Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Current Issues in Production Ecology ((CIPE,volume 3))

Abstract

Effects of drought can be partitioned into effects on radiant energy interception, conversion of light into dry matter, partitioning of assimilate, and tuber dry matter concentration. The main effect of drought is to reduce radiant energy interception, by reducing both the rate and the duration of growth of leaves, and also the number of leaves produced. Rate of leaf expansion is inversely related to soil moisture deficit (SMD), and genotypes differ both in the threshold at which leaf expansion is constrained by soil moisture, and in their ability to maintain expansion with increasing SMD. Differences between genotypes appear to be related to the ability to maintain leaf water status, rather than in the ability for osmotic adjustment.

The efficiency of conversion of light into dry matter is less sensitive to drought stress than leaf growth. Drought has little effect on the functioning of Photosystem II, and effects on photosynthesis largely reflect stomatal limitation. Prolonged drought, though, may result in a reduction in light-harvesting complexes and down-regulation of carboxylating enzymes. Greater reduction in stomatal conductance to water vapour transfer than photosynthetic rate results in an increase in water use efficiency.

It is suggested that differences between experiments in the pattern of assimilate partitioning to tubers by droughted crops may reflect differences in timing and intensity of water-stress relative to tuber initiation. Tuber dry matter concentration can be related to thermal time accumulated from the time of plant emergence and to SMD. Increasing stability in dry matter concentration over a range of soil moisture conditions could contribute to improved drought tolerance. However, evidence for genotypic differences in stability in dry matter concentration is inconclusive.

The supply of water to shoots depends on the ability of roots to exploit available soil moisture. Compared with cereals, root systems of potatoes tend to be weak and shallowly distributed so that the ability to extract soil moisture effectively is restricted. Drought, while reducing dry matter production increases the root: shoot ratio indicating a shift in the balance of growth in favour of roots. Roots of plants grown in droughted conditions also tend to be thinner. Both responses enable droughted plants to exploit the available soil moisture more effectively. Genotypic differences in rooting depth and in amount of root growth have been found, but the significance of these differences for water extraction and growth of droughted crops is not clear.

Grafting experiments indicate that shoots largely determine changes in both stomatal conductance and partitioning of assimilates in response to drought. Interaction of hydraulic and non-hydraulic regulation of physiological processes provides a mechanism coupling long-term adaptation to soil moisture status with short-term response to evaporative demand. Future work must consider not only effects of water-stress on individual processes, but also the integration of response by the whole plant and the physiological processes underlying long-term responses to drought.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bansal K C, Nagarajan S (1987) Reduction of leaf growth by water stress and its recovery in relation to transpiration and stomatal conductance in some potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) genotypes. Potato Research 30:497–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackman P G, Davies W J (1985) Root to shoot communication in maize plants of the effects of soil drying. Journal of Experimental Botany 36:39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blum A, Johnson J W, Ramseur E L, Tollner E W (1991) The effect of drying topsoil and a possible non-hydraulic root signal on wheat growth and yield. Journal of Experimental Botany 42:1225–1231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaves M M (1991) Effects of water deficits on carbon assimilation. Journal of Experimental Botany 42:1–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cleland R E (1986) The role of hormones in wall loosening and growth. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 13:93–103.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dale J E (1988) The control of leaf expansion. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 39:267–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deleens E, Marcotte L, Schwebel-Dugue N, Vartanian N (1989) Stable isotope carbon study: long-term partitioning during progressive drought stress in Brassica napus var. oleifera. Plant, Cell and Environment 12:615–620.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein E, Grant W J (1973) Water stress relations of the potato plant under field conditions. Agronomy Journal 65:400–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farquhar G D, O’Leary M H, Berry J A (1982) On the relationship between carbon isotope discrimination and the intercellular carbon concentration in leaves. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 9:121–137.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gandar P W, Tanner C D (1976) Leaf growth, tuber growth and water potential in potatoes. Crop Science 16:534–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory P J, Simmonds L P (1992) Water relations and growth of potatoes. Pages 214–246 in P. Harris (Ed.) The Potato Crop: The Scientific Basis for Improvement, 2nd Edition. Chapman & Hall, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haverkort A J, Van de Waart M, Bodlaender K B A (1990) The effect of early drought stress on numbers of tubers and stolons of potato in controlled and field conditions. Potato Research 33:89–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao T C (1973) Plant responses to water stress. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 24:519–517.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferies R A (1989) Water-stress and leaf growth in field-grown crops of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Journal of Experimental Botany 40:1375–1381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferies R A (1992a) Effects of drought on chlorophyll fluorescence in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). I. Plant water status and the kinetics of chlorophyll fluorescence. Potato Research 35:25–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferies R A (1992b) Effects of drought on chlorophyll fluorescence in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). II. Relations between plant growth and measurements of fluorescence. Potato Research 35:35–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferies R A (1993a) Cultivar responses to water stress in potato: effects of shoot and roots. New Phytologist 123:491–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferies R A (1993b) Responses of potato genotypes to drought. I. Expansion of individual leaves and osmotic adjustment. Annals of Applied Biology 122:93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferies R A (1994) Drought and chlorophyll fluorescence in field-grown potato (Solanum tuberosum). Physiologia Plantarum 90:93–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferies R A, Heilbronn T D, MacKerron D K L (1989) Estimating tuber dry matter concentration from accumulated thermal time and soil moisture. Potato Research 32:411–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferies R A, MacKerron D K L (1987) Aspects of the physiological basis of cultivar differences in yield of potato under droughted and irrigated conditions. Potato Research 30:201–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferies R A, MacKerron D K L (1989) Radiation interception and growth of irrigated and droughted potato (Solanum tuberosum). Field Crops Research 22:101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferies R A, MacKerron D K L (1993) Responses of potato genotypes to drought. II. Leaf area index, growth and yield. Annals of Applied Biology 122:105–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Killick R J, Simmonds N W (1974) Specific gravity of potato tubers as a character showing small genotype-environment interactions. Heredity 32:109–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludlow M M, Muchow R C (1989) A critical evaluation of traits for improving crop yields in water-limited environments. Advances in Agronomy 43:107–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKerron D K L, Jefferies R A (1986) The influence of early soil moisture stress on tuber numbers in potato. Potato Research 29:299–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKerron D K L, Jefferies R A (1985) Observations on the effects of the relief of late water stress in potato. Potato Research 28:349–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKerron D K L, Peng Z Y (1989) Genotypic comparisons of potato root growth and yield response to drought. Pages 199–206 in Aspects of Applied Biology 22, Roots and the Soil Environment. Association of Applied Biologists, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKerron D K L, Waister P D (1985) A simple model of potato growth and yield. I. Model development and sensitivity analysis. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 34:241–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munns R (1990) Chemical signals moving from roots to shoots: the case against ABA. Pages 175– 183 in Davies W J, Jeffcoat B (Eds.) British Society for Plant Growth Regulation, Monograph 21. Importance of Root to Shoot Communication in Responses to Environmental Stress. BSPGR, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munns R, Passioura J B, Milborrow B V, James R A, Close T J (1993) Stored xylem sap from wheat and barley in drying soil contains a transpiration inhibitor with a large molecular size. Plant, Cell and Environment 16:867–872.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Passioura J B (1988) Root signals control leaf expansion in wheat seedlings growing in drying soil. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 15:687–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salter P J, Goode J E (1967) Crop responses to water at different stages of growth. Research Reviews of the Commonwealth Bureau of Horticulture, East Mailing 2:93–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair T R, Ludlow M M (1985) Who taught plants thermodynamics? the unfulfilled potential of plant water potential. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 12:213–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steckel J R, Gray D (1979) Drought tolerance of potatoes. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 47:770–775.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tardieu F, Davies W J (1992) Stomatal response to abscisic acid is a function of current plant water status. Plant Physiology 98:540–545.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tardieu F, Zhang J, Gowing D J G (1993) Stomatal control of both [ABA] in the xylem sap and leaf water status: a test of a model for droughted or ABA-fed field-grown maize. Plant, Cell and Environment 16:413–420.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas H (1987) Physiological responses to drought of Lolium perenne L.: measurement of, and genetic variation in, water potential, solute potential, elasticity and cell hydration. Journal of Experimental Botany 38:115–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner N C, O’Toole J C, Cruz R T, Yambao E B, Sayeed A, Namuco O S, Dingkuhn M (1986) Responses of seven diverse rice cultivars to water deficits. II. Osmotic adjustment, leaf elasticity, leaf extension, leaf death, stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Field Crops Research 13:273–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vos J, Groenwold J (1988) Water relations of potato leaves. I. Diurnal changes, gradients in the canopy, the effects of leaf insertion number, cultivar and drought. Annals of Botany 62:363–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vos J, Groenwold J (1989a) Characteristics of photosynthesis and conductance of potato canopies and the effects of cultivar and transient drought. Field Crops Research 20:237–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vos J, Groenwold J (1989b) Genetic differences in water use efficiency, stomatal conductance and carbon isotope fractionation in potato. Potato Research 32:113–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vos J, Oyarzún P J (1987) Photosynthesis and stomatal conductance of potato leaves -effects of leaf age, irradiance, and leaf water potential. Photosynthesis Research 11:253–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Davies W J (1990a) Changes in the concentration of ABA in xylem sap as a function of changing soil water status can account for changes in leaf conductance and growth. Plant, Cell and Environment 13:277–285.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Davies W J (1990b) Does ABA in the xylem control the rate of leaf growth in soil-dried maize and sunflower plants? Journal of Experimental Botany 41:1125–1132.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jefferies, R.A. (1995). Physiology of crop response to drought. In: Haverkort, A.J., MacKerron, D.K.L. (eds) Potato Ecology And modelling of crops under conditions limiting growth. Current Issues in Production Ecology, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0051-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0051-9_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4028-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0051-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics