Abstract
This paper presents a review of geoid error characteristics of three satellite gravity missions in view of the general problem of separating scientifically interesting signals from various noise sources. The problem is reviewed from the point of view of two proposed applications of gravity missions, one is the observation of the mean oceanic circulation whereby an improved geoid model is used as a reference surface against the long term mean sea level observed by altimetry. In this case we consider the presence of mesoscale variability during assimilation of derived surface currents in inverse models. The other experiment deals with temporal changes in the gravity field observed by GRACE in which case a proposed experiment is to monitor changes in the geoid in order to detect geophysical interesting signals such as variations in the continental hydrology and non-steric ocean processes. For this experiment we will address the problem of geophysical signal contamination and the way it potentially affects monthly geoid solutions of GRACE.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Colombo. O.L.: 1986. The global mapping of gravity with two satellites, Netherlands Geodetic Commission. New Series No. 30. pp. 1–180.
Dickey, J.O.: 1997, Satellite Gravity and the Geosphere, National Research Council Report, Nat. Acad. Washington D.C.. 112 pp.
ESA: 1999, Gravity field and steady slate ocean circulation mission, ESA SP-1233. pp 217
Fu, L.L., et at.: 1994. ‘TOPEX/POSE1DON mission overview’, JGR 99, 24.369–24.382.
Fu, L.L. and Cazenave, A.: 2001, Satellite isUtimetry and Earth Sciences, A handbook of techniques and applications, International Geophysics Series, Vol 69. Academic Press.
Ganachaud. A,, Wunsch, C., Kim, M.-C.. and Tapley, B.: 1997, ‘Combination of TOPEX/POSE1DON data with a hydrographic inversion for determination of the oceanic general circulation and its relation to geoid accuracy’. Geophysical J. Int. 128, 708–722.
Hciskancn. W.A. and Moritz, H.; 1979. Physical Geodesy, Reprint Institute of Physical Geodesy, TU Graz. Austria
Hurlburt, H.E. and Thompson, J.D.: 1980, ‘A numerical study of Loop Current intrusions and eddy-shedding’, J. Phys. Oceanogr. 10. 1611–1651.
Knudsen. P. and Andersen. O.: 2002. ‘Correcting GRACE gravity liclds lor ocean tide effects’. Geophysical Research Letters 29, 19.1–19.4
Koch. K.-R.: 1986. “Maximum likelihood estimate of variance components’. Bulletin Geodesique 60. 329–338.
Koch. K.-R.: 1990. Bayesian Inference with Geodetic Applications. Lecture notes in Earth Sciences. Springer. Berlin.
Lefüvre. F.. Lyard. F., Le Provost. C.. and Schrama. E.: 2002. ‘FES99: A global tide finite element solution assimilating tide gauge and altimetric information’. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology 19. 1345–1356.
Lerch, F.J.: 1991, ‘Optimum data weighting and error calibration for estimation of gravitational parameters’. Bulletin Geodesique 65. 44–52.
LeGrand. P.: 2001, ‘Impact of the Gravity Field and Steady State Ocean Circulation Explorer (GOCE) mission on ocean circulation estimates: Volume fluxes in a climatological inverse model of the Atlantic’. Journal of Geophysical Research 106. 19.597–19.610.
LeGrand. P.. Schrama, E.. and Tournadre, J.: 2002. “An Inverse Estimate of the Dynamic Topography of the Ocean’. Geophysical Research Letters. 30(2). 34–1, cite ID 1062. DOI I0.1029/2002GL0I4917
Lemoine. et al.: 1998. ‘The development of the joint NASA GSFC and NIM A geopotential model EGM-96 gravity model’. NASA/TP-1998–206861.
Lillibridge, J., et al.: 2000. ‘ERS-2 altimetry in operational NOAA forecast models’. Proc. 4th ERS Symp.. Gothenberg. Sweden.
Moritz. H.: 1980. Advanced Physical Geodesy. H. Wichman Verlag, Karlsruhe.
NRL: 2002, http://www.ocean.nrlssc.navy.mil/altimetry/.
Ray. R.: 1999. ‘A Global Ocean Tidel Model from TOPEX/POSEIDON Altimetry: GOT99.2’. NASA TM 1999–209478.
Ray, R.. Rowlands. D.. and Egbert. G.: 2003, “Tidal models in a New Era of Satellite Gravimetry”. Space Science Reviews, this volume.
Reigber. et al.: 2002. ‘A High-Quality Global Gravity Field Model from CHAMP GPS Tracking Data and Accelerometry (EIGEN-IS)’, Geophysical Research Letters 29. 10129/20O2GLO15064.
Schrama, E.: 1991, ‘Gravity Field Error Analysis: Applications of Global Positioning System Receivers and Gradiometers on Low Orbiting Platforms’, Journal of Geophysical Research 96. 20.041–20,051.
Schrama. E. and Ray. R.: 1994. ‘A preliminary tidal analysis of TOPEX/POSEIDON altimetry’. JGR 99. 24,799–24,808.
Schrama. E.: 1995. ‘Gravity missions reviewed in the light of the indirect ocean tide potential’. Proceedings IAG symposia proceedings No 116, 131–140. Springer Verlag.
Schröter J., Losch, M.. and Sloyan. B.: 2002. “Impact of the Gravity Field and Steady-State Ocean Circulation Explorer (GOCE) mission on ocean circulation estimates 2: Volume and heal fluxes across hydrographic section of unequally spaced stations’. JGR 107. 4. 1–4. 20.
Velicogna, L, Wahr. J., and van den Dool. H.: 2001, ‘Can surface pressure be used to remove atmospheric contributions from GRACE data with sufficient accuracy to recover hydrological signals?’. JGR 106. 16. 415.
Verhagen. S.: 2001. Time variations in the gravity field, the effect of the atmosphere. MSc report. 81 pages, TU Delft Geodesy.
Wahr. J.. Molenaar. M.. Bryan, F.: 1998. ‘Time variability of the Earth’s gravity field: Hydrological and oceanic effects and their possible detection using GRACE“. JGR 103. 30. 205–30. 229.
Wunsch. C.: 1996. The Ocean Circulation Inverse Problem, Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schrama, E.J.O. (2003). Error Characteristics Estimated from Champ, GRACE and GOCE Derived Geoids and from Satellite Altimetry Derived Mean Dynamic Topography. In: Beutler, G., Drinkwater, M.R., Rummel, R., Von Steiger, R. (eds) Earth Gravity Field from Space — From Sensors to Earth Sciences. Space Sciences Series of ISSI, vol 17. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1333-7_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1333-7_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6334-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1333-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive