Abstract
The complexity of science education today, particularly the areas related to chemistry, needs new teaching approaches, new teaching resources, new skills of the teacher and an alternative focus for the subject itself. All of these factors need to be considered in the context of all countries of the world. In developing countries, there are still further challenges ahead, as teachers struggle to enable their families to survive and do not always have the necessary training, while schools are overcrowded, operating multiple sittings in a day and textbooks are few and far between, with new copies often too expensive to purchase. All too often in these countries, student-centred learning is a dream that is far from being feasible and assessment systems are a burden, serving to determine how the selected few students can progress, while ignoring the exciting challenges and intrigues from stimulating learning which the subject has to offer. Despite these problems, improving science education is often regarded as a priority for developing countries — the goal is nothing less than the capacity to apply learning, whether this is knowledge, skills or values, to new situations. This chapter addresses some of the issues currently facing science education in developing countries. In so doing it draws also on ideas expressed in earlier chapters of this book.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Annan, K. (2003). A challenge to the world scientists. Science, 299, 1485.
Barboza, N. (2000). Educating for a sustainable future: Africa in action. Prospects, 30(1), 71–85.
Buck, G. A., Trauth-Nare, A., & Kaftan, J. (2010). Making formative assessment discernible to pre-service teachers of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 402–421.
Bradley, J. D. (2005). Chemistry education for development. Chemical Education International, 6 (1).
Burmeister, M., Rauch, F., & Eilks, I. (2012). Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) and secondary chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13, 59–68.
Corio, P., & Fernandez, C. (2010). Teaching chemistry in Brazil. In B. Risch (ed.), Teaching chemistry around the world (pp. 45–66). Münster: Waxmann.
Corrigan, D., Dillon, J., & Gunstone, R. (2007). The re-emergence of values in science education. Rotterdam: Sense.
De Vos, W., Bulte, A. M. W., & Pilot, A. (2002). Chemistry curricula for general education: analysis and elements of a design. In J. K. Gilbert, R. Justi, O. de Jong, & J. Van Driel (eds.), Chemical education: towards research-based practice (pp. 101–124). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Delors, J. (1996). Learning: The treasure within: report to UNESCO of the international commission on education for the twenty-first century. Paris: UNESCO. www.unesco.org/delors/delors_e.pdf.
Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people’s images of science. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Earl, L. (2003). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximise student learning. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.
Fensham, P. (2008). Science education policy-making: 11 emerging issues. Paris: UNESCO.
Gluckman, P. (2011). Looking ahead: Science education for the 21st century. Office of the Prime Minister’s Science Advisory Committee. Available from www.pmcsa.org.nz.
Hofstein, A., & Kesner, M. (2006). Industrial chemistry and school chemistry: making chemistry studies more relevant. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 1017–1039.
Hofstein, A., Eilks, I., & Bybee, R. (2011). Societal issues and their importance for contemporary science education: a pedagogical justification and the state of the art in Israel, Germany and the USA. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 1459–1483.
Holbrook, J. (2005). Making chemistry teaching relevant. Chemical Education International, 6(1).
Holbrook, J. (2009). Meeting challenges to sustainable development through science and technology education. Science Education International, 20, 44–59.
Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2007). Nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 1347–1362.
Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2010). Contextualisation, de-contextualisation, re-contextualisation - A science teaching approach to enhance meaningful learning for scientific literacy. In I. Eilks & B. Ralle (eds.), Contemporary science education (pp. 69–82). Aachen: Shaker.
Hume, A., & Coll, R. (2009). Assessment of learning, for learning, and as learning: New Zealand case studies. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 16, 269–290.
Kostka, K. L., & McKay, D. D. (2002). Chemists clean up: A history and exploration of the craft of soapmaking – How soap came to be common in America. Journal of Chemical Education, 79, 1172–1175.
Krugly-Smolskaa, E. T. (1990). Scientific literacy in developed and developing countries. International Journal of Science Education, 12, 473–480.
Lewin, K.M. (2000). Mapping science education policy in developing countries. Washington: World Bank. www1.worldbank.org/education/scied/documents/Lewin-Mapping.pdf.
Malcolm, C. (2007). The value of science in African countries. In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. Gunstone (eds.), The re-emergence of values in science education (pp. 61–76). Rotterdam. Sense.
Mandler, D., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Blonder, R., Yayon, M., & Hofstein, A. (2012). High-school chemistry teaching through environmentally oriented curricula. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13, 80–92.
Ministerio da Educacao, Brasil. (1996). Lei de diretrizes e bases da educação nacional: Lei 9.394/96.
Ministerio da Educacao Brasil (1999). Secretaria de educaçâo média e tecnológica. Parâmetros curriculares nacionais: Ensino Médio. Brasília.
NCTB (National Curriculum and Textbook Board) (2004). General science curriculum for grades IX and X. Dhaka: Ministry of Education.
NRC (National Research Council). (1996). The national science education standards. Washington: NRC.
OECD (2005). The definition and selection of key competencies executive summary. www.oecd.org/dataoecd/47/61/35070367.pdf.
OECD (2006). The programme for international student assessment. www.oecd.org/dataoecd/15/13/39725224.pdf.
Ospina, G. L. (2000). Education for sustainable development: a local and international challenge. Prospects, 30, 31–40.
Poppe, N., Markic, S., & Eilks, I. (2011). Low-cost-lab techniques for the science classroom. Bremen: SALiS Project; www.salislab.org.
Sadler, T. D. (2011). Socio-scientific issues in the classroom. Dordrecht: Springer.
Shymansky, J. A., & Kyle, W. C. (1992). Establishing a research agenda: Critical issues of science curriculum reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 749–778.
Shwartz, Y., Ben-Zvi-R., & Hofstein, A. (2006). Chemical literacy: What does it mean to scientists and school teachers? Journal of Chemical Education, 83, 1557–1561.
Sjöström, J. (2011). Towards Bildung-oriented chemistry education. Science & Education, online first doi 10.1007/s11191-011-9401-0.
Stiggins, R. J. (1998). Learning teams for assessment literacy. Classroom assessment. psycho.measuredprogress.org/documents/10157/15652/LeargTeamsAssessmtLiteracy.pdf.
Sumner, J. (2008). From academic imperialism to the civil commons: Sustainable development. Interchange, 39, 77–94.
Symington, D., & Tytler, R. (2004). Community leaders’ views of the purposes of science in the compulsory years of schooling. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 1403–1418.
Turner, R.S. (2008). Why we teach school science, and why knowing why matters. Keynote Address to the CRYSTAL Atlantique Annual Colloquium, Fredericton, Canada.
Tytler, R. (2007). Australian education review: Re-imagining science education engaging students in science for Australia’s future. Victoria: ACER Press.
Tytler, R., & Symington, D. (2006). Science in school and society: Teaching science. The Journal of the Australian Science Teachers Association, 52(3), 10–15
WCED (1987). World Commission on Environment and Development: Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University.
WNCP (2006). Western and Northern Canadian protocol for collaboration in education. Rethinking classroom assessment with purpose in mind: assessment for learning, assessment as learning, assessment of learning. www.wncp.ca/media/40539/rethink.pdf.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fernandez, C., Holbrook, J., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Coll, R.K. (2013). How to Teach Science in Emerging and Developing Environments. In: Eilks, I., Hofstein, A. (eds) Teaching Chemistry – A Studybook. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-140-5_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-140-5_11
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6209-140-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)