Skip to main content

Introduction: Reference and the Semantics of Anaphora

  • Chapter
Reference and Anaphoric Relations

Part of the book series: Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy ((SLAP,volume 72))

Abstract

An investigation of reference and anaphoric relations is of central interest to the understanding of the structure of linguistic meaning in its truth-conditional aspects. The truth-conditional tradition in semantics has its roots in the works of logicians and philosophers of language who investigated the relation between language on the one hand, and the objects that are associated with the linguistic expressions on the other hand. In this tradition, reference, truth-conditions, and inferences are the basic data which a semantic theory must correctly describe to meet even the most minimal standards of adequacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ballmer, T. 1978. Logical Grammar. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, J. & Cooper, R. 1981. Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language. Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 159–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, G. 1992. Anaphora and Dynamic Logic. Linguistics and Philosophy 15, 111–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, G. 1995. Dynamics of Meaning. Anaphora, Presupposition, and the Theory of Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. 1979. The Interpretation of Pronouns. In: F. Heny & H. Schnelle (eds.) Syntax and Semantics 10: Selections from the Third Groningen Round Table. New York: Academic Press, 61–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Does, J. 1993. Dynamics of Sophisticated Laziness. In: J. Groenendijk (ed.). Plurals and Anaphora. Dyana-2 deliverable R.2.2.A Part I. Institute for Logic, Language and Computation (ILLC), University of Amsterdam, 1-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Does, J. 1996. Quantification and Nominal Anaphora. In: K. von Heusinger & U. Egli (eds.). Proceedings of the Konstanz Workshop Reference and Anaphoric Relations. Arbeitspapier 79. Fachgruppe Sprachwissenschaft, Universität Konstanz, 27–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekker, P. 1993. Transsentential Meditations: Ups and Downs in Dynamic Semantics. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Amsterdam. Distributed by Institute for Logic, Language and Computation (ILLC), University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelberg, W. 1986. A New Puzzle about Intentional Identity. Journal of Philosophical Logic 15, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelberg, W. 1992. Intentional Identity and the Attitudes. Linguistics and Philosophy 15, 561–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelberg, W. 1995. A Perspectival Semantics for the Attitudes. Noûs 29, 316–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egli, U. 1991. (In)definite Nominalphrase und Typentheorie. In: U. Egli & K. von Heusinger (eds.). Zwei Aufsätze zur definiten Kennzeichnung. Arbeitspapier 27. Fachgruppe Sprachwissenschaft, Universität Konstanz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egli, U. & von Heusinger, K. 1995. The Epsilon Operator and E-Type Pronouns. In: U. Egli et al. (eds.). Lexical Knowledge in the Organization of Language. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 121–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engdahl, E. 1986. Constituent Questions. The Syntax and Semantics of Questions with Special Reference to Swedish. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. 1977. Pronouns, Quantifiers and Relative Clauses (I). Canadian Journal of Philosophy 7, 467–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geach, P. 1962. Reference and Generality. An Examination of Some Medieval and Modern Theories. Ithaca/NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geach, P. 1967. Intentional Identity. Journal of Philosophy 64, 627–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk, J. & Stokhof, M. 1991. Dynamic Predicate Logic. Linguistics and Philosophy 14, 39–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk, J. & Stokhof, M. & Veltman, F. 1996. Coreference and Modality. In: S. Lappin (ed.). The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 179–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, I. 1982. The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Distributed by Ann Arbor: University Microfilms.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, I. 1990. E-Type Pronouns and Donkey Anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy 13, 137–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Heusinger, K. 1997a. Salienz und Referenz. Der Epsilonoperator in der Semantik der Nominalphrase und anaphorischer Pronomen. Studia grammatica 43. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Heusinger, K. 1997b. Definite Descriptions and Choice Functions. In: S. Akama (ed.). Logic, Language, and Computation. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 61–91.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hilbert, D. & Bernays, P. [1939] 1970. Grundlagen der Mathematik. Vol. II. 2nd ed. Berlin; Heidelberg; New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J. & Kulas, J. 1985. Anaphora and Definite Descriptions: Two Applications of Game-Theoretical Semantics. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, H. 1981. A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation. In: J. Groenendijk & T. Janssen & M. Stokhof (eds.). Formal Methods in the Study of Language. Amsterdam: Mathematical Centre, 277–322. [Reprinted in: J. Groenendijk & T. Janssen & M. Stokhof (eds.) 1984. Truth, Interpretation and Information. Dordrecht: Foris, 1-41.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Karttunen, L. 1976. Discourse Referents. In: J. McCawley (ed.). Syntax and Semantics 7: Notes from the Linguistic Underground. New York: Academic Press, 363–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, A. 1998. Scope or Pseudoscope? Are there Wide-Scope Indefinites? In: S. Rothstein (ed.). Events and Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 163–196.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Montague, R. 1974. Formal Philosophy. Selected Papers of Richard Montague. Ed. and with an introd. by R. Thomason. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milsark, G. 1974. Existential Sentences in English. Ph.D. dissertation. Cambridge/MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neale, S. 1990. Descriptions. Cambridge/MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peregrin, J. & von Heusinger, K. 1995. Dynamic Semantics with Choice Functions. In: U. Egli & K. von Heusinger (eds.). Choice Functions in Natural Language Semantics. Arbeitspapier 71. Fachgruppe Sprachwissenschaft, Universität Konstanz. [Also in: H. Kamp & B. Partee (eds.) 1997. Proceedings of the Workshop “Context Dependence in the Analysis of Linguistic Meaning ”. Vol. I: Papers. Institut für maschinelle Sprachverarbeitung, Universität Stuttgart, 329-353.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart, T. 1992. Wh-in-situ: An Apparent Paradox. In: P. Dekker & M. Stokhof (eds.). Proceedings of the Eighth Amsterdam Colloquium. Institute for Logic, Language and Computation (ILLC), University of Amsterdam, 483-491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart, T. 1997. Quantifier Scope: How Labor is Divided Between QR and Choice Functions. Linguistics and Philosophy 20, 335–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, B.H. 1988. Prolegomena to Formal Logic. Aldershot/England: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, Y. 1997. Choice Functions and the Scopal Semantics of Indefinites. Linguistics and Philosophy 20, 399–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Von Heusinger, K., Egli, U. (2000). Introduction: Reference and the Semantics of Anaphora. In: von Heusinger, K., Egli, U. (eds) Reference and Anaphoric Relations. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 72. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3947-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3947-2_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0291-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3947-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics