The Cartesian Test for Automatism

  • Gerald J. Erion
Part of the Studies in Cognitive Systems book series (COGS, volume 30)


In Part V of his Discourse on the Method, Descartes introduces a test for distinguishing people from machines that is similar to the one proposed much later by Alan Turing. The Cartesian test combines two distinct elements that Keith Gunderson has labeled the language test and the action test. Though traditional interpretation holds that the action test attempts to determine whether an agent is acting upon principles, I argue that the action test is best understood as a test of common sense. I also maintain that this interpretation yields a stronger test than Turing’s, and that contemporary artificial intelligence should consider using it as a guide for future research.

Key words

Artificial intelligence common sense Descartes Turing Test 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adler, M.J. (1967)The Difference of Man and the Difference it MakesNew York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  2. Chomsky, N. (1966)Cartesian LinguisticsNew York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  3. Cottingham, J. (1978), ‘A Brute to the Brutes?’Philosophy53, pp. 551–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Damasio, A.R. (1994)Descartes’ ErrorNew York: G.P. Putnam.Google Scholar
  5. Dennett, D.C. (1991)Consciousness ExplainedBoston: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar
  6. Descartes, R. (1985)The Philosophical Writings of Descartestrans. and ed. by J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, D. Murdoch, and A. Kenny, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Cited in text as CSM.)Google Scholar
  7. Egenhofer, M. and Mark, D.M. (1995), ‘Naive Geography’, in A.U. Frank and W. Kuhn, eds.Spatial Information Theory: A Theoretical Basis for GIS, BerlinNew York: Springer, pp. 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Erion, G.J. (2000), Common Sense: An Investigation in Ontology, Epistemology, and Moral Philosophy, unpublished doctoral dissertation, University at Buffalo, State University of New York.Google Scholar
  9. Forguson, L. (1989)Common SenseNew York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Gunderson, K. (1964), ‘Descartes, La Mettrie, Language, and Machines’Philosophy39, pp. 193–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hamad, S. (1991), ‘Other Bodies, Other Minds: A Machine Incarnation of an Old Philosophical Problem’Minds and Machines1, pp. 43–54.Google Scholar
  12. Hauser, L. (1993), ‘Reaping the Whirlwind’Minds and Machines3, pp. 219–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hayes, P.J. (1985a), ‘Naive Physics 1: Ontology for Liquids’, in J.R. Hobbs and R.C. Moore, eds.Formal Theories of the Common-Sense WorldNorwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 71–107.Google Scholar
  14. Hayes, P.J. (1985b). ‘The Second Naive Physics Manifesto’, in J.R. Hobbs and R.C. Moore, eds.Formal Theories of the Common Sense WorldNorwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 1–36.Google Scholar
  15. Horton, R. (1982), ‘Tradition and Modernity Revisited’, in M. Hollis and S. Lukes, eds.Rationality and RelativismOxford: Basil Blackwell pp. 201–260.Google Scholar
  16. Leiber, J. (1989), ‘Re(ad) Me; Re(ad) Myself’Philosophy and Literature13, pp. 134–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Macnamara, J. (1986)A Border Dispute: The Place of Logic in PsychologyCambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  18. Radner, D. and Radner, M. (1989)Animal Consciousness.Buffalo: Prometheus.Google Scholar
  19. Radner, D. and Radner, M. (1995), ‘Cognition, Natural Selection, and the Intentional Stance’International Studies in the Philosophy of Science9, pp. 109–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ryle, G. (1971), ‘Knowing How and Knowing That’, inCollected Papers of Gilbert RyleVol. II. New York: Barnes and Noble, pp. 212–225. (Original work published in 1945.)Google Scholar
  21. Shieber, S.M. (1994), ‘Lessons From a Restricted Turing Test’Communications of the ACM 37pp. 70–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Smith, B. (1994), ‘The Structures of the Common-Sense World’, in S. Poggi, ed.Gestalt Psychology: Its Origins Foundations and InfluenceFirenze: L.S. Olschki, pp. 209–232.Google Scholar
  23. Turing, A.M. (1950), ‘Computing Machinery and Intelligence’Mind59, pp. 433–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerald J. Erion
    • 1
  1. 1.Medaille CollegeBuffaloUSA

Personalised recommendations