoxes of communicating corporate social responsibility. The handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility (pp. 23–43).Google Scholar
  29. Wagner, T., Lutz, R. J., & Weitz, B. A. (2009). Corporate hypocrisy: Overcoming the threat of inconsistent corporate social responsibility perceptions. Journal of Marketing, 73, 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wales, A., Gorman, M., & Hope, D. (2010). Big business, big responsibilities: From villains to visionaries: How companies are tackling the worlds greatest challenges. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  31. Zadek, S., & Chapman, J. (1998). Revealing the emperor’s clothes: How does social responsibility count? London: New Economics Foundation.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Textiles and DesignHeriot-Watt UniversityGalashielsUK
  2. 2.Faculty of Arts, Design and Social SciencesNorthumbria UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK

Personalised recommendations