Abstract
The word Physics comes from the Greek word ‘phusis’ which means ‘that what comes into existence’, and itself is derived from the Greek verb ‘phuoo’ which means ‘to create, to come into existence’.
Absolute space, in its own nature, without relation to anything external, remains always similar and immovable. Absolute, true, and mathematical time, of itself, and from its own nature, flows equally without relation to anything external.
Isaac Newton, 1642–1726
An intelligence that would know at a certain moment all the forces existing in nature and the situations of the bodies that compose nature, and if it would be powerful enough to analyze all these data, would be able to grasp in one formula the movements of the biggest bodies of the Universe as well as of the lightest atom.
Simon Laplace, 1749–1827
Because of the relativity of the concept of simultaneity, space and time melt together to a four dimensional continuum.
Albert Einstein, 1879–1955
Everything is still unclear to me, but my feeling is getting stronger everyday. I believe that in the scheme that I am developing the particles will not move anymore on orbits, and we shall have to reconsider fundamental classical concepts.
Werner Heisenberg, 1901–1976
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Rauch, H. et al., “Test of a single crystal neutron interferometer”, Phys. Lett., 47 A, 1974, p. 369.
Rauch, H. et al., “Verification of coherent spinor rotations of fermions”, Phys. Lett., 54 A, 1975, p. 425.
Rauch, H., “Neutron interferometric tests of quantum mechanics”, Helv. Phys. Acta, 61, 1988, p. 589.
Aerts, D., “An attempt to imagine parts of the reality of the micro-world”, in the proceedings of the conference Problems in Quantum Physics; Gdansk ’89, World Scientific Publishing Company, Singapore, 1990, p. 3.
Aerts, D. and Reignier, J., “The spin of a quantum entity and problems of non-locality”, in the proceedings of the Symposium on the Foundations of modern Physics 1990, Joensuu, Finland, World Scientific Publishing Company, Singapore, 1990, p. 9.
Aerts, D. and Reignier, J., “On the problem of non-locality in quantum mechanics”, Helv. Phys. Acta, 64, 1991, p. 527.
Aerts, D., “A possible explanation for the probabilities of quantum mechanics and a macroscopic situation that violates Bell inequalities”, in: Mittelstaedt, P. et al. (eds.), Recent Developments in Quantum Logic, in Grundlagen der Exacten Naturwissenschaften, vol. 6, Wissenschaftverlag, Bibliographisches Institut, Mannheim, 1983, p. 235.
Aerts, D., “A possible explanation for the probabilities of quantum mechanics”, J. Math. Phys., 27, 1986, p. 202.
Aerts, D., “The origin of the non-classical character of the quantum probability model”, in: Blanquiere, A. et al. (eds.), Information, Complexity, and Control in Quantum Physics, Springer-Verlag, 1987.
Aerts, D., “The construction of reality and its influence on the understanding of quantum structures”, Int. J. Theor. Phys., 31, 1992, p. 1815.
Aerts, D., “Quantum structures, separated physical entities and probability”, Found. Phys., 24, 1994, p. 1227.
Aerts, D., “Quantum structures: an attempt to explain the origin of their appearance in nature”, Int. J. Theor. Phys., 34, 1995, p. 1165.
de Broglie, L., “Sur la possibilité de relier les phénomènes d’interférence et de diffraction à la théorie des quanta de lumière”, Comptes Rendus, 183, 1926, p. 447.
Böhm, D. and Vigier, J.P., “Model of the causal interpretation of quantum theory in terms of a fluid with irregular fluctuations”, Physical Review, 96, p. 208.
Böhm, D., Wholeness and the implicate order, ARK Edition, 1983.
Heisenberg, W., “Uber quantentheoretische Umdeuting kinematischer und mechanischer Beziehungen”, Zeitschrift für Physik, 33, 1925, p. 879.
Schrödinger, E., “Quantisiering als Eigenwertproblem”, Ann. der Phys., 79, 1926, p. 361.
Dirac, P.A.M., The principles of quantum mechanics, Oxford University Press, 1930.
von Neumann, J., Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik, Berlin, Springer, 1932.
Jauch, J.M., Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Addison Wesley, 1968.
Piron, C., Foundations of Quantum Physics, Benjamin, 1976.
Ludwig, G., Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, (two volumes), Springer-Verlag, New York, Berlin, 1983/5.
Randall, C. and Foulis, D., “The operational approach to quantum mechanics”, in: Hooker, CA. (ed.), Physical theory as logico-operational structure, Reidel, 1979.
Randall, C. and Foulis, D., “A mathematical language for quantum physics”, in: Gruber, C. et al. (eds.), Les Fondements de la Mécanique Quantique, A.V.C.P., case postale 101, 1015 Lausanne, Suisse, 1983.
Mittelstaedt, P., Quantum Logic, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1978.
Segal, I.E., Ann. Math., 48, 1947, p. 930.
Emch, G.G.,Mathematical and conceptual foundations of 20th century physics, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1984.
Feynman, R. and Hibbs, A.R., Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals, McGraw Hill-International Series in the Earth and Planetary Sciences, 1965.
Aerts, D., The one and the many, Doctoral Thesis, Brussels Free University, 1981.
Aerts, D., “Description of many physical entities without the paradoxes encountered in quantum mechanics”, Found. Phys., 12, 1982, p. 1131.
Aerts, D., “Classical theories and non classical theories as a special case of a more general theory”, J. Math. Phys., 24, 1983, p. 2441.
Aerts, D., “Foundations of quantum physics: a general realistic and operational approach”, Int. J. Theor. Phys., 38, 1999, p. 289.
Coecke, B., “Hidden Measurement Representation for Quantum Entities Described by Finite Dimensional Complex Hilbert Spaces”, Found. Phys., 25, 1995, p. 203.
Coecke, B., “Generalization of the Proof on the Existence of Hidden Measurements to Experiments with an Infinite Set of Outcomes”, Found. Phys. Lett, 8, 1995, p. 437.
Coecke, B., “New Examples of Hidden Measurement Systems and Outline of a General Scheme”, Tatra Mountains Mathematical Publications, 10, 1996, p. 203.
Birkhoff, G. and von Neumann, J., J. Ann. Math., 37, 1936, p. 823.
Gudder, S.P., Quantum Probability, Academic Press, Harcourt Brave Jovanovitch Publishers, 1988.
Accardi, L., “On the statistical meaning of the complex numbers in quantum mechanics”, Nuovo Cimento, 34, 1982, p. 161.
Pitovski, I., Quantum Probability—Quantum Logic, Springer Verlag, 1989.
Aerts, D. and D’Hooghe, B., “Operator structure of a non-quantum and a non-classical system”, Int. J. Theor. Phys., 35, 1996, p. 2241.
D’Hooghe, B., “Structure of the algebra of observables in the intermediate situation of the epsilon-model”, Int. J. Theor. Phys., 37, 1998, p. 323.
Aerts, D. and Van Bogaert, B., A mechanical classical laboratory situation with a quantum logic structure, Int. J. Theor. Phys., 31, 1992, p. 1839.
Aerts, D., Durt, T. and Van Bogaert, B., “A physical example of quantum fuzzy sets, and the classical limit”, in Proceedings of the first International Conference on Fuzzy Sets and their Applications, Tatra Montains Math. Publ. 1, 1992, p. 5.
Aerts, D., Durt, T., Grib, A.A., Van Bogaert, B. and Zapatrin, R.R., “Quantum structures in macroscopic reality”, Int. J. Theor. Phys., 32, 3, 1993, p. 489.
Aerts, D., Durt, T. and Van Bogaert, B., “Quantum probability, the classical limit and non-locality”, in: Hyvonen, T. (ed.), Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics, World Scientific, Singapore, 1993.
Aerts, D. and Durt, T., “Quantum, Classical and Intermediate, an illustrative example”, Found. Phys., 24, 1994.
Aerts, D. and Durt, T., “Quantum, classical and intermediate: a measurement model”, in Montonen C. (ed.), Editions Frontières, Gives Sur Yvettes, France, 1994.
Aerts, D., spi“The Entity and Modern Physics”, in: Castellani, E. (ed.), Interpreting Bodies: Classical and Quantum Objects in Modern Physics, Princeton University Press, Princeton University Press, 1998.
Aerts, D. and Coecke, B., “The creation-discovery-view: towards a possible explanation of quantum reality”, in: Dalla Chiara, M.L. (ed.), Language, Quantum, Music, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1999.
Aerts, D. and Aerts, S., “The hidden measurement approach and conditional probabilities”, in: Ferrero, M. and van der Merwe, A. (eds.), Fundamental Problems in Quantum Physics II, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1996.
Aerts, D., “The hidden measurement formalism: what can be explained and where paradoxes remain?” Int. J. Theor. Phys., 37, 1998, p. 291.
Aerts, D. and Aerts, S., “Applications of quantum statistics in psychological studies of decision processes”, Foundations of Science, 1, 1994, p. 85.
Schrödinger, E., “Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik”, Naturwissenschaften, 23, 1935, pp. 807, 823 and 844.
Valckenborgh, F., “Closure Structures and the Theorem of Decomposition in Classical Components”, Tatra Mountains Mathematical Publications, 10, 1997, p. 75.
Aerts, D., “How do we have to change quantum mechanics in order to describe separated systems”, in: Diner, S. et al. (eds.), The wave-particle Dualism, D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1984, p. 419.
Aerts, D., “The physical origin of the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox”, in: Tarozzi, G. and van der Merwe, A. (eds.), Open Questions in Quantum Physics, D. Reidel Publishing Cy, 1985, p. 33.
Aerts, D., “The physical origin of the EPR paradox and how to violate Bell inequalities by macroscopic systems”, in: Lahti, P. and Mittelstaedt, P. (eds.), On the Foundations of modern Physics, World Scientific, Singapore, 1985, p. 305.
Aerts, D., Coecke, B., Durt T. and Valckenborgh, F., “Quantum, classical and intermediate I; a model on the Poincare Sphere”, Tatra Mountains Mathematical Publications,10, 1997, p. 225.
Aerts, D., Coecke, B., Durt, T. and Valckenborgh, F., “Quantum, classical and intermediate II; the vanishing vector space structure”, Tatra Mountains Mathematical Publications, 10, 1997, p. 241.
Aerts D., Aerts, S., Durt, T. and Lévèque, O., “Classical and quantum probability in the epsilon model”, Int. J. Theor. Phys., 38, p. 407.
Einstein, A., Ann. Phys., 17, 1905, p. 891.
Misner, C.W., Thorne, K.S. and Wheeler, J.A., Gravitation, W.H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, 1973.
Aerts, D., “Framework for possible unification of quantum and relativity theories”, Int. J. Theor. Phys., 35, 1996, p. 2431.
Aerts, D., “Relativity theory: what is reality?”, Found. Phys., 26, 1996, p. 1627.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Aerts, D. (1999). The Stuff the World is Made of: Physics and Reality. In: Aerts, D., Broekaert, J., Mathijs, E. (eds) Einstein Meets Magritte: An Interdisciplinary Reflection. Einstein Meets Magritte: An Interdisciplinary Reflection on Science, Nature, Art, Human Action and Society, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4704-0_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4704-0_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5979-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4704-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive