Angiographic endpoints in progression trials
The use of different angiographic criteria represents one of the reasons why the results of angiographic trials are difficult to compare. In principle, this is an avoidable problem and therefore a serious attempt at standardization should be made. This chapter reviews the criteria which have been used in trials using quantitative coronary angiography and presents a proposal for standardization.
KeywordsCoronary Atherosclerosis Quantitative Coronary Angiography Angiographic Data Focal Change Progression Trial
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.Haskell WL, Alderman EL, Fair JM, et al. Effects of intensive multiple risk factor reduction on coronary atherosclerosis and clinical cardiac events in men and women with coronary artery disease. The Stanford Coronary Risk Intervention Project (SCRIP). Circulation. 1994;89:975–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Pitt B, Mancini GB, Ellis SG, Rosman HS, McGovern ME. Pravastatin limitation of atherosclerosis in the coronary arteries (PLAC I) [abstract]. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23 Special issue: 131A.Google Scholar
- 7.Waters D, Higginson L, Gladstone P, et al. Effects of monotherapy with an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor on the progression of coronary atherosclerosis as assessed by serial quantitative arteriography. The Canadian Coronary Atherosclerosis Intervention Trial. Circulation. 1994;89:959–68.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Jukema JW, Bruschke AV, van Boven AJ, et al. Effects of lipid lowering by pravastatin on progression and regression of coronary artery disease in symptomatic men with normal to moderately elevated serum cholesterol levels. The Regression Growth Evaluation Statin Study (REGRESS). Circulation. 1995;91:2528–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Gould KL, Martucci JP, Goldberg DI, et al. Short-term cholesterol lowering decreases size and severity of perfusion abnormalities by positron emission tomography after dipyridamole in patients with coronary artery disease. A potential noninvasive marker of healing coronary endothelium. Circulation. 1994;89:1530–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar