Abstract
Whole nematode communities, extracted from soil samples taken from agricultural fields, were enumerated by taxonomic family and trophic group (i.e., bacterivores, fungivores, omnivores, plant-parasites, and predators) to evaluate nematode community structure as an indicator for monitoring ecological condition of soil. No differences were found in mixing treatments or methods of packing or shipping samples. However, extraction using Cobb’s sifting and gravity method, followed by sucrose centrifugation, gave greater recovery of free-living nematodes than elutriation followed by sucrose centrifugation. Population means and variance of the sampled area were similar when sampled using different strategies for collecting soil samples within fields, including several patterns, directions and repetitions of transects. Components of variation associated with ratios among the five trophic groups of nematodes and selected indices of community structure were quantified as variation among regions, among counties, among agricultural fields (2-ha area), among transects within agricultural fields, and within composite soil samples. The variance component for ‘within composite soil samples’ was relatively large compared to the other components of variance. Variation within composite soil samples was less for maturity indices (based on life-history strategy characteristics), ratio of bacterivores to plant-parasites, sum of bacterivores and fungivores, populations of plant-parasites, and populations of bacterivores than for trophic diversity indices, populations of fungivores, populations of omnivores, populations of predators, or the ratio of fungivores to bacterivores. With a single composite sample per field, the ability to differentiate ecological condition of soils among fields within a region improved if the variance among and within fields exceeded the variance within composite samples. Given the variance components, power curves indicated that detection of a 10% change (with 0.8 power) in the ecological condition of soils within a region between two time periods would require sampling a minimum of 25 and 50 fields with one composite soil sample analyzed per field for the maturity and trophic diversity index, respectively. More than 100 fields per region would be required to detect temporal change in populations of individual trophic groups. Biplots of maturity indices, but not of trophic diversity or populations of individual trophic groups, identified clear differences among fields. Thus, maturity indices, which differentiated among sampling sites better and more efficiently than trophic diversity indices or measures based on populations of individual trophic groups, may be appropriate for use in a regional and/or national monitoring program.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Atlas R M, Horowitz A, Krichevsky M and Bej A K 1991 Response to microbial populations to environmental disturbance. Microbiol. Ecol. 22, 249–256.
Ayoub S M 1980 Plant Nematology, An Agricultural Training Aid. California Department of Food and Agriculture, NemaAid Publications, Sacramento, CA. 195 p.
Barker K R, Nusbaum C J and Nelson L A 1969 Effects of storage temperature and extraction procedure on recovery of plant-parasitic nematodes from field soils. J. Nematol. 1, 240–247.
Barker K R 1985a Sampling nematode communities. In An Advanced Treatise on Meloidogyne Vol. II: Methodology. Eds. K R Barker, C C Carter and J N Sasser. pp 2–17. North Carolina State University Graphics, Raleigh.
Barker K R 1985b Nematode extraction and bioassays. In An Advanced Treatise on Meloidogyne Vol. II: Methodology. Eds. K R Barker, C C Carter and J N Sasser. pp 19–35. North Carolina State University Graphics, Raleigh.
Barker K R and Campbell C L 1981 Sampling nematode populations. In Plant Parasitic Nematodes, Vol. III. Eds. E. B M Zuckerman and R A Rohde. pp 451–474. Academic Press, New York.
Barker K R and Noe J P 1988 Techniques in quantitative nematology. In Experimental Techniques in Plant Disease Epidemiology. Eds. J Kranz and J Rotem. pp 223–236. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Barker K R, Schmitt D P and Noe J P 1985 Role of sampling for crop-loss assessmentand nematode management. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 12, 355–369.
Boag B 1977 Factors influencing the occurrence and abundance of nematodes in forest soils in eastern Scotland. Ann. Appl. Biol. 86, 446–450.
Bongers A M T 1990a Biologische bodembeoordeling met nemato-den. In Handboek voor Milieubeheer: Bodembescherming. Eds. F A M de Haan, Ch H Henkens and D A Zeilmaker. pp J2000–1–J2000–17. Samson H D Tjeenk Willink, Alphen aan de Rijn, Deurne.
Bongers T 1990b The maturity index: an ecological measure of en vi-ronmental disturbance based on nematode species composition. Oecologia 83, 14–19.
Burt A J, McKee P M Hart D R and Kauss P B 1991 Effects of pollution on benthic invertebrate communities of the St. Mary’s River, 1985. Hydrobiologia 219, 63–81.
Camargo J A 1992 New diversity index for assessing structural alterations in aquatic communities. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 48, 428–434.
Caveness F E and Jensen H J 1955 Modification of the centrifugal-flotation technique for the isolation and concentration of nematodes and their eggs from soil and plant tissue. Proc. Helminthol. Soc. 22, 87–89.
Daykin M E and Hussey R S 1985 Staining and histopathological techniques in nematology. In An Advanced Treatise on Meloidog-yne Vol. II: Methodology. Eds K R Barker, C C Carter and J N Sasser. pp 39–48. North Carolina State University Graphics, Raleigh.
Englund E and Sparks A 1991 GEO-EAS 1.2.1 Geostatistical Environmental Assessment Software-User’s Guide. EPA 600/8-91/008. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, Nevada. pp 1–1 to 17-2.
Ferris V R and Ferris J M 1974 Inter-relationships between nematode and plant communities in agricultural ecosystems. Agro-Ecosystems 1, 275–299.
Ferris H, Mullens T A and Foord K E 1990 Stability and characteristics of spatial description parameters for nematode populations. J. Nematol. 22, 427–439.
Francl L J 1986a Spatial analysisof Heterodera glycines populations in field plots. J. Nematol. 18, 183–189.
Francl L J 1986b Improving the accuracy of sampling field plots for plant-parasitic nematodes. J. Nematol. 18, 190–195.
Freckman D W 1988 Bacterivorous nematodes and organic-matter decomposition. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 24, 195–217.
Freckman D W and Ettema C H 1993 Assessing nematode communities in agroecosystems of varying human intervention. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 45, 239–261.
Gee G W and Bauder J W 1986 Particle-size analysis. In Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1. Ed. A Klute. pp 383–411. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Agronomy Monograph No. 9 (2nd edition) 383–411.
Goodell P and Ferris H 1980 Plant-parasitic nematode distributions in an alfalfa field. J. Nematol. 12, 136–141.
Goodell P B and Ferris H 1981 Sample optimization for five plant-parasitic nematodes in an alfalfa field. J. Nematol. 13, 304–313.
Gorny M 1976 Zagadnienie bioindykacjiw glebach biotopów Zde-fradowanych. Wiad. Ekol. 22, 224–230 (cited by Wasilews-ka,1979).
Heck W W, Campbell C L, Finkner A L, Hayes C R, Hess G R, Meyer J R, Munster M J, Neher D A, Peck S L, Rawlings J O, Smith C N and Tooley M B 1993 Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP) — Agroecosystem 1992 Pilot Project Plan. EPA/620/R-93/010. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC.
Heip C, Herman P M J and Soetaert K 1988 Data processing, evaluation and analysis. In Introduction to the Study of Meiofauna. Eds. R P Higgins and H Thiel. pp 197–231. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC.
Hendrix P F, Parmelee R W, Crossley D A Jr, Coleman D C, Odum E P and Groffman P M 1986 Detritus food webs on conventional and no-tillage agroecosystems. BioScience 36, 374–380.
Ingham R E, Trofymow J A, Ingham E R and Coleman D C 1985 Interactions of bacteria, fungi, and their nematode grazers: Effects on nutrient cycling and plant growth. Ecol. Monogr. 55, 119–140.
Isaaks E H and Srivastava R M 1989 Applied Geostatistics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. 561 p.
Jarošik V 1983 A comparison of the diversity of carabid beetles (Col., Carabidae) of two floodplain forests differently affected by emissions. Vest. Ceskoslav. Spolec. Zool. 47, 215–220.
Kästner V A und Germershausen K 1989 Struktur und Abundanz-dynamik der Nematodenfaunain einem Schwarzerde-Lössboden. Hercynia N. F. 26, 71–93.
Kutz, F W and Linthurst R A 1990 A systems-level approach to environmental assessment. Toxicol. Environ. Chem. 28, 105–114.
Lin C S, Poushinsky G and Mauer M 1979 An examination of five sampling methods under random and clustered disease distribution using simulation. Can. J. Plant Sci. 59, 121–130.
Ludwig J A and Reynolds J F 1988 Statistical Ecology: A Primer on Methods and Computing. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 337 p.
Maggenti A R 1982 Nemata. In Synopsis and Classification of Living Organisms. Ed. S P Parker. pp 878–923. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Maggenti A R 1991 Nemata: Higher classification. In Manual of Agricultural Nematology. Ed. W R Nickle. pp 147–187. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.
McSorley R 1987 Extraction of nematodes and sampling methods. In Principles and Practice of Nematode Control in Crops. Eds. R H Brown and B R Kerry. pp 13–47. Academic Press, Orlando.
McSorley R and Parrado J L 1982 Estimating relative error in nematode numbers from single soil samples composed of multiple cores. J. Nematol. 14
McSorley R and Walter D E 1991 Comparison of soil extraction methods for nematodes and microarthropods. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 34, 201–207.
McSorley R, Dankers W H, Parrado J L and Reynolds J S 1985 Spatial distribution of the nematode community on penine marl soils. Nematropica 15, 77–92.
Messer J J, Linthurst R A and Overton W S 1991 An EPA program for monitoring ecological status and trends. Environ. Monit. Assess. 17, 67–78.
Moore J C and de Ruiter P C 1991 Temporal and spatial heterogeneity of trophic interactions within below-ground food webs. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 34, 371–397.
Nannipieri P, Grego S and Ceccanti B 1990 Ecological significance of the biological activity in soil. In Soil Biochemistry, Volume 6. Eds. Jean-Marc Bollag and G Stotzky. pp 293–355. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.
Noe J P and Barker K R 1985 Relation of within-field spatial variation of plant-parasitic nematode population densities and edaphic factors. Phytopathology 75, 247–252.
Noe J P and Campbell C L 1985 Spatial pattern analysis of plant-parasitic nematodes. J. Nematol. 17, 86–93.
North Carolina Agricultural Statistics Division 1990 North Carolina Agricultural Statistics: 1990. North Carolina Department of Agriculture, Raleigh. 76 p.
North Carolina Agricultural Statistics Division 1991 North Carolina Agricultural Statistics: 1991. North Carolina Department of Agriculture, Raleigh. 76 p.
Oliver M A 1987 Geostatistics and its application to soil science. Soil Use Manage. 3, 8–20.
Parmelee R W and Alston D 1986 Nematode trophic structure in conventional and no-tillage agroecosystems. J. Nematol. 18, 403–407.
Pielou P C 1977 Mathematical Ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 385 p.
Platt H M, Shaw K M and Lambshead P J D 1984 Nematode species abundance patterns and their use in the detection of environmental perturbations. Hydrobiologia 118, 59–66.
Prot J C and Ferris H 1992 Sampling approaches for extensive surveys in nematology. Suppl. J. Nematol. 24, 757–764.
Rawlings J O 1988 Applied Regression Analysis: a Research Tool. Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole Advanced Books & Software, Pacific Grove, California. 553 p.
Saly A and Ragala P 1984 Free-living nematodes-bioindicators of the effects of chemization on the soil fauna. UVTIZ-Ochr. Rostl. 20, 15–21.
Samoiloff M R 1987 Nematodes as indicators of toxic environmental contaminants. In Vistas on Nematology. Eds. J A Veech and D W Dickson. pp 433–439. Society of Nematologists, Lakeland, Florida.
SAS Institute, Inc 1989 SAS/STAT User’s Guide, Version 6, Fourth Edition, Volume 2. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC. 1686 p.
SAS Institute, Inc 1992 SAS Technical Report P-229, SAS/STAT Software: Changes and Enhancements, Release 6.07. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC. 620 p.
Schmitt D P, Barker K R, Noe J P and Koenning S R 1990 Repeated sampling to determine the precision of estimating nematode population densities. J. Nematol. 22, 552–559.
Seastedt T R, James S W and Todd T C 1988 Interactions among soil invertebrates, microbes and plant growth in the tallgrass prairie. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 24, 219–228.
Sohlenius B 1982 Short-term influence of clear-cutting on abundance of soil-microfauna (Nematoda, Rotatoria and Tardigrada) in a Swedish pine forest soil. Appl. Ecol. 19, 349–359.
Sohlenius B, Bostrom S and Sandor A 1988 Carbon and nitrogen budgets of nematodes in arable soil. Bio. Fertil. Soils 6, 1–8.
Stinner B R and Crossley D A Jr 1982 Nematodes in no-tillage agroecosystems. In Nematodes in Soil Ecosystems. Ed. D W Freckman. pp 14–28. University of Texas Press, Austin.
Thorne G 1961 Principles of Nematology. McGraw-Hill Inc, New York. 553 p.
Twinn D C 1974 Nematodes. In Biology of Plant Litter Decomposition. Eds. C H Dickinson and G J F Pugh. pp 421–465. Academic Press, London.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census 1987 1987 Census of Agriculture — County Data, North Carolina. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
Wasilewska L 1979 The structure and function of soil nematode communities in natural ecosystems and agrocenoses. Pol. Ecol. Stud. 5, 97–145.
Wasilewska L 1989 Impact of human activities on nematodes. In Ecology of Arable Land. Eds. M Charholm and L Bergstrom. pp 123–132. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Holland.
Yeates G W, Bongers T, de Goede R G M, Freckman D W and Georgieva S S 1993 Feeding habits in soil nematode families and genera-An outline for soil ecologists. J. Nematol. 25, 315–331.
Yeates G W and Coleman D C 1982 Nematodes in decomposition. In Nematodes in Soil Ecosystems. Ed. D W Freckman. pp 55–80. University of Texas Press, Austin.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Neher, D.A., Peck, S.L., Rawlings, J.O., Campbell, C.L. (1995). Measures of nematode community structure and sources of variability among and within agricultural fields. In: Collins, H.P., Robertson, G.P., Klug, M.J. (eds) The Significance and Regulation of Soil Biodiversity. Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences, vol 63. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0479-1_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0479-1_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4214-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0479-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive