Skip to main content

Algorithms for Constructing Comparative Maps

  • Chapter
Comparative Genomics

Part of the book series: Computational Biology ((COBO,volume 1))

Abstract

Comparative maps are a powerful tool for aggregating genetic information about related organisms, for inferring phylogenetic relationships, and for examining hypotheses about the evolution of gene families and the functional significance of orthologous genes. Construction of any genetic map is laborious, but compiling comparative maps across multiple species requires a large investment of manual effort on the part of biologists. In this paper we present efficient algorithms that help in automating this effort and offer an explicit set of principles on which to base the construction of such maps. We compare the results of three approaches: manual expert analysis, a simple linear algorithm, and a more complex stack-based algorithm. All three methods produce remarkably similar results, with the stack algorithm more closely approximating the manual expert analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ahn, S. and Tanksley, S. D. 1993. Comparative linkage maps of the rice and maize genomes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 90:7980–7984.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Argumuganathan, K. and Earle, E. D. 1991. Nuclear DNA content of some important plant species. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 9:208–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breen, M., Thomas, R., Binns, M. M., Carter, N. P., and Langford, C. F. 1999. Reciprocal chromosome painting reveals detailed regions of conserved synteny between the karyotypes of the domestic dog (Canis familiaxis) and human. Genomics 61:145–155.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. 1956. Three models for the description of language. IRE Transactions on Information Theory 2:113–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhary, B. P., Raudsepp, T., Fronicke, L., and Scherthan, H. 1998. Emerging patterns of comparative genome organization in some mammalian species as revealed by Zoo-FISH. Genome Research 8:577–589.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G. L., Mcmullen, M. D., Baysdorfer, C., Musket, T., Grant, D., Staebell, M., Xu, G., Polacco, M., Koster, L., Melia-Hancock, S., Houchins, K., Chao, S., and Coe, Jr., E. H. 1999. A maize map standard with sequenced core markers, grass genome reference points and 932 expressed sequence tagged sites (ESTs) in a 1736-locus map. Genetics 152:1137–1172.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Debry, R. W. and Seldin, M. F. 1996. Human/mouse homology relationships. Genomics 33:337–351.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Devos, K. M. and Gale, M. D. 1997. Comparative genetics in the grasses. Plant Molecular Biology 35:3–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Devos, K. M., Wang, Z., Beales, J., Sasaki, T., and Gale, M. D. 1998. Comparative genetic maps of foxtail millet (Setaria italica) and rice (Oryza sativa). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 96:63–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Durbin, R., Eddy, S., Krogh, A., and Mitchison, G. 1997. Biological Sequence Analysis: Probabilistic Models of Proteins and Nucleic Acids. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gellin, J., Brown, S., Graves, J. A. M., Rothschild, M., Schook, L., and J. Womack, M. Y. 2000. Comparative gene mapping workshop: progress in agriculturally important animals. Mammalian Genome 11:140–144.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gusfield, D. 1997. Algorithms on Strings, Trees, and Sequences: Computer Science and Computational Biology. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannenhalli, S. 1995. Transforming mice into men (a computational theory of genome rearrangements). PhD thesis, Pennsylvania State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopcroft, J. E. and Ullman, J. D. 1979. Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages, and Computation. Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jauch, A., Wienberg, J., Stanyon, R., Arnold, N., Tofanelli, S., Ishida, T., and Cremer, T. 1992. Reconstruction of genomic rearrangements in great apes and gibbons by chromosome painting. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA pp. 8611–8615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koonin, E. V. and Galperin, M. Y. 1997. Prokaryotic genomes: the emerging paradigm of genome-based microbiology. Current Opinion in Genetics and Development 7:757–763.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kurata, N. G., Moore, Y., Nagamura, T., Foote, M., Yano, Y., Minobe, and Gale, M. 1994. Conservation of genome structure between rice and wheat. Bio/Technology 12:276–278.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lagercrantz, U. 1998. Comparative mapping between Arabidopsis thaliana and Brassica nigra indicates that Brassica genomes have evolved through extensive genome replication accompanied by chromosome fusions and frequent rearrangements. Genetics 150:1217–1228.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, K. D., Lackney, V. K., Blauth, J. R., Van Wijk, R., and Jahn, M. K. 1999. Genome mapping in capsicum and the evolution of genome structure in the solanaceae. Genetics 152:1183–1202.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ming, R., Liu, S.-C., Lin, Y.-R., Da Silva, J., Wilson, W., Braga, D., Van Deynze, A., Wenslaff, T. E., Wu, K. K., Moore, P. H., Burnquist, W., Irvine, J. E., Sorrells, M. E., and Paterson, A. H. 1998. Alignment of the Sorghum and Saccharum chromosomes: Comparative genome organization and evolution of a polysomic polyploid genus and its diploid cousin. Genetics 150:1663–1682.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G., Devos, K. M., Wang, Z., and Gale, M. D. 1995. Grasses, line up and form a circle. Current Biology 5:737–739.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mouse Genome Database 2000. Mouse Genome Informatics Web Site. The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, W. J., Menotti-Raymond, M., Lyons, L. A., Thompson, M. A., and O’brien, S. J. 1999. Development of a feline whole genome radiation hybrid panel and comparative mapping of human chromosome 12 and 22 loci. Genomics 57:1–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nadeau, J. H. and Sankoff, D. 1998. Counting on comparative maps. Trends in Genetics 14:495–501.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nadeau, J. H. and Taylor, B. A. 1984. Lengths of chromosomal segments conserved since divergence of man and mouse. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 81:814–818.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’brien, S. J., Menotti-Raymond, M., Murphy, W. J., Nash, W. G., Wienberg, J., Styanyon, R., Copeland, N. G., Jenkins, N. A., Womack, J., and Graves, J. A. M. 1999. The promise of comparative genomics in mammals. Science 286:458–481.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’brien, S. J., Womack, J. E., Lyons, L. A., Moore, K. J., Jenkins, N. A., and Copeland, N. G. 1993. Anchored reference loci for comparative genome mapping in mammals. Nature Genetics 3:103–112.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Periera, M. G., Lee, M., Bramel-Cox, P., Woodman, W., Doebley, J., and Whitkus, R. 1994. Construction of an RFLP map in sorghum and comparative mapping in maize. Genome 37:236–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pevzner, P. and Waterman, M. S. 1995. Open combinatorial problems in computational molecular biology. In 3rd Israel Symposium on Theory of Computing and Systems, pp. 158–163. IEEE Computer Society Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sankoff, D. 1992. Edit distance for genome comparison based on nonlocal operations. In Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM’92), volume 644 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 121–135. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sankoff, D., Ferretti, V., and Nadeau, J. H. 1997. Conserved segment identification. Journal of Computational Biology 559:559–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sankoff, D., Leduc, G., Antoine, N., Paquin, B., Lang, B. F., and Cedergren, R. J. 1992. Gene order comparisons for phylogenetic inference: evolution of the mitochondrial genome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 89:6575–6579.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Serikawa, T., Cui, Z. H., Yokoi, N., Kuramoto, T., Kondo, Y., Kitada, K., and Guenet, J. L. 1998. A comparative genetic map of rat, mouse and human genomes. Experimental Animals 47:1–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tanksley, S. D., Bernatzky, R., Lapitan, N. L., and Prince, J. P. 1988. Conservation of gene repertoire but not gene order in pepper and tomato. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 85:6419–6423.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tanksley, S. D., Ganal, M. W., Prince, J. P., De Vicente, M. C., Bonierbale, M. W., et al. 1992. High density molecular linkage maps of the tomato and potato genomes. Genetics 132:1141–1160.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Deynze, A. E., and W. D. Park, M. E. S., Ayres, N. M., Fu, H., Cartinhour, S. W., Paul, E., and Mccouch, S. R. 1997. Anchor probes for comparative mapping of grass genera. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 97:356–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Deynze, A. E., Dubcovsky, J., Gill, K., et al. 1995a. Molecular-genetic maps for chromosome 1 in Triticeae species and their relation to chromosomes in rice and oats. Genome 38:47–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Deynze, A. E., Nelson, J. C., Ands. N. Ahn, L. S. O., Siripoonwiwat, W., Harrington, S. E., Yglesias, E. S., Braga, D. P., Mccouch, S. R., and Sorrells, M. E. 1995b. Comparative mapping in grasses. Oat relationships. Molecular and General Genetics 249:349–356.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Deynze, A. E., Nelson, J. C., Yglesias, E. S., Harrington, S. E., Braga, D. P., Mccouch, S. R., and Sorrells, M. E. 1995C. Comparative mapping in grasses. Wheat relationships. Molecular and General Genetics 248:744–754.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, M. S. 1995. Introduction to Computational Biology: Maps, Sequences and Genomes. Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wienberg, J., Jauch, A., Stanyon, R., and Cremer, T. 1990. Molecular cytotaxonomy of primates by chromosomal in situ suppression hybridization. Genomics 8:347–350.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W. A., Harrington, S. E., Woodman, W. L., Lee, M., Sorrells, M. E., and Mccouch, S. R. 1999. Inferences on the genome structure of progenitor maize through comparative analysis of rice, maize, and the domesticated panicoids. Genetics 153:453–473.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Goldberg, D.S., McCouch, S., Kleinberg, J. (2000). Algorithms for Constructing Comparative Maps. In: Sankoff, D., Nadeau, J.H. (eds) Comparative Genomics. Computational Biology, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4309-7_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4309-7_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-6584-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4309-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics