Skip to main content

Anatomical and Physiological Bases of Fecal Continence

  • Chapter
Advances in Abdominal Surgery 2002
  • 100 Accesses

Abstract

Fecal incontinence, i. e. the impaired ability to control gas or stool, is a disabling and distressing condition, which, when severe, causes progressive social isolation of the patient. However, it is a common condition, especially in older individuals, where prevalence has been reported to approach 60 per cent, and in women, where incontinence as a result of childbirth reaches 54 per cent [1]. Sultan and associates [2] found that 13 per cent of primigravidae and 23 per cent of multigravidae had some degree of incontinence in the first six weeks after delivery, and Mac Arthur and colleagues [3] reported that up to two years later 4 per cent still had the symptom. Of patients surgically treated, the female-to-male ratio is 4 to 1. In a recent epidemiological study published by the University of Illinois on JAMA in 1995, fecal incontinence was determined in 2.2 per cent of the general population [4]. Data from Great Britain suggest a community prevalence of 4.2 men and 1.7 women per 1000 people who are 15 to 64 years of age, and 10.9 men and 13.3 women per 1000 people who are 65 or older [5].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Fang DT, Nivatvongs S, Vermeulen FD, et al. Overlapping sphincteroplasty for acquired anal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1984; 27: 720–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Bartram CI.Third degree obstetric and sphincter tears:risk factors and outcome of primary repair. BMJ 1994; 308: 887–91.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mac Arthur C, Bick DE, Keighley MRB. Faecal incontinence after childbirth. Br JObstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 46–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nelson R, Norton N, Cautley E, Fumer S. Community based prevalence of anal incontinence. JAMA 1995; 274: 559–61.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheskin LJ, Schuster MM. Fecal incontinence. In: Hazzard WR, Andres R, Bierman EL, Blass JP, eds. Principles of geriatric medicine and gerontology.New York: Mc Graw-Hill, 1990:1143–5.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Thomas TM, Egan M, Walgrave A, Meade TW. The prevalence of faecal and double incontinence. Community Med 1984; 6: 216–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pena A, de Vries PA. Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty: important technical considerations and new applications. J Paed Surg 1982; 17: 796–809.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bannister JJ, Gibbons C, Red NW. Preservation of faecal continence during rises in intrabdominal pressure: is there a role for the flap-valve? Gut 1987; 28: 1242–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bartolo DCC, Roe AM, Locke-Edwards JC, et al. Flap valve theory of anorectal incontinence. BrJSurg 1986; 73: 1012–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Keighley MRB, Williams NS, eds. Surgery of the anus,rectum, and colon. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mavrantonis C, Wexner SD. A clinical approach to fecal incontinence. J Clin Gastroenterol 1998; 27: 108121.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Eckadt VF, Elmer T. Reliability of anal pressure measurements. Dis Colon Rectum 1991; 34: 72–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pedersen IK, Christiansen J. A study of the physiological variations in anal manometry. Br JSurg 1989; 76: 69–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Speakman CTM, Burnett SJD, Kamm MA, Bartram CI. Sphincter injury after anal dilatation demonstrated by anal endosonography. BrJSurg 1991; 78: 1429–30.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Madoff DR, Williams JG, Caushaj PF. Fecal incontinence. N Engl J Med 1992; 326: 1002–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Williams NS. Topical issues in selected specialties: surgery of anorectal incontinence. Lancet 1999; 353 (suppl I): 31–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Swash M, GrayA, Lubowski DZ, Nichols RI. Ultrastructural changes in internal anal sphincter in neurologic faecal incontinence. Gut 1988; 29: 1692–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Miller R, Bartolo DCC, Cervero F, Mortensen NJ. Anorectal sampling: a comparison of normal and incontinence patients. Br J Surg 1988; 75:+44–7.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rogers J, Henry MM, Misiewicz JJ.Combined sensory and motor deficit in primary neuropath faecal incontinence. Gut 1988; 29: 5–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rogers J, Levy DM, Henry MM, Misiewicz JJ.Pelvic floor neuropathy: a comparative study of diabetes mellitus and idiopathic faecal incontinence. Gut 1988: 29. 756–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Roe AM, Bartolo DCC, Mrtensen NJMcC. New method for assessment of anal sensation in various anorectal disorders. Br JSurg 1986; 73: 310–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gunterberg B, Kewenter J, Petersen I, Stener B. Anorectal function after major resections of the sacrum with bilateral or unilateral sacrifice of sacral nerves. Br JSurg 1976; 63: 546–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Parks AG, Porter NH, Hardcastle J. The syndrome of the descending perineum. Proc R Soc Med 1966; 59: 477–82.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Penninckx F, Debruyne C„ Lestar B, Kerremans RP. Observer variation in the radiological measurement of the anorectal angle. Int J Colorectal Dis 1990; 5: 94–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Jorge JMN, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36: 77–97.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bruck CE, Lubowski DZ, King DW. Do patients with haemorrhoids have pelvic floor denervation? Int Colorectal Dis 1988; 3: 210–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wexner SD, Marchetti F, Jagelman DG. The role of sphincteroplasty for fecal incontinence reevaluated: a prospective physiologic and functional review. Dis Colon Rectum 1991; 34: 22–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Williams NS, Patel J, George BD, Hall= RI, Watkins ES. Development of an electrically stimulated neoanal sphincter. Lancet 1991; 338: 1166–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wong DW, Jensen LL, Bartolo DCC, Rothenberger DA. Artificial anal sphincter. Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39: 1345–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Farinon, A.M. (2002). Anatomical and Physiological Bases of Fecal Continence. In: Farinon, A.M. (eds) Advances in Abdominal Surgery 2002. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0637-7_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0637-7_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6135-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0637-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics