Skip to main content

Abstract

Independent work on cognitive models of visual perception and of perception of lexical items reveals a common framework underlying the two sets of cognitive mechanisms posited. From these two classes of model — one visual and the other linguistic — a unifying structure has been extracted. The integrated model is presented, discussed, and some general implications for the notion of unified theories of visual and linguistic perception are considered. In particular, we are able to demonstrate a similar structuring of contextual, or top-down, information, and a similar pattern of interplay between serial and parallel processes as well as between top-down and bottom-up information. In addition, several common problems, such as the role of ‘value’ parameters in perception, are identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Becker, C. A. (1980). Semantic Context Effects in Visual Word Recognition. Memory and Cognition 8(6): 493–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bundy, A. (1981). Some Suggested Criteria for Assessing AI Research. AISB Quarterly 40–41: 26–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A. (1903). The Modularity of Mind. MIT Press: Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, R. (1990). Where Art and Science Meet. RSA Journal CXXXVIII(5406): 399–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, V. S., Partridge, D. & Lopez, P. D. (1988). A Biologically Based Algorithm for Rapid Scene Analysis. In Proceedings ECAI88, 675–677. Munich, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, J. L. & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An Interactive Activation Model of Context Effects in Letter perception: Part 1. An Account of Basic Findings. Psychological Review 88: 375–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, J. E. (1981). An Information Processing Analysis of Word Recognition. PhD thesis, Department of Psychology, New Mexico State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of Information in Word Recognition. Psychological Review 76: 165–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paap, K. R., Newsome, S. L., McDonald, J. E. & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1982). An Activation-Verification Model for Letter and Word Recognition: The Word Superiority Effect. Psychological Review 89(5): 573–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partridge, D. (1985). Input-Expectation Discrepancy Reduction: A Ubiquitous Mechanism. In Proceedings of The Ninth Internat. Joint Conf. on AI, IJCAI85, 261–213. Los Angeles, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partridge, D., Burleson, C. & Lopez, P. D. (1985). An Algorithm for Robot Perception. Technical Report MCCS-85-2, Computing Research Laboratory, New Mexico State University, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partridge, D., Johnston, V. & Lopez, P. (1987). Experiments with a Cognitive Industrial Robot. Internat. J. Man-Machine Studies 27: 435–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partridge, D., McDonald, J., Johnston, V. & Paap, K. (1988). AI Programs and Cognitive Models. In Proceedings of ECAI88, 55–60. Munich, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. N. (1983). Why the Human Perceiver is a Bad Machine. In Beck, J., Hope, B. & Rosenfeld, A. (eds.) Human and Machine Vision, 341–364. Academic Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1985). Computation and Cognition. MIT Press: Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, V. S. & Anstis, S. M. (1986). The Perception of Apparent Motion. Scientific American 254(6): 102–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D. E. & McClelland, J. L. (1982). An Interactive Activation Model of Context Effects in Letter Percveption: Part 2. the Contextual Enhancement Effect and Some Tests and Extensions of the Mode. Psychological Review 89: 60–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, A. (1988). Features and Objects: The Fourteenth Barlett Memorial Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 40A(2): 201–237.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Partridge, D. (1995). Language and Vision: A Single Perceptual Mechanism?. In: Mc Kevitt, P. (eds) Integration of Natural Language and Vision Processing. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1639-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1639-5_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-3944-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-1639-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics