Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 323))

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to show that the account of objective truth taken for granted by logicians at least since the publication in 1933 of Tarski’s The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages’ arose out of a tradition of philosophical thinking initiated by Bolzano and Brentano. The paper shows more specifically that certain investigations of states of affairs and other objectual correlates of judging acts, investigations carried out by Austrian and Polish philosophers around the turn of the century, formed part of the background of views that led to standard current accounts of the objectivity of truth.1 It thus lends support to speculations on the role of Brentano and his heirs in contemporary logical philosophy advanced by Jan Wolenski in his masterpiece on the Logic and Philosophy in the Lvov-Warsaw School of 1989.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ajdukiewicz, K.: 1934, ‘Sprache und Sinn’, Erkenntnis 4, 100–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajdukiewicz, K.: 1935, ‘Die syntaktische Konnexität’, Studia Philosophica 1, 1–27. Translated by H. Weber as ‘Syntactic Connexion’, in: S. McCall (ed.), Polish Logic, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1967, pp. 207–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, W.: 1987, ‘Die Begründung von Wahrheit durch Evidenz. Der Beitrag Brentanos’, in: Gewissheit und Gewissen. Festschrift für Franz Wiedmann zum 60. Geburstag, Koenigshausen und Neumann, Würzburg, pp. 93–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D.: 1979, Frege’s Theory of Judgment, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, J.: 1879, Allgemeine Logik, I. Reine Logik, Mittler, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolzano, B.: 1837, Wissenschaftslehre, 4 vols., Seidel, Sulzbach. Translated by R. George, Theory of Science, Blackwell, Oxford, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brentano, F.: 1874, Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkte, Duncker and Humblot, Leipzig. Second edition 1924. Translated by A. C. Rancurello, D. B. Terrell and L. L. MacAlister, Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint, Routledge, London, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brentano, F.: 1889, ‘Über den Begriff der Wahrheit’, as repr. in: Brentano (1930), pp. 3–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brentano, F.: 1928, Vom sinnlichen und noetischen Bewusstsein. Vol. III of Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt, Meiner, Leipzig. Translated by L. L. McAlister, Sensory and Noetic Consciousness, Routledge, London, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brentano, F.: 1930, Wahrheit und Evidenz, Meiner, Leipzig. Translated by R. M. Chisholm, I. Politzer, K. R. Fischer, The True and the Evident, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brentano, F.: 1933, Kategorienlehre, Meiner, Leipzig. Translated by R. M. Chisholm and N. Guterman, The Theory of Categories, Nijhoff, The Hague, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brentano, F.: 1956, Die Lehre vom richtigen Urteil, Francke, Bern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brentano, F.: 1982, Deskriptive Psychologie, Meiner, Hamburg. Translated by B. Müller as Descriptive Psychology, Routledge, London/New York, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, G.: 1887/88, ‘Mitteilungen zur Lehre vom Transfiniten’, as reprinted in: Cantor (1966), pp. 373–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, G.: 1895/97, ‘Beiträge zur Begründung der transfiniten Mengenlehre’, as reprinted in: Cantor (1966), pp. 282–311. Translated by P. E. B. Jourdain, Contributions to the Founding of the Theory of Transfinite Numbers, Dover, New York, 1915.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, G.: 1966, Gesammelte Abhandlungen mathematischen und philosophischen Inhalts, Olms, Hildesheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chrudzimski, Arkadiusz: 2001, Intentionalitätstheorie beim frühen Brentano, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chrudzimski, Arkadiusz: 2001a, ‘Die Intentionalitätstheorie Anton Martys’, Grazer Philosophische Studien 62, 175–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, M.: 1981, Frege. Philosophy of Language, Duckworth, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, M.: 1988, Ursprünge der analytischen Philosophie, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt. English version: Origins of Analytic Philosophy, Duckworth, London, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G.: 1879, Begriffsschrift, Halle. Translated by S. Bauer-Mengelberg in: J. van Heijenoort (ed.), From Frege to Gödel A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G.: 1884, Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik, Wilhelm Koebner, Breslau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E.: 1894, ‘Intentionale Gegenstände’, in: Husserliana 22, Nijhoff, The Hague, 1979, pp. 303–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E.: 1900/01, Logische Untersuchungen, Niemeyer, Halle. Translated by J. N. Findlay, Logical Investigations, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotarbinski, T.: 1913, ‘Zagadnienie istnienia przyszlosci’ (The problem of the existence of the future), Przeglad Filozoficzny 16, 74–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotarbinski, T.: 1929, Elementy teorii poznania, logiki formalnej i metodologii nauk, Lvov. Cited according to the English translation, The Scientific Approach to the Theory of Knowledge, Pergamon Press, Oxford, Eng. trans. by O. Wojtasiewicz, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreiser, Lothar: 2001, Gottlob Frege. Leben, Werk, Zeit, Felix Meiner, Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusch, M.: 1995, Psychologism. A Case Study in the Sociology of Philosophical Knowledge, Routledge, London/New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesniewski, S.: 1913, ‘Krytyka logicznej zasady wylaczonego srodka’ (Critique of the logical principle of the excluded middle), Przeglad Filozoficzny 16, 315–352; Eng. trans. in: Lesniewski (1992), pp. 47–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesniewski, S.: 1927, ‘O podstawach matematyki’, Przeglad Filozoficzny 30, 164–206; English trans. as ‘On the Foundations of Mathematics’, in: Lesniewski (1992), pp. 174–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesniewski, S.: 1992, Collected Works, S. J. Surma, J. T. Srzednicki and D. I. Barnett (eds.), 2 vols., Kluwer, Dordrecht/Boston/London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotze, H.: 1880, Logik: Drei Bücher vom Denken, vom Untersuchen, und vom Erkennen, 2nd ed., S. Hirzel, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukasiewicz, J.: 1987, ‘On the Principle of the Excluded Middle’, History and Philosophy of Logic 8, 67–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lukasiewicz, J.: 1907, ‘Logika a psychologia’ (Logic and Psychology), Przeglad Filozoficzny 10, no. 4, 489–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukasiewicz, J.: 1910, ‘Über den Satz von Widerspruch bei Aristoteles’, Bulletin international de l’Académie des Sciences de Cracovie, Classe de philologie, pp. 15–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukasiewicz, J.: 1913, ‘Logical Foundations of Probability Theory’, as translated in: J. Lukasiewicz, Selected Works, edited by L. Borkowski, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1970, pp. 16–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marty, A. 1908, Untersuchungen zur Grundlegung der allgemeinen Grammatik und Sprachphilosophie, Niemeyer, Halle. Reprinted 1976, Olms, Hildesheim/New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinong, A.: 1899, ‘Über Gegenstände höherer Ordnung und deren Verhältnis zur inneren Wahrnehmung’, Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane 21, 182–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinong, A.: 1902, Über Annahmen, Barth, Leipzig. Second edition 1910. Translated by J. Heanue as On Assumptions, University of California Press, Berkeley, Los Angeles, London, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinong, A.: 1965, Philosophenbriefe, Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt, Graz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morscher, E.: 1986, ‘Propositions and States of Affairs in Austrian Philosophy before Wittgenstein’, in: J. C. Nyíri (ed.), From Bolzano to Wittgenstein: The Tradition of Austrian Philosophy, Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, Vienna, pp. 75–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, K.: 1985, ‘Wie die Sachen sich zueinander verhalten Inside and Outside the Tractatus’, Teoria 5, 145–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, K.: 1990, ‘Husserl on States of Affairs in the Logical Investigations’, Epistemologia 12, 207–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, K., P. M. Simons, and Barry Smith: 1984, ‘Truth-Makers’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 44, 287–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuchelmans, G.: 1973, Theories of the Proposition. Ancient and Medieval Conceptions of the Bearers of Truth and Falsity, North-Holland, Amsterdam and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ossowska, M.: 1928, ‘O pojeciu wyrazania’ (On the concept of expression), Przeglad Filozoficzny 31, no. 1–2, pp. 145–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ossowska, M.: 1931, ‘Slowa i mysli’ (Words and thoughts), Przeglad Filozoficzny 34, no. 4, pp. 203–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ossowski, S.: 1926, ‘Analiza pojecia znaku’, Przeglad Filozoficzny 29, no. 1–2, pp. 29–56; fragments trans. as ‘An analysis of the concept of sign’, in: J. Pelc (ed.), Semiotics in Poland 1894–1969, PWN-Polish Scientific Publishers, Warsaw, D. Reidel, Dordrecht/Boston, pp. 164–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeil, C. F.: 1914, Der Einfluss Lotzes auf die logische Bewegung der Gegenwart. Dargestellt am Begriff der Geltung und am Begriff der Wahrheit und des Apriori, Dissertation, Erlangen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinach, A.: 1911, ‘Zur Theorie des negativen Urteils’, as reprinted in: Reinach (1989), pp. 95–104. Trans. by Barry Smith, ‘On the Theory of the Negative Judgment’, in: B. Smith (ed.), Parts and Moments: Studies in Logic and Formal Ontology, Philosophia, Munich, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinach, A.: 1913, ‘Die apriorischen Grundlagen des bürgerlichen Rechts’, Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung 1, 685–847. Translated by John Crosby, ‘The A Priori Foundations of the Civil Law’, Aletheia 3, 1983, 1–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinach, A.: 1989, Sämtliche Werke: Kritische Ausgabe mit Kommentar, edited by K. Schuhmann and B. Smith, Philosophia, Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojszczak, A.: 1994, ‘Wahrheit und Evidenz bei Franz Brentano’, Brentano Studien 5, 187–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojszczak, A.: 1997, ‘Od sadów do zdan. Nosnik prawdy a obiektywizacja wiedzy’, Filozofia Nauki 2 (18), pp. 93–106. Translation forthcoming as ‘From the Act of Judging to the Sentence. The Problem of Truth-Bearers and the Objectivisation of Knowledge’, in: J. J. Jadacki and J. Pasniczek (eds.), The Lvov-Warsaw School: Second Generation, Rodopi, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojszczak, A.: 1998, ‘Truth-Bearers from Twardowski to Tarski’, in: K. Kijania-Placek and J. Wolenski (eds.), The Lvov-Warsaw School and Contemporary Philosophy, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 73–84.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rojszczak, A.: 1999, ‘Why Should a Physical Object Take on the Role of Truth-Bearer?’, in: E. Köhler and J. Wolenski (eds.), Alfred Tarski and the Vienna Circle, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 115–125.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rojszczak, A. and B. Smith: 2001, ‘Urteilstheorien und Sachverhalte’, in: Satz und Sachverhalt, edited by O. Neumayer, Academia Verlag, Sankt Augustin, pp. 9–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojszczak, A. and B. Smith (in press): ‘Theories of Judgment’, in: The Cambridge History of Philosophy 1870–1914, edited by T. Baldwin, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaar, M. van der: 1991, G. F. Stout’s Theory of Judgment and Proposition, Dissertation, University of Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuhmann, K. and B. Smith: 1987, ‘Questions: An Essay in Daubertian Phenomenology’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47, 353–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuhmann, K.: 1998, ‘Johannes Daubert’s Theory of Judgment’, in: R. Poli (ed.), The Brentano Puzzle, Ashgate, Aldershot/Hants/Brookfield, pp. 179–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, P. M.: 1982, ‘On Understanding Lesniewski’, History and Philosophy of Logic 3, 165–191. Reprinted in: P. M. Simons, Philosophy and Logic in Central Europe from Bolzano to Tarski, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1992, pp. 227–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, P. M.: 1993, ‘Nominalism in Poland’, in: F. Coniglione, R. Poli and J. Wolenski (eds.), Polish Scientific Philosophy: The Lvov-Warsaw School, Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp. 207–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sluga, H.: 1980, Gottlob Frege, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Barry: 1978, ‘An Essay in Formal Ontology’, Grazer Philosophische Studien 6, 39–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Barry: 1987, ‘On the Cognition of States of Affairs’, in: K. Mulligan (ed.), Speech Act and Sachverhalt: Reinach and the Foundations of Realist Phenomenology, Nijhoff, Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster, pp. 189–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Barry: 1989, ‘On the Origins of Analytical Philosophy [Review of Dummett 1988]’, Grazer Philosophische Studien 35, 153–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Barry: 1989a, ‘Logic and Formal Ontology’, in: J. N. Mohanty and W. McKenna (eds.), Husserl’s Phenomenology: A Textbook, University Press of America, Lanham, pp. 29–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Barry: 1990, ‘Towards a History of Speech Act Theory’, in: A. Burckhardt (ed.), Speech Acts, Meanings, and Intentions: Critical Approaches to the Philosophy of John R. Searle, de Gruyter, Berlin, New York, pp. 29–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Barry: 1992, ‘Sachverhalt’, in: J. Ritter and K. Gründer (ed.), Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosohie, Schwabe, Basel, vol. 8, pp. 1102–1113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Barry: 1992a, ‘Characteristica Universalis’, in: K. Mulligan, (ed.), Language, Truth and Ontology (Philosophical Studies Series), Kluwer, Dordrecht/Boston/London, pp. 48–77.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Barry: 1994, Austrian Philosophy, Open Court, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Barry: 1999, ‘Truthmaker Realism’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 77, 274–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Barry (ed.): 1982, Parts and Moments. Studies in Logic and Formal Ontology, Philosophia, Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stumpf, C.: 1907, ‘Erscheinungen und psychische Funktionen’, in: Abhandlungen der Königlichen Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, phil.-hist. Kl., 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stumpf, C.: 1907a, ‘Zur Einteilung der Wissenschaften’, in: Abhandlungen der Königlichen Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, phil-hist. Kl., 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, A.: 1933, ‘Pojecie prawdy w jezykach nauk dedukcyjnych’, Prace Towarzystwa Naukowego Warszawskiego (Wydzial III nauk matematyczno-fizycznych), 34. German revised version: ‘Der Wahrheitsbegriff in den formalisierten Sprachen’, Studia Philosophica 1 (1936), 261–405. English translation of German version with supplementary comments: ‘The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages’, in: Tarski (1956), pp. 152–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, A.: 1956, Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics: Papers from 1923 to 1938 (translation by J. H. Woodger), Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twardowski, K.: 1894, Zur Lehre vom Inhalt und Gegenstand der Vorstellungen: Eine psychologische Untersuchung, Hölder, Vienna. Translated by R. Grossmann as On the Content and Object of Presentations, Nijhoff, The Hague, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twardowski, K.: 1902, ‘Über relative Wahrheit’, Archiv für systematische Philosophie 8, 415–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twardowski, K.: 1912, ‘Actions and Products. Comments on the Border Area of Psychology, Grammar and Logic’, as repr. in: Twardowski, On Actions, Products and Other Topics in Philosophy, J. Brandl and J. Wolenski (eds.), Rodopi, Amsterdam, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willard, D.: 1984, Logic and the Objectivity of Knowledge, University of Ohio Press, Athens, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witasek, S.: 1908, Grundlinien der Psychologie, Dürr, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L.: 1921, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, first published in Annalen der Naturphilosophie 14, 185–262. Translated by D. F. Pears and B. F. McGuinness, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolenski, J.: 1989, Logic and Philosophy in the Lvov-Warsaw School, Kluwer, Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wolenski, J.: 1998, ‘Theories of Truth in Austrian Philosophy’, in: T. Czarnecki (ed.), Rationalistic Epistemology (Reports on Philosophy 18, pp. 13–49).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolenski, J.: 1998/99, ‘Twardowski and the Distinction between Content and Object’, Brentano Studien 8, pp. 15–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolenski, J. and P. M. Simons: 1989, ‘De Ventate: Austro-Polish Contributions to the Theory of Truth from Brentano to Tarski’, in: K. Szaniawski (ed.), The Vienna Circle and the Lvov-Warsaw School, Kluwer, Dordrecht/Boston/London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rojszczak, A., Smith, B. (2003). Truthmakers, Truthbearers and the Objectivity of Truth. In: Hintikka, J., Czarnecki, T., Kijania-Placek, K., Placek, T., Rojszczak, A. (eds) Philosophy and Logic in Search of the Polish Tradition. Synthese Library, vol 323. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0249-2_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0249-2_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6471-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0249-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics