Abstract
From a formal semantic perspective, interpreting natural language utterances can be broken down into two tasks:
-
(I)
Constructing logical forms or semantic representations of the utterances and
-
(II)
Manipulating well-formed semantic representations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Asher, N. (1993) Reference to Abstract Objects in Discourse. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Asher, N. (1996) Mathematical treatments of discourse contexts. In P. Dekker and M. Stokhof, editors, Proc. Tenth Amsterdam Colloquium. ILLC, University of Amsterdam.
Asher, N. (fortc.) Logical foundations of discourse interpretation. In J. M. Larrazabal, editor, Logic Colloqium ′96.
Asher, N. and A. Lascarides (1995) Lexical disambiguation in a discourse context. J. Semantics, 12, 1995.
Asher, N. and H. Wada (1989) A computational account of syntactic, semantic and discourse principles for anaphora resolution. J. Semantics, 6, 1989.
Barwise, J. and R. Cooper (1993) Extended Kamp notation: a graphical notation for situation theory. In P. Aczel, et al., editors, Situation Theory and Its Applications, volume 3. CSLI, Stanford.
Bos, J. (1996) Predicate logic unplugged. In P. Dekker and M. Stokhof, editors, Proc. Tenth Amsterdam Colloquium. ILLC, University of Amsterdam.
Fernando, T. (1997) Ambiguity under changing contexts. Linguistics and Philosophy, 20, 1997.
Gabbay, D. and R. Kempson (1996) Language and Proof Theory. J. Logic, Language and Information, 5, 1996.
Groenendijk, J. and M. Stokhof (1991) Dynamic predicate logic. Linguistics and Philosophy, 14, 1991.
Groenendijk, J., M. Stokhof, and F. Veltman (1996) This might be it. In J. Seligman and D. Westerståhl, editors, Logic, Language and Computation, volume 1. CSLI Lecture Notes Number 58, Stanford.
Grosz, B., A. Joshi, and S. Weinstein (1995) Centering: a framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 21(2), 1995.
Grosz, B. and C. Sidner (1986) Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 12(3), 1986.
Hardt, D. (1996) Centering in dynamic semantics. In Proceedings COLING-96.
Hobbs, J.R. (1985) On the coherence and structure of discourse. Technical Report 85–37, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford.
Kamp, H. and U. Reyle (1993) From Discourse to Logic. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Lascarides, A. and N. Asher (1993) Temporal interpretation, discourse relations and commonsense entailment. Linguistics and Philosophy, 16(5), 1993.
Polanyi, L. (1985) A theory of discourse structure and discourse coherence. In P.D. Kroeberger et al., editors, General Session, 21st Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society.
Reyle, U. (1993) Dealing with ambiguities by underspecification: construction, representation and deduction. J. Semantics, 10(2), 1993.
Sandt, R.A. van der (1992) Presupposition projection as anaphora resolution. J. Semantics, 9(4), 1992.
Sperber, D. and D. Wilson (1986) Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Blackwell, Oxford.
Thompson, S. and W. Mann (1987) Rhetorical structure theory: a framework for the analysis of texts. In IPRA Papers in Pragmatics, volume 1. 1987.
Wilson, D. Truth, coherence, relevance: recent approaches to pragmatics. Invited talk, ITALLC 96, London, July 1996.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Asher, N., Fernando, T. (1999). Labeled Representations, Underspecification and Disambiguation. In: Bunt, H., Muskens, R. (eds) Computing Meaning. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 73. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4231-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4231-1_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0290-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4231-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive