Abstract
Children growing up in an Arabic-speaking community must learn both a vernacular language variety (Spoken Arabic or SA) used in everyday life, and a standard language variety (Modern Standard Arabic or MSA) used for writing and formal language functions. A diglossic situation such as this poses special challenges for professionals engaged in the assessment of children’s emergent learning skills because of issues related to the simultaneous acquisition of two distinct linguistic systems. Most, if not all available Arabic language and reading assessment tools test children only in MSA. In contrast with this traditional stance, recent approaches have proposed evaluation in SA only, or in both MSA and SA, depending on the modality: written tasks versus spoken tasks. In this chapter, we will outline the development of “ADAT”, the Arabic Diglossic Knowledge and Awareness Test, which was designed to assess diglossic and metadiglossic knowledge at the elementary school level in the two language varieties of Arabic (MSA and SA) and across all language domains.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Forty percent of the total population of all Arab states over 15 years old is illiterate, with some variation across the Arab states and within each state (Maamouri 2003).
- 2.
For further discussion of children’s performances on negation structures refer to Khamis-Dakwar et al. (2012).
- 3.
Abu-Rabia and Taha (2004) classified children’s oral reading errors into the following types of errors: non-semantic semiphonetic errors, semantic and non-morphological semiphonetic errors, semantic dysphonetic errors, non-semantic dysphonetic errors, morphological errors, addition of functional words, visual letter confusion, irregular pronunciation rules, semantic sentence guessing, semantic errors, and omitting functional words. Similarly, children’s spelling errors were classified as phonetic errors, semiphonetic errors, dysphonetic errors, visual-letter confusion errors, irregular spelling errors, word omission, and functional word omissions.
- 4.
The authors do not declare the number of words used for testing children’s spelling and they only note that the number of words for each list differed depending on the grade level.
- 5.
A similar dichotomy of assessing speaking and listening using vernacular Arabic, while using MSA when assessing writing and reading is reported in the assessment of the most common proficiency tests used for assessing students learning Arabic as a second language in the United States: the ACTFL & ILR tests (Eisels 2006).
References
Abou-Elsaad, T., Baz, H., & El-Banna, M. (2009). Developing an articulation test for Arabic-speaking school-age children. Folia Phoniatrica Logopedia, 61, 275–282.
Abu-Rabia, S. (2000). Effects of exposure to literary Arabic on reading comprehension in a diglossic situation. Reading and writing, 13(1–2), 147–157.
Abu-Rabia, S. (2002). Reading in a root-based-morphology language: The case of Arabic. Journal of Research in Reading, 25(3), 299–309.
Abu-Rabia, S., & Shalhoub Awwad, J. (2004). Morphological structures in visual word recognition: The case of Arabic. Journal of Research in Reading, 27(3), 321–336.
Abu-Rabia, S., & Taha, H. (2004). Reading and spelling errors analysis of native Arabic dyslexic readers. Reading and Writing; An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17, 651–689.
Abu-Rabia, S., & Taha, H. (2006). Phonological errors predominate in Arabic spelling across grades 1–9. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35(2), 167–189.
Abu-Rabia, S., Share, D., & Mansour, M. (2003). Word recognition and basic cognitive processes among reading-disabled and normal readers in Arabic. Reading and writing, 16, 423–442.
Al-Khaledi, M., Lincoln, M., McCabe, P., Packman, A., & Alshatti, T. (2008). The attitudes, knowledge and beliefs of Arab parents in Kuwait about stuttering. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 34, 44–59.
Amara, M. (2002). The place of Arabic in Israel. International Journal of Sociolinguistics and Language, 158, 53–68.
Amayreh, M. (1994). A normative study of the acquisition of consonant sounds in Arabic. Ph.D dissertation, University of Florida.
Azzam, R. (1990). The nature of Arabic reading and spelling errors of young children: A descriptive study. EDD dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University.
Charity, A., Scarborough, H., & Griffin, D. (2004). Famliarity with school English in African American children and it relation to early reading achievement. Child Development, 75, 1340–1356.
Connor, C., & Craig, H. (2006). African Amreican preschoolers’ language, emergent literacy skills, and use of African American English: A complex relation. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 49, 771–792.
Craig, H. K., & Washington, J. A. (2004). Grade-related changes in the production of African American English. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 47, 450–463.
Craig, H. K., & Washington, J. A. (2006). Malik goes to school: Examining the language skills of African American students from preschool- 5th grade. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Eviatar, Z., & Ibrahim, R. (2000). Bilingual is as bilingual des: Metalinguistic abilities of Arabic-speaking children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 451–471.
Ferguson, C. (1959). Diglossia. Word, 15, 325–340.
Foster, W. A., & Miller, M. (2007). Development of the literacy achievement gap: A longitudinal study of kindergarten through third grade. Language Speech Hearing Service in Schools, 38, 173–181.
Gonzalez, J., & Hernandez, V. I. (2000). Word identification and reading disorders in the Spansih language. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(1), 44–60.
Haeri, N. (2003). Sacred language, ordinary people. Dilemmas of culture and politics in Egypt. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Human Rights Watch. (2001). Second class discrimination against Palestinian Arab children in Israel’s schools. New York: Author.
Khamis-Dakwar, R. (2005). Children’s attitudes towards the diglossia situation in Arabic and its impact on learning. Language Communities and Education, 1, 75–86.
Khamis-Dakwar, R., & Crowley, C. (2005). Language testing for Arabic-speaking individuals in Israel. Poster presented at American Speech, Language & Hearing Association Convention, San Diego, November 2005.
Khamis-Dakwar, R., & Froud, K. (2007). Lexical processing in two language varieties: An event related brain potential study of Arabic native speakers. In M. Mughazy (Ed.), Perspectives on Arabic linguistics XX (pp. 153–166). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Khamis-Dakwar, R., Boudelaa, S., & Froud, K. (2009). Lexical processing in diglossic code switching between Modern Standard Arabic and Palestinian colloquial Arabic: An event-related brain potential study of Arabic native speakers. Poster presented at Cognitive Neuroscience Symposium. San Francisco, March 2009.
Khamis-Dakwar, R., & Froud, K. Aphasia, language, and culture: Arabs in the U.S. In M. Gitterman, M. Goral, & L. Obler (Eds.), Multilingual aphasia book. Bristol: Multilingual Matters (under review).
Khamis-Dakwar, R., Froud, K., & Gordon, P. (2012). Acquiring diglossia: Mutual influences of formal and colloquial Arabic on children’s grammaticality judgments. Journal of Child Language, 39, 1–29.
Korenbrot, F., Hertzano, T., & Ben Aroya, A. (2002). Emerging issues in Israel: Commentaries in a global context. Folia Phoniatrica Logopaedica, 54, 72–74.
Kotby, M. N., El-Sady, S., & Hegazi, M. (2010). Thirty five years of care of child language in Egypt. Topics in Language Disorders, 30(1), 8491.
Labov, W. (2003). When ordinary children fail to read. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(1), 128–131.
Landerl, K., & Wimmer, H. (2000). Deficits in phoneme segmentation are not the core problem of dyslexia: Evidence from German and English children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 234–262.
Maamouri, M. (1998). Language education and human development. Arabic diglossia and its impact on the quality of education in the Arab world. The World Bank: The Mediterranean Development Forum: Marrakesh.
Mahfoudhi, A., Elbeheri, G., Al-Rashidi, M., & Everatt, J. (2010). The role of morphological awareness in reading comprehension among typical and learning disabled native Arabic speakers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(6), 500–514.
Mcdonald, C., & Craig, H. (2006). African American preschoolers’ language, emergent literacy skills, and use of African American English: A complex relation. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 49, 771–792.
Miles, E. (2000). Dyslexia may show a different face in different languages. Dyslexia, 6(1), 193–201.
Moreno, E., Federmeier, K., & Kutas, M. (2002). Switching languages, switching palabras (words): An electrophysiological study of code-switching. Brain and Language, 80, 188–207.
Morrison, F. J., Bachamn, H. J., & Connor, C. M. (2005). Improving literacy in America: Guidelines from research. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Patel, R., & Khamis-Dakwar, R. (2005). An AAC training program for special education teachers: A case study of Palestinian Arab teachers in Israel. Journal of Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21(3), 205–217.
Pearson, B. P., Velleman, S. L., Bryant, T. J., & Charko, T. (2009). Phonological milestones for African American English-speaking children learning mainstream American English as a second dialect. Language Speech and Hearing Service in Schools, 40, 229–244.
Romaine, S. (2000). Language in society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2003). Linguistic distance and initial reading acquisition: The case of Arabic diglossia. Applied Psycholinguistic, 24, 115–135.
Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2004). The impact of phonemic and lexical distance on the phonological analysis of words and pseudowords in a diglossic context. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 495–512.
Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2005). Correlates of reading fluency in Arabic diglossic and orthographic factors. Reading and Writing, 18(6), 559–582.
Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2007). Linguistic constraints on children’s ability to isolate phonemes in Arabic. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 607–625.
Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2011a). The effect of exposure to standard Arabic and linguistic distance from spoken Arabic on lexical processing in standard Arabic. In D. Aram & O. Korat (Eds.), Literacy and language: Interaction, bilingualism, and difficulties (pp. 321–336). Hebrew: Magnes Press.
Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2011b). Phonological processing in diglossic Arabic: The role of linguistic distance. In E. Broselow & H. Ouli (Eds.), Perspectives on Arabic linguistics XXII (pp. 269–280). John Benjamins Publishers.
Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2012). Literacy reflexes of Arabic diglossia. In M. Leikin, M. Schwartz, & Y. Tobin (Eds.), Current issues in bilingualism: Cognitive and sociolinguistic perspectives (pp. 43–55). Springer.
Saiegh-Haddad, E., Hende, N., & Ziv, M. (2011). The linguistic affiliation constraint and phoneme recognition in diglossic Arabic. Journal of Child Language, 38, 297–315.
Scarborough, H. S., Terry, N. P., & Griffin, D. M. (2007). Addressing dialect differences: Advances in policy, research, and practice. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language Hearing Association, Boston, MA.
Share, D. L. (2008). On the Anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615.
Spolsky, B. (1997). Multilingualism in Israel. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 17, 138–150.
Terry, N. P. (2010). Examining relationships among dialect variation and emergent literacy skills. Communication Disorders Quarterly, x(x), 1–11.
Terry, N. P., Connor, C. M., Thomas-tate, S., & Love, M. (2010). Examining relationships among dialect variation, literacy skills, and school context in first grade. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 53, 126–145.
United Nations Development Programme. (2003). Arab human development report 2003: Building a knowledge society. New York: UNDP, Regional Bureau for Arab States.
United State Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2003). The nation’s report card. Reading highlights (No. NCES 2004–452). Washington, DC: Author.
Wiig, E. H., & El-Halees, Y. (2000). Developing a language screening test for Arabic-speaking children. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 52, 260–274.
Wilson, M. E. (1996). Arabic speakers language and culture, here and abroad. Topics in Language Disorders, 16(4), 65–80.
Wimmer, H., Mayringer, H., & Landerl, K. (2000). The double-deficit hypothesis and difficulties in learning to read a regular orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(4), 668–680.
Zoccolotti, P., De Luca, M., Rico, D. P., Judica, A., & Spinelli, D. (1999). Markers of developmental surface dyslexia in a language (Italian) with high grapheme-phoneme correspondence. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20, 191–216.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported in part by a generous grant from Oranim College and the Faculty Development Grant at Adelphi University. The authors wish to thank Karen Froud, Peter Gordon, Felicidad Garcia and Elinor Saiegh-Haddad for invaluable encouragement and support, as well as Toraya Kubetty for her professional support. A special thanks to Abed Tamesh for his artistic creativity and contribution. The authors also thank the children who participated in this study, their parents, and the teachers for their kind cooperation. Address correspondence to Reem Khamis-Dakwar, Communication Sciences and Disorders, School of Education, Adelphi University, Garden City, NY 11553. E-mail: khamis-dakwar@adelphi.edu, http://home.adelphi.edu/~nslplab
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Khamis-Dakwar, R., Makhoul, B. (2014). The Development of ADAT (Arabic Diglossic Knowledge and Awareness Test): A theoretical and clinical overview. In: Saiegh-Haddad, E., Joshi, R. (eds) Handbook of Arabic Literacy. Literacy Studies, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8545-7_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8545-7_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-8544-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-8545-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)