Skip to main content

Labeled Representations, Underspecification and Disambiguation

  • Chapter
Computing Meaning

Part of the book series: Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy ((SLAP,volume 73))

  • 196 Accesses

Abstract

From a formal semantic perspective, interpreting natural language utterances can be broken down into two tasks:

  1. (I)

    Constructing logical forms or semantic representations of the utterances and

  2. (II)

    Manipulating well-formed semantic representations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Asher, N. (1993) Reference to Abstract Objects in Discourse. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Asher, N. (1996) Mathematical treatments of discourse contexts. In P. Dekker and M. Stokhof, editors, Proc. Tenth Amsterdam Colloquium. ILLC, University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asher, N. (fortc.) Logical foundations of discourse interpretation. In J. M. Larrazabal, editor, Logic Colloqium ′96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asher, N. and A. Lascarides (1995) Lexical disambiguation in a discourse context. J. Semantics, 12, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asher, N. and H. Wada (1989) A computational account of syntactic, semantic and discourse principles for anaphora resolution. J. Semantics, 6, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, J. and R. Cooper (1993) Extended Kamp notation: a graphical notation for situation theory. In P. Aczel, et al., editors, Situation Theory and Its Applications, volume 3. CSLI, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos, J. (1996) Predicate logic unplugged. In P. Dekker and M. Stokhof, editors, Proc. Tenth Amsterdam Colloquium. ILLC, University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernando, T. (1997) Ambiguity under changing contexts. Linguistics and Philosophy, 20, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabbay, D. and R. Kempson (1996) Language and Proof Theory. J. Logic, Language and Information, 5, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk, J. and M. Stokhof (1991) Dynamic predicate logic. Linguistics and Philosophy, 14, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk, J., M. Stokhof, and F. Veltman (1996) This might be it. In J. Seligman and D. WesterstÃ¥hl, editors, Logic, Language and Computation, volume 1. CSLI Lecture Notes Number 58, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosz, B., A. Joshi, and S. Weinstein (1995) Centering: a framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 21(2), 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosz, B. and C. Sidner (1986) Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 12(3), 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, D. (1996) Centering in dynamic semantics. In Proceedings COLING-96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, J.R. (1985) On the coherence and structure of discourse. Technical Report 85–37, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, H. and U. Reyle (1993) From Discourse to Logic. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lascarides, A. and N. Asher (1993) Temporal interpretation, discourse relations and commonsense entailment. Linguistics and Philosophy, 16(5), 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, L. (1985) A theory of discourse structure and discourse coherence. In P.D. Kroeberger et al., editors, General Session, 21st Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyle, U. (1993) Dealing with ambiguities by underspecification: construction, representation and deduction. J. Semantics, 10(2), 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandt, R.A. van der (1992) Presupposition projection as anaphora resolution. J. Semantics, 9(4), 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D. and D. Wilson (1986) Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S. and W. Mann (1987) Rhetorical structure theory: a framework for the analysis of texts. In IPRA Papers in Pragmatics, volume 1. 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. Truth, coherence, relevance: recent approaches to pragmatics. Invited talk, ITALLC 96, London, July 1996.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Asher, N., Fernando, T. (1999). Labeled Representations, Underspecification and Disambiguation. In: Bunt, H., Muskens, R. (eds) Computing Meaning. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 73. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4231-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4231-1_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0290-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4231-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics