Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Corporate Sustainability Reporting: A Study in Disingenuity?

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over recent years, there has been a focus in corporate activity upon the concept of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and one of its central platforms, the notion of sustainability, and particularly sustainable development. We argue in this article that the use of such a term has the effect of obfuscating the real situation regarding the effect of corporate activity upon the external environment and the consequent implications for the future. One of the effects of persuading that corporate activity is sustainable is that the cost of capital for the firm is reduced as investors are misled into thinking that the level of risk involved in their investment is lower than it actually is. We analyse the effects of this misrepresentation and argue for a fuller debate about sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abreu R., F. David (2004); Corporate Social Responsibility: Exploration Inside Experience and Practice at the European Level In D. Crowther, & L. Rayman-Bacchus (eds.), Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility, Aldershot, Ashgate, 109–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Amba-Rao, S. C. (1993); Multinational Corporate Social Responsibility, Ethics, Interactions and Third World Governments: An Agenda for the 1990s, Journal of Business Ethics, 12, 553–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aras, G., and D. Crowther: 2007a, ‹Sustainable Corporate Social Responsibility and the Value Chain’, in D. Crowther and M. M. Zain (eds.), New Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility, 109–128

  • Aras, G. and D. Crowther: 2007b, ‹Is the Global Economy Sustainable?’, in S. Barber (ed.), The Geopolitics of the City (Forum Press, London), pp. 165–194

  • Aras G., D. Crowther (2007c); What Level of Trust is Needed for Sustainability? Social Responsibility Journal, 3(3), 60–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aras, G. and D. Crowther: 2008, Corporate Sustainability: A Guide to Best Practice (Gower, Aldershot) (In Press)

  • Azzone G., R. Manzini, G. Noel (1996); Evolutionary Trends in Environmental Reporting. Business Strategy and Environment, 5(4), 219–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barthes, R.: 1973, Mythologies. Trans: A. Lavers. (HarperCollins, London)

  • Beder, S. (1997); Global Spin: The Corporate Assault on Environmentalism. London: Green Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1999); Corporate Social Responsibility. Business and Society, 38(3), 268–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowther, D. (2000a); Social and Environmental Accounting. London: Financial Times Prentice Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowther, D. (2000b); Corporate Reporting, Stakeholders and the Internet: Mapping the New Corporate Landscape. Urban Studies, 37(10), 1837–1848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowther, D. (2002); A Social Critique of Corporate Reporting. Aldershot: Ashgate

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowther, D. (2006); Standards of Corporate Social Responsibility: Convergence Within the European Union. In D. Njavro, & K. Krkac (eds), Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility. Zagreb: MATE, 17–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowther, D. and D. J. Duty: 2002, ‹Operational Performance in Post Modern Organisations – Towards a Framework for Including Time in the Evaluation of Performance’, Journal of Applied Finance May, 23–46

  • Daly, H. E. (1992); Allocation, Distribution, and Scale: Towards an Economics that is Efficient, Just, and Sustainable. Ecological Economics, 6(3), 185–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, H. E. (1996); Beyond Growth. Boston, MA: Beacon Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, H. E. (1999); Ecological Economics and the Ecology of Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyllick T, K. Hockerts (2002); Beyond the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability. Business Strategy & the Environment, 11, 130–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, S. R.: 2005, ‹Sustainability: An Economic Perspective’, Resources Conservations and Recycling, 44, 263–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore C. G., H. Willmott (1992); Company Law and Financial Reporting: A Sociological History of the UK Experience In M. Bromwich, & A. Hopwood (eds) Accounting and the Law. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall, 159–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray R. H., K. J. Bebbington (2001); Accounting for the Environment. London: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. L. (1997); Beyond Greening: Strategies for a Sustainable World. Harvard Business Review, 75(1), 66–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart S. L., M. B. Milstein (2003); Creating Sustainable Value. Academy of Management Executive, 17(2), 56–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawken, P. (1993); The Ecology of Commerce. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovelock, J. (1979); Gaia. Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, C. (2000); The New Corporate Citizenship of Big Business: Part of the Solution to Sustainability. Business & Society Review, 105(1), 9–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew, N. (1997); Fading to Grey: The Use and Abuse of Corporate Executives’ “Representational Power”. In R. Welford (eds), Hijacking Environmentalism: Corporate Response to Sustainable Development. London: Earthscan, 63–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1983); The Case for Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Strategy, 4(2), 3–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz Martinez E., D. Crowther (2005); Corporate Social Responsibility Creates an Environment for Business Success. In D. Crowther, & R. Jatana (eds), Representations of Social Responsibility vol 1. Hyderabad: ICFAI University Press, 125–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Orwell, G. (1970); Collected Essays, Journalism and Letters vol 4. Harmondsworth: Penguin

    Google Scholar 

  • Pava M. L., J. Krausz (1996); The Association Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: The Paradox of Social Cost. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(3), 321–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed R., R. J. DeFillippi (1990); Causal Ambiguity, Barriers to Imitation, and Sustainable Competitive Advantage. Academy of Management Review, 15(1), 88–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapir, E.: 1949, ‹The Unconscious Patterning of Behaviour in Society’, in D. G. Mendelbaum (ed.), Selected Writings of Edward Sapir (University of California Press, Berkley, CA)

  • Schmidheiny, S. (1992); Changing Course. New York: MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Spangenberg, J. H. (2004); Reconciling Sustainability and Growth: Criteria, Indicators, Policy. Sustainable Development, 12, 76–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development): 1987, Our Common Future (The Brundtland Report) (Oxford University Press, Oxford)

  • Zwetsloot, G. I. J. M. (2003), From Management Systems to Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2/3), 201–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Crowther.

Additional information

Their research is concerned with factors affecting corporate sustainability.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aras, G., Crowther, D. Corporate Sustainability Reporting: A Study in Disingenuity?. J Bus Ethics 87 (Suppl 1), 279–288 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9806-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9806-0

Keywords

Navigation