Skip to main content

Connection between Classical and Quantum Descriptions of Evolution

  • Conference paper
Causality and Locality in Modern Physics

Part of the book series: Fundamental Theories of Physics ((FTPH,volume 97))

  • 602 Accesses

Abstract

Classically, the evolution of a physical system is described by a unique trajectory in an appropriate phase space. Ehrenfest’s theorem suggests the possibility of similar description in terms of the expected values of the position and momentum observables. This connection between the classical and quantum descriptions is often useful but has a limited range of applicability in deducing the behaviour of physical systems. The source of the discrepancy is investigated providing an insight into the basic differences between the classical and quantum descriptions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. V.S. Vardarajan, Geometry of Quantum Mechanics, Second Edition, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. Merzbacher, Quantum Mechanics, Wiley, New York, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R.L. Liboff, Quantum Mechanics, Holden-Day, San Francisco, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  4. L.E. Ballentine, Y. Yang and J.P. Jibin, Phys. Rev. A, 50 (1994) 2854.

    Google Scholar 

  5. N. Moiseyev, J. Chem. Phys. 79 (1983) 5945

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. R.P. Feynman and A.R. Hibbs, Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals, McGraw-Hill, New York, (1965).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. W.P. Reinhardt, J. Phys. Chem. 86 (1982) 2158.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S.R. Vatsya, Existence and Approximation of the Classical Trajectories, Submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S.R. Vatsya, Comments on Ehrenfest’s theorem, Unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. Madelung, Z. Phys. 40 (1926) 322.

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. D. Bohm and J.P. Vigier, Phys. Rev., 96 (1954) 208.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. A.W. Conway and A.J. McConnell (ed.) The mathematical papers of Sir Willium Rowan Hamilton, Vol II, University of Cambridge Press, Cambridge, 1940.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Vatsya, S.R., Pritchard, H.O. (1998). Connection between Classical and Quantum Descriptions of Evolution. In: Hunter, G., Jeffers, S., Vigier, JP. (eds) Causality and Locality in Modern Physics. Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol 97. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0990-3_52

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0990-3_52

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5092-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0990-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics