Skip to main content

Measuring Gender in the Context of Demographic Change

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
International Handbook on Gender and Demographic Processes

Part of the book series: International Handbooks of Population ((IHOP,volume 8))

Abstract

In this chapter we focus on the definition and measurement of gender in demographic research. We start by reviewing the history of efforts to bring gender into demographic analyses and the challenges that researchers have faced in this endeavor. We then investigate different approaches to measuring gender and its relationships to demographic outcomes, and look at both quantitative and qualitative methodologies. We argue that while demography now recognizes the importance of gender in any demographic analysis, we are still far from capturing the full effects of gender; especially difficult has been capturing the influence of gender operating at the community or societal levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 349.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Widespread recognition of the importance of gender is also evident in the inclusion of a Gender Development Index and a Gender Inequality Index in recent volumes of the Human Development Report (UNDP 2016a), and also a Gender Equality Goal in the Sustainable Development Goals that supersede the Millennium Development Goals (UNDP 2016b).

References

  • Adams, V. (2016). Metrics of the global sovereign. In V. Adams (Ed.), Metrics: What counts in global health (pp. 19–54). Durham: Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Afifi, M. (2009). Wealth index association with gender issues and the reproductive health of Egyptian women. Nursing and Health Sciences, 11, 29–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agarwala, B., & Lynch, S. (2006). Refining the measurement of women’s autonomy: An international application of a multi-dimensional construct. Social Forces, 84(4), 2077–2098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akmatov, M., Mikolajczyk, R., Labeeb, S., Dhaher, E., & Khan, M. M. (2008). Factors associated with wife beating in Egypt: Analysis of two surveys (1995 and 2005). BMC Women’s Health, 8, 15. Online, no paging.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali, K. (2002). Planning the family in Egypt: New bodies, new selves. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, A. (1999). The power of feminist theory: Domination, resistance, solidarity. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alsopp, R., & Heinsoln, N. (2005). Measuring empowerment in practice: Structuring analysis and framing indicators. World Bank: Research Working Paper 3510 (Feb).

    Google Scholar 

  • Applebaum, B. (2017). To lift growth, Janet Yellen says, make it easier for women to work. New York Times. May 5, 2017. Accessed online at: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/05/us/politics/to-lift-growth-janet-yellen-says-make-it-easier-for-women-to-work.html?_r=0.

  • Aranda, C. (2017). Overseas employment: Greater gender equalizer? Manila Times. 20 March 2017. Accessed at: https://www.pressreader.com/philippines/manila-times/20170320/281513635970357.

  • Attane, I. (2012). Being a woman in China today: A demography of gender. China Perspectives, 2012(4), 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balk, D. (1994). Individual and community aspects of women’s status and fertility in rural Bangladesh. Population Studies, 48, 21–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu, A., & Koolwal, G. (2005). Two concepts of female empowerment: Some leads from DHS data on women’s status and reproductive health. In S. Kishor (Ed.), A focus on gender: Collected papers on gender using DHS data (pp. 15–53). Calverton: ORC Macro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhana, D. (2012). Book review: Love in the time of AIDS. Global Public Health, 7(1), 101–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bier, L. (2010). ‘The family is a factory’: Gender, citizenship, and the regulation of reproduction in Postwar Egypt. Feminist Studies, 36(2), 404–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwood, E. (2000). Webs of power: Women, kin, and community in a Sumatran village. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, F. (2005). The inner quarters: Oppression or freedom? In R. Knapp (Ed.), House, home family living and being Chinese. University of Hawai’i Press. Honolulu. 259–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, S. (1995). Why women rule the roost: Rethinking Javanese ideologies of gender and self-control. In A. Ong & M. Peletz (Eds.), Bewitching women, pious men: Gender and body politics in Southeast Asia (pp. 19–50). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, L. (2017). How all politics became reproductive politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, J. (1986). Routes to low mortality in poor countries. Population and Development Review, 12(2), 171–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cools, S., & Kotsadam, A. (2017). Resources and intimate partner violence in Sub-Saharan Africa. World Development, 95, 211–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desai, S. (2000). Maternal education and child health: A feminist dilemma. Feminist Studies, 26(2), 425–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desai, S., & Jain, D. (1994). Maternal employment and family dynamics: The social context of women’s work in rural South India. Population and Development Review, 20(1), 115–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desai, S., & Johnson, J. (2005). Women’s decisionmaking and child health: Familial and social hierarchies. In S. Kishor (Ed.), A focus on gender: Collected papers on gender using DHS data (pp. 55–68). Calverton: ORC Macro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, T., & Moore, M. (1983). On kinship structure, female autonomy, and demographic behavior in India. Population and Development Review, 9(1), 35–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edin, K., & Kefalas, M. (2007). Promises I can keep. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Zeini, L. (2008). The path to replacement fertility in Egypt: Acceptance, preference, and achievement. Studies in Family Planning, 39(3), 161–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferree, M. (1990). Beyond separate spheres: Feminism and family history. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 866–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, S. (1995). Anthropology theorizes reproduction: Integrating practice, political economic, and feminist perspectives. In S. Greenhalgh (Ed.), Situating fertility (pp. 3–29). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, S. (2010). Cultivating global citizens: Population in the rise of China. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddad, L., Brown, L. R., Richter, A., & Smith, L. (1995). The gender dimensions of economic adjustment policies: Potential interactions and evidence to date. World Development, 23(6), 881–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, M. (2010). Love in the time of AIDS. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inhorn, M. C. (1996). Infertility and patriarchy: The cultural politics of gender and family life in Egypt. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interagency Gender Working Group. (2017). Accessed at: https://www.igwg.org/.

  • IWPR. (2010). Focus on Morocco: Social attitudes toward women. Accessed at: https://iwpr.org/page/2/?s=morocco&aid&publication_date_from&publication_date_to&publication_number&searched_from=publications#breadcrumbs

  • Jejeebhoy, S., & Sathar, Z. (2001). Women’s autonomy in India and Pakistan: The influence of religion and region. Population and Development Review, 27(4), 687–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kishor, S. (1995). Autonomy and Egyptian women: Findings from the 1988 Egypt demographic and health survey. Calverton: Macro International. Occasional Papers no. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kishor, S. (2005). Introduction. In S. Kishor (Ed.), A focus on gender: Collected papers on gender using DHS data (pp. 1–14). Calverton: ORC Macro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kishor, S., & Neitzel, K. (1996). The status of women: Indicators for twenty-five countries, DHS Comparative Studies no 21. Calverton: Macro International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, R. (2010). Routes to low mortality in poor countries revisited. Population and Development Review, 36(4), 655–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, K. O. (1984). The status of women: A review of its relationships to fertility and mortality. New York: Rockefeller Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, K. O. (1986). The status of women: Conceptual and methodological issues in demographic studies. Social Forces, 1(2), 284–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, K. O. (1987). The impact of women’s social position on fertility in developing countries. Social Forces, 2(4), 718–744.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, K. O., & Smith, H. L. (2001). Thinking about, measuring, and analyzing women’s empowerment/autonomy: Lessons from a cross-country comparative study. Presentation, Population Association of America Annual Meetings, March 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, K. O., & Smith, H. L. (2003). Women’s empowerment and social context: Results from five Asian countries. Unpublished. Accessed at: http://swaf.pop.upenn.edu/sites/www.pop.upenn.edu/files/WomensEmpowerment2Jan2003.pdf.

  • Nachmias, P. (2012). Measuring female autonomy in Egypt. Paper presented at Population Association of America Annual Meetings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parreñas, R. (2005). Children of global migration. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, N. E. (1997). Similarities and differences: Anthropological and demographic perspectives on gender. In D. I. Kertzer & T. Fricke (Eds.), Anthropological demography: Towards a new synthesis (pp. 115–138). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, N. E. (1998). Research on gender in demography: Limitations and constraints. Population Research and Development Review, 17, 521–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, N. E. (2003). Gender. Encyclopedia of population. New York: Macmillan Reference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, N. E. (2017). Gender inequality in low-fertility societies: What does China’s experience teach us? In D. Poston (Ed.), Low fertility regimes and demographic and societal change (pp. 115–132). Cham: Springer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risman, B. (1998). Gender vertigo. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, P. (1995). Female education and adjustment programs: A crosscountry statistical analysis. World Development, 23(11), 1931–1949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruggles, S. (2015). Patriarchy, power, and pay: The transformation of American families, 1800–1915 (PAA presidential address). Demography, 52, 1797–1823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruklanonchai, C., et al. (2016). Equality in maternal and newborn health: Modelling geographic disparities in utilisation in five East African countries. PLoS One, 11(8), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singleton, R., & Straits, B. (2002). Survey interviewing. In J. Gubrium & J. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp. 59–82). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malawi Longitudinal Study of Families and Health (MLSFH). (n.d.). https://malawi.pop.upenn.edu/

  • Sparr, P. (Ed.). (1994). Mortgaging women’s lives: Feminist critiques of structural adjustment. London: Zed Books Ltd..

    Google Scholar 

  • Status of Women and Fertility Survey. (n.d.). At: http://swaf.pop.upenn.edu/sites/www.pop.upenn.edu/files/MasonSmithPAA2001.pdf.

  • Stone, P. (2008). Opting out? Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramanian, S. V., et al. (2006). The mortality divide in India: The differential of gender, caste and standard of living across the life course. American Journal of Public Health, 96(5), 818–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SWMENA. (2010). Focus on Morocco: Social attitudes toward women, topic brief. IFES and IWPR. Available at: http://www.swmena.org/en/topicbrief/43. Washington, DC

  • United Nations. (2015). The world’s women 2015: Trends and statistics. New York: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Statistics Division. Sales No. E.15.XVII.8. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/gender/downloads/worldswomen2015_report.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Programme. (2016a). Human development report 2016: Human development for everyone. New York: UNDP.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Programme. (2016b). Sustainable development goals. New York: UNDP.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (n.d.). Data. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BX.TRF.PWKR.DT.GD.ZS?locations=PH&page=3. Accessed 9 Aug 2017.

  • Yount, K., & Li, L. (2009). Women’s ‘justification’ of domestic violence in Egypt. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 1125–1140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nancy E. Riley .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix A: DHS Data Related to Women’s Status and Empowerment

Appendix A: DHS Data Related to Women’s Status and Empowerment

The DHS Program data and analysis provide an in-depth look at:

  • The life courses of women and men, including

    • when they first have sex, marry, and have their first child

    • whether they work

    • whether they control income and household decisions

  • Gender differentials in education and in children’s health and health care

  • Women’s experience of various forms of gender-based violence

All Demographic and Health Surveys include the following women’s status and empowerment indicators:

  • Literacy and educational attainment

  • Employment and occupation

  • Control over own earnings (most surveys)

  • Age at first marriage

  • Age at first birth

  • Contraceptive use

  • Spousal age and education differences

Demographic and Health Surveys implemented since 1999–2000 contain information on the following additional women’s status and empowerment indicators:

  • Women’s participation in household decisions

  • Women’s attitudes toward wife-beating by husbands

  • Women’s opinions on whether a woman can refuse sex to her husband

  • Hurdles faced by women in accessing health care for themselves

Demographic and Health Surveys for some countries include a module of additional questions on women’s status and empowerment the DHS Women’s Status Module. Indicators available from the module include:

  • Choice of spouse

  • Natal family support

  • Asset ownership

  • Control over money for different purposes

  • Knowledge and use of micro-credit programs

  • Attitudes about gender roles

  • Freedom of movement

  • Membership in any association

  • Having a bank account

accessed at: https://www.dhsprogram.com/topics/Womens-Status-and-Empowerment.cfm

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Riley, N.E., DeGraff, D.S. (2018). Measuring Gender in the Context of Demographic Change. In: Riley, N., Brunson, J. (eds) International Handbook on Gender and Demographic Processes. International Handbooks of Population, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1290-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1290-1_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-024-1288-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-024-1290-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics