Abstract
In this chapter we focus on the definition and measurement of gender in demographic research. We start by reviewing the history of efforts to bring gender into demographic analyses and the challenges that researchers have faced in this endeavor. We then investigate different approaches to measuring gender and its relationships to demographic outcomes, and look at both quantitative and qualitative methodologies. We argue that while demography now recognizes the importance of gender in any demographic analysis, we are still far from capturing the full effects of gender; especially difficult has been capturing the influence of gender operating at the community or societal levels.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Widespread recognition of the importance of gender is also evident in the inclusion of a Gender Development Index and a Gender Inequality Index in recent volumes of the Human Development Report (UNDP 2016a), and also a Gender Equality Goal in the Sustainable Development Goals that supersede the Millennium Development Goals (UNDP 2016b).
References
Adams, V. (2016). Metrics of the global sovereign. In V. Adams (Ed.), Metrics: What counts in global health (pp. 19–54). Durham: Duke University Press.
Afifi, M. (2009). Wealth index association with gender issues and the reproductive health of Egyptian women. Nursing and Health Sciences, 11, 29–36.
Agarwala, B., & Lynch, S. (2006). Refining the measurement of women’s autonomy: An international application of a multi-dimensional construct. Social Forces, 84(4), 2077–2098.
Akmatov, M., Mikolajczyk, R., Labeeb, S., Dhaher, E., & Khan, M. M. (2008). Factors associated with wife beating in Egypt: Analysis of two surveys (1995 and 2005). BMC Women’s Health, 8, 15. Online, no paging.
Ali, K. (2002). Planning the family in Egypt: New bodies, new selves. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Allen, A. (1999). The power of feminist theory: Domination, resistance, solidarity. Boulder: Westview Press.
Alsopp, R., & Heinsoln, N. (2005). Measuring empowerment in practice: Structuring analysis and framing indicators. World Bank: Research Working Paper 3510 (Feb).
Applebaum, B. (2017). To lift growth, Janet Yellen says, make it easier for women to work. New York Times. May 5, 2017. Accessed online at: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/05/us/politics/to-lift-growth-janet-yellen-says-make-it-easier-for-women-to-work.html?_r=0.
Aranda, C. (2017). Overseas employment: Greater gender equalizer? Manila Times. 20 March 2017. Accessed at: https://www.pressreader.com/philippines/manila-times/20170320/281513635970357.
Attane, I. (2012). Being a woman in China today: A demography of gender. China Perspectives, 2012(4), 5–15.
Balk, D. (1994). Individual and community aspects of women’s status and fertility in rural Bangladesh. Population Studies, 48, 21–45.
Basu, A., & Koolwal, G. (2005). Two concepts of female empowerment: Some leads from DHS data on women’s status and reproductive health. In S. Kishor (Ed.), A focus on gender: Collected papers on gender using DHS data (pp. 15–53). Calverton: ORC Macro.
Bhana, D. (2012). Book review: Love in the time of AIDS. Global Public Health, 7(1), 101–103.
Bier, L. (2010). ‘The family is a factory’: Gender, citizenship, and the regulation of reproduction in Postwar Egypt. Feminist Studies, 36(2), 404–432.
Blackwood, E. (2000). Webs of power: Women, kin, and community in a Sumatran village. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
Bray, F. (2005). The inner quarters: Oppression or freedom? In R. Knapp (Ed.), House, home family living and being Chinese. University of Hawai’i Press. Honolulu. 259–280
Brenner, S. (1995). Why women rule the roost: Rethinking Javanese ideologies of gender and self-control. In A. Ong & M. Peletz (Eds.), Bewitching women, pious men: Gender and body politics in Southeast Asia (pp. 19–50). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Briggs, L. (2017). How all politics became reproductive politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Caldwell, J. (1986). Routes to low mortality in poor countries. Population and Development Review, 12(2), 171–220.
Cools, S., & Kotsadam, A. (2017). Resources and intimate partner violence in Sub-Saharan Africa. World Development, 95, 211–230.
Desai, S. (2000). Maternal education and child health: A feminist dilemma. Feminist Studies, 26(2), 425–446.
Desai, S., & Jain, D. (1994). Maternal employment and family dynamics: The social context of women’s work in rural South India. Population and Development Review, 20(1), 115–136.
Desai, S., & Johnson, J. (2005). Women’s decisionmaking and child health: Familial and social hierarchies. In S. Kishor (Ed.), A focus on gender: Collected papers on gender using DHS data (pp. 55–68). Calverton: ORC Macro.
Dyson, T., & Moore, M. (1983). On kinship structure, female autonomy, and demographic behavior in India. Population and Development Review, 9(1), 35–60.
Edin, K., & Kefalas, M. (2007). Promises I can keep. Berkeley: University of California Press.
El-Zeini, L. (2008). The path to replacement fertility in Egypt: Acceptance, preference, and achievement. Studies in Family Planning, 39(3), 161–176.
Ferree, M. (1990). Beyond separate spheres: Feminism and family history. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 866–884.
Greenhalgh, S. (1995). Anthropology theorizes reproduction: Integrating practice, political economic, and feminist perspectives. In S. Greenhalgh (Ed.), Situating fertility (pp. 3–29). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Greenhalgh, S. (2010). Cultivating global citizens: Population in the rise of China. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Haddad, L., Brown, L. R., Richter, A., & Smith, L. (1995). The gender dimensions of economic adjustment policies: Potential interactions and evidence to date. World Development, 23(6), 881–896.
Hunter, M. (2010). Love in the time of AIDS. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Inhorn, M. C. (1996). Infertility and patriarchy: The cultural politics of gender and family life in Egypt. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Interagency Gender Working Group. (2017). Accessed at: https://www.igwg.org/.
IWPR. (2010). Focus on Morocco: Social attitudes toward women. Accessed at: https://iwpr.org/page/2/?s=morocco&aid&publication_date_from&publication_date_to&publication_number&searched_from=publications#breadcrumbs
Jejeebhoy, S., & Sathar, Z. (2001). Women’s autonomy in India and Pakistan: The influence of religion and region. Population and Development Review, 27(4), 687–712.
Kishor, S. (1995). Autonomy and Egyptian women: Findings from the 1988 Egypt demographic and health survey. Calverton: Macro International. Occasional Papers no. 2.
Kishor, S. (2005). Introduction. In S. Kishor (Ed.), A focus on gender: Collected papers on gender using DHS data (pp. 1–14). Calverton: ORC Macro.
Kishor, S., & Neitzel, K. (1996). The status of women: Indicators for twenty-five countries, DHS Comparative Studies no 21. Calverton: Macro International.
Kuhn, R. (2010). Routes to low mortality in poor countries revisited. Population and Development Review, 36(4), 655–692.
Mason, K. O. (1984). The status of women: A review of its relationships to fertility and mortality. New York: Rockefeller Foundation.
Mason, K. O. (1986). The status of women: Conceptual and methodological issues in demographic studies. Social Forces, 1(2), 284–300.
Mason, K. O. (1987). The impact of women’s social position on fertility in developing countries. Social Forces, 2(4), 718–744.
Mason, K. O., & Smith, H. L. (2001). Thinking about, measuring, and analyzing women’s empowerment/autonomy: Lessons from a cross-country comparative study. Presentation, Population Association of America Annual Meetings, March 2001.
Mason, K. O., & Smith, H. L. (2003). Women’s empowerment and social context: Results from five Asian countries. Unpublished. Accessed at: http://swaf.pop.upenn.edu/sites/www.pop.upenn.edu/files/WomensEmpowerment2Jan2003.pdf.
Nachmias, P. (2012). Measuring female autonomy in Egypt. Paper presented at Population Association of America Annual Meetings.
Parreñas, R. (2005). Children of global migration. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
Riley, N. E. (1997). Similarities and differences: Anthropological and demographic perspectives on gender. In D. I. Kertzer & T. Fricke (Eds.), Anthropological demography: Towards a new synthesis (pp. 115–138). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Riley, N. E. (1998). Research on gender in demography: Limitations and constraints. Population Research and Development Review, 17, 521–538.
Riley, N. E. (2003). Gender. Encyclopedia of population. New York: Macmillan Reference.
Riley, N. E. (2017). Gender inequality in low-fertility societies: What does China’s experience teach us? In D. Poston (Ed.), Low fertility regimes and demographic and societal change (pp. 115–132). Cham: Springer Press.
Risman, B. (1998). Gender vertigo. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Rose, P. (1995). Female education and adjustment programs: A crosscountry statistical analysis. World Development, 23(11), 1931–1949.
Ruggles, S. (2015). Patriarchy, power, and pay: The transformation of American families, 1800–1915 (PAA presidential address). Demography, 52, 1797–1823.
Ruklanonchai, C., et al. (2016). Equality in maternal and newborn health: Modelling geographic disparities in utilisation in five East African countries. PLoS One, 11(8), 1–17.
Singleton, R., & Straits, B. (2002). Survey interviewing. In J. Gubrium & J. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp. 59–82). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Malawi Longitudinal Study of Families and Health (MLSFH). (n.d.). https://malawi.pop.upenn.edu/
Sparr, P. (Ed.). (1994). Mortgaging women’s lives: Feminist critiques of structural adjustment. London: Zed Books Ltd..
Status of Women and Fertility Survey. (n.d.). At: http://swaf.pop.upenn.edu/sites/www.pop.upenn.edu/files/MasonSmithPAA2001.pdf.
Stone, P. (2008). Opting out? Berkeley: University of California Press.
Subramanian, S. V., et al. (2006). The mortality divide in India: The differential of gender, caste and standard of living across the life course. American Journal of Public Health, 96(5), 818–825.
SWMENA. (2010). Focus on Morocco: Social attitudes toward women, topic brief. IFES and IWPR. Available at: http://www.swmena.org/en/topicbrief/43. Washington, DC
United Nations. (2015). The world’s women 2015: Trends and statistics. New York: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Statistics Division. Sales No. E.15.XVII.8. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/gender/downloads/worldswomen2015_report.pdf.
United Nations Development Programme. (2016a). Human development report 2016: Human development for everyone. New York: UNDP.
United Nations Development Programme. (2016b). Sustainable development goals. New York: UNDP.
World Bank. (n.d.). Data. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BX.TRF.PWKR.DT.GD.ZS?locations=PH&page=3. Accessed 9 Aug 2017.
Yount, K., & Li, L. (2009). Women’s ‘justification’ of domestic violence in Egypt. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 1125–1140.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix A: DHS Data Related to Women’s Status and Empowerment
Appendix A: DHS Data Related to Women’s Status and Empowerment
The DHS Program data and analysis provide an in-depth look at:
-
The life courses of women and men, including
-
when they first have sex, marry, and have their first child
-
whether they work
-
whether they control income and household decisions
-
-
Gender differentials in education and in children’s health and health care
-
Women’s experience of various forms of gender-based violence
All Demographic and Health Surveys include the following women’s status and empowerment indicators:
-
Literacy and educational attainment
-
Employment and occupation
-
Control over own earnings (most surveys)
-
Age at first marriage
-
Age at first birth
-
Contraceptive use
-
Spousal age and education differences
Demographic and Health Surveys implemented since 1999–2000 contain information on the following additional women’s status and empowerment indicators:
-
Women’s participation in household decisions
-
Women’s attitudes toward wife-beating by husbands
-
Women’s opinions on whether a woman can refuse sex to her husband
-
Hurdles faced by women in accessing health care for themselves
Demographic and Health Surveys for some countries include a module of additional questions on women’s status and empowerment the DHS Women’s Status Module. Indicators available from the module include:
-
Choice of spouse
-
Natal family support
-
Asset ownership
-
Control over money for different purposes
-
Knowledge and use of micro-credit programs
-
Attitudes about gender roles
-
Freedom of movement
-
Membership in any association
-
Having a bank account
accessed at: https://www.dhsprogram.com/topics/Womens-Status-and-Empowerment.cfm
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Riley, N.E., DeGraff, D.S. (2018). Measuring Gender in the Context of Demographic Change. In: Riley, N., Brunson, J. (eds) International Handbook on Gender and Demographic Processes. International Handbooks of Population, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1290-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1290-1_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-024-1288-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-024-1290-1
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)