Skip to main content

A Two-Track Doctorate in Education

There is More Than One Path to Advanced Scholarship

  • Chapter
The Nurturing of New Educational Researchers
  • 250 Accesses

Abstract

The observation that many doctoral students in education in most countries do not plan on a research career is not a new one. As argued by Shulman, Golde, Bueschel, and Garabedian (2006), for example, many of these students come to graduate studies after years of practice in education as supervisors, school principals, curriculum or program designers, administrators, policy makers and officials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Altman, I., & Rogoff, B. (1987). World views in psychology: Trait, interactional, organismic, and transactional perspectives. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banaji, M. R., & Crowder, R. G. (1989). The bankruptcy of every day memory. American Psychologist, 44, 1185–1193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahawah, NJ: LEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berliner, D. C. (2002). Educational research: The hardest science of all. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 18–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J., & Suppes, P. (1969). Research for tomorrow’s schools: Disciplined inquiry for education. New York: McMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, M. (1995). Implications of the Introduction of the Doctor of Education Degree in British Universities: Can the Ed.D. reach parts the PhD cannot? The Vocational Aspect of Education, 47, 177–188. Retrieved February 26, 2014 from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0305787950470206.

  • Iran-Nejad, A., McKeachie, W. J., & Berliner, D. C. (1990). The multisource nature of learning: An introduction. Review of Educational Research, 60, 509–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lester, S. (2004). Conceptualizing the practitioner doctorate. Studies in Higher Education, 29, 757–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, T. W. (2000). From first to second generation professional doctorate. University of New England, Armidale, Australia: Seddon.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliam,, E. L., Taylor, P., Thomson, P., Green, B., Maxwell, T., Wildy, H., & Simons, D. (2002). Research training in doctoral programs: What can be learned from professional doctorates? Commonwealth: Dept of Education, Science & Training (DEST).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moscarini, G., & Thomsson, K. (2007). Occupational and job mobility in the U.S. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 109, 807–836.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D. C. (2010, September). Great things from small beginings: Innovations in the education of educational researchers. Presentation at the IAE Meeting, Merida, Mexico, J, based on the Report of the Spencer Foundation Task Force.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roglio, K. D., & Parana, C. D. (2009). Executive MBA programs: The development of the reflective executive. The Academy of Management, 8, 156–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G. (1991). Transcending the qualitative/quantitative debate: The analytic and systemic approaches to educational research. Educational Researcher, 20(6), 10–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G. (1996). Unorthodox thoughts on the nature and mission of educational psychology. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 397–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G. (2006). The systemic vs. analytic study of complex learning environments. In J. Ellen & R. E. Clark (Eds.), Handling complexity in learning environments: Theory and research (pp. 255–274). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G., & Perkins, D. N. (1989). Rocky roads to transfer: Rethinking mechanisms of a neglected phenomenon. Educational Psychologist, 24, 113–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, S. B. (1991). The predictable failure of educational reform. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, D. L., Chase, C. C., & Bransford, J. D. (2012). Resisting overzealous transfer: Coordinating previously successful routines with needs for new learning. Educational Psychologist, 47, 204–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (2010, April 4). Doctoral education shouldn’t be a marathon. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 56(30), B9-B12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S., Golde, C. M., Bueschel, A. C., & Garabedian, K. J. (2006). Reclaiming education’s doctorates: A critique and a proposal. Educational Researcher, 35, 25–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. K. (1986). The search for intraterrestrial intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg & R. K. Wagner, Practical intelligence (pp. 379–380). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittrock, M.C. (1992). An empowering conception of educational psychology. Educational Psychologist, 27, 129–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Salomon, G. (2014). A Two-Track Doctorate in Education. In: Ibarrola, M.d., Anderson, L.W. (eds) The Nurturing of New Educational Researchers. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-698-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics