Abstract
I have three goals for the present chapter. The first is to provide an overview of the research that has informed our group’s understanding of two important foundations for the development of effective science teaching; one of these foundations consists of a collection of core practices that are essential components of such teaching.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ball, D. L., & Forzani, F. M. (2010). Teaching skillful teaching. Educational Leadership, 68(4), 40–45.
Ball, D. L., Sleep, L., Boerst, T. A., & Bass, H. (2009). Combining the development of practice and the practice of development in teacher education. The Elementary School Journal, 109(5), 458–474.
Ball, D. L., Thames, M., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special. Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 389–407.
Crawford, B. A. (2007). Learning to teach science as inquiry in the rough & tumble of practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(4), 613–642.
Davis, E. A., Petish, D., & Smithey, J. (2006). Challenges new science teachers face. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 607–651.
Feiman-Nemser, S. (1983). Learning to teach. In L. Shulman & G. Sykes (Eds.), Handbook of teaching and policy (pp. 150–170). New York, NY: Longman.
Fairbanks, C. M., & Merritt, J. (1998). Preservice teachers’ reflections and the role of context in learning to teach. Teacher Education Quarterly, 25(3), 47–68.
Grossman, P., & McDonald, M. (2008). Back to the future: Directions for research in teaching and teacher education. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 184–205.
Hiebert, J., Morris, A. K., Berk, D., & Jansen, A. (2007). Preparing teachers to learn from teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(1), 47–61.
Kang, H., & Anderson, C. W. (2008). Teacher candidates’ interpretations of problems of practice in science teaching. Paper presented at the annual AERA conference, New York, NY.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Luehmann, A. L. (2007). Identity development as a lens to science teacher preparation. Science Education, 91(5), 822–839.
Ma, L. (1999). Knowing & teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China & the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
Morris, A. K. (2006). Assessing pre-service teachers’ skills for analyzing teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 471–505.
Morris, A. K., Hiebert, J., & Spitzer, S. M. (2009). Mathematical knowledge for teaching in planning and evaluating instruction: What can pre-service teachers learn? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(5), 491–529.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Achieve, Inc. on behalf of the twenty-six states and partners that collaborated on the NGSS.
Parker, J., & Lark, A. (2010). Science content knowledge for planning. Paper presented at the annual NARST conference, Philadelphia, PA, March 18–21, 2010.
Richmond, G. (2012a). Examining the role of content knowledge in learning to teach science: Implications for teacher preparation. Paper presented at annual NARST conference, Indianapolis, IN.
Richmond, G. (2012b). The influence of theory and research on science teacher preparation program design. Paper presented at annual conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Indianapolis, IN.
Richmond, G. (in press). Making sense of the interplay of context, identity, and agency in the development of beginning secondary science teachers in high-poverty schools. In L. Avraamidou (Ed.), Studying science teacher identity: Theoretical and methodological approaches. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishing.
Richmond, G., & Muirhead, F. (2014, April). Contextual factors shaping teacher identity and agency among non-traditional science teacher candidates. Paper presented at annual conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Pittsburgh, PA.
Richmond, G., Parker, J., Gotwals, A., Kang, H., Sato, T., Lark, A., & Anderson, C. (2010, March). Improving science teacher preparation by studying how knowledge, identity and context affect teaching practices. Symposium and paper presented at annual conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia, PA.
Richmond, G., Juzwik, M., & Steele, M. (2011). Trajectories of teacher development across institutional contexts: Constructing a narrative approach. Teachers College Record, 113(9), 1863–1905.
Schwarz, C. (2009). Developing pre-service elementary teachers’ knowledge and practices through modeling-centered scientific inquiry. Science Education, 93(4), 720–74
Sfard, A., & Prusak, A. (2005). Telling identities: In search of an analytic tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 14–22.
Sherin, M. G., & Han, S. Y. (2004). Teacher learning in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 163–183.
Star, J. R., & Strickland, S. K. (2008). Learning to observe: using video to improve pre-service mathematics teachers’ ability to notice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(2), 107–125.
Thames, M. H., & Ball, D. L. (2010). What mathematical knowledge does teaching require? Knowing mathematics in and for teaching. Teaching Children Mathematics, 17(4), 220–225.
Thompson, J., Windschitl, M., & Braaten, M. (2013). Developing a theory of ambitious early-career teacher practice. American Educational Research Journal, 50, 574–615.
Traianou, A. (2006). Teachers’ adequacy of subject knowledge in primary science: Assessing constructivist approaches from a sociocultural perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 28(8), 827–842.
van Es., E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2002). Learning to notice: Scaffolding new teachers’ interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(4), 571–596.
van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2008). Mathematics teachers’ “learning to notice” in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 244–276.
Windschitl, M. (2002). Framing constructivism in practice as the negotiation of dilemmas: An analysis of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural, & political challenges facing teachers. Review of Educational Research, 72(2), 131–175.
Windschitl, M. (2009). Cultivating 21st century skills in science learners: How systems of teacher preparation and professional development will have to evolve. Paper presented at National Academies of Science Workshop on 21st Century Skills, February 5–6, 2009. Retrieved from http://www7.nationalacademies.org/bose/Windschitl_Paper.pdf
Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2008). How novice science teachers appropriate epistemic discourses around model-based inquiry for use in classrooms. Cognition & Instruction, 26(3), 310–378.
Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2009). Fostering ambitious pedagogy in novice teachers: The new role of tool-supported analyses of student work. Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Anaheim, CA.
Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., Braaten, M., & Stroupe, D. (2012). Proposing a core set of instructional practices and tools for teachers of science. Science Education, 96(5), 878–903.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Richmond, G. (2015). Creating Supports for the Development of High-Leverage Teaching Practices in Secondary Science Classrooms. In: Luft, J.A., Dubois, S.L. (eds) Newly Hired Teachers of Science. Cultural and Historical Perspectives on Science Education. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-283-7_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-283-7_12
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-283-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)