Skip to main content

Predicting Unethical Behavior: A Comparison of the Theory of Reasoned Action and the Theory of Planned Behavior

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Citation Classics from the Journal of Business Ethics

Part of the book series: Advances in Business Ethics Research ((ABER,volume 2))

Abstract

This study is a comparison of the validity of theory of reasoned action and theory of planned behavior as applied to the area of moral behavior (i.e., illegal copying of software) using structural equation modeling. Data were collected from 181 university students on the various components of the theories and used to asses the influence of attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control on the intention to make unauthorized software copies. Theory of planned behavior was found to be better than the theory of reasoned action in predicting unethical behavior. A modified version of the theory of planned behavior, with a causal path linking subjective norm to attitude, provided a significant improvement on model fit. The results indicated that perceived behavioral control is a better predictor of behavioral intention then attitude. The direct effect of subjective norm on behavioral intention was not significant, but the indirect effect through attitude was highly significant. Applicability of the theory of planned behavior for moral behavior and the implications for future research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ajzen, I. 1985. From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Action-control: From cognitions to behavior, ed. J. Kuhland and J. Beckman, 11–39. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes 50: 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., and M. Fishbein. 1980. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., and T.J. Madden. 1986. Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 22: 453–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J.C., and D.W. Gerbing. 1988. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin 103: 411–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P.M. 1990. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin 107: 238–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P.M. 1992. On the fit of models to covariance and methodology to the Bulletin. Psychological Bulletin 112: 400–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P.M. 1993. EQS structural equations program manual. Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K.A. 1989. Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bommer, M., C. Gratto, J. Gravander, and M. Tuttle. 1987. A behavioral model of ethical and unethical decision making. Journal of Business Ethics 6: 265–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady, F.N., and M.J. Hatch. 1992. General causal models in business ethics: An essay on colliding research traditions. Journal of Business Ethics 11: 307–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B.M. 1994. Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/windows: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrel, O.C., and G. Gresham. 1985. A contingency framework for understanding ethical decision making in marketing. Journal of Marketing 49: 87–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., and I. Ajzen. 1975. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredricks, A.J., and D.L. Dossett. 1983. Attitude-behavior relations: A comparison of the Fishbein-Ajzen and the Bentler-Speckart models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45: 501–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S.D., and S. Vitell. 1986. A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of Macromarketing 6: 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madden, T.J., P.S. Ellen, and I. Ajzen. 1992. A comparison of the theory of planned behavior and the theory of reasoned action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 18: 3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathieson, K. 1991. Predicting User intentions: Comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information Systems Research 2: 173–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prestholdt, P.H., I.M. Lane, and R.C. Mathews. 1987. Nurse turnover as reasoned action: Development of a process model. Journal of Applied Psychology 72: 221–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randall, D.M. 1989. Taking stock: Can the theory of reasoned action explain unethical conduct? Journal of Business Ethics 8: 873–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randall, D.M., and A.M. Gibson. 1991. Ethical decision making in the medical profession: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Business Ethics 10: 111–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, G.J., and D.J. O’Keefe. 1984. Separability of attitudinal and normative influences on behavioral intentions in the Fishbein-Ajzen model. The Journal of Social Psychology 122: 287–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, B.H., J. Hartwick, and P.R. Warshaw. 1988. The theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. Journal of Consumer Research 15: 325–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimp, T.A., and A. Kavas. 1984. The theory of reasoned action applied to coupon usage. Journal of Consumer Research 11: 795–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smiddy, J.D., and L.O. Smiddy. 1985. Caught in the act. Datamation 31: 102–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timko, C. 1987. Seeking medical care for a breast cancer symptom: Determinants of intentions to engage in prompt or delay behavior. Health Psychology 6: 305–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L.K. 1986. Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review 11: 601–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallerand, R.J., P. Deshaies, J. Cuerrier, L.G. Pelletier, and C. Mongeau. 1992. Ajzen and Fishbein’s theory of reasoned action as applied to moral behavior: A confirmatory analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 62: 98–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, H.M., L. Lierman, G. Powell-Cope, D. Kasprzyk, and J.Q. Benoliel. 1991. Operationalizing the theory of planned behavior. Research in Nursing & Health 14: 137–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Man Kit Chang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chang, M.K. (2013). Predicting Unethical Behavior: A Comparison of the Theory of Reasoned Action and the Theory of Planned Behavior. In: Michalos, A., Poff, D. (eds) Citation Classics from the Journal of Business Ethics. Advances in Business Ethics Research, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4126-3_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics