Skip to main content
Book cover

Wetland Techniques pp 1–58Cite as

Methods for Sampling and Analyzing Wetland Algae

Abstract

Algae are a biologically diverse group of aquatic photosynthetic organisms, and are often common in wetlands. Algal species vary in their optimal environmental conditions, thus the taxonomic identity of algae present in a wetland can be used to make inferences about the environmental characteristics (e.g., water quality) of the wetland in which they are found. Algae also play important roles in the ecology of wetlands. They can be highly abundant and productive, thereby supporting wetland food webs and affecting wetland biogeochemical cycles. It is hoped that this chapter will provide a useful reference for wetland scientists and managers, and also serve to introduce students to appropriate methods for the sampling and analysis of wetland algae.

Keywords

  • Gross Primary Production
  • Algal Biomass
  • Cover Slip
  • Algal Community
  • Benthic Alga

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-6931-1_1
  • Chapter length: 58 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-94-007-6931-1
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   149.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Learn about institutional subscriptions
Fig. 1.1
Fig. 1.2
Fig. 1.3
Fig. 1.4
Fig. 1.5
Fig. 1.6
Fig. 1.7
Fig. 1.8
Fig. 1.9
Fig. 1.10
Fig. 1.11
Fig. 1.12

References

  • APHA (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Belay A (1981) An experimental investigation of inhibition of phytoplankton photosynthesis at lake surfaces. New Phytol 89:61–74

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bergey EA, Getty GM (2006) A review of methods for measuring surface area of stream substrates. Hydrobiology 556:7–16

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs BJF (1987) Effects of sample storage and mechanical blending on the quantitative analysis of river periphyton. Freshw Biol 18:197–203

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs BJF, Kilroy C (2000) Stream periphyton monitoring manual. NIWA, Christchurch

    Google Scholar 

  • Borchardt MA (1996) Nutrients. In: Stevenson RJ, Bothwell ML, Lowe RL (eds) Algal ecology: freshwater benthic ecosystems. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 183–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Bott TL (1996) Primary productivity and community respiration. In: Hauer FR, Lamberti GA (eds) Methods in stream ecology. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 533–556

    Google Scholar 

  • Brett MT, Müller-Navarra DC (1997) The role of essential fatty acids in aquatic food web processes. Freshw Biol 38:483–499

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bruckmeier B, Eisenmann H, Beisker W, Ute Simon U, Steinberg CEW (2005) Exogenous alkaline phosphatase activity of algae cells determined by fluorometric and flow cytometric detection of soluble enzyme products (4-methyl-umbelliferone, fluorescein). J Phycol 41:993–999

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cao X, Song C, Zhou Y (2010) Limitations of using extracellular alkaline phosphatase activities as a general indicator for describing P deficiency of phytoplankton in Chinese shallow lakes. J Appl Phycol 22:33–41

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Carlton RG, Wetzel RG (1988) Phosphorus flux from lake sediments: effects of epipelic algal oxygen production. Limnol Oceanogr 33:562–570

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Carr JM, Hergenrader GL, Troelstrup NH (1986) A simple, inexpensive method for cleaning diatoms. Trans Am Microscop Soc 105:152–157

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Carrick HJ, Lowe RL (2008) Nutrient limitation of benthic algae in Lake Michigan: the role of silica. J Phycol 43:228–234

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cattaneo A, Amireault MC (1992) How artificial are artificial substrata for periphyton? J N Am Benthol Soc 11:244–256

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cembella AD, Antia NJ, Harrison PJ (1984) The utilization of inorganic and organic phosphorus compounds as nutrients by eukaryotic microalgae: a multi-disciplinary perspective, part 1. CRC Crit Rev Microbiol 10:317–391

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Chrost RJ (1996) Environmental control of the synthesis and activity of aquatic microbial ectoenzymes. In: Chrost RJ (ed) Microbial enzymes in aquatic environments. Springer, New York, pp 29–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Chrost RJ, Overbeck J (1987) Kinetics of alkaline phosphatase activity and phosphorus availability for phytoplankton and bacterioplankton in lake Plußsee (north German eutrophic lake). Microb Ecol 13:229–248

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Dillard GE (2007) Freshwater algae of the Southeastern United States, part 8. Bibliotheca phycologica, band 112. E. Schweizerbart, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillard GE (2008) Common freshwater algae of the United States, 2nd edn. E. Schweizerbart, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA (2002) Methods for evaluating wetland condition: using algae to assess environmental conditions in wetlands. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. EPA-822-R-02-021

    Google Scholar 

  • Espeland EM, Wetzel RG (2001) Complexation, stabilization, and UV photolysis of extracellular and surface-bound glucosidase and alkaline phosphatase: implications for biofilm microbiota. Microb Ecol 42:572–585

    PubMed  CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Espeland EM, Francoeur SN, Wetzel RG (2002) Microbial phosphatase activity in biofilms: a comparison of whole community enzyme activity and individual bacterial cell-surface phosphatase expression. Arch Hydrobiol 153:581–593

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fairchild GW, Lowe RL, Richardson WB (1985) Algal periphyton growth on nutrient-diffusing substrates: an in situ bioassay. Ecology 66:465–472

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald GP, Nelson TC (1996) Extractive and enzymatic analyses for limiting or surplus phosphorus in algae. J Phycol 2:32–37

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Flecker AS, Taylor BW, Bernhardt ES, Hood JM, Cornwell WK, Cassatt SR, Vanni MJ, Altman NS (2002) Interactions between herbivorous fishes and limiting nutrients in a tropical stream ecosystem. Ecology 87:1831–1844

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Francoeur SN (2001) Meta-analysis of lotic nutrient amendment experiments: detecting and quantifying subtle responses. J N Am Benthol Soc 20:358–368

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Francoeur SN, Schaecher M, Neely RK, Kuehn KA (2006) Periphytic photosynthetic stimulation of extracellular enzyme activity in microbial communities associated with natural decaying wetland plant litter. Microb Ecol 52:662–669

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fucikova K, Hall JD, Johansen JR, Lowe R (eds) (2008) Desmid flora of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park, USA. Bibliotheca phycologica, band 113. E. Schweizerbart, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Furet JE, Benson-Evans K (1982) An evaluation of the time required to obtain complete sedimentation of fixed algal particles prior to enumeration. Br Phycol J 17:253–258

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gaiser EE, Rühland K (2010) Diatoms as indicators of environmental change in wetlands and peatlands. In: Smol JP, Stoermer EF (eds) The diatoms: applications in environmental and earth sciences, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 473–496

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Goldsborough LG, Robinson GGC (1985) Effect of an aquatic herbicide on sediment nutrient flux in a freshwater marsh. Hydrobiology 122:121–128

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Goldsborough LG, Robinson GGC (1996) Pattern in wetlands. In: Stevenson RJ, Bothwell ML, Lowe RL (eds) Algal ecology: freshwater benthic ecosystems. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 77–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsborough LG, McDougal RL, North AK (2005) Periphyton in freshwater lakes and wetlands. In: Azim ME, Verdegem MCJ, vam Dam AA, Beveridge MCM (eds) Periphyton: ecology exploitation and management. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, pp 71–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham LE, Wilcox LW (2000) Algae. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Hameed HA, Kilinc S, McGowan S, Moss B (1999) Physiological tests and bioassays: aids or superfluities to the diagnosis of phytoplankton nutrient limitation? A comparative study in the broads and the Meres of England. Eur J Phycol 34:253–269

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton SK, Lewis WM Jr, Sippel SJ (1992) Energy sources for aquatic animals in the Orinoco River floodplain: evidence from stable isotopes. Oecologia 89:324–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart EA, Lovvorn JR (2003) Algal vs. macrophyte inputs to food webs of inland saline wetlands. Ecology 84:3317–3326

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Healy FP, Hendzel LL (1980) Physiological indicators of nutrient deficiency in lake phytoplankton. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 37:442–453

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Helbling EW, Villafane V, Buma A, Andrade M, Zaratti F (2001) DNA damage and photosynthetic inhibition induced by solar ultraviolet radiation in tropical phytoplankton (Lake Titicaca, Bolivia). Eur J Phycol 36:157–166

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hessen DO, Færøvig PJ, Andersen T (2002) Light, nutrients, and P:C ratios in algae: grazer performance related to food quality and quantity. Ecology 83:1886–1898

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins SN, Howell ET, Hecky RE, Guildford SJ, Smith RE (2005) The wall of green: the status of Cladophora glomerata on the northern shores of Lake Erie’s eastern basin, 1995–2002. J Great Lakes Res 31:547–563

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hill WR, Fanta SE (2008) Phosphorus and light colimit periphyton growth at subsaturating irradiances. Freshw Biol 53:215–225

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hill WR, Fanta SE, Roberts BJ (2009) Quantifying phosphorus and light effects in stream algae. Limnol Oceanogr 54:368–380

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hillebrand H, Sommer U (1999) The nutrient stoichiometry of benthic microalgal growth: Redfield proportions are optimal. Limnol Oceanogr 44:440–446

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hillebrand H, Durselen C-D, Kirschtel D, Pollingher U, Zohary T (1999) Biovolume calculation for pelagic and benthic microalgae. J Phycol 35:403–424

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hoppe H-G (1983) Significance of exoenzymatic activities in the ecology of brackish water: measurements by means of methylumbelliferyl substrates. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 11:299–308

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Jones AK, Cannon RC (1986) The release of micro-algal photosynthate and associated bacterial uptake and heterotrophic growth. Br Phycol J 21:341–358

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kahlert M (1998) C:N:P ratios of freshwater benthic algae. Arch Hydrobiol (Special Issues: Ergebnisse der Limnologie, Advances in Limnology) 51:105–114

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keough JR, Hagley CA, Ruzycki E, Sierszen M (1998) δ13C composition of primary producers and role of detritus in a freshwater coastal ecosystem. Limnol Oceanogr 43:734–740

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Komarek J, Anagnostidis K (2008) Cyanoprokaryota Part 1 Chroococcales. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Krammer K, Lange-Bertalot H (1986) Bacillariophyceae Part 1 Naviculaceae. VEB Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeb S (1981) An in-situ method for measuring the primary productivity and standing crop of the epilithic periphyton community in lentic systems. Limnol Oceanogr 26:394–399

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe RL, LaLibertie GD (1996) Benthic stream algae: distribution and structure. In: Hauer R, Lamberti GA (eds) Methods in stream ecology. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 269–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe RL, Pan Y (1996) Benthic algal communities as biological monitors: distribution and structure. In: Stevenson RJ, Bothwell ML, Lowe RL (eds) Algal ecology: freshwater benthic ecosystems. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 705–739

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin A, Cattaneo A (1992) Factors affecting sampling variability of freshwater periphyton and the power of periphyton studies. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 49:1695–1703

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mulholland PJ, Rosemond AD (1992) Periphyton response to longitudinal nutrient depletion in a woodland stream: evidence of upstream-downstream linkage. J N Am Benthol Soc 11:405–419

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Norton TA, Melkonian M, Andersen RA (1996) Algal biodiversity. Phycologia 35:308–326

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Novotna J, Nedbalova L, Kopacek J, Vrba J (2010) Cell-specific extracellular phosphatase activity of dinoflagellate populations in acidified mountain lakes. J Phycol 46:635–644

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick R (1961) A study of the numbers and kinds of species found in rivers in eastern United States. Proc Acad Nat Sci Phil 113:215–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick R, Strawbridge D (1963) Variation in the structure of natural diatom communities. Am Nat 97:51–57

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick R, Hohn MH, Wallace JH (1954) A new method for determining the pattern of the diatom flora. Notulae Naturae Acad Nat Sci Phil Number 259

    Google Scholar 

  • Payn RA, Webster JR, Mulholland PJ, Valett HM, Dodds WK (2005) Estimation of stream nutrient uptake from nutrient addition experiments. Limnol Oceanogr Methods 3:174–182

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Peperzak L, Brussard CPD (2011) Flow cytometric applicability of fluorescent vitality probes on phytoplankton. J Phycol 3:692–702

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Power ME (1990) Benthic turfs vs floating mats of algae in river food webs. Oikos 58:67–79

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Prescott GW (1962) Algae of the western great lakes region. WM C Brown Company, Dubuque

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen KE, Albrechtsen J (1974) Glutaraldehyde. The influence of pH, temperature, and buffering on the polymerization rate. Histochemistry 38:19–26

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Redfield AC (1958) The biological control of chemical factors in the environment. Am Sci 46:205–222

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Riemann B, Simonsen P, Stensgaard L (1989) The carbon and chlorophyll content of phytoplankton from various nutrient regimes. J Plank Res 11:1037–1045

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rivkin RB, Swift E (1982) Phosphate uptake by the oceanic dinoflagellate Pyrocystis noctiluca. J Phycol 18:113–120

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rose C, Axler RP (1998) Uses of alkaline phosphatase activity in evaluating phytoplankton community phosphorus deficiency. Hydrobiology 361:145–156

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Round FE, Crawford RM, Mann DG (1990) The diatoms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugenski AT, Marcarelli AM, Bechtold HA, Inouye RS (2008) Effects of temperature and concentration on nutrient release rates from nutrient diffusing substrates. J N Am Bentholl Soc 27:52–57

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sartory DP, Grobelaar JE (1984) Extraction of chlorophyll a from freshwater phytoplankton for spectrophotometric analysis. Hydrobiology 114:177–187

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Scott JT, Doyle RD, Black JA, Dworkin SI (2007) The role of N2 fixation in alleviating N limitation in wetland metaphyton: enzymatic, isotopic, and elemental evidence. Biogeochemistry 84:207–218

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Seal Analytical (2005) EPA-approved methods for Aq-2 discrete analyzer. Available from: http://seal-analytical.com/support/discreteAnalyzerMethods.asp

  • Sharma K, Inglett PW, Reddy KR, Ogram AV (2005) Microscopic examination of photoautotrophic and phosphatase-producing organisms in phosphorus-limited everglades periphyton mats. Limnol Oceanogr 50:2057–2062

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sinsabaugh RL, Findlay S, Franchini P, Fisher D (1997) Enzymatic analysis of riverine bacterioplankton production. Limnol Oceanogr 42:29–38

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson RJ (1984) Procedures for mounting algae in a syrup medium. Trans Am Microscop Soc 103:320–321

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson RJ (1996) Algal ecology in freshwater benthic habitats. In: Stevenson RJ, Bothwell ML, Lowe RL (eds) Algal ecology: freshwater benthic ecosystems. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockner JG, Armstrong FAJ (1971) Periphyton of the experimental lakes area, northwestern Ontario. J Fish Res Board Can 28:215–229

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sun J, Liu D (2003) Geometric models for calculating cell biovolume and surface area for phytoplankton. J Plank Res 25:1331–1346

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas VK, Kuehn KA, Francoeur SN (2009) Effects of UV radiation on wetland periphyton: algae, bacteria, and extracellular polysaccharides. J Freshw Ecol 24:315–326

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Tuchman NC, Schollett MA, Rier ST, Geddes P (2006) Differential heterotrophic utilization of organic compounds by diatoms and bacteria under light and dark conditions. Hydrobiology 561:167–177

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Vadeboncoeur Y, Lodge DM (1998) Dissolved inorganic carbon sources for epipelic algal production: sensitivity of primary production estimates to spatial and temporal distribution of 14C. Limnol Oceanogr 43:1222–1226

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Vadeboncoeur Y, Lodge DM (2000) Periphyton production on wood and sediment: substratum-specific response to laboratory and whole-lake nutrient manipulation. J N Am Benthol Soc 19:68–81

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Hoek C, Mann DG, Jahns HM (1995) Algae: an introduction to phycology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderploeg HA, Liebig JR, Carmichael WW, Agy MA, Johengen TH, Fahnenstiel GL, Nalepa TF (2001) Zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) selective filtration promoted toxic Microcystis bloom in Saginaw Bay (Lake Huron) and Lake Erie. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:1208–1221

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Vymazal J (1995) Algae and element cycling in wetlands. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasmund N (1989) Micro-autoradiographic determination of the viability of algae inhabiting deep sediment layers. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 28:651–656

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Webster JR, Mulholland PJ, Tank JL, Valett HM, Dodds WK, Peterson BJ, Bowden WB, Dahm CN, Findlay S, Gregory SV (2003) Factors affecting ammonium uptake in streams – an inter-biome perspective. Freshw Biol 48:1329–1352

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wehr JD, Sheath RG (eds) (2003) Freshwater algae of north America: ecology and classification. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Weilhoefer CL, Pan Y (2006) Diatom-based bioassessment in wetlands: how many samples do we need to characterize the diatom assemblage in a wetland adequately? Wetlands 26:793–802

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wetzel RG (2001) Limnology, 3rd edn. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetzel RG, Likens GE (2000) Limnological analyses, 3rd edn. Springer, New York

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Whitton BA, John DM, Brook AJ (2002) The freshwater algal flora of the British isles. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Whorley SB (2008) Rapid measurements of periphytic responses to nutrients using PAM fluorimetry. Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, MI. MS Thesis

    Google Scholar 

  • Winterbourne MJ (1990) Interactions among nutrients, algae and invertebrates in a New Zealand mountain stream. Freshw Biol 23:463–474

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Withers PJA, Jarvie HP (2008) Delivery and cycling of phosphorus in rivers: a review. Sci Total Environ 400:379–395

    PubMed  CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Biology Department, Eastern Michigan University, 441 Mark Jefferson, Ypsilanti, MI, 48197, USA

    Steven N. Francoeur

  2. Department of Biological and Allied Health Sciences, Bloomsburg University, 400 East Second Street, Bloomsburg, PA, 17815-1301, USA

    Steven T. Rier

  3. Department of Biological Sciences, Louis Calder Center Biological Field Station, Fordham University, 53 Whipporwill Road, Armonk, NY, 10504, USA

    Sarah B. Whorley

Authors
  1. Steven N. Francoeur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Steven T. Rier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sarah B. Whorley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven N. Francoeur .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Forestry & Natural Resources & Environmental Research Center, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA

    James T. Anderson

  2. Department of Natural Resource Ecology a, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA

    Craig A. Davis

Student Exercises

Student Exercises

The following laboratory exercises and in-class activities are designed to build skills in several common techniques used for analysis of wetland algae, introduce students to natural patterns and variability exhibited by wetland algae, and provide experience in conducting, analyzing and interpreting data.

1.1.1 Classroom Exercises

The following activities are designed as short in-class activities.

  1. 1.

    Make a high-quality wet mount. Recall that a satisfactory wet mount can be inverted without the cover slip moving along the glass microscope slide.

  2. 2.

    Properly load a Palmer-Maloney cell and a Sedgewick-Rafter cell.

  3. 3.

    Use a stage micrometer to measure the area of your microscope’s field of view at each magnification. Calculate the volume of sample that you can observe in a single field of a Palmer-Maloney cell and a single field of a Sedgewick-Rafter cell at each magnification.

  4. 4.

    Use a stage micrometer to calibrate your microscope’s ocular micrometer at each magnification.

  5. 5.

    Distribute an algal sample to everyone in the class, and agree upon the use of one algal taxon. Measure the biovolume of one individual from that taxon and share the data. How different are the values? How many individuals need to be measured before the mean biovolume stabilizes?

1.1.2 Laboratory Exercises

The following activities are designed as laboratory exercises.

  1. 1.

    Qualitatively collect algae from a nearby wetland. Examine samples under the microscope using wet mounts, and refer to appropriate taxonomic references. How many different genera are you able to discern? Are there any patterns in the presence of taxa across the three major habitats (planktonic, metaphytic and benthic) or across different substrata (e.g., epipelic vs. epiphytic)?

  2. 2.

    Using the qualitative algal samples from Laboratory exercise #1, chemically clean the material and make diatom mounts. Examine samples under the microscope, and refer to appropriate taxonomic references. How many different diatom genera are you able to discern? Is this more or fewer than recorded using wet mounts? Are there any patterns in the presence of diatom taxa across the three major habitats (planktonic, metaphytic and benthic) or across different substrata (e.g., epipelic vs. epiphytic)?

  3. 3.

    Quantitatively collect and measure the biomass of algae in the three major habitats (planktonic, metaphytic and benthic) in a nearby wetland. On a per m2 basis, which habitat supports the most algal biomass? Do you think the differences in algal biomass between the habitat types is substantial? Why or why not?

  4. 4.

    Using the O2 technique, quantify algal production in the three major habitats (planktonic, metaphytic and benthic) in a nearby wetland. On a per m2 basis, which habitat supports the most algal production? Do you think the differences in algal production between the habitat types is substantial? Why or why not?

  5. 5.

    Construct NDS and deploy them in a nearby wetland. After 21 days, retrieve the NDS and assay algal biomass. Did nutrient availability constrain benthic algal biomass? If so, which nutrient(s) was/were limiting?

  6. 6.

    Collect a quantitative algal sample. Use a Palmer-Maloney cell or a Sedgewick-Rafter cell to measure algal cell densities. How similar are each person’s or group’s cell density values?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Francoeur, S.N., Rier, S.T., Whorley, S.B. (2013). Methods for Sampling and Analyzing Wetland Algae. In: Anderson, J., Davis, C. (eds) Wetland Techniques. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6931-1_1

Download citation