Abstract
This paper explores the relationship between the epistemological considerations that drive educational research – the ‘epistemic’ project of the pursuit of truth or at least better understanding – and ethical considerations which function both as a constraint and in some cases as a goal. It is this last claim – that educational research should be primarily driven by, for example, a concern for social justice – that is at the centre of the discussion. The paper argues that the analysis of a situation or structure as unjust as well as any proposals for the rendering of this situation as more just are both dependant on getting clear about the facts of the case and the likely consequences of doing this rather than that. The epistemic project has to be present alongside any pursuit of justice. Social justice appears however in a different way, as a procedural principle governing the conduct of research, illustrated in, among other sources, MacDonald’s model of ‘democratic evaluation’. The paper argues that a concern to hear the voices of the excluded and the marginalised through educational research is not just an ethical requirement: it is an epistemic requirement if we are to understand things properly. The paper then turns to a different set of relations between ethical and epistemological considerations in research, relations rooted in the literature on the ethics of belief ie to the set of ethical obligations that bear on what we should believe or not, that require us to give careful attention to evidence, to be honest in how we represent evidence and draw conclusions from it – obligations not just to be rational and honest but to express, to make public, what research compels us to believe to be the case, even if it is uncomfortable to do so.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
I am inclined to refer to such affirmations as proposition.
- 2.
MacDonald was at some pains to distinguish evaluation from research, not least because in programme evaluation the ‘researcher’ does not control the agenda in quite the same way a s research (though many forms of contemporary commissioned research including that of the UK Department for Education and Science render this distinction meaningless. I think, nevertheless, that the issues in both contexts are very similar.
References
Adugna, W. G. (2008). The nature and practice of teacher education via distance learning: The case of Addis Ababa University and the Educational Media Agency. Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by the University of East Anglia
Attia, M. (2011). Teacher cognition and the use of technology in teaching Arabic to speakers of other languages. A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
Bok, S. (1978). Lying: Moral choice in public and private life. Brighton: Harvester Press.
Bridges, D. (1998). Educational research: Pursuit of truth or flight into fancy. British Educational Research Journal, 21(5), 597–616.
Bridges, D. (2002). Narratives in history, fiction and educational research. In R. Huttinen, L. J. H. Heikinnen, & L. Syyälä (Eds.), Narrative research: Voices of teachers and philosophers. Jyväskylän, SoPhi: University of Jyvaskylää.
Bridges, D. (2003). Fiction written under oath’: Essays in philosophy and educational research. Dordrecht: Springer.
Bridges, D., Smeyers, P., & Smith, R. D. (Eds.). (2009). Evidence-based edicational policy: What evidence? What basis? Whose policy? Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
British Educational Research Association. (2011). Ethical guidelines for educational research. London: British Educational Research Association.
Charlton, J. I. (1998). Nothing about us without us: Disability power and oppression. Berkley: University of California Press.
Chisholm, R. M. (1956). Epistemic statements and the ethics of belief. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 16, 447–460.
Clifford, W. K. (1877 [1999]). The ethics of belief. In T. Madigan (Ed.), The ethics of belief and other essays (pp. 70–96). Amherst: Prometheus.
David, M. (2001). Truth as the epistemic goal. In M. Steup (Ed.), Knowledge, truth, and duty (pp. 151–170). New York: Oxford.
Feldman, R. (2000). The ethics of belief. Philosophy and Phenemonological Research, XL(3), 667–699.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–77. Brighton: Harvester Press.
Griffiths, M. (1998). Educational research for social justice: Getting off the fence. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Hall, R. J., & Johnson, C. R. (1998). The epistemic duty to seek more evidence. American Philosophiical Quarterly, 34(2), 129–139.
Hammersley, M. (1999). Some reflections on the current state of qualitative research. Research Intelligence, 70, 16–18.
Heil, J. (1983). Believing what one ought. Journal of Philosophy, 80, 752–765.
James, W. (1896a [1979]). The will to believe. In F. Burkhardt et al. (Eds.), The will to believe and other essays in popular philosophy (pp. 291–341). Cambridge, MA: Harvard.
James, W. (1896b). The will to believe reprinted in The theory of knowledge (2nd ed., pp. 555–562).
MacDonald, B. (1976). Evaluation and the control of education. In D. Tawney (Ed.), Curriculum evaluation today: Trends and implications (pp. 125–136). London: Schools Council and MacMillan Education.
Marshall, J. D., & Martin, B. (2000). The boundaries of belief: Territories of encounter between indigenous people and western philosophies. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 32, 1.
Peters, R. S., & White, J. P. (1969). The philosopher’s contribution to educational research. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 1, 1–15.
Quinton, A. (1973). Utilitarian ethics. London: Macmillan.
Rolfe, G. (2002). ‘A lie that helps us to see the truth’: Research truth and fiction in the caring professions. Reflective Practice, 3(1), 89–102.
Sosa, E. (2000). For the love of truth. In A. Fairweather & L. Zagzebski (Eds.), Virtue epistemology: Essays on epistemic virtue and responsibility. New York: Oxford.
Sosa, E. (2003). The place of truth in epistemology. In L. Zagzebski & M. DePaul (Eds.), Intellectual virtue: Perspectives from ethics and epistemology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Stenhouse, L. (1980). What counts as research? Unpublished mimeo, CARE Archive, University of East Anglia.
Stronach, I., & MacLure, M. (1997). Educational research undone: The post-modern embrace. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Tierney, W. G. (1994). On method and hope. In A. Gitlin (Ed.), Power and method: Political activism and educational research. New York: Routledge.
Veck, W. (2002). What are the proper ends of educational inquiry: Research for justice, for truth or for both? Paper presented to the Biennial conference of the International Network of Philosophers of Education, Oslo, 9th August 2002.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bridges, D. (2018). Epistemology, Ethics and Educational Research. In: Smeyers, P., Depaepe, M. (eds) Educational Research: Ethics, Social Justice, and Funding Dynamics. Educational Research, vol 10. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73921-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73921-2_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73920-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73921-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)