Skip to main content

A Precautionary Tale of Risk Aversion and Prudence

  • Chapter
Models and Experiments in Risk and Rationality

Part of the book series: Theory and Decision Library ((TDLB,volume 29))

Abstract

The expected-utility framework of von Neumann and Morgenstern (1944) and the theory of risk aversion, as developed by Pratt (1964) and Arrow (1965), remain cornerstones in the economics of choice under uncertainty. Although much recent work has focused on non-expected utility theory, the general preference functionals found in these models typically resemble those generated by expected-utility preferences locally. Moreover, the expected-utility model itself has been extended to account for more complex settings, and the Arrow-Pratt rankings have been shown to be robust in many of these extensions. For example, Kihlstrom, Romer and Williams (1981) and Nachman (1982) show that the Arrow-Pratt rankings extend to models with multiple sources of risk.2 Pratt and Zeckhauser (1987) complement this work by imposing some additional structure on preferences in the presence of multiple risks.

The research was undertaken while Schlesinger was a Visiting Professor at the Catholic Faculty of Mons and CORE, Catholic University of Louvain. Financial support for the former visit from the Intercollegiate Center for Management Science (CIM) in Brussels is gratefully acknowledged.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrow, K. J. (1965): “Aspects of a Theory of Risk Bearing,” Yrjo Jahnsson Lectures, Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brocket, P. L. and L. L. Golden (1985): “A Class of Utility Functions Containing All the Common Utility Functions,” Management Science, 33, 955–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drèze, J. H. and F. Modigliani (1972): “Consumption Decisions Under Uncertainty,” Journal of Economic Theory, 5, 308–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eeckhoudt, L., C. Gollier and H. Schlesinger (1991): “Increases in Risk and Deductible Insurance,” Journal of Economic Theory, 55, 435–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eeckhoudt, L. and M. Kimball (1992): “Background Risk, Prudence, and the Demand for Insurance,” in Contributions to Insurance Economics, ed. by G. Dionne, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, L. and S. Zin (1989): “Substitution, Risk Aversion and the Temporal Behavior of Consumption and Asset Returns: A Theoretical Framework,” Econometrica, 57, 937–970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kihlstrom, R. E., D. Romer and S. Williams (1981): “Risk Aversion with Random Initial Wealth,” Econometrica, 49, 911–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimball, M. S. (1990): “Precautionary Savings in the Small and in the Large,” Econometrica, 58, 53–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimball, M. S. (1993): “Standard Risk Aversion,” Econometrica, 61, 589–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kocherlakota, N. (1990): “Disentangling the Coefficient of Relative Risk Aversion from the Elasticity of Intertemporal Substitution,” Journal of Finance, 45, 175–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAfee, R. P. (1991): “Efficient Allocation with Continuous Quantities,” Journal of Economic Theory, 53, 51–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nachman, D. C. (1982): “Preservation of `More Risk Averse’ Under Expectation,” Journal of Economic Theory, 28, 36 1368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, J. von and O. Morgenstern (1944): Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, J. W. (1964): “Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large,” Econometrica,32, 122–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, J. W. (1988): “Aversion to One Risk in the Presence of Others,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, 105–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, J. W. and R. J. Zeckhauser (1987): “Proper Risk Aversion,” Econometrica, 55, 143–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandmo, A. (1970): “The Effect of Uncertainty on Savings Decisions,” Review of Economic Studies, 37, 353–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlee, E. E. (1992): “Multivariate Risk Aversion and Intertemporal Substitution,” GENEVA PAPERS on Risk and Insurance Theory, 17, 159–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Eeckhoudt, L., Schlesinger, H. (1994). A Precautionary Tale of Risk Aversion and Prudence. In: Munier, B., Machina, M.J. (eds) Models and Experiments in Risk and Rationality. Theory and Decision Library, vol 29. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2298-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2298-8_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4447-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2298-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics