Abstract
Item response models are applied for analyzing item scores of psychological and intelligence tests, and they are based on exponential relationships between the psychological traits and the item responses (Baker and Kim 2004; De Boeck and Wilson 2004). Items are usually questions with “yes” or “no” answers. Item response models were invented by Georg Rasch, a mathematician from Copenhagen who was unable to find work in his discipline in the 30ths and turned to work as a psychometrician (Rasch 1980). These models are, currently, the basis for modern psychological testing including computer-assisted adaptive testing (Van der Linden and Veldkamp 2004). Advantages compared to classical linear testing include first that item response models do not use reliability as a measure of their applicability, but instead use formal goodness of fit tests (Zwinderman 1991). Second, the scale does not need to be of an interval nature. As a consequence the effects of covariates can be analyzed and reported with odds ratios, independently of the item format and population averages. Ceiling effects are, therefore, much less of a problem than they are with classical linear methods (Fischer 1974).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anonymous (1991) Egret manual. Statistics and Epidemiology Research Computing. University of Seattle, Seattle
Baker FB, Kim SH (2004) Item response theory: parameter estimation techniques. Marcel Dekker, New York
Cleophas TJ, Zwinderman AH, Cleophas TF, Cleophas EP (2009a) Lack of sensitivity of quality of life (QOL) assessments. In: Statistics applied to clinical trials, 4th edn. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 323–329
Cleophas TJ, Zwinderman AH, Cleophas TF, Cleophas EP (2009b) Method 1: the chi-square goodness of fit test. In: Statistics applied to clinical trials, 4th edn. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 356–357
Cleophas TJ, Zwinderman AH, Cleophas TF, Cleophas EP (2009c) Method 2: the Kolmogorov-Smirnov goodness of fit test. In: Statistics applied to clinical trials, 4th edn. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 357–359
Conquest Generalized Item Response Modeling Software. www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt133o.htm. Accessed 15 Dec 2011
Cook KF, Teal CR, Bjorner JB, Celia D et al (2007) Item response theory health data analysis project: an overview and summary. Qual Life Res 16(s1):121–132
De Boeck P, Wilson M (2004) Explanatory item response models. A generalized linear and nonlinear approach. Springer, New York
Douglas JA (1999) Item response models for longitudinal quality of life data in clinical trials. Stat Med 18:2917–2931
Fischer GH (1974) Einfuhrung in die Theorie psychologischer Tests. Huber, Bern
Full Lifecycle Unified Modeling Language Modeling Software. www.sparxsystems.eu/?gclid. Accessed 15 Dec 2011
Glas CA, Ellis J (1993) Rasch Scaling Program (RSP) I.E.C. University of Groningen, Groningen
Item Response Modeling with BILOG-MG and MULTILOG for Windows. www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/custom/portlets/recorDetails/detailminii.jsp. Accessed 15 Dec 2011
Kessler RC, Mrocek DK (1995) Measuring the effects of medical interventions. Med Care 33:109–119
Rasch G (1980) Probabilistic models from intelligence and attainment tests, expanded edn. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Reeve BB, Hays RD, Chang CH, Perfetto E (2007) Applying item response theory to health outcomes. Qual Life Res 16(s1):1–3
Teresi JA, Fleishman JA (2007) Differential item functioning and health. Qual Life Res 16(s1):33–42
Uebersax J (2006) Free Software LTA (latent trait analysis) -2 (with binary items). www.john-uebersax.com/stat/Ital.htm. Accessed 15 Dec 2011
Uttaro T, Lehman A (1999) Graded response modeling of the quality of life interview. Program Plan 22:41–52
Van der Linden WJ, Veldkamp BP (2004) Constraining item exposure in computer adaptive testing with shadow tests. J Educ Behav Stat 29:273–291
Verhelst ND (1993) One parameter Logistic Model (OPLM). CITO, Arnhem
Zwinderman AH (1991) A generalized Rasch model with manifest predictors. Psychometrika 33:AS 109–AS 119
Zwinderman AH, Niemeijer MG, Kleinjans HA, Cleophas TJ (1998) Application of item response modeling for quality of life assessment. In: Kuhlmann J, Mrozikiewicz A (eds) Clinical Pharmacology, vol 16. What should a clinical pharmacologist know to start a clinical trial (phase I and II). Zuckschwerd Verlag, Munich, pp 48–55
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cleophas, T.J., Zwinderman, A.H. (2012). Item Response Modeling. In: Statistics Applied to Clinical Studies. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2863-9_39
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2863-9_39
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-2862-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-2863-9
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)