Skip to main content

Analysis of some direct and indirect methods for estimating root biomass and production of forests at an ecosystem level

  • Chapter
Root Demographics and Their Efficiencies in Sustainable Agriculture, Grasslands and Forest Ecosystems

Part of the book series: Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences ((DPSS,volume 82))

Abstract

The relationship of global climate change to plant growth and the role of forests as sites of carbon sequestration have encouraged refinement of the estimates of root biomass, and production has been highlighted. However, tremendous controversy exists in the literature as to which is the best method to determine fine root biomass and production. This lack of consensus makes it difficult for researchers to determine which methods are most appropriate for their system. The sequential root coring method was the most commonly used method to collect root biomass data in the past and is still commonly used. But within the last decade the use of rninirhizotrons has become a favourite method of many researchers. In addition, due to the high labour-intensive requirements of many of the direct approaches to determine root biomass, there has been a shift to develop indirect methods that would allow fine root biomass and production to be predicted using data on easily monitored variables that are highly correlated to root dynamics. Discussions occur as to which method should be used but without gathering data from the same site using different methods, these discussions can be futile. This paper discusses and compares the results of the most commonly used direct and indirect methods of deterrnining root biomass and production: Sequential root coring, ingrowth cores, rninirhizotrons, carbon fluxes approach, nitrogen budget approach and correlation’s with abiotic resources. No consistent relationships were apparent when comparing several sites where at least one indirect and one direct method were used on the same site. Until the different root methods can be compared to some independently derived root biomass value obtained from total carbon budgets for systems, one root method cannot stated be the best and the method of choice will be determined from a researcher’s personal reference, experiences, equipment, and/or finances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aber J D, Mellilo J M, Nadelhoffer K J, McClaugherty C A, and Pastor J 1985 Fine root turnover in forest ecosystems in relation to quantity and form of nitrogen availability: a comparison of two methods. Oecol. (Berl.) 66, 317–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aber J D and FĂ©dĂ©rer C A 1992 A generalised, lumped-parameter model of photosynthesis, evapotranspiration and net primary production in temperate and boreal forest ecosystems. Oecol. 92, 463–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams C M and Hutchinson T C 1992 Fine-root growth and chemical composition in declining central Ontario sugar maple stands. Can. J. For. Res. 22, 1489–1503.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ă…gren G I, Axelsson B, Flower-Ellis J G K, Linder S, Persson H, Staaf H and Troeng E 1980 Annual carbon budget for a young Scots pine. In Structure and Function of Northern Coniferous Forests — An Ecosystem Study. Ed. T Persson. pp 307–313. Ecol. Bull. (Stockholm) 32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballard R 1979 Use of fertilisers to maintain productivity of intensively managed forest plantations. In Proceedings Impact of Intensive Harvesting on Forest Nutrient Cycling. pp. 321–342. Northeast For. Exp. Sta. USDA For. Serv. Pennsylvania. College of Environmental Science and Forestry, State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber S A 1984 Soil Nutrient Bioavailability. A Mechanistic Approach. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 398 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benzing D H 1991 Aerial roots and their environment. In The Hidden Half. Eds. Y Waisel, A Eshel and U Kafkafi. pp 867–886. Marcel Dekker, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binkley D and Hart S C 1989 The components of nitrogen availability assessments in forest soils. Springer-Verlag, New York, Advances in Soil Science Volume 10, 57–112.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield J, Vogt K A and Vogt D J 1993 Decay rate and substrate quality of fine roots and foliage of two tropical tree species in the Luquillo Experimental Forest, Puerto Rico. Plant and Soil 150, 233–245.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Böhm W 1979 Methods of Studying Root Systems. Ecological Studies 33. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bormann F H and Graham B F Jr 1958 Translocation of silvicides through root grafts. J. of Forestry 58, 402–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boul S W, Hole F D and McCracken R J 1980 Soil Genesis and Classification. 2nd Ed. The Iowa State University Press. Ames, Iowa, USA. 404 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray J R and Gorham E 1964 Litter production in forests of the world. Adv. Ecol. Res. 2, 101–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown D A and Upchurch D R 1987 Minirhizotrons: A summary of methods and instruments in current use. In Minirhizotron Observation Tubes: Methods and Applications for Measuring Rhizosphere Dynamics. Ed. H M Taylor. pp 15–30. ASA Spec. Publ. no. 50. ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Inc., Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke M K and Raynal D J 1995 Fine root growth phenology, production, and turnover in a northern hardwood forest ecosystems. Plant and Soil 162, 135–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell M M 1979 Root structure: the considerable cost of belowground functions. In Topics in Plant Population Biology. Eds. Solbrig O T, Jain S, Johnson G B and Raven P H. pp. 408–427. Columbia University Press. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemensson-Lindell A 1994 Triphenyltetrazolium chloride as an indicator of fine-root vitality and environmental stress in coniferous forest stands: applications and limitations. Plant and Soil 159, 297–300.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clemensson-Lindell A and Persson H 1995 Fine-root vitality in a Norway spruce stand subjected to various nutrient supplies. Plant and Soil 168-169, 167–172.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cuevas E and Medina E 1983 Root production and organic matter decomposition in a Tierra Firme forest of the Upper Rio Negro Basin. In Wurzelokologie und Ihre Nutzanwendung. Eds. W Böhm, L Kutschera and E Lichtenegger. pp 653–666. BVA Gumpenstein, Irdning, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon R K, Meldahl R S, Ruark G A and Warren W G (eds.) 1990 Process Modeling of Forest Growth Responses to Environmental Stress. Timber Press, Portland, Oregon. 441 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon R K, Brown S, Houghton R A, Solomon A M, Trexler M C and Wisniewski J 1994 Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems. Science 263, 185–190.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eissenstat D M and Caldwell M M 1988 Seasonal timing of root growth in favourable microsites. Ecology 69, 870–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eissenstat D M and Van Rees K C J 1994 The growth and function of pine roots. In Environmental Constraints on the Structure and Productivity of Pine Forest Ecosystems: A Comparative Analysis. Eds. Gholz H L, Linder S and McMurtrie R E. pp. 76–91. Ecol. Bull. (Copenhagen) 43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson A and Persson H 1980 Seasonal changes in starch reserves and growth of fine roots of 20-year-old scots pine. In Structure and Function of Northern Coniferous Forests — An Ecosystem Study, pp 239–250. Ecol. Bull. (Stockholm) 32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewel K C, Cropper W P Jr and Gholz H L 1987 Soil C02 evolution in Florida slash pine plantations. II. Importance of root respiration. Can. J. For. Res. 17, 330–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabiao A, Persson H A and Steen E 1985 Growth dynamics of superficial roots in Portuguese plantations of Eucalyptus globulus Labill. studied with a mesh bag technique. Plant and Soil 83, 233–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson J C and Smucker A J M 1989 Modifications of the minirhizotron video camera system for measuring spatial and temporal root dynamics. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 53, 1601–1605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flower-Ellis J G K and Persson H 1980 Investigations of structural properties and dynamics of Scots pine stands. In Structure and Function of Northern Coniferous Forests — An Ecosystem Study, pp. 125–138. Ed. Persson T. Ecol. Bull. (Stockholm) 32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogel R and Hunt G 1983 Contribution of mycorrhizae and soil fungi to nutrient cycling in a Douglas-fir ecosystem. Can. J. For. Res. 13, 219–232.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freckman D W and Virginia R A 1989 Plant-feeding nematodes in deep-rooting desert ecosystems. Ecology 70, 1665–1678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friend A L, Eide M R and Hinckley T M 1990 Nitrogen stress alters root proliferation in Douglas-fir seedling. Can. J. For. Res. 20, 1524–1529.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gholz H L, Hendry L C and Cropper W P Jr 1986 Organic matter dynamics of fine roots in plantations of slash pine (Pinus elliotti) in north Florida. Can. J. For. Res., 16, 529–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gower S T, Vogt K A and Grier C C 1992 Carbon dynamics of Rocky Mountain Douglas-fir: influence of water and nutrient availability. Ecol. Monogr., 62, 43–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gower S T, Gholz H L, Nakane K and Baldwin V C 1994 Production and carbon allocation patterns of pine forests. In Environmental Constraints on the Structure and Productivity of Pine Forest Ecosystems: A Comparative Analysis. Eds. Gholz H L, Linder S and McMurtrie RE. pp. 115–135. Ecol. Bull. (Copenhagen) 43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gower S T, Running S W, Gholz H L, Haynes B E, Hunt J E R, Ryan M G, Waring R H and Cropper J W P 1996 Influence of climate and nutrition on carbon allocation and net primary production of four conifer forests. Tree Physiol. (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham B F Jr and Bormann F H 1966 Natural root grafts. Bot. Rev. 32, 255–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grier C C, Vogt K A, Keyes M R, and Edmonds R L 1981 Biomass distribution and above-and below-ground production in young and mature Abies amabilis zone ecosystems of the Washington Cascades. Can J. For. Res. 11, 155–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes B E and Gower S T 1995 Belowground carbon allocation in unfertilised and fertilised red pine plantations in northern Wisconsin. Tree Physiol. 15, 317–325.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrick R L and Pregitzer K S 1992 Spatial variation in root distribution and growth associated with rninirhizotrons. Plant and Soil 143, 283–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrick R L and Pregitzer K S 1993 The dynamics of fine root length, biomass, and nitrogen content in two northern hardwood ecosystems. Can. J. For. Res. 23, 2507–2520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson R, Ford E D, Renshaw E and Deans J D 1988 Morphology of the structural root system of Sitka spruce. 1. Analysis and quantitative description. Forestry 56, 121–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingestad T and Ă…gren G 1992 Theories and methods on plant nutrition and growth. Physiol. Plant. 84, 177–184.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson R B, Canadell J, Ehleringer J R, Mooney H A, Sala O E and Schulze E D 1996 A global analysis of root distribution for terrestrial biomes. Oecologia 108, 389–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson R B, Mooney H A and Schulze E-D 1997 A global budget for fine root biomass, surface area, and nutrient contents. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 7362–7366.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Joslin J D and Henderson G S 1984 The determination of percentages of living tissue in woody fine root samples using triphenyltetrazolium chloride. Forest Sci. 30, 965–970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyes M R 1982 Ecosystem Development in Abies amabilis Stands of the Washington Cascades: Root Growth and its Role in Net Primary Production. Dissertation. University of Washington. Seattle, Washington, USA. pp. 110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyes M R and Grier C C 1981 Below-and above-ground biomass and net production in two contrasting Douglas-fir stands. Can. J. For. Res 11, 599–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurz W A and Kimmins J P 1987 Analysis of some sources of error in methods used to determine fine root production in forest ecosystems: a simulation approach. Can. J. For. Res. 17, 909–912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambers H and Poorter H 1992 Inherent variation in growth rate between higher plants: A search for physiological causes and ecological consequences. Adv. Ecol. Res. 23, 187–261.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Landsberg J J, Linder S and McMurtrie R E 1995 A strategic plan for research on managed forest ecosystems in a globally changing environment. Global change and Terrestrial Ecosystems GCTE Report No. 4. GCTE Activity 3.5: Effects of Global Change on Managed Forests. Implementation Plan, pp 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lussenhop J, Fogel R and Pregitzer K 1991 A new dawn for soil biology: video analysis of root-soil-microbial faunal interactions. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environ. 34, 235–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyr H and Hoffmann G 1967 Growth rates and growth periodicity of tree roots. In International Review of Forestry Research Vol. 2. Eds. J A Romberger and P Mikola. pp 181–236. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majdi H, Smucker A J M and Persson H 1992 A comparison between minirhizotron and monolith sampling methods for measuring root growth of maize (Zea mays L.) Plant and Soil 147, 127–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall J D and Waring R H 1985 Predicting fine root production and turnover by monitoring root starch and soil temperature. Can. J. For. Res. 15, 791–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClaugherty C A, Aber J D and Melillo J M 1982 The role of fine roots in the organic matter and nitrogen budgets of two forested ecosystems. Ecology 63, 1481–1490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMichael B L and Taylor H M 1987 Applications and limitations of rhizotrons and minirhizotrons. In Minirhizotron Observation Tubes: Methods and Applications for Measuring Rhizosphere Dynamics. Ed. H M Taylor, pp 1–13. ASA Spec. Publ. no. 50. ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQueen D R 1968 The quantitative distribution of absorbing roots of Pinus silvestris and Fagus sylvatica in a forest succession. Oecol. Plant. 3, 83–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier C E, Grier C C and Cole D W 1985 Below-and aboveground N and P used by young and mature Abies amabilis stands. Ecology 66, 1928–1942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milchunas D G and Lauenroth W K 1992 Carbon dynamics and estimates of primary production by harvest, 14C dilution, and 14C turnover. Ecology 73, 593–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mooney H A 1972 The carbon balance of plants. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 3, 315–346.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muller R N, Kalisz P J and Luken J O 1989 Fine root production of astringent phenolics. Oecol. 79, 563–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadelhoffer K J, Aber J D, and Mellilo J M 1985 Fine roots, net primary production, and soil nitrogen availability: A new hypothesis. Ecology 66, 1377–1390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadkarni N M 1981 Canopy roots: convergent evolution in rainforest nutrient cycles. Science 214, 1023–1024.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nambiar E K S 1987 Do nutrients retranslocate from fine roots? Can. J. For. Res. 17, 913–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neill C 1992 Comparison of soil coring and ingrowth methods for measuring belowground production. Ecology 73, 1918–1921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nepstad D C, Carvalho C R de, Davidson E A, Jipp P H, Lefebvre P A, Negreiros G H, Silva E D da, Stone T A, Trumbore S E, Vieira S 1994 The role of deep roots in the hydrological and carbon cycles of Amazonian forests and pastures. Nature 372, 666–669.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Persson H 1978 Root dynamics in a young Scots pine stand in central Sweden. OIKOS 30, 508–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson H 1983 The distribution and productivity of fine roots in boreal forests. Plant Soil 71,87–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson H 1984 The dynamic fine roots of forest trees. In State and Change of Forest Ecosystems-Indicators in Current Research. Ed. G I Ă…gren. pp 193–204. Swed. Univ. Agric. Sci. Dept Ecology and Environmental Research Report no. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson H, Von Fircks Y, Majdi H and Nilsson L O 1995 Root distribution in a Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) stand subjected to drought and ammonium-sulphate application. Plant and Soil 168-169, 161–165.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Persson H and Baitulin I (eds.) 1996 Plant Root Systems and Natural Vegetation. Acta Phytogeogr. Suec. 81. 131 pp. Uppsala, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pregitzer K S, Zak D R, Curtis P S, Kubiske M E, Teeri J A and Vogel C S 1995 Atmospheric CO2, soil nitrogen and turnover of fine roots. New Phytol. 129, 579–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Publicover D and Vogt K A 1992 Belowground ecology of forests. In McGraw-Hill Yearbook of Science and Technology. Ed. S P Parker, pp 427–429. McGraw-Hill Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Publicover D A and Vogt K A 1993 A comparison of methods for estimating forest fine root production with respect to sources of error. Can. J. For. Res. 23, 1179–1186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raich J W and Nadelhoffer K J 1989 Belowground carbon allocation in forest ecosystems: Global trends. Ecology 70, 1346–1354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rendig V V and Taylor H M 1989 Principles of Soil-Plant Interrelationships. McGraw-Hill Publishing Co., New York, 275 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy S and Singh J S 1995 Seasonal and spatial dynamics of plant-available N and P pools and N-mineralization in relation to fine roots in a dry tropical forest habitat. Soil Biol. Biochem., 27, 33–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruark G A and Bockheim J G 1987 Below-ground biomass of 10-, 20-, and 32-year-old Populus tremuloides in Wisconsin. Pedobiologia 30, 207–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruark G A, Mader D L and Tattar T A 1982 The influence of soil compaction and aeration on the root growth and vigour of trees-a literature review. Part 1. Arboricultural J. 6, 251–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rygiewicz P T and Andersen C P 1994 Mycorrhizae alter quality and quantity of carbon allocated below ground. Nature 369, 58–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sala O E, Biondini M E and Lauenroth W K 1988 Bias in estimates of primary production: an analytical solution. Ecol.Modelling 44, 43–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanford R L Jr 1987 Apogeotropic roots in an Amazon rain forest. Science 235, 1062–1064.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Santantonio D and Grace J C 1987 Estimating fine-root production and turnover from biomass and decomposition data: a compartment-flow model. Can. J. For. Res. 17, 900–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santantonio D and Hermann R K 1985 Standing crop, production, and turnover of fine roots on dry, moderate, and wet sites of mature Douglas-fir in western Oregon. Ann. Sci. For. 42,113–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santantonio D 1990 Modeling growth and production of tree roots. In Process Modeling of Forest Growth Responses to Environmental Stress. Eds. R K Dixon R S Meldahl G A Ruark and W G Warren pp 124–141. Timber Press Portland Oregon

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab S M, Menge J A and Leonard R T 1983 Quantitative and qualitative effects of phosphorus on extracts and exudates of sudangrass in relation to vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza formation. Plant Physiol. 73, 761–765.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh J S, Lauenroth W K, Hunt H W, and Swift D M 1984 Bias and random errors in estimators of net root production: A simulation approach. Ecology 65, 1760–1764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smucker A J M, Ferguson J C, DeBruyn W P, Belford R L and Ritchie J T 1987 Image analysis of video-recorded plant root systems. In Minirhizotron Observation Tubes: Methods and Applications for Measuring Rhizosphere Dynamics. Ed. H M Taylor, pp 67–80. ASA Spec. Publ. no. 50. ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Inc., Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprugel D G, Ryan M G, Brooks J R, Vogt K A, and Martin T A 1995 Respiration from the organ level to the stand. In Resource Physiology of Conifers-Acquisition, Allocation, and Utilisation. Eds. W K Smith and T M Hinckley, pp 255–299. Academic Press, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. John T V, Coleman D C and Reid C P P 1983 Growth and spatial distribution of nutrient-absorbing organs: selective exploitation of soil heterogeneity. Plant and Soil 71, 487–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone E L and Kalisz P J 1991 On the maximum extent of tree roots. Forest Ecology Management 46, 59–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor H M 1987 Minirhizotron Observation Tubes: Methods and Applications for Measuring Rhizosphere Dynamics. ASA Spec. Publ. no. 50. ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Inc., Madison, WI. 143 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor J 1993 The mutable carbon sink. Nature 366, 515–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Upchurch D R and Richie J T 1983 Root observations using a video recording system in minirhizotrons. Agron. J. 75,1009–1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Werf A, Poorter H and Lambers H 1994 Respiration as dependent on a species inherent growth rate and on the nitrogen supply to the plant. In A Whole Plant Perspective on Carbon-Nitrogen Interactions, pp. 91–110. Eds. Roy J and Garnier E. SPB Academic Publishing bv. The Hague, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Noordwijk M 1983 Functional interpretation of root densities in the field for nutrient and water uptake. In Wurzelokologie und Ihre Nutzanwendung. Eds. W Böhm, L Kutschera and E Lichtenegger. pp 207–226. BVA Gumpenstein, Irdning, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Praag H J, Sougnez-Remy S, Weissen F and Carletti G 1988 Root turnover in a beech and a spruce stand of the Belgian Ardennes. Plant and Soil 105, 87–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogt K A and Staffeldt E E 1977 Fungal degradation of pure and mixed carbon substrates. Develop, inlndustr. Micro. 18, 571–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogt K A, Grier C C, Edmonds R L and Meier C E 1982 Mycorrhizal role in net primary production and nutrient cycling in Abies amabilis [Dougl.] Forbes ecosystems in western Washington. Ecology 63, 370–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogt K A, Vogt D J, Moore E E, Littke W, Grier C C, and Leney L 1985 Estimating Douglas-fir fine root biomass and production from living bark and starch. Can. J. For. Res. 15, 177–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogt K A, Grier C C, Gower S T, Sprugel D G, and Vogt D J 1986a Overestimation of net root production: A real or imaginary problem? Ecology 67, 577–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogt K A, Grier C C and Vogt D J 1986b Production, turnover, and nutrient dynamics of above-and belowground detritus of world forests. Adv. Ecol. Res., 15, 303–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogt K A, Vogt D J, Moore E E, Fatuga B A, Redlin M R and Edmonds R L 1987 Conifer and angiosperm fine-root biomass in relation to stand age and site productivity in Douglas-fir forests. J. of Ecol. 75, 857–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogt K A, Vogt D J, Moore E E and Sprugel D G 1989 Methodological considerations in measuring biomass, production, respiration and nutrient resorption for tree roots in natural ecosystems. In Applications of Continuous and Steady-State Methods to Root Biology. Eds. J G Torrey and L J Winship. pp 217–232. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vogt K A, Vogt D J, Gower S T and Grier C C 1990 Carbon and nitrogen interactions for forest ecosystems. In Above-and Below-ground Interactions in Forest Trees in Acidified Soils. Ed. H Persson. pp 203–235. Air pollution Report 32. Commission of the European Communities. Directorate-General for Science, Research and Development. Environment Research Programme, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogt K A and Bloomfield J 1991 Root turnover and senescence. In Plant Roots: The Hidden Half. Eds. Y Waisel, A Eschel and U Kafkafi. pp 287–306. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogt K A and Persson H 1991 Root methods. In Techniques and Approaches in Forest Tree Ecophysiology. Eds. J P Lassoie and T M Hinckley, pp 477–502. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogt K A, Vogt D J and Bloomfield J 1991 Input of organic matter to the soil by tree roots. In Plant Roots and Their Environment. Eds. H Persson and B L McMichael. ppl71–190. Elsevier Publications, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogt K A, Bloomfield J, Perez J M, Vogt D J and Silver W L 1993 Belowground responses as indicators of environmental change. Environ. Experimental Bot. 33, 189–205.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vogt K A, Vogt D J, Asbjornsen H and Dahlgren R A 1995 Roots, nutrients and their relationship to spatial patterns. Plant and Soil 168-169, 113–123.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vogt K A, Vogt D J, Palmiotto P A, Boon P, O’Hara J and Asbjornsen H 1996 Review of root dynamics in forest ecosystems grouped by climate, climatic forest type and species. Plant and Soil 187, 159–219.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Waisel Y 1972 Biology of Halophytes. Academic Press, New York. 395 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waisel Y, Eshel A and Kafkafi U 1991 Plant Roots. The Hidden Half. Marcel Dekker, Inc. New York. 948 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waring R H and Schlesinger W H 1985 Forest Ecosystems: Concepts and Management. Academic Press. Orlando, Florida. 340 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vogt, K.A., Vogt, D.J., Bloomfield, J. (1998). Analysis of some direct and indirect methods for estimating root biomass and production of forests at an ecosystem level. In: Box, J.E. (eds) Root Demographics and Their Efficiencies in Sustainable Agriculture, Grasslands and Forest Ecosystems. Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences, vol 82. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5270-9_61

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5270-9_61

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6218-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5270-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics