Abstract
Fecal incontinence, i. e. the impaired ability to control gas or stool, is a disabling and distressing condition, which, when severe, causes progressive social isolation of the patient. However, it is a common condition, especially in older individuals, where prevalence has been reported to approach 60 per cent, and in women, where incontinence as a result of childbirth reaches 54 per cent [1]. Sultan and associates [2] found that 13 per cent of primigravidae and 23 per cent of multigravidae had some degree of incontinence in the first six weeks after delivery, and Mac Arthur and colleagues [3] reported that up to two years later 4 per cent still had the symptom. Of patients surgically treated, the female-to-male ratio is 4 to 1. In a recent epidemiological study published by the University of Illinois on JAMA in 1995, fecal incontinence was determined in 2.2 per cent of the general population [4]. Data from Great Britain suggest a community prevalence of 4.2 men and 1.7 women per 1000 people who are 15 to 64 years of age, and 10.9 men and 13.3 women per 1000 people who are 65 or older [5].
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Fang DT, Nivatvongs S, Vermeulen FD, et al. Overlapping sphincteroplasty for acquired anal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1984; 27: 720–2.
Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Bartram CI.Third degree obstetric and sphincter tears:risk factors and outcome of primary repair. BMJ 1994; 308: 887–91.
Mac Arthur C, Bick DE, Keighley MRB. Faecal incontinence after childbirth. Br JObstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 46–50.
Nelson R, Norton N, Cautley E, Fumer S. Community based prevalence of anal incontinence. JAMA 1995; 274: 559–61.
Cheskin LJ, Schuster MM. Fecal incontinence. In: Hazzard WR, Andres R, Bierman EL, Blass JP, eds. Principles of geriatric medicine and gerontology.New York: Mc Graw-Hill, 1990:1143–5.
Thomas TM, Egan M, Walgrave A, Meade TW. The prevalence of faecal and double incontinence. Community Med 1984; 6: 216–20.
Pena A, de Vries PA. Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty: important technical considerations and new applications. J Paed Surg 1982; 17: 796–809.
Bannister JJ, Gibbons C, Red NW. Preservation of faecal continence during rises in intrabdominal pressure: is there a role for the flap-valve? Gut 1987; 28: 1242–4.
Bartolo DCC, Roe AM, Locke-Edwards JC, et al. Flap valve theory of anorectal incontinence. BrJSurg 1986; 73: 1012–5.
Keighley MRB, Williams NS, eds. Surgery of the anus,rectum, and colon. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1993.
Mavrantonis C, Wexner SD. A clinical approach to fecal incontinence. J Clin Gastroenterol 1998; 27: 108121.
Eckadt VF, Elmer T. Reliability of anal pressure measurements. Dis Colon Rectum 1991; 34: 72–7.
Pedersen IK, Christiansen J. A study of the physiological variations in anal manometry. Br JSurg 1989; 76: 69–71.
Speakman CTM, Burnett SJD, Kamm MA, Bartram CI. Sphincter injury after anal dilatation demonstrated by anal endosonography. BrJSurg 1991; 78: 1429–30.
Madoff DR, Williams JG, Caushaj PF. Fecal incontinence. N Engl J Med 1992; 326: 1002–6.
Williams NS. Topical issues in selected specialties: surgery of anorectal incontinence. Lancet 1999; 353 (suppl I): 31–2.
Swash M, GrayA, Lubowski DZ, Nichols RI. Ultrastructural changes in internal anal sphincter in neurologic faecal incontinence. Gut 1988; 29: 1692–8.
Miller R, Bartolo DCC, Cervero F, Mortensen NJ. Anorectal sampling: a comparison of normal and incontinence patients. Br J Surg 1988; 75:+44–7.
Rogers J, Henry MM, Misiewicz JJ.Combined sensory and motor deficit in primary neuropath faecal incontinence. Gut 1988; 29: 5–9.
Rogers J, Levy DM, Henry MM, Misiewicz JJ.Pelvic floor neuropathy: a comparative study of diabetes mellitus and idiopathic faecal incontinence. Gut 1988: 29. 756–61.
Roe AM, Bartolo DCC, Mrtensen NJMcC. New method for assessment of anal sensation in various anorectal disorders. Br JSurg 1986; 73: 310–2.
Gunterberg B, Kewenter J, Petersen I, Stener B. Anorectal function after major resections of the sacrum with bilateral or unilateral sacrifice of sacral nerves. Br JSurg 1976; 63: 546–54.
Parks AG, Porter NH, Hardcastle J. The syndrome of the descending perineum. Proc R Soc Med 1966; 59: 477–82.
Penninckx F, Debruyne C„ Lestar B, Kerremans RP. Observer variation in the radiological measurement of the anorectal angle. Int J Colorectal Dis 1990; 5: 94–7.
Jorge JMN, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36: 77–97.
Bruck CE, Lubowski DZ, King DW. Do patients with haemorrhoids have pelvic floor denervation? Int Colorectal Dis 1988; 3: 210–4.
Wexner SD, Marchetti F, Jagelman DG. The role of sphincteroplasty for fecal incontinence reevaluated: a prospective physiologic and functional review. Dis Colon Rectum 1991; 34: 22–30.
Williams NS, Patel J, George BD, Hall= RI, Watkins ES. Development of an electrically stimulated neoanal sphincter. Lancet 1991; 338: 1166–9.
Wong DW, Jensen LL, Bartolo DCC, Rothenberger DA. Artificial anal sphincter. Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39: 1345–51.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Farinon, A.M. (2002). Anatomical and Physiological Bases of Fecal Continence. In: Farinon, A.M. (eds) Advances in Abdominal Surgery 2002. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0637-7_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0637-7_19
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6135-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0637-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive