Abstract
The paper is broadly sympathetic to McTaggart’s position on participatory action research, but points, in particular, to three limitations in its treatment of the issues. First, it suggests that McTaggart has broadly assumed that the researcher is in a position of power vis-à-vis the researched and that the ethical precautions are designed primarily to safeguard research participants. However, when researchers are investigating up the power hierarchy (e.g. enquiring into powerful arms of government, large corporations or even manipulative and over-protective headteachers) different sets of ethical issues and obligations start to kick in, in which the researcher’s obligations such as to public understanding may over-ride obligations towards research participants. Secondly, not all educational research fits the model of participatory action research, nor can it all involve those who are its focus in quite the same way. Historical research and at least some biography have research ‘subjects’ who are no longer with us. Large population studies clearly cannot engage with participants in the same way as participatory action research. Philosophy, critical theory and discourse analysis stand in different relations again to those with whose writing, policy or practice they engage. All of these carry certain kinds of ethical requirements, but these start to look rather different from those which McTaggart is occupied. Finally, I raise the question of whether the source of the morality of research practice is really to be found in codes of ethical behaviour — especially when these become institutionalised and bureaucratised. Perhaps instead we should be looking to how intellectual virtue is embedded in and cultivated by the practice of our universities?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
These are both examples from the experience of the Centre for Applied Research in Education at the University of East Anglia. The issue of the terms of government research contracts was taken up by a working party of the British Educational Research Association which urged university administrations to insist on a clause in such contracts to the effect that ‘the right to publish independently should not unreasonably be refused’ (Bridges et al. 1988). Some universities sustained this principle for a period of time, though as far as I know what would count as ‘unreasonable’ was never tested in the courts. Universities’ increasingly commercial attitudes towards the winning of research contracts have, I believe, made them less fastidious about the terms under which they are offered.
References
Bridges D (1999) Educational research: pursuit of truth or flight into fancy? Br Educ Res J 25(5):593–608 (also in Bridges 2003)
Bridges D (2003) ‘Fiction written under oath?’ Essays in philosophy and educational research. Kluwer, Dordrecht/London/New York
Bridges D (2009) Education and the possibility of outsider understanding. Ethics Educ 4(2):105–125
Bridges D, Brown S, Adelman C, Torrance H (1988) What constitutes a fair research contract? Paper presented to British Educational Research Association annual conference, Aug 1988, Norwich
Dewey J (1916) Democracy and education. Macmillan, New York
Hume D (1983) An enquiry concerning the principles of morals (ed: Schneewind JB). Hackett Publishing, Indianapolis
McNamee M (2002) The guilt of whistle blowing: conflicts in action research and educational ethnography. In: McNamee M, Bridges D (eds) The ethics of educational research. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 129–150
McTaggart R (2013) Evolving ethics of educational research. In: Reid AD, Hart EP, Peters MA (eds) A companion to research in education. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 457–469
Montmarquet JA (1986) Epistemic virtue. Mind 96:482–497
Montmarquet JA (1993) Epistemic virtue and doxastic responsibility. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham
Pring R (2000) Philosophy of educational research. Continuum, London/New York
Simons H, Usher R (2000) Situated ethics in educational research. RoutledgeFalmer, London
Smith LT (1999) Decolonising methodologies: research and indigenous peoples. Zed Books, London
Stenhouse L (1980) What counts as research? Unpublished mimeo. CARE Archive, University of East Anglia, Norwich
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bridges, D. (2014). Ethics, Power and Intellectual Virtue: Doing Right in a Diversified Educational Research Environment. In: Reid, A., Hart, E., Peters, M. (eds) A Companion to Research in Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6809-3_62
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6809-3_62
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6808-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6809-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)